马刺 @ 森林狼 139 - 109 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-05-18 06:38:17
圣安东尼奥马刺在六场大战中击败了明尼苏达森林狼，成功晋级西部决赛。在输掉第一场比赛后，马刺在接下来的五场比赛中赢下了四场，并在第五场和第六场以大胜之势结束了系列赛。当尘埃落定时，圣安东尼奥看起来是那支更出色、阵容深度更厚、球风更强硬且更有天赋的球队。
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
文班亚马的系列赛表现并非完美，但他显然是场上最重要的球员。在防守端，他是圣安东尼奥所有战术的核心。森林狼在进入禁区前必须三思而后行，在很长一段时间里，禁区对他而言简直是“禁止通行”。
他在第一场比赛中的进攻挣扎令人痛苦。他八次三分出手全部打铁，打得缺乏爆发力。但即便在那场比赛中，他也以12次盖帽创下了季后赛纪录。文班亚马从第一场的挣扎中吸取了教训，并在余下的比赛中表现出色。他在第三场比赛的表现是他职业生涯中最好的表现之一，而他在第四场被驱逐后在第五场做出的回应，正是圣安东尼奥所需要的。
整个系列赛，文班亚马在场均29.2分钟的时间里贡献19.8分、12.0个篮板、4.2次盖帽和2.7次助攻。三分球命中率并不理想，第四场那次肘击误伤也引发了不少风波，所以这还不算是一个A+级别的系列赛。但他的防守极具统治力，他的篮板价值连城，他的牵制力为队友创造了大量空间，而且他在关键时刻表现神勇，毫无疑问，他是马刺晋级的首要功臣。
评分：A-
达龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
福克斯在系列赛的表现喜忧参半，但总体影响是积极的。第一场他打得很糟糕，这一点无可回避。他看起来犹豫不决，失误过多，在进攻和防守端都没有提供足够的贡献。对于一名季后赛经验丰富的资深后卫来说，那场揭幕战的表现远未达到及格线。
值得称赞的是，福克斯找回了状态。他在第二场表现好得多，在第三场挺过了糟糕的开局，在第四场文班亚马被驱逐后帮助马刺稳住了局势，然后在第六场拿出了系列赛的最佳表现。那场关门战中的福克斯正是圣安东尼奥整个系列赛都在期待的版本。他10投8中砍下21分和9次助攻，表现得冷静沉着，速度快得惊人且掌控了全局。
整个系列赛，福克斯场均得到17.7分和5.0次助攻，投篮命中率为42.9%，三分命中率为32.0%。这种效率并不算好，而且有太长的时间他看起来打得并不舒服。但他的防守比预想的要好，在第一场之后他很好地控制了球权，并以高光表现结束了系列赛。
评分：B
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔的表现太棒了。这种级别的系列赛表现让人很难不去对他寄予厚望。他虽然还年轻，依然会犯错，依然会频繁陷入犯规麻烦……但是，老天，这孩子看起来就像未来的巨星。
在进攻端，卡斯尔表现得强力、耐心且高效。他场均贡献21.0分、5.7个篮板和6.2次助攻，投篮命中率高达54.8%。森林狼试图用体型和对抗来针对他，而卡斯尔通常会以更强硬的对抗作为回应。当他们在第六场放他投篮时，他连续命中五记三分球，让他们付出了代价。
防守端，卡斯尔同样是一个巨大的正资产。他竞争意识极强，很好地利用了自己的力量，为圣安东尼奥提供了一个可以围绕其建队的强悍外线防守者。失误是主要问题，他有一些处理球随意的时刻，有时他需要慢下来。但考虑到他的年龄、角色和比赛难度，这是一个令人印象深刻的系列赛。卡斯尔从始至终都是那个改变比赛走势的人。
评分：A
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
瓦塞尔的表现并不惊艳，但非常稳健。他的得分数据并不夸张，场均得到12.3分，但他很好地融入了圣安东尼奥的其他武器库中。马刺不需要他强行解决问题，他们需要他投中空位三分、做好防守、转移球并避免失误——而他基本上圆满完成了任务。
瓦塞尔在系列赛中最令人欣喜的部分是他的防守。他比平时更加专注，阅读比赛很快，在单人对位中表现出色。在多场比赛中，他的防守活跃度远超统计数据所能体现的价值。面对一支拥有巨大体型和蛮力的明尼苏达球队，这一点至关重要。
进攻端，瓦塞尔的三分命中率为43.8%，并在整个系列赛中多次投进关键球。虽然有些时候他传掉了一些本该出手的机会，但他打得很理智，做出了聪明的决策，并帮助球队拉开了空间。
评分：B+
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尽管尚帕尼的手感忽冷忽热，但他打出了一个有价值的系列赛。他场均得到11.5分和6.0个篮板，三分命中率为36.6%。对于一名主要职责是投射的球员来说，他的打铁有时显得格外刺眼。但他对比赛的整体贡献不仅仅体现在投篮评估上。
篮板球的贡献是巨大的。尚帕尼多次帮助圣安东尼奥完成防守回合，并在进攻端创造了一些额外的机会。他在第三场抢下12个篮板的表现是那场胜利中被忽视的关键因素之一。他的防守也足够到位，传球聪明，没有犯太多粗心的错误。
但是，再说一次，他的投篮并不总是值得信赖。他在第一场错失了潜在的绝杀球，在第四场三分球5投0中，在第五场外线手感依然挣扎。对马刺来说庆幸的是，即使投篮不进，他依然保持着强硬的比赛态度。
评分：B
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
哈珀的表现真的非常出色。对于一名在季后赛中替补出场的新秀来说，你很难再要求更多了。他在场均仅24.9分钟的时间里贡献14.7分、6.2个篮板和2.5次助攻，投篮命中率高达56.9%。在这样的环境下，对于他这个年纪的球员来说，这种产出简直不可思议。
最令人印象深刻的是他的沉稳。哈珀看起来一点也不慌乱，毫无惧色。他充满自信地冲击森林狼的防线，并在进攻端需要火力时多次为马刺提供支持。他在第四场的表现尤为亮眼。在文班亚马缺阵的情况下，哈珀狂砍24分，几乎帮助圣安东尼奥偷下了一场胜利。
哈珀的三分投射尚欠火候，决策也并非完美，他确实有一些新秀式的稚嫩时刻。但他冲击篮筐的得分能力、篮板意识和防守端的竞争心都是巨大的亮点。他看起来已经是一个马刺可以在季后赛中托付上场时间的球员了。这意义重大。
评分：A
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
凯尔登的系列赛表现大多是那种他应该忘掉的。他挣扎了很久——尽管值得称赞的是，他还是留下了一个亮点。
第五场比赛显然是最高光时刻。凯尔登看起来找回了常规赛版本的自己。他强力冲击篮筐，在对抗中完成终结，充满活力地冲抢篮板，在22分钟内为圣安东尼奥贡献了21分。那场表现帮助马刺将一场胶着的比赛变成了大胜，并为板凳席注入了急需的活力。
系列赛的其他部分就没那么令人鼓舞了。除了第五场，凯尔登场均仅得到7.0分和3.4个篮板，投篮命中率为38.7%。他的防守有时摇摆不定，有些突破显得过于急躁。希望随着季后赛的进行，他能打得更好。
评分：C
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
科内特有一项重要的工作：帮助马刺在文班亚马下场休息的时间里撑住局面。在大多数时间里，他做到了。他的数据并不亮眼，场均在13.9分钟内得到3.5分、3.3个篮板和1.8次盖帽。但他的价值体现在护筐能力上，以及在非文班亚马时间里防止森林狼在禁区内翻江倒海的能力。
虽然也有一些艰难时刻，比如在第一场和第三场，科内特的篮板保护不够理想，防守存在感也不足。当他不能保护好篮板时，他的容错率就会变得很低。但他通过有用的表现实现了反弹，并以系列赛最佳的一场比赛收官。
在第六场比赛中，科内特在14分钟内贡献了6分、6个篮板和4次盖帽。这正是马刺对替补中锋的所有期待。他拼抢积极，保护篮筐，为文班亚马赢得了宝贵的休息时间。科内特并不完美，但在这样一场艰难的对决中，他完成了自己的任务。
评分：B
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
布莱恩特的上场时间不算多，但他把握住了每一分钟。他场均出场12.1分钟，随着系列赛的进行，他逐渐赢得了更多的信任。对于一名身处高强度季后赛的新秀来说，他表现得惊人地从容。
防守是布莱恩特能留在轮换阵容中的主要原因。他强壮、活跃，并且愿意承担艰巨的任务。他在第六场对安东尼·爱德华兹 (Anthony Edwards) 的防守确实令人印象深刻。他让爱德华兹打得很艰难，很好地利用了自己的身体，并且在关键时刻毫不退缩。
失误确实存在。布莱恩特在第二场犯规过多，在第四场表现挣扎，出现了三次失误和三次犯规。但瑕不掩瑜。他的投篮命中率为54.5%，三分命中率为42.9%，防守充满活力，看起来完全适应了这个舞台。对于一名未经雕琢的新秀来说，这就是胜利。
评分：B+
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯在这个系列赛中从未真正找到自己的角色。他场均仅出战8.5分钟，随着系列赛的进行，显然教练组更信任年轻球员。考虑到哈珀和布莱恩特的出色表现，这个决定很难被质疑。
值得称赞的是，巴恩斯并没有完全崩盘。作为一名老将，他在篮板、传球和更衣室领导力方面提供了一些帮助。他在一些低强度的比赛时间里投进了一些球，没有强行出手。但如果他想继续留在核心轮换中，马刺需要他提供更多的贡献。
评分：C-
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
米奇·约翰逊教练打出了一个出色的系列赛。第一场并不理想，进攻过于停滞，文班亚马没有得到足够的空位机会，马刺在调整方面显得慢了半拍。第四场在文班亚马被驱逐后，比赛也在后期失去了控制，尽管那显然是一个难以处理的局面。
除此之外，米奇教练做得非常出色。马刺在第一场后调整得很好。文班亚马得到了更好的接球机会，卡斯尔被委以重任，哈珀承担了真正的责任，布莱恩特也赢得了关键的上场时间。约翰逊没有对糟糕的阶段反应过度，也没有因为资历而固执地强行给老将时间。
他最出色的执教表现体现在系列赛末尾。他在需要时限制了凯尔登的上场时间，在防守端信任布莱恩特，让哈珀尽情发挥，并且在第五场开局不稳时没有恐慌。马刺在最后两场比赛中净胜59分，这绝非偶然。米奇教练调度有方，帮助圣安东尼奥以令人信服的方式终结了系列赛。
评分：A-
由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Second Round Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Minnesota Timberwolves
Second Round Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Minnesota Timberwolves
The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Minnesota Timberwolves in six games to advance to the Western Conference Finals. After losing Game 1, the Spurs won four of the next five games and finished the series by blasting Minnesota in Games 5 and 6. When all was said and done, San Antonio looked like the better, deeper, tougher and more talented team.
Victor Wembanyama
Wembanyama didn’t have a perfect series but he was obviously the most important player on the court. Defensively, he was the centerpiece of everything San Antonio did. The Timberwolves had to think twice before entering the paint and there were long stretches when the lane simply wasn’t open for business.
His Game 1 offensive struggles were painful. He missed all eight of his three-point attempts and didn’t play with enough oomph. But even in that game, he set a playoff record with 12 blocks. Wembanyama learned from his Game 1 struggles and thrived the rest of the way. His Game 3 performance was one of the best of his career, and his Game 5 response after the Game 4 ejection was exactly what San Antonio needed.
For the series, Wembanyama averaged 19.8 points, 12.0 rebounds, 4.2 blocks and 2.7 assists in 29.2 minutes per game. The three-point shooting wasn’t good and the errant elbow in Game 4 caused a lot of drama so this wasn’t quite an A-plus series. But his defense was so dominant, his rebounding was so valuable, his gravity opened up so much for everyone else and he came up so big in key moments that there’s no question he was the main reason the Spurs advanced.
Grade: A-
De’Aaron Fox
Fox’s series was a mixed bag — but the overall impact was positive. He was bad in Game 1. There’s no real way around that. He looked hesitant, turned the ball over too much and didn’t bring enough offensively or defensively. For a veteran guard in a playoff series, that opening performance wasn’t close to good enough.
To his credit, Fox recovered. He was much better in Game 2, fought through a rough start in Game 3, helped keep the Spurs alive after Wembanyama’s ejection in Game 4 and then had his best performance in Game 6. That closeout game was the version of Fox that San Antonio had been waiting for all series. He had 21 points and nine assists on 8-for-10 shooting while looking calm, impossibly fast and in control.
For the series, Fox averaged 17.7 points and 5.0 assists while shooting 42.9% from the field and 32.0% from three. That efficiency wasn’t great and there were too many stretches where he looked uncomfortable. But his defense was better than expected, he protected the ball well after Game 1 and he finished the series on a high note.
Grade: B
Stephon Castle
Castle was fantastic. This was the type of series that makes it difficult to keep expectations subdued. He’s still young, he still makes mistakes and he still gets himself into foul trouble too often … but, man, this kid looked like a future star.
Offensively, Castle was powerful, patient and productive. He averaged 21.0 points, 5.7 rebounds and 6.2 assists while shooting 54.8% from the field. The Timberwolves tried to use size and physicality against him and Castle usually responded by playing with even more force. When they dared him to shoot in Game 6, he made them pay by hitting five straight three-pointers.
Defensively, Castle was also a major positive. He competed hard, used his strength well and gave San Antonio a rugged perimeter defender to build around. The turnovers were the main issue. He had some loose moments and there were times he needed to slow down. But considering his age, role and degree of difficulty, this was a highly impressive series. Castle was a difference-maker from start to finish.
Grade: A
Devin Vassell
Vassell wasn’t spectacular but he was rock solid. His scoring numbers weren’t huge, as he averaged 12.3 points, but he fit well around the rest of San Antonio’s weapons. The Spurs didn’t need him to force the issue. They needed him to hit open threes, defend, move the ball and avoid mistakes — and he mostly did exactly that.
The most encouraging part of Vassell’s series was his defense. He was more locked in than usual, read plays quickly and held up well in individual matchups. In multiple games, his defensive activity was better than what his box score suggested. That mattered against a Minnesota team with a lot of size and brute strength.
Offensively, Vassell shot 43.8% from three and made timely shots throughout the series. There were moments when he passed up looks he probably should have taken. Still, he played within himself, made smart decisions and helped keep the floor spaced.
Grade: B+
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie had a useful series even though his shooting ran hot and cold. He averaged 11.5 points and 6.0 rebounds while shooting 36.6% from three. For a player whose primary job is to hit shots, his misses were sometimes loud. But his overall game was better than just a simple shooting evaluation.
The rebounding was huge. Champagnie repeatedly helped San Antonio finish defensive possessions and created a few extra chances on the offensive glass. His 12-rebound performance in Game 3 was one of the quiet keys to that win. He also defended well enough, moved the ball smartly and didn’t make many careless mistakes.
But, again, his shooting wasn’t always trustworthy. He missed the potential game-winner in Game 1, went 0-for-5 from three in Game 4 and struggled from deep again in Game 5. Thankfully for the Spurs, he kept playing hard even when the jumper wasn’t falling.
Grade: B
Dylan Harper
Harper was really, really good. For a rookie coming off the bench in a playoff series, it’s hard to ask for much more. He averaged 14.7 points, 6.2 rebounds and 2.5 assists in only 24.9 minutes per game while shooting 56.9% from the field. That’s ridiculous production for someone his age in this environment.
What stood out most was his poise. Harper didn’t look rushed. He didn’t look scared. He attacked Minnesota’s defense with confidence and repeatedly gave the Spurs scoring punch when the offense needed a lift. His Game 4 performance was especially impressive. With Wembanyama out, Harper poured in 24 points and nearly helped San Antonio steal a game.
Harper’s three-point shooting wasn’t great and his decision-making wasn’t perfect. He had a few rookie moments. But his downhill scoring, rebounding and defensive competitiveness were all major positives. He already looks like someone the Spurs can trust in playoff minutes. That’s a very big deal.
Grade: A
Keldon Johnson
Johnson’s series was mostly one that he should forget. He struggled quite a bit — although, to his credit, there was one reason to smile.
Game 5 was the clear high point. Johnson looked like the regular season version of himself. He attacked with power, finished through contact, rebounded with energy and gave San Antonio 21 points in 22 minutes. That performance helped the Spurs turn a tight game into a blowout and gave the bench a badly needed boost.
The rest of the series wasn’t nearly as encouraging. Outside of Game 5, Johnson averaged 7.0 points and 3.4 rebounds while shooting 38.7% from the field. His defense was shaky at times and some of his drives were too frantic. Let’s hope he plays better as the postseason goes along.
Grade: C
Luke Kornet
Kornet had an important job: help the Spurs survive the minutes when Wembanyama was on the bench. For the most part, he did that. His numbers weren’t loud, as he averaged 3.5 points, 3.3 rebounds and 1.8 blocks in 13.9 minutes. But his value showed up in his rim protection and his ability to keep Minnesota from living in the paint during non-Wembanyama minutes.
There were some rough moments. In Game 1 and Game 3, Kornet didn’t rebound well enough and didn’t have enough of a defensive presence. When he’s not cleaning the glass, his margin for error gets thin. But he bounced back with useful outings and finished the series with his best game.
In Game 6, Kornet had six points, six rebounds and four blocks in 14 minutes. That’s exactly what the Spurs needed from their backup center. He competed hard, protected the rim and bought Wembanyama valuable rest. Kornet wasn’t perfect, but he did his job in a difficult matchup.
Grade: B
Carter Bryant
Bryant didn’t play a ton, but he made his minutes count. He averaged 12.1 minutes and slowly earned more trust as the series progressed. For a young player in a physical playoff series, he looked surprisingly comfortable.
Defense was the main reason Bryant stayed in the rotation. He was strong, active and willing to take on difficult assignments. His work against Anthony Edwards in Game 6 was legitimately impressive. He made Edwards work, used his body well and didn’t back down from the moment.
There were mistakes. Bryant fouled too much in Game 2 and had a rough Game 4 with three turnovers and three fouls. But the good outweighed the bad. He shot 54.5% from the field and 42.9% from three, defended with energy and looked like he belonged. That’s a win for a raw rookie.
Grade: B+
Harrison Barnes
Barnes never really found a role in this series. He averaged only 8.5 minutes per game, and as the series went on, it became clear that the coaching staff trusted the younger players more. It’s hard to argue with that decision considering how well Harper and Bryant played.
To Barnes’ credit, he didn’t totally fall apart. He had a few useful moments as a rebounder, passer and veteran presence. He hit a few shots in low-leverage minutes and didn’t force much. But the Spurs needed more than that if he was going to remain a real part of the rotation.
Grade: C-
Mitch Johnson
Coach Mitch Johnson had a strong series. Game 1 wasn’t great. The offense was too stagnant, Wembanyama didn’t get enough clean looks and the Spurs looked a step slow in terms of adjustments. Game 4 also got away from him late after Wembanyama’s ejection, although that was obviously a difficult situation to manage.
Other than that, Coach Mitch did a whole lot right. The Spurs adjusted well after Game 1. Wembanyama got better touches, Castle was empowered, Harper got real responsibility and Bryant earned meaningful minutes. Johnson didn’t overreact to bad stretches and didn’t stubbornly force veteran minutes just because of experience.
His best work came at the end of the series. He limited KJ when needed, trusted Bryant defensively, let Harper cook and didn’t panic when Game 5 started to get wobbly. The Spurs won the final two games by a combined 59 points. That doesn’t happen by accident. Coach Mitch pushed the right buttons and helped San Antonio close the series in convincing fashion.
Grade: A-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk