马刺 vs 雄鹿 119 - 101 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-01-17 20:17:33
周四晚，圣安东尼奥马刺以119-101的比分轻松战胜密尔沃基雄鹿。在经历了相对慢热的开局后，马刺在主场霜冻银行中心的球迷面前，于第二、三节强势爆发。在这两节时间里，圣安东尼奥以75-42的得分压倒了密尔沃基，基本上终结了比赛悬念。
此役过后，马刺来到了赛季中点，战绩为28胜13负。
数据统计：马刺 vs. 雄鹿
马刺 vs. 雄鹿 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
比赛初期，文班亚马因一次膝盖对撞而痛苦倒地，被迫离场。值得庆幸的是，这位超级巨星大个子得以重返赛场，且状态似乎丝毫未受影响。最引人注目的是，他的三分投射手感堪称完美。他最终三分线外6投5中。在进攻端，文班亚马的决策迅速而明智。防守端，他坚决地守护着篮筐，并在篮板拼抢上尽职尽责。最终，文班亚马仅出战22分钟，就贡献了22分、10个篮板和2次封盖。
评分：B+
德阿龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
福克斯在比赛初期就很好地掌控了局面，并确保了自己的影响力。在23分钟内，他贡献了18分、4个篮板和4次助攻，投篮命中率也很出色。他的侵略性十足，看到他毫不费力地命中三分也令人欣喜。不过，福克斯罚丢了一半的罚球，并且出现了4次失误。然而，这些失误大多属于偶然性的，所以我不会因此过多地苛责他。
评分：B+
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔的表现非常出色。事实上，这是他本赛季悄然打出的最佳表现之一。防守端，他承担了最艰巨的任务，并且完成得相当出色。他用头脑打球，避免了犯规麻烦，同时在场上处处阻击着雄鹿队。进攻端，卡斯尔堪称效率之神。他两分球7投5中，三分球2投1中，并命中了全部6次罚球。更令人印象深刻的是，他送出了10次助攻且没有任何失误。正如数据所示，卡斯尔的组织能力非常出色，他将密尔沃基的防线撕得粉碎。
评分：A
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼又一次贡献了杰出的表现。他以11个篮板领跑全队；作为一名外线球员，他已经成功地转变为一名出色的篮板手。面对雄鹿，他还展现了强硬的防守。进攻端，尚帕尼高效地再中三记三分球。他抓住每一个机会果断出手，并且近来一直保持着很高的命中率。
评分：A-
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
对于这位状态低迷的前锋来说，这应该被视为朝着正确方向迈出的一步。在16分钟的出场时间里，巴恩斯没有抢到一个篮板，也没有命中一记两分球……但他命中了两个三分球，在持球时做出了明智的决策，并在防守端积极移动脚步。尽管如此，当前版本的巴恩斯与赛季初那个时常扛起球队的巴恩斯相去甚远。
评分：B-
迪兰·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
几乎在所有方面，哈珀都打出了一场非常不错的比赛。他三分线外5投0中的表现是主要的槽点。除此之外，这位新秀的表现堪称活力四射。他在三分线内8投6中，送出5次助攻，并且仅有1次失误。他看起来充满活力，变向速度快如闪电。希望哈珀已经找到了突破新秀墙的方法。
评分：B+
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
优点：约翰逊在21分钟内贡献了8个篮板、2次助攻和3次抢断。他还命中了全部4次罚球，并且打得充满激情，这一点显而易见。防守端，他有时在单防对位中展现出的统治力给我留下了深刻印象。缺点：约翰逊没有尝试过一次两分球出手，并且出现了两次失误。在进攻端，他无疑比平时沉寂了许多。总评：我认为单凭约翰逊的防守就值得一阵掌声。
评分：B+
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
我的意思是，刚开始可能还有点好笑，但布莱恩特真的需要开始在篮下终结进攻了。对于这位新秀来说，就连空位扣篮似乎都成了不可能完成的任务。说句客气话，20分钟内6投0中的表现实在是不怎么好看。在防守和篮板方面，布莱恩特的表现还行。
评分：D+
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
对科内特来说，这是一场稳健的表演。他5投5中，得到10分。他在篮板和防守端也尽了自己的本分。总而言之，这只是一个低调而高效的夜晚。
评分：B
林迪·沃特斯三世 (Lindy Waters III)
沃特斯在15分钟内三分球2投1中……而这差不多就是他贡献的全部了。马刺本可以从他身上得到更多，尤其是在垃圾时间里。
评分：C
凯利·奥利尼克 (Kelly Olynyk)
在漫长的垃圾时间里，奥利尼克有时看起来是场上唯一在努力打球的人。他做得刚刚好，避免了主力球员需要重新上场来终结比赛的尴尬局面。
评分：B-
杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)
索汉在垃圾时间里的表现并没有为自己赢得任何出场时间。如果说有什么作用的话，那就是他的表现恰好说明了为什么他会掉出轮换阵容。
评分：D+
乔丹·麦克劳克林 (Jordan McLaughlin)
麦克劳克林度过了需要忘掉的7分钟。他投篮2中0，还出现了3次失误。这可不是你希望从一名老将后卫在垃圾时间里看到的表现。
评分：D
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊教练干得不错。轮换安排合理，进攻计划完美无瑕，防守体系也极具统治力。垃圾时间的表现虽然难看，但这并不能掩盖球队在比赛核心时段的出色发挥。
评分：B+
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Milwaukee Bucks – Game #41
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Milwaukee Bucks – Game #41
The San Antonio Spurs enjoyed an easy win over the Milwaukee Bucks on Thursday night by a final count of 119-101. After a relatively slow start, the Spurs exploded over the second and third quarters in front of their home fans at the Frost Bank Center. In those two periods, San Antonio outscored Milwaukee 75-42 to basically end the competition.
The Spurs reach the midway mark of the season with a record of 28-13.
Stats: Spurs vs. Bucks
Spurs vs. Bucks – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Early on, Wembanyama was forced to leave the game after a knee-to-knee blow left him in pain on the ground. Thankfully, the superstar big man was able to return and didn’t appear to skip a beat. Most notably, his three-point stroke looked perfect. He finished 5-for-6 from beyond the arc. Wembanyama was making quick, smart decisions on offense. Defensively, he protected the rim with determination and took care of business on boards. When the smoke cleared, Wembanyama had 22 points, ten rebounds and two blocks in only 22 minutes.
Grade: B+
De’Aaron Fox
Fox did a great job of grabbing this game early and making sure his impact was felt. In 23 minutes, he finished with 18 points, four rebounds and four assists while shooting well from the field. His aggression was great and it was nice to see him effortlessly knock down threes. Fox did miss half of his free throws and he turned the ball over four times. However, the turnovers were of the fluke-ish variety so I won’t blame him too much for those.
Grade: B+
Stephon Castle
Castle was great. In fact, this was quietly one of his better performances of the season. Defensively, he took on the biggest challenges and did very well. He used his brain to stay out of foul trouble while also stonewalling the Bucks at every turn. Offensively, Castle was an efficiency god. He was 5-for-7 on twos, 1-for-2 on threes and hit all six free throws. More impressively, he finished with ten assists and no turnovers. As those numbers suggest, Castle’s playmaking was great as he picked apart Milwaukee’s defense.
Grade: A
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie had another stellar outing. He led the way with 11 rebounds; he has managed to become a fantastic rebounder for a perimeter player. He also played stout defense against the Bucks. Offensively, Champagnie dropped three more three-pointers and did it in an efficient manner. He’s letting the ball fly at every opportunity and he has been knocking down his looks at a high rate recently.
Grade: A-
Harrison Barnes
This should be considered a step in the right direction for the slumping forward. Barnes didn’t have a rebound or a two-pointer in his 16 minutes … but he was able to connect on a pair of three-pointers, make smart decisions with the ball and move his feet on defense. All that said, this version of Barnes isn’t close to the Barnes who was at times carrying the team earlier in the season.
Grade: B-
Dylan Harper
In just about every category, Harper had a really good game. His 0-for-5 showing from three-point land was the main disappointment. Otherwise, the rookie was dynamite. He was 6-for-8 inside of the arc, handed out five assists and turned the ball over only once. He looked spry and he was changing directions at lightning speed. Let’s hope Harper has found his way beyond the rookie wall.
Grade: B+
Keldon Johnson
The good: Johnson had eight rebounds, two assists and three steals in 21 minutes. He also connected on all four of his free throws while playing with a palpable amount of enthusiasm. Defensively, I was really impressed with how he dominated his one-on-one matchups at times. The bad: Johnson didn’t attempt a two-pointer and turned the ball over twice. Offensively, he was definitely more muted than normal. Overall: I thought Johnson’s defense alone was worthy of a round of applause.
Grade: B+
Carter Bryant
I mean, it was funny at first but Bryant needs to start finishing shots at the rim. Even open dunks are seemingly impossible for the rookie. Going 0-for-6 in 20 minutes was not aesthetically pleasing, to be kind. Defensively and on the boards, Bryant was fine.
Grade: D+
Luke Kornet
It was a solid showing for Kornet. He scored ten points on 5-for-5 shooting. He did his share of the work on the boards and on the defensive end. All in all, it was just a quiet, efficient night at the office.
Grade: B
Lindy Waters III
Waters was 1-for-2 from three-point range in 15 minutes … and that was about the extent of his production. The Spurs could have used more, particularly in garbage time.
Grade: C
Kelly Olynyk
In deep garbage time, it looked like Olynyk was the only one trying at times. He did just enough to avoid having the starters come in to finish off the game.
Grade: B-
Jeremy Sochan
Sochan didn’t exactly win any minutes with his play in garbage time. If anything, he illustrated why he has found himself on the outside of the rotation.
Grade: D+
Jordan McLaughlin
McLaughlin had seven minutes to forget. He was 0-for-2 from the field and turned the ball over three times. That’s not what you want from a veteran guard during garbage time.
Grade: D
Mitch Johnson
Good stuff by Johnson. The rotation made sense, the offensive gameplan was pristine and the defensive scheme was dominant. Garbage time was ugly but that doesn’t take away from how well the team looked during the guts of the game.
Grade: B+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk