By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-01-22 07:55:13
在背靠背的第二场比赛中，圣安东尼奥马刺队在下半场崩盘，最终以106-111的比分不敌休斯顿火箭。马刺队在第一节得到39分，半场结束时已拿到70分。但遗憾的是，我们这支球队在整个下半场仅仅得到36分。
马刺队一度领先多达16分，并且在很长一段时间里都打得非常出色。可惜，冰冷的手感和糟糕的执行力最终葬送了圣安东尼奥在第四节的努力。
数据统计：马刺 vs 火箭
马刺 vs 火箭 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
文班亚马最近一段时间在外线一直保持着神准的投射。不幸的是，这位法国高个子在休斯顿跌落凡间。文班亚马三分线外7投0中，全场21投仅5中。如此低下的效率让他成为了进攻端的累赘，这在我们评价他时是极为罕见的。在防守端，文班亚马的表现也并不算出色。他全场没有送出一次盖帽，在单防中失利的次数也远超以往。
评分：D-
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
福克斯有一些高光表现，但总的来说，他的表现乏善可陈。他15次出手得到14分，出现3次失误，没有获得罚球机会，在防守端也基本是隐身状态。福克斯有能力掌控自己的比赛开关，但当他持续向对手施压时，马刺队的表现会更好。
评分：C-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
和文班亚马一样，卡斯尔也打出了一个他自己会想要忘记的夜晚。他三分线外8投2中，两分球区域11投3中，且只获得一次罚球。卡斯尔出现了三次失误，还有好几次险些失误。不过，比赛中也不乏亮点。这位二年级后卫抢下了7个篮板，并送出了全队最高的8次助攻。他的防守也相当出色。
评分：C
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼开场手感火热，帮助马刺队建立了巨大的领先优势。他上半场就命中了六记三分球。遗憾的是，他在下半场手感冰凉。即便如此，尚帕尼的表现依然非常出色。他三分线外16投8中，他极快的出手速度迫使火箭队不得不对他严加防范。尚帕尼还抢下了8个篮板，并贡献了水准之上的防守。总而言之，如果不是他今晚砍下27分，马刺队的处境会更加艰难。
评分：A-
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
对巴恩斯而言，这又是另一场表现平平的比赛。他的三分投射足够出色（5投2中），但出手次数太少，未能产生显著影响。巴恩斯本场的场上积极性比平时要高，但圣安东尼奥需要这位首发老将能打出几场爆发性的表现。
评分：B-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
优点：约翰逊以12分领衔替补席。他两分球6投5中，两罚全中。约翰逊还抢下6个篮板并且没有失误。防守端，约翰逊的个人贡献优于平常水准。缺点：约翰逊三分球3投0中，并且没有送出一次助攻。在众多队友进攻挣扎的情况下，约翰逊本可以承担起更多的得分重任。
评分：B-
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
科内特的表现令人印象深刻。他看起来比平时更快、更具运动能力。他在24分钟的出场时间里贡献了8分，其中包括几次势大力沉的扣篮。他的篮板拼抢很强硬，护筐表现也非常出色，在攻防两端都将失误降到了最低。科内特正在证明自己是一名顶级的替补中锋。
评分：A-
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
我认为哈珀的这次出场是积极的。虽然他错失了全部三次三分出手，但他其余方面的表现都很稳健。他两分球6投4中，送出5次助攻，仅有1次失误。他的防守表现也给我留下了深刻印象。回过头看，哈珀或许应该获得更多的上场时间。
评分：B+
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
对布莱恩特来说，这是朝着正确的方向迈出了一步。虽然他投丢了两个三分球，但他利用身体在篮下强硬地打进了两球。我也认为他打出了比以往更聪明的防守。
评分：B
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
马刺队上半场打得不错，但下半场却完全失灵——而约翰逊没能找到任何解决办法。事后来看，哈珀或许应该打更长时间，因为他有能力盘活进攻。通过有针对性的战术安排来让福克斯更多地参与进来，本可能改变比赛的走向。
评分：C
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Houston Rockets – Game #44
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Houston Rockets – Game #44
Playing on the second night of a back-to-back, the San Antonio Spurs collapsed in the second half to fall to the Houston Rockets by a score of 111-106. The Spurs scored 39 points in the first quarter and had 70 points by halftime. But, regrettably, the good guys could only muster 36 points in the entire second half.
The Spurs led by as many as 16 points and looked really good for long stretches. Alas, cold shooting and poor execution doomed San Antonio in the fourth quarter.
Stats: Spurs at Rockets
Spurs at Rockets – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Wembanyama had recently been a dead-eye from the perimeter. Unfortunately, the tall Frenchman came crashing down to earth in Houston. Wembanyama was 0-for-7 from three-point range and 5-for-21 overall from the field. That level of inefficiency made him a liability on offense, which is something we can almost never say about him. Defensively, Wembanyama wasn’t all that good, either. He finished without a block and lost one-on-one matchups much more often than usual.
Grade: D-
De’Aaron Fox
Fox had a few highlights but, all in all, his performance was underwhelming. He scored 14 points on 15 shots, turned it over three times, didn’t get to the free throw line and was mostly quiet on the defensive end. Fox has the ability to turn it on and off but the Spurs are better when he’s constantly pushing the issue.
Grade: C-
Stephon Castle
Like Wembanyama, Castle had a night at the office that he will want to forget. He was 2-for-8 from three-point land, 3-for-11 from two-point territory and shot only one free throw. Castle turned it over three times and had a number of other close calls. There were some bright spots, though. The second year guard had seven rebounds and a team-high eight assists. His defense was also pretty darn good.
Grade: C
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie came out red hot and gave the Spurs the ability to build a big lead. He finished the first half with six three-pointers. Sadly, he cooled off in the second half. That said, Champagnie still had a really solid outing. He was 8-for-16 from three-point range and his quick trigger forced the Rockets to respect him. Champagnie also had eight rebounds and played above average defense. All told, the Spurs would have been in big trouble if it wasn’t for him scoring 27 points on this night.
Grade: A-
Harrison Barnes
It was another quiet showing for Barnes. He shot well enough from three-point land (2-for-5) but his volume was too low to make a notable impact. Barnes’ overall activity level was higher than usual but San Antonio could use a few breakout games from their veteran starter.
Grade: B-
Keldon Johnson
The good: Johnson led the bench with 12 points. He was 5-for-6 from two-point territory and hit both of his free throws. Johnson also grabbed six rebounds and didn’t turn the ball over. Defensively, Johnson’s individual contributions were better than normal. The bad: Johnson was 0-for-3 from deep and he finished without an assist. With so many players struggling offensively, Johnson could have picked up even more slack.
Grade: B-
Luke Kornet
Kornet was impressive. He looked faster and more athletic than usual. He had a couple thunderous dunks on the way to eight points in 24 minutes. His rebounding was stout, his rim protection was very good and he kept his mistakes to a minimum on both ends. Kornet is proving himself to be a top flight backup center.
Grade: A-
Dylan Harper
I’d classify this as a positive outing for Harper. He missed all three of his three-point attempts but the rest of his performance was solid. He was 4-for-6 from two-point range, dished out five assists and turned it over only once. I was also pretty impressed with his defensive play. In retrospect, Harper likely should have played more minutes.
Grade: B+
Carter Bryant
This was a step in the right direction for Bryant. While he missed a pair of three-pointers, he used his body to finish a pair of gritty buckets right at the rim. I also thought he played a smarter brand of defense than usual.
Grade: B
Mitch Johnson
The Spurs played well in the first half but nothing was working in the second half — and Johnson couldn’t find any answers. Looking back on things, Harper probably should have played more because he was able to make things happen. Forcing Fox to get more involved via targeted playcalling could have been a game-changer.
Grade: C
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk