马刺 vs 火箭 101 - 106 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2024-10-29 17:40:26
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队在周一晚上的比赛中以 101-106 负于休斯顿火箭队，本赛季战绩跌至 1 胜 2 负。火箭队目前战绩为 2 胜 2 负，他们在第四节的关键时刻命中了一些投篮，最终守住了胜利。
这场比赛与周六晚上两队之间的较量完全相反。在那场比赛中，马刺队一度领先 22 分，火箭队在下半场奋起直追，但圣安东尼奥队在最后时刻稳扎稳打，取得了胜利。而今晚，火箭队一度领先多达 21 分，马刺队在下半场发起反击，但休斯顿队在第四节顶住了压力，最终锁定了胜局。
数据统计：马刺队对阵火箭队
马刺队对阵火箭队 - 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
从很多方面来说，这都是文班亚马本赛季表现最好的一场比赛。他在篮板上势不可挡，传球也非常出色，在内线防守滴水不漏，在防守端对外线球员的注意力也非常集中。文班亚马很好地展现了他全面的技术。不幸的是，他的进攻效率不高。具体来说，他的投篮选择很糟糕。在面对身高比他矮一英尺的球员防守时，文班亚马没能利用好自己的身高优势。当他有空位突破路线时，他却选择了跳投。如果马刺队想要赢球，文班亚马必须在进攻端做出更好的决定。他不能用糟糕的投篮来浪费球队的防守。
评分：B
杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)
索汉的表现给我留下了深刻的印象。他在内线极具身体对抗性，他在篮筐附近的强力终结令人惊叹。遗憾的是，他错过了一些简单的上篮机会；他本可以打出一场非常出色的比赛。索汉在篮板上付出了巨大的努力，传球也很好，并且打得很有勇气。话虽如此，他的外线投篮实在令人担忧。他只投了一记三分球，而且这记三分球的出手姿势非常别扭。不出所料，尽管有很多机会，但他之后再也没有在外线出手了。
评分：A-
克里斯·保罗 (Chris Paul)
优点：保罗的得分能力恢复了。他在中距离看起来很舒服，甚至还尝试了几次冲击篮筐。缺点：保罗的组织能力不足。他很难找到合适的角度来传出精准的球。在防守端，当他坐在替补席上时，马刺队的防守明显更出色。
评分：C+
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
好吧，他这场比赛的表现可以用“毫无贡献”来形容。巴恩斯出场 29 分钟，几乎没有任何作为。他的防守不佳，在进攻端移动不多，而且在攻防两端都没有为队友创造机会。希望这只是巴恩斯在适应球队方面的问题。
评分：D
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼无法拉开球场空间是马刺队的一个主要问题。圣安东尼奥队没有多少空间型球员，所以当德文·瓦塞尔缺阵，而尚帕尼又手感不佳时，球队的进攻就会变得非常拥堵。话虽如此，我认为他的防守相对来说还不错。尚帕尼本赛季在攻防两端都做得很好。
评分：C
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
我欣赏约翰逊的努力，但他在这场比赛中缺乏技巧。他不假思索地往对方防守的牙齿上冲。对于大多数球员来说，这是个糟糕的选择。对于约翰逊来说，这个选择偶尔也会奏效，因为他非常强壮。但是，如果他能更多地扮演组织者的角色，而不是像蛮牛一样横冲直撞，那将会对球队更有帮助。他的三分球失准，这也于事无补。值得称赞的是，我认为他的外线防守比平时要好。
评分：C
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
由于特雷·琼斯缺阵，在保罗下场休息时，卡斯尔承担了大部分的控球后卫职责。他的表现又一次给我留下了深刻的印象。他犯了一些新秀错误，导致了三次失误，但他的传球很聪明，他在 18 分钟内送出了 5 次助攻就证明了这一点。这孩子真的很会传球。卡斯尔现在就已经是一名非常出色的外线防守者了。如果他能减少失误，并增加三分投篮的稳定性，那么教练组将很难将他放在替补席上。
评分：B
马拉基·布拉纳姆 (Malaki Branham)
在圣安东尼奥队进攻乏力的情况下，布拉纳姆挺身而出，为球队注入了一些活力。他连续命中了三个三分球，并且在持球和无球状态下都跑出了很好的空切路线。如果布拉纳姆能成为一名三分命中率达到 40% 的射手，他就能在联盟中立足。尽管他在得分方面表现出色，但也犯了一些令人遗憾的错误。他在处理球方面有些随意，防守时手上的动作过多。但是，总的来说，这对布拉纳姆来说是朝着正确方向迈出的一步。
评分：A-
扎克·科林斯 (Zach Collins)
科林斯在本赛季初的表现非常出色。在这场对阵火箭队的比赛中，他仅出场 13 分钟就得到了 11 分，同时还有不错的篮板球和及时的传球。他的防守很稳固，反应速度也很快。继续努力，扎克。
评分：A-
布莱克·韦斯利 (Blake Wesley)
优点：韦斯利在防守端付出了巨大的努力。他积极的推节奏帮助了球队的进攻流畅性。韦斯利在突破时很有目的性，这对他来说并不常见。缺点：韦斯利的投篮手感一直是个问题，在这场比赛中尤其糟糕。有时候他打得太快了，导致决策失误。
评分：B
波波维奇教练
我对教练组为文班亚马制定的战术并不太满意，这些战术没能帮助他发挥出身高优势。现在看来，巴恩斯的上场时间过长。我喜欢波波维奇教练给了布拉纳姆更多的上场时间，以及他继续信任卡斯尔的组织能力。
评分：C+
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Houston Rockets – Game #3
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Houston Rockets – Game #3
The San Antonio Spurs dropped to 1-2 on the season after falling to the Houston Rockets on Monday night by a final count of 106-101. The Rockets, 2-2, hit enough big shots in the fourth quarter to hold on to the victory.
This game was the exact opposite of Saturday night’s contest between these two teams. In that game, the Spurs got up by 22 points, the Rockets rallied in the second half but San Antonio was able to execute down the stretch to get the win. Tonight, the Rockets got up by as many as 21 points, the Spurs rallied in the second half but Houston did just enough in the fourth to secure the win.
Stats: Spurs vs. Rockets
Spurs vs. Rockets – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
In many ways, this was Wembanyama’s best game of the season. He was a monster on the boards, he passed the ball really well, he protected the paint with honor and was very attentive defensively out on the perimeter. Wembanyama did well to show off his wide array of skills. Unfortunately, his offense was underwhelming. To be specific, his shot-selection was poor. Wembanyama failed to use his height to his advantage when guarded by players a foot shorter. When he had open driving lanes, he settled for jumpers. Wembanyama has to make better decisions on offense if the Spurs are going to be a winning team. He can’t bail out the defense with bad shots.
Grade: B
Jeremy Sochan
I was impressed by how Sochan played. He was extremely physical in the paint and his power finishes near the rim were wow-inducing. Sadly, he missed a couple easy layups; he was close to having a huge outing. Sochan gave great effort on the boards, passed the ball well and played with a palpable amount of courage. That said, his outside shot is really worrying me. He only shot one three-pointer and that three had about four different hitches in it. I don’t know if I’ve ever seen a more disjointed jumper. Unsurprisingly, he didn’t shoot another one from deep despite plenty of opportunities.
Grade: A-
Chris Paul
The good: Paul’s scoring resurfaced. He looked comfortable in the midrange and even made it all the way to the rim for a few attempts. The bad: Paul’s playmaking was minimal. He was having trouble finding the right angles to make the proper passes. Defensively, the Spurs were noticeably better when he was on the bench.
Grade: C+
Harrison Barnes
Welp, yeah, that was a nothingburger. Barnes was on the court for 29 minutes and did next to nothing. His defense was subpar, he didn’t move much on offense and he wasn’t making life easier for others on either end. Let’s hope it’s just a matter of Barnes figuring out his fit on this team.
Grade: D
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie not being able to spread the court was a major issue for the Spurs. San Antonio doesn’t have many floor spacers so when Devin Vassell is out and Champagnie is misfiring, things get clogged in a hurry. That said, I thought his defense was relatively good. Champagnie is doing a good job of focusing on both ends of the court this season.
Grade: C
Keldon Johnson
I appreciate Johnson’s effort but his skill was lacking on Monday night. He was driving into the teeth of the defense without a second thought. For most players, that’s a bad idea. For Johnson, it’s a bad idea that sometimes works because he’s so strong. But being more of a playmaker rather than a brute force sledgehammer would be helpful. His three-point shot was off, which also wasn’t helping matters. To Johnson’s credit, I thought his perimeter defense was better than usual.
Grade: C
Stephon Castle
With Tre Jones sidelined, Castle was handling most of the point guard duties when Paul was on the bench. I was again impressed. He had some rookie mistakes that led to three turnovers but his passing was heady, as evidenced by his five assists in 18 minutes. Kid can really pass the ball. Castle is also a really good perimeter defender already. If he can clean up the mistakes and add a three-point jumper, it’s going to be difficult for the coaching staff to justify having him off the court.
Grade: B
Malaki Branham
With San Antonio’s offense sputtering, Branham came alive to breathe some life into the Silver and Black. He hit three consecutive three-pointers and was also cutting well with and without the ball. If Branham can become a 40% three-point shooter, he has a spot in this league. Despite his very good showing in terms of scoring the ball, there were some unfortunate mistakes. He was loose with his ball-handling duties and his defense was too handsy. But, again, this was a step in the right direction for Branham.
Grade: A-
Zach Collins
Collins is playing really, really well to start the season. Against the Rockets, he had 11 points in only 13 minutes while also rebounding well and delivering timely passes. His defense was sturdy and his reaction speed was lightning quick. Keep on trucking, Z.
Grade: A-
Blake Wesley
The good: Wesley gave big league effort on defense. His pushing of the pace was helping the offensive flow. Wesley was driving with a purpose, which is not always the case with him. The bad: Wesley’s touch is always a question mark and it was especially iffy on Monday evening. Sometimes he got going too fast and his decision-making suffered.
Grade: B
Pop
I wasn’t too impressed with the sets that were called to help Wembanyama weaponize his height advantage. In retrospect, Barnes played too much. I did like how Pop gave Branham extra minutes and how he continues to trust Castle as a playmaker.
Grade: C+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk