By Boxscorehistory | Pounding The Rock (PtR), 2026-05-25 15:02:10
我必须承认，昨晚比赛开始时，我的信心真的命悬一线。毕竟，雷霆队是一支货真价实的强队，而马刺在此前的连续三场比赛中都处于明显的劣势（例如失误控制方面）。而且，雷霆不断对文班进行犯规的策略，似乎正成为限制他影响力的有效手段。甚至在圣安东尼奥在首节建立起巨大领先优势时，我都没敢太乐观，因为，唉，看看第三场就知道了。即便如此，随着第二节的进行，我的情绪开始好转；当维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 在半场结束前投中中圈超远三分，帮助球队在半场结束时领先12分时，我的情绪彻底高涨，并在整个下半场的统治级表现中保持着极佳的状态。考虑到比赛环境和重要性，这可能是马刺本赛季迄今为止最出色的一场表现。幸运的是，这场比赛也留下了一张极具看点的数据表。让我们来回顾一些亮点：
注意： 随着我们进入季后赛阶段，评分所使用的参考样本也从2012-2013赛季以来的常规赛，调整为2012-2013赛季以来的季后赛。除非下文另有说明，否则该样本包含附加赛。截至2026年5月24日结束，该样本共包含1,197场比赛。
决定比赛胜负的因素
- 这场比赛完美地诠释了为什么胜负取决于双方表现的“相对差距”（即赢家相对于输家的表现）。具体来说，马刺本场比赛的投篮手感极其糟糕，但他们依然在运动战得分上比雷霆多了13分，因为雷霆的投篮效率简直是灾难级的。
- 我会在下文详细展开，但马刺完成了一项罕见的壮举：在所有与投篮出手数或效率没有直接关系的基础数据对比中，他们全部击败了雷霆（详见下文）。这些数据差值很少有特别巨大的（因此评分通常比较温和），但众多微小的优势累积起来，往往能换来一场大胜。
- 圣安东尼奥在绝大多数与投篮出手数或效率相关的对比中也占据了优势，其中最显著的胜利是罚球出手数（FTA）净胜14次。有趣的是，罚球命中率（FT%）是他们唯一惨败给雷霆的关键领域；即便如此，马刺在罚球线上依然比雷霆多拿了8分。
罕见的数据统计
- 昨晚，圣安东尼奥成为了自2012-2013赛季季后赛开始以来，首支在投篮命中率（FG%）、三分命中率（3P%）和罚球命中率（FT%）分别低至38.89%、27.27%和75%（或更低）的情况下，仍能赢下21分及以上的季后赛球队。在同一时期的1,197场比赛中，仅有另外4次出现赢球方的这三项命中率数据同样糟糕（或更差）的情况，而此前这些比赛中的最大净胜分也仅为12分。
- 马刺成为了自2012-2013赛季季后赛开始以来，第12支在所有非投篮出手数或命中率相关的数据对比中全方位压制对手的赢家。换句话说，相比雷霆，他们抢到了更多的进攻篮板、更多的防守篮板、送出了更多的助攻、出现了更少的失误、完成了更多的抢断、送出了更多的盖帽，并且个人犯规也更少。
- 圣安东尼奥成为了过去1,197场NBA季后赛中，第42支在出手数差（FGA margin）和三分出手数差（3PA margin）分别不高于-1和0的情况下，仍能净胜21分及以上的球队（在这段时期内，大约每29场季后赛中才会出现一次）。
- 马刺和雷霆在这场比赛中一共仅投进了15记三分球。在过去的14个季后赛中，这并不算极其罕见；事实上，在1,197场比赛中已经发生过195次。然而，这些情况绝大多数发生在2010年代。自2019年以来，每个季后赛中这种情况仅发生过0到7次。
- 与总三分命中数形成有趣对比的是，昨晚比赛的双方总运动战进球数（65个）相对于参考样本也相当低。在过去的1,197场比赛中，共有98场比赛（即大约每12场比赛中就有一场）两队合力投进的运动战进球数在65个或以下。随着时间的推移，这种情况发生的频率有所下降（这很大程度上是由于比赛节奏的加快），但其下降幅度远没有三分球那么剧烈。
- 文班打出了自1996-1997赛季季后赛以来，第12次在真正的季后赛中砍下至少33分、8个篮板、5次助攻、3次盖帽和2次抢断的表现。
- 凯利·奥利尼克 (Kelly Olynyk) 出现在头图照片中，是因为昨晚他成为了自1996-1997赛季以来，唯一一位在出场不超过5分钟的真正季后赛中送出至少3次抢断的NBA球员。事实上，在自1996-1997赛季以来所有包含3次及以上抢断的48,406次球员单场表现中（包括任何NBA比赛），奥利尼克昨晚的比赛仅仅是第六例出场时间不足5分钟的情况。干得漂亮，凯利！
什么是球队数据评分？
简单来说，这些数据评分是对赢家和输家之间基础数据差值的评级，评分依据是赢家的差值与特定参考样本期内其他NBA赢家的数据对比。你可以把它看作是一张成绩单，用来了解某支获胜球队相对于其他赢家的表现如何。所使用的参考样本期从2012-2013赛季开始一直到最近的比赛日，且仅包含相同类型的赛事（即常规赛和季后赛不会进行横向对比）。
***数据来源：*用于制作这些数据评分的基础数据收集自Basketball Reference。在所有情况下，数据均在比赛结束后的次日早晨收集。尽管罕见，但数据收集后确实可能会出现赛后数据修正，这可能会对最终结果产生事后影响。
由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Box Grades: Spurs Even Series in Dominant Fashion
Box Grades: Spurs Even Series in Dominant Fashion
I must admit, my confidence was hanging by a thread as last night’s game started. After all, the Thunder are a genuinely great team, the Spurs had suffered consistently bad disadvantages in three straight games (e.g., turnover margin), and it felt like OKC’s plan of fouling Wemby continuously was going to end up being an effective method for mitigating his impact. I didn’t even feel good when San Antonio got up big in the first quarter because, well, look at Game 3. Even so, my spirits lifted as the second quarter progressed, soared with Victor’s halfcourt heave to go up 12 at halftime, and remained excellent throughout a dominant second half. Considering the environment and stakes, this may have been the Spurs best performance of the season to date, and fortunately it also produced a fascinating box score. Let’s review some highlights:
Note: Now that we’ve moved into the postseason, the reference period used for grading changes from the set of regular season games since 2012-2013 to the set of postseason games since 2012-2013. Unless otherwise noted below, this set DOES include play-in games. As of the end of May 24, 2026, this group include 1,197 games.
Factors that decided the game
- This is a great game for showcasing why winning is determined by relative differences in performance (i.e., how the winner performed relative to the loser). In particular, the Spurs shot terribly in this game, yet still outscored OKC by 13 from the field because the Thunder’s shooting efficiency was DREADFUL.
- I talk about this more below, but the Spurs achieved the rare feat of beating OKC in every basic box score battle that doesn’t directly relate to shooting volume or efficiency (more on that below). These margins were rarely huge (hence the grades are usually modest), but lots of little advantages often add up to a big victory.
- San Antonio also won most margins having to do with shooting volume or efficiency, with the most notable victory being their FTA margin of +14. Interestingly, FT% is the only key area where they lost to the Thunder badly; even so, the Spurs outscored OKC by eight from the charity stripe.
Rare Box Score Stats
- Last night, San Antonio became the first postseason victor since the start of 2012-2013 to win by 21+ points while logging FG%, 3P%, and FT% values at least as bad as 38.89%, 27.27%, and 75%, respectively. There are only four other instances in the same 1,197-game period in which a winning team had a shooting percentage line at least as bad in all three dimensions, and the previous high margin of victory in that set was 12.
- The Spurs became just the 12th winner since the start of the 2012-2013 postseason to win EVERY basic box score battle outside of anything related to shooting volume or accuracy. In other words, relative to OKC they had more offensive rebounds, more defensive rebounds, more assists, fewer turnovers, more steals, more blocks, and fewer personal fouls.
- San Antonio became the 42 winner in the last 1,197 NBA postseason contests to win by 21+ points with FGA and 3PA margins no better than -1 and 0, respectively (that’s a frequency of about once in every 29 postseason games during the period).
- The Spurs and Thunder combined for just 15 total made threes in this game. That is not wildly unusual over the last 14 postseasons; in fact, it has now happened 195 times in that 1,197-game span. However, the vast majority of those occasions were in the 2010s. Since 2019, it’s happened between 0 and 7 times per postseason.
- An interesting point of comparison for this fact about total threes made is that the total number of field goals made in last night’s game (65) was also quite low relative to the reference period, with 98 total games over the last 1,197 (i.e., about one game in every dozen) where two teams have combined to make 65 or fewer field goals. The frequency of this occurrence has declined over time (largely due to rising pace), but not nearly as dramatically.
- Wemby logged just the 12th true playoff performance since the 1996-1997 postseason that included 33+ points, 8+ rebounds, 5+ assists, 3+ blocks, and 2+ steals.
- Kelly Olynyk is featured in the headline photograph because last night he became the only NBA player to record 3+ steals while playing no more than five minutes in a true playoff game since 1996-1997. In fact, of the 48,406 player performances that have included 3+ steals in ANY NBA game since 1996-1997, Olynyk’s game last night was just the sixth case that lasted less than five minutes. Nice job, Kelly!
What are Team Graded Box Scores?
Very briefly, these box scores grade winner-loser differentials for basic box score statistics, with the grade being based on the winning team’s differential relative to other NBA winners during a defined reference period. Think of it like a report card for understanding how a given winner performed relative to other winners. The reference period used runs from the start of the 2012-2013 season to the latest date of play, including only games in the same season category (i.e., regular season and playoff games are not compared to each other).
***Data Source:*The underlying data used to create these box scores was collected fromBasketball Reference. In all cases, the data are collected the morning after the game is played. Although rare, postgame statistical revisions after data collection do occur and may affect the results after the fact.
By Boxscorehistory, via Pounding The Rock