马刺 vs 湖人 115 - 120 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2024-11-16 19:13:34
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
在这场精彩纷呈、你来我往的比赛中，圣安东尼奥马刺队全力以赴，但最终在周五晚上以115-120负于洛杉矶湖人队。这场失利使马刺队的战绩跌至6胜7负，而湖人队则凭借这场胜利将战绩提升至8胜4负。
圣安东尼奥和洛杉矶整晚都在交替领先。在第四节，两队都命中了一次又一次的关键球。新秀斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)在比赛还剩1分44秒时帮助马刺队领先一分。不幸的是，马刺队此后再也没有得分，而湖人队在最后阶段的执行力足够出色，最终赢得了比赛。
总而言之，马刺队对他们的表现应该感到相当满意。球队在攻防两端显然都有提升的空间，但这并不是一场让他们垂头丧气的比赛。
数据：马刺 vs. 湖人
马刺 vs. 湖人 – 最终评级
维克托·文班亚马(Victor Wembanyama)
优点：文班亚马毫无疑问打得很努力。他投中了四个三分球，两分球12投8中。他的篮板球抢得很好，并且送出了几次精妙的传球。缺点：文班亚马缺乏对抗性。他在34分钟的出场时间里没有一次罚球，而湖人队的安东尼·戴维斯得到了40分。如果他能更强硬一些，比赛结果可能会大不相同。文班亚马的失误也有点多，而且他的护框也没有像往常那样具有统治力。总评：对于这位二年级超级新星的表现很难过于苛责，但他本可以打得更聪明、更强硬。
评分：B-
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
保罗在29分钟内得到11分和11次助攻。他在进攻端非常高效，尽管我认为他的传球不如平时精准。他在第四节的表现本可以更犀利。防守方面，保罗表现得相当不错。湖人队利用挡拆攻击他，但他大部分时间都能成功地破坏他们的进攻。
评分：B-
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯在进攻端非常沉寂。他只出手了三次，但值得称赞的是，尽管触球有限，他还是得到了8分。防守方面，巴恩斯总体来说表现不错。他有几次换防比较慢，但在其他方面，他都很好地完成了自己的工作。
评分：B
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼命中了两个三分球，还有几次令人印象深刻的突破上篮。他的持球进攻越来越好——传球也是如此。话虽如此，尚帕尼在跳投时犹豫的次数太多。即使投不进，他也必须果断出手。防守方面，我喜欢他在一对一情况下的表现。他正在稳步成长为一名合格的防守者。
评分：B-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔
哇哦，伙计，这个新秀真令人印象深刻。当然，卡斯尔在第四节攻防两端都犯了一些新秀的错误——但总的来说，他在对阵湖人队的比赛中表现非常出色。他送出了一些精彩的传球，三分球4投3中，充满活力地突破上篮，在压力下保持冷静，限制了自己的失误，并且在防守端非常积极。卡斯尔并不完美，但他全力以赴，充满自信地打球。这位新秀看起来很有前途。
评分：A-
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
对约翰逊来说，这不是一场值得纪念的比赛。他在防守端出现了几次灾难性的失误。通常情况下，他在防守端的努力是值得肯定的，但失误不断累积。进攻方面，他坚决的突破上篮取得了成效，但约翰逊的“单打独干”有时会在他在场上时阻碍球队的进攻节奏。
评分：C-
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
瓦塞尔做了很多积极的事情。他的传球比他复出后我们看到的要好。他在22分钟内送出了5次助攻，没有失误。得分方面，他的表现也很稳定。尽管他错失了几次空位跳投，但他还是得到了15分。他在进攻端的决策可以更好一些。具体来说，他经常不必要地强投。瓦塞尔的防守不太好。这是他休赛期接受足部手术后，最后一个恢复到正常水平的方面。
评分：B
扎克·科林斯(Zach Collins)
科林斯的表现还不错。他的篮板球可以更好一些，他在内线的防守也没什么值得称道的，而且他今晚似乎有些缺乏协调性。另一方面，科林斯的三次投篮全部命中，传球也很好，并且在攻防两端都很努力。
评分：B-
布莱克·韦斯利(Blake Wesley)
哎呀，韦斯利的表现很糟糕。他8分钟内4投0中，强投连连。他的组织能力很有限，防守端形同虚设，而且经常跑来跑去没有章法。韦斯利必须拿出比这更好的表现才能在轮换阵容中赢得一席之地。
评分：D
马拉基·布拉纳姆(Malaki Branham)
布拉纳姆的表现并没有比韦斯利好多少。他命中了一个三分球，但他的防守更糟糕，而且他的控球也很吃力。
评分：C-
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利(Sandro Mamukelashvili)
马穆克拉什维利得到了6分钟的出场时间，但未能对比赛产生实质性的影响。
评分：C-
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
我认为约翰逊做得还不错。防守策略很到位。他的战术安排让文班亚马早早地参与到比赛中来。相反，约翰逊本可以缩短轮换阵容；11人轮换意义不大。他还必须弄清楚如何使用约翰逊和瓦塞尔，而不会打断球队的节奏。
评分：B
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Los Angeles Lakers – Game #13
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Los Angeles Lakers – Game #13
In an entertaining, back-and-forth affair, the San Antonio Spurs gave it their all but ultimately lost to the Los Angeles Lakers on Friday night by a final count of 120-115. The loss dropped the Spurs to 6-7, while the win improved the Lakers to 8-4.
San Antonio and Los Angeles traded runs all night long. In the fourth quarter, the two teams hit big shot after big shot. Rookie Stephon Castle put the Spurs ahead by a point with 1:44 remaining. Unfortunately, the Spurs never scored again as the Lakers executed well enough down the stretch to get the win.
Net-net, the Spurs should be reasonably happy with how they played. There’s clearly room to improve on both ends but there’s no reason to hang their heads after this one.
Stats: Spurs vs. Lakers
Spurs vs. Lakers – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
The good: Wembanyama unquestionably played hard. He hit four three-pointers and was also 8-for-12 from two-point range. He rebounded really well and authored a handful of heady passes. The bad: Wembanyama simply lacked fiber. He had no free throw attempts in 34 minutes and Anthony Davis scored 40 points for the Lakers. A little more sturdiness would have gone a long way. Wembanyama was also too careless with the ball and his rim protection wasn’t as dominant as usual. Overall: It’s difficult to be too upset with how the super sophomore played but he could have played smarter and tougher.
Grade: B-
Chris Paul
Paul had 11 points and 11 assists in 29 minutes. He was very efficient on the offensive end, though I would say his passing was less precise than usual. His play in the fourth could have also been sharper. Defensively, Paul held up pretty well. The Lakers were attacking him on switches but he was able to disrupt those possessions more often than not.
Grade: B-
Harrison Barnes
Barnes was really quiet on the offensive end. He only shot three times but, to his credit, he did score eight points despite limited touches. Defensively, Barnes was mostly good. He had a couple of slow switches but otherwise he was a doing his job on that end.
Grade: B
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie hit a pair of three-pointers and also had a couple of impressive drives to the rack. His off the dribble game is getting better and better — as is his passing. That said, Champagnie hesitated too often on jumpers. Even if he is missing, he has to let them fly. Defensively, I liked what I saw of him in one-on-one situations. He’s slowly but surely becoming a competent defender.
Grade: B-
Stephon Castle
Dang, man, this rookie is impressive. Sure, Castle had some rookie mistakes in the fourth quarter on both sides of the ball — but, all in all, he was pretty awesome against the Lakers. He had some outstanding passes, he hit 3-of-4 from deep, he drove to the hoop with vigor, he was calm under pressure, he limited his mistakes and he was a pest on defense. Castle wasn’t perfect but he gave it his all and hooped with confidence. Rook looks like a good one.
Grade: A-
Keldon Johnson
It just wasn’t a memorable outing for Johnson. He had a handful of calamitous defensive breakdowns. Usually the effort was there on defense but the miscues piled up. Offensively, his hard-headed drives to the rim paid dividends but Johnson’s tunnel vision can sometimes hold the team back when he’s on the court.
Grade: C-
Devin Vassell
Vassell did a lot of positive things. His passing was better than we’ve seen since his return. He finished with five assists and no turnovers in 22 minutes. Scoring-wise, he was solid. He scored 15 points even though he missed a few wide open jumpers. His decision-making on offense could have been better. Specifically, he needlessly forced shots too often. Vassell’s defense wasn’t good. That has been the last aspect of his game to return following his offseason foot surgery.
Grade: B
Zach Collins
Collins was decent. His rebounding could have been better, his defense in the lane was nothing to write home about and he strangely seemed to lack coordination tonight. On the other hand, Collins hit all three of his field goal attempts, passed the ball well and hustled on both ends.
Grade: B-
Blake Wesley
Yikes, bad showing for Wesley. He forced shots and ended up 0-for-4 in eight minutes. His playmaking was minimal, his defense was missing in action and he could usually be found running around without a plan. Wesley has to be better than this to win a spot in the rotation.
Grade: D
Malaki Branham
Branham wasn’t a whole lot better than Wesley. He hit a three-pointer but his defense was even worse and his ball-handling was a struggle.
Grade: C-
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Mamukelashvili got six minutes but failed to make a tangible impact on the game.
Grade: C-
Mitch Johnson
I thought Johnson did well enough. The defensive gameplan was adequate. His play-calling got Wembanyama involved early and often. Conversely, Johnson could have tightened up his rotation; going 11 deep didn’t make much sense. He also has to figure out how to use KJ and Vassell in ways that don’t interrupt the team’s rhythm.
Grade: B
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk