🎧 Spurs Insider️ 播客: 超越预期,再战雷霆

Spurs Insider Podcast, 2026-01-14 09:18:00

专栏作家迈克·芬格 (Mike Finger) 与随队记者杰夫·麦克唐纳 (Jeff McDonald) 和汤姆·奥斯本 (Tom Orsborn) 探讨马刺是否能再次击败雷霆,以及本赛季至今球队所面临的期望已发生了怎样的变化。

推荐阅读:

文班亚马能保持足够健康以赢得年度最佳防守球员吗?

马刺能否对强大的雷霆取得四连胜?

为什么关于马刺队文班亚马的年度最佳第六人讨论将不复存在

马刺会交易杰里米·索汉吗?“不去想是不可能的”

文班亚马回归首发,马刺憾负:三大看点

以下是播客的文字实录:

迈克·芬格 :这里是《马刺内幕》,我们从遍布中部时区的顶级秘密地点安全网络为您播报。我是迈克·芬格,和我一起的还是老搭档——快报马刺随队记者杰夫·麦克唐纳和汤姆·奥斯本。

冒着泄露杰夫秘密地点的风险,也冒着当你们中许多人在周三早上听到这期播客时它已经过时的风险,我要说的是,杰夫的所在地离一群人很近,而他们的对手正是今年以来专治马刺各种不服的“良药”。这种情况会继续吗?我们将在周二晚上找到答案。

不过,关于马刺队的现状,让我们先连线杰夫·麦克唐纳。那边情况如何?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :我觉得你这个开场白充满激情。很不错,我喜欢。你在我们开始前听起来还像刚睡醒,可一旦倒数到3、2、1,你立马就进入状态了。

迈克·芬格 :我可是专业的,杰夫。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :完全没有——完全没有热身。他是个大场面先生。不需要任何热身。你知道,就连帕瓦罗蒂也得在更衣室里开嗓热身。你完全不需要。直接就进入状态了,太棒了。

迈克·芬格 :感谢赏识。

嗯,你所在的城市会成为治愈马刺的良药吗?他们能像《马刺内幕》播客的主持人一样,只要聚光灯亮起、只要有观众和听众,就能瞬间点燃状态吗?杰夫,他们能以我为榜样,在对阵俄克拉荷马城雷霆的比赛中做到吗?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :我想说,我们可以别卖关子了。我现在在俄克拉荷马城,准备报道今晚的比赛。嗯,现在是周二早上,所以很多内容可能会过时。我只想指出,到目前为止,我对俄克拉荷马城和马刺系列赛的每一次预测都错了。我的预测战绩是0胜3负,而马刺是3胜0负。所以,但是,嗯,我……我不认为他们今晚会赢。所以,我现在就把这个预测记录在案,等到人们听到这个的时候,嗯,他们就会知道我是对是错了。

迈克·芬格 :铁杆粉丝们会在周二下午,等我们优秀的制作人蒙蒂·博特把节目上传后就收听。所以对于最忠实的听众来说,这可能是一期赛前播客。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :我只是觉得——

迈克·芬格 :而他们,那些最忠实的赛前听众,想听你用那个本赛季你已经对俄克ла荷马城雷霆队用过三次的词,因为他们觉得那和运气有关,他们觉得那是好运。所以,说吧,杰夫,用那个词。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :现在这就像巴特·辛普森那个梗一样。快说那个词。

迈克·芬格 :是的。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :我会说的。但首先,我只是觉得那些可怜又顽强的雷霆队也该赢一次了。就像是,他们已经厌倦了被强大的恶霸马刺队欺负。你懂的。

迈克·-芬格 :所以这对马刺来说意味着什么?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :而且雷霆现在状态正佳。你知道,他们已经取得了三连胜。上次在圣诞节与马刺交手后,他们的状态并不算好。他们在接下来的12场比赛里只取得了6胜6负,但现在他们已经调整好了状态,又变回了那支强大的雷霆。呃,他们已经三连胜了。所以我认为这场比赛……

迈克·芬格 :很难打。

说吧,说那个词。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :很难打。嗯,呃……

迈克·芬格 :人们想听你说另一个词。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :不可能赢。

迈克·芬格 :是的。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :这场不可能赢。

迈克·芬格 :这场不可能赢。

好了,我做到了。我表演完了。感觉自己像只受过训练的海豹,但我还是表演了。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :我的鱼呢?我的金枪鱼在哪?

迈克·芬格 :[叹气] 我不知道。嗯,马刺陷入困境了吗?过去10场5胜5负。我的意思是,按照过去六个赛季的标准,他们正处于一波连胜热潮中。但按照我们从这支本地球队过去两个半月所看到的情况来看,这……这似乎是赛季中他们开始面临一些挑战的阶段。

汤姆·奥斯本 :我……我刚才想说,我……你知道,他们主场击败了湖人,客场击败了凯尔特人。你知道,他们在背靠背第二晚的比赛中惜败给明尼苏达。嗯,如果我是马刺球迷,我不会有太多抱怨。

迈克·芬格 :我记得在我们上一期播客里,我相信是智慧的汤姆·奥斯本说的,对于他们接下来的四场比赛,他们最好拿下上周二晚在孟菲斯的那一场,因为后面三场会很难打。结果他们恰恰没拿下那场。而他们最终几乎拿下了后面三场。他们赢了接下来的两场,并且在明尼苏达一度掌控了比赛,看起来要拿下那三场看起来很难的比赛。然而……事情在对阵明尼苏达的最后阶段并未如愿。但所有这一切都说明,他们在面对一些最强对手时表现出了最佳状态。而……如果他们在那些所谓的“更可能赢”的比赛中有所退步,嗯,我想那只是作为一支球队成长的一部分,学习如何在每晚都保持专注。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :是的,那是在输掉孟菲斯那场比赛后,维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 有一段很棒的引述,正好谈到了这一点,以及他们如何根据不同对手的水平或高或低地发挥。我试着准确复述,那段话大概是说,你知道,好处是我们发现自己能和任何对手抗衡,能直视任何人的眼睛。但坏处是,我们往往会直视每一个对手的眼睛。我认为那段引述非常精彩,尤其出自一个7英尺4英寸的人之口。

迈克·芬格 :嗯哼。

汤姆·奥斯本 :你刚才想说什么来着,那时我们像往常一样粗鲁地打断了你?

没关系。他们……嗯,是的,在波士顿的胜利,那场打得很好。我在现场看了那场比赛,至少可以说,那是一场高质量的胜利。嗯……

迈克·芬格 :我听说裁判帮他们赢了球。

汤姆·奥斯本 :是啊,是啊,是啊。酸葡萄心理,酸葡萄心理。杰伦·布朗 (Jaylen Brown) 对那场比赛的判罚不太满意。

迈克·芬格 :这对马刺来说是一个贯穿赛季的趋势。我不确定人们是否意识到这支本地球队拥有多大的优势。通常情况下,就像这个国家的每个NBA球迷群体一样,就像世界上每个体育迷群体一样,一支球队的球迷、关注这支球队的人们,总会倾向于认为他们的球队在判罚上吃了亏。嗯,马刺在罚球差上拥有巨大优势。我相信这是联盟最大的,杰夫。考虑到他们的打法,这很有道理。嗯,他们的后场有三名球员,我们可能稍后会在这个播客里谈到,他们喜欢持球冲击,喜欢攻击篮筐,喜欢杀入禁区。他们拥有联盟最大的对位优势,我是从字面意义上说“最大”,因为他有7英尺4英寸,维克托·文班亚马。他会得到很多罚球。那三名后卫也会得到很多罚球。他们不像其他队那样投那么多三分球。所以,你比波士顿凯尔特人队获得更多罚球是合乎逻辑的,凯尔特人比联盟几乎任何队投的三分都多。这种差距的存在是合理的。所以我认为在某些情况下,这确实是杰伦·布朗……在表现出一些酸葡萄心理。嗯,我……我理解有些判罚可能两边都有理,马刺可能比平时得到了一点点更多的优势。但所有这一切都说明,我认为大多数晚上马刺的罚球都会比对手多。而……这与弥补他们在三分线上的劣势有关。这说得通吗?

汤姆·奥斯本 :是的,而且……在你谈到那点之前,《波士顿环球报》的丹·肖内西 (Dan Shaughnessy) 大师在比赛当天在他的专栏里批评了杰伦·布朗,那不是一篇专门针对他的专栏,只是一个笔记专栏,里面就说,呃,你知道,他最近抱怨的事情很多,就是……你知道,冷静点,别再抱怨了。

迈克·芬格 :所以……他今年打得非常出色。

汤姆·奥斯本 :是的,但这有点像他的惯常做法。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :嗯,我最近也抱怨很多,所以也许我能感同身受。

汤姆·奥斯本 :但你的抱怨是合情合理的。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :啊,那倒是。那倒是。他们把菠萝放在我的披萨上了。

迈克·芬格 :你对马刺的进攻,以及整体情况有什么看法?你看看过去几周的趋势,他们的得分不如以前了。效率数据在下降。值得注意的是,防守却保持了——如果不是提升了的话——赛季初的统治力。就像是,防守还在,他们只是最近似乎打了很多“肉搏战”。不再是我们在11月和12月大部分时间里看到的那种“美丽篮球”式的胜利。他们……他们在和对手缠斗,防守大部分时间都在线,但进攻得分和效率都不如从前了。我……我想知道,杰夫,你过去几天都和球队在一起,那边的计划是什么?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :嗯,首先是要诊断问题出在哪里,嗯,这可能有点像先有鸡还是先有蛋的问题,但你从宏观、鸟瞰的视角首先注意到的是,你之前提到的那些后卫,德阿龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox),尤其是斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle) 和迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper),没有像12月份时那样造成同样的破坏力了,那时候马刺正处于八连胜,三次击败雷霆,所有人都想把他们封为下一个三巨头之类的。嗯,他们一直非常低效。斯蒂芬·卡斯尔一直非常低效。迪伦·哈珀似乎撞上了所谓的新秀墙。他们不像那个阶段那样能够随心所欲地杀入内线。我认为随着赛季的进行,对手们已经适应了这些球员的打法。我认为这些球员,尤其是年轻球员,已经筋疲力尽了。我认为旅行太多,比赛太多了。嗯,我们已经详细讨论过。我认为他们有点撞上了所谓的赛季“疲劳期”。我认为很多年轻球员都会经历这个阶段。他们只需要坚持挺过去。我们一直在和很多球员谈论这个。

所以一旦……但是,另一方面是他们投不进三分球。就像如果这两件事中有一件能做到,我认为局面就会豁然开朗一些。嗯,我无法判断他们是由于后卫无法很好地杀入内线导致三分出手机会不好而投不进,还是因为三分投不进导致后卫无法很好地杀入内线。但过去一个月的三分球表现相当糟糕。而那……那是我觉得,我们赛季初就预料到的,然后他们开始了这个赛季,就像他们有一些球员开局火热,比如哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes) 简直是百分百先生。而且,你知道,朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie),他状态起伏不定,当时正处于上升期。还有德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell) 有过几场重要的比赛,而他现在缺阵,这对球队没有帮助。嗯,但现在他们的三分球表现有点回归到他们……他们有点回归均值了。所以这有点……当你在这个时代投不进三分球时,其他所有事情都会变得困难得多。所以要么是……是这些因素的结合。我知道进攻是相辅相成的。你投进外线投篮,内线的机会……就会出现。你杀入内线,就会为外线投篮创造机会。而现在这两方面都失灵了,得分就像一场肉搏战。

汤姆·奥斯本 :是的,凯尔特人明显放空了那些球员去夹击文班。所以,是的,我的意思是就像你说的,这影响了一切,这也基本上就是为什么他在波士顿的上半场打得很挣扎。他们就是……他们就是放空了卡斯尔、哈珀,然后……大量夹击文班。

迈克·芬格 :在杰夫那段分析马刺进攻困境的精彩独白中,我本想问他伟大的马努·吉诺比利 (Manu Ginobili) 会对此说些什么,结果他……他在中间自己就用上了。他抢先我一步。马努总是谈论“均值回归”,而杰夫把它悄悄地加了进去,就像……这个播客的马努·吉诺比利。干得漂亮,先生。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :谢谢。我的意思是,因为他们可能是一支命中率在30%左右的球队。所以如果他们一个月能投出40%的命中率,他们可能也会有一个月投出20%的命中率。而我们现在就处在这个阶段。他们这一个月投出了20%的命中率。

迈克·芬格 :这就引出了一个事实,如果你不能指望他们保持赛季初的三分球命中率——那超出了预期,也可能超出了对这支球队应有表现的现实期望——那么你就需要在你的强项上更加稳定,这就是你所说的冲击篮筐和从你的持球冲击型后卫那里得到更多。是的,那两个家伙,我说的是斯蒂芬·卡斯尔和迪伦·哈珀,他们进入联盟还不到……怎么说,16个月。嗯,他们都是年轻人,经历低谷是正常的。但我认为你可以期待他们在那里取得更多的进步,更多的上升,而不是期望每个人都再次开始投出40%的三分命中率。是的。嗯,因为我不认为这支球队会成为一支三分命中率40%、38%、37%的球队。嗯,如果他们能做到那就太好了,但这等于要求太多球员投出比他们以往任何时候都好的表现。这可能会让你想到一些问题,比如他们是否应该增加更多能投三分的球员,嗯,在未来。但我认为,如果你要在未来一天、一周、一个月内寻找这支球队的进步,嗯,我认为进步更有可能来自于那些后卫变得更像马刺希望他们成为的样子,而不是每个人都再次投出40%的三分命中率。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :我认为说到三分球投射,情况就是我们赛季开始时所想的那样。要想进入下一个层次,他们必须增加更稳定的三分投射。无论是在今年的交易截止日前还是在夏天,嗯,这都是一个必须解决的问题。我认为每个人也都知道这一点。我不认为他们投不进三分,达不到他们需要的命中率,这对管理层来说是个意外。但是他们……他们需要那种球员,似乎每支和马刺比赛的球队都有这样的球员,就是……球传来传去,哦,到那个人手上了。好吧,这球稳了。嗯,今年有一段时间哈里森·巴恩斯是这样的人,但再次强调,期望他整个赛季都投出比以往任何时候都好的表现可能是不现实的。他们需要一个就是“那种”球员的人。嗯,我不知道这是否是现在交易截止日前能得到的。我不知道现在是否为时过早,或者这是夏天需要努力的事情。但他们需要……他们需要那样的球员才能实现下一次飞跃,我认为。当你谈论赢得季后赛系列赛之类的事情时。

迈克·芬格 :在考虑这个问题的时候,我敢肯定其他精明的马刺关注者也想过,但我……我不确定我见过太多讨论。嗯,这支球队会不会也很想念德文·瓦塞尔?比如,这……这是不是进攻看起来不那么好的部分原因?他会是那个提供投射威胁、让整个体系运转起来的关键棋子吗?还是……还是这夸大了他的重要性?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :不,我不认为他是……我不认为他是关键核心,但我认为当你经历某种进攻低谷时,拥有尽可能多的有机会打破得分荒的球员……是有帮助的。我的意思是,在整个赛季中有时候马刺会经历低迷,然后是……你知道,瓦塞尔投进几个12英尺的中投或者一些空位三分,稍微打开了局面。有时候是其他人,但我认为仅仅从……从……嗯,概率和百分比的角度来看,拥有更多能够打破得分荒的球员是有帮助的,这就是我认为他们想念他的地方。当你在比赛中段经历这些低谷,场上只是斯蒂芬·卡斯尔试图创造机会然后失误,或者……球员们投篮不中,或者只是……拥有一个德文·瓦塞尔,他是在场上某些位置感觉自己出手就有的那种球员之一。就像你可以为他跑一个战术,嗯,让他得到一个底线的12英尺小中投,他在那里感觉就像是稳进的。拥有那样一个球员,只是为了在比赛过程中打破得分荒,呃,他们确实想念这一点。我真的……我真的这么认为。我不认为他是整个进攻体系运转起来的关键核心或类似的角色,但他确实是其中一个缺失了的宝贵部分。

汤姆·奥斯本 :他投篮……我没想到我注意到他本赛季的三分命中率是38%,是的,大约是38%,这很不错。他越来越接近了。他越来越接近了。在波士顿,我和他聊了一会儿,他越来越接近进行二对二的训练了。所以米奇说他正朝着正确的方向发展。

迈克·芬格 :嗯,与德文缺阵相伴的是,米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson) 基本上自从瓦塞尔缺阵以来,一直在使用一套固定的八人阵容,而在赛季初,你看到的是10人,有时是11人。而且……我的意思是每晚都有八个人可以确定会上场。嗯,第九和第十个位置曾经是兰迪·沃特斯 (Landy Waters),曾经是凯利·奥利尼克 (Kelly Olynyk),也曾是杰里米·索汉,但并不固定。我认为当你的轮换阵容中只有八个人每晚都上场时,这对那八个人来说可能是个很大的负担。而且……我想这是在说,即使德文·瓦塞尔回来了,也还有一个位置是空缺的,如果马刺出去再引进一个轮换球员的话。他不一定非要是首发。他不一定非要是每晚打30分钟的球员,但我认为杰夫说的那种射手,那个能防守、当球传到他手里时能投进的球员,是有位置的。现在,他们能得到那样的球员吗?马刺能提供的筹码能换来那样的球员吗?我不确定。我们还有……什么,三、四周的时间,在交易截止日前就能知道了。嗯,但我认为如果马刺要在截止日前补强,那将是他们会瞄准的轮换位置。

嗯,就首发阵容而言,现在有一个位置由维克托·文班亚马填补,而且他显然会一直待在那里。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :嗯,除非他再次受伤。

迈克·芬格 :是的。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :但是的,计划就是这样。他……他回到了首发阵容,并且上场……一旦他的上场时间被允许达到接近30分钟的高位,让他首发就更容易了。我可以谈谈孟菲斯那件事,他们在比赛最后阶段,他们最好的球员在一场一分之差的比赛的最后三分半钟无法上场,因为——

迈克·芬格 :那就谈谈吧。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :因为他的上场时间用完了。嘿,他已经打了20分钟,这很难。很难……很难为一个球员分配20分钟的时间。如果你想一下,就是每节五分钟。现在你该怎么办?你是……是每节的前五分钟,还是后五分钟?你如何分配?而那场比赛,做他们所做的事情就很有道理了,就是他刚从小腿拉伤中恢复时,让他整整一节都不上场。现在你就是在三节里打20分钟。但是……但是我们和米奇在下一场比赛前谈过这个,不管那是在哪,我……我想是回到主场后了。他当时暗示他们又考虑过那样做,但他们不喜欢。尽管那次成功了,尽管他们赢了那场维克托只打了后三节的比赛,他们不喜欢那样对轮换阵容造成的影响。他们不喜欢维克托不得不在整整一节之后上场,米奇用的词是“比赛形成了自己的个性”,而米奇和维克托必须在一节之后上场,并想办法融入那个个性。这对维克托不公平,对其他球员也不公平,他们必须……你知道,想办法围绕他来调整。你知道,他们已经用一种方式打了一整节了。现在又来了……他们就是不太喜欢那种感觉。嗯,我想现在这不重要了,因为他的上场时间已经到了27、28分钟,并且还在增加。所以你不用那么担心了。把他的时间分配到……四节里更容易,你可以让他首发,让他收尾,就像……就像他们在……我上次在哪来着?我记不清了。明尼苏达。

汤姆·奥斯本 :嗯,嗯,然后在波士顿,你看到他在最后两分钟用那两个关键的15英尺投篮终结比赛。所以这是一个完美的……完美的例子,说明了当他在那种情况下在场上时你能得到什么。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :是的,但很多人都很好奇,你知道,在孟菲斯,你一分之差输了比赛,而你最好的球员只能坐在那里看最后三分半钟,你就是不打算偏离那个计划。而且一旦比赛进入……比如,那些都是管理层的决定。就像米奇……我想我需要大声说出来。米奇对此没有控制权。他可以控制时间的分配方式,但他得到的是一个数字。一旦比赛开始,到了最后三分钟,比如,他不能说,是啊,但现在是一分之差,我们无论如何都要让他上场。就像他根本没有那个权力,而且他职业生涯也还没到那个位置,可以就在比赛的关键时刻擅自行动,违背他得到的那个数字。所以你可以……你可以争论说时间本可以分配得更好,这样维克托在比赛结束时就能在场上,但问题是怎么做。嗯,所以就是这样。这不像……我要说,如果你还记得孟菲斯那场比赛是怎么结束的,乔克·兰代尔 (Jock Landale) 正在罚两次球,试图……我想是把孟菲斯的领先优势扩大到三分,结果他两罚不中。但维克托从板凳上站起来了,我知道这个是因为我们在孟菲斯有场边座位。在兰代尔准备罚第二球时,维克托从板凳上站起来,走到米奇身边。当时大概还剩15秒,他试图……试图说服米奇让他回到比赛中。叫暂停,让他回到比赛中。我想,我不知道,也许本该问问的,但我想如果乔克·兰代尔罚进了那球,时间停止了,米奇可能会叫暂停,让维克托在最后,比如说,16秒上场,执行最后一攻。但因为兰代尔罚失了,他们决定抢篮板然后尝试快攻,当你……当德阿龙·福克斯持球时,这并不是一个坏……不是一个坏策略。但德阿龙冲到底线,有点……有点无处可去,就……犯了个错,打出了一个糟糕的回合,比赛就结束了。但我认为维克托是想在可能的情况下回到比赛中,执行最后一个回合,而且我认为如果时间停下来了,他们可能会那么做。

迈克·芬格 :第二天晚上是主场对阵湖人,当我想到这个时,你提到了,因为我……我觉得这太有趣了。我本想提一下米奇说他们不喜欢维克托在那场杯赛中分配时间的方式,那场比赛他们……他们终结了俄克拉荷马城雷霆的16连胜,取得了也许是他们本年度最激动人心的一场胜利。我……我觉得他说“不,是的,我们不会再那么做了”这一点非常引人注目,尽管那次成功了。他们就是不想……不想继续那样做了。嗯,我想这有道理。虽然不想做一件成功过的事情有点奇怪。我……我理解他的观点。而且马刺在那场在拉斯维加斯的俄克拉荷马城比赛中确实一开始就大比分落后。那可能不会每晚都奏效。他们……他们只是遇到了各种事件的完美交汇,才让那次成功了。

而且,我们又在谈论一件可能不再重要的事情,因为维克托的上场时间限制已经取消,他又回到了首发。但我认为那很酷,在他们本赛季也许最令人难忘的一场胜利中,他们用一种我觉得很酷的方式做到了,他们……他们让维克托打了一场三节的比赛,而且……让他在比赛结束时在场上。而且……就像汤姆说的,当他在比赛结束时在场上时,关于凯尔特人那场胜利的结尾,有一件事让我印象深刻,那就是维克托在场上经历的所有高低起伏,弄清楚自己在场上的定位,弄清楚如何最好地部署他,嗯,投三分,后仰跳投,试图在篮下背身单打,试图接空中接力,嗯,试图成为一名后卫,试图成为一名中锋。就像马刺选中维克托·文班亚马时,一个7英尺4英寸的法国人,嗯,将要改变比赛。我脑海里有一件事,我想很多球迷脑海里也有,就是这是一个在比赛关键时刻,一个拥有……拥有跳投触感、技术、能做各种事情的家伙。这是一个你可以像把球传给蒂姆·邓肯 (Tim Duncan) 那样传球给他的家伙。而蒂姆在波士顿的背身单打位置可能比维克托更靠近篮筐。在波士顿的两次背身单打都是在罚球线延长线,15-18英尺的地方,然后就让他投出一个无法防守的球。那两次……在波士顿的那两球有点像后仰跳投,我知道那不是篮球场上命中率最高的投篮,但对维克托来说,它们的命中率相当高。

对我来说,那就像是一个顶点的体现:让人们尊重你的三分球,让人们尊重德阿龙·福克斯可能会在这里出手投篮的想法。让人们尊重你必须关注斯蒂芬·卡斯尔和凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson) 以及当时场上其他任何人的事实。让……让某个人一对一防守维克托,然后让那一投变得无法防守。

而维克托在对阵波士顿的比赛中做到了两次。而且……一次是在最后两分钟,一次是在我记得是倒数第二个回合。他都投进了。而且……我想他还会投进很多。

汤姆·奥斯本 :那是一个相当不错……相当不错的、面对一个七尺长人防守的……努力。

迈克·芬格 :是的。而且……他不会全部投进,但我……我想这是一个冗长、复杂……荒谬的说法,想说的是我认为马刺越来越清楚他们想如何赢球,以及在比赛结束时他们需要处在什么位置。即使他们没有赢得这些比赛,杰夫报道的那场在明尼苏达的比赛,就像我们谈到的那三名后卫打得不好,但是,如果我错了请纠正我,杰夫,德阿龙·福克斯不是在最后30秒投进了一个相当关键的球,给了他们一个短暂的领先吗?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :是的,他在最后阶段投进了几个关键球,是的,在整个下半场表现平平之后。

迈克·芬格 :我的观点是,这支球队并非像是在茫茫大海上迷失了方向,不……不明白在比赛关键时刻如何得分。即使在这些失利中,即使在这些不顺利的比赛中,他们似乎也清楚自己想实现什么目标,无论那是把球送到维克托喜欢的位置,还是让德阿龙·福克斯去做他们交易他来要做的事情。嗯,维克托在对阵森林狼的比赛中,在那个……在那个肘区跳投上,没有得到和对阵波士顿时最后那个回合完全相同的位置,但那仍然是他们乐于让他出手的一球。他只是没投进。而在另一端,安特·爱德华兹 (Ant Edwards) 只是打出了一个世界级的表现。

嗯,米奇对此非常生气。我想他认为可能有一个移动掩护,类似的事情。但是,呃,安特在对阵斯蒂芬·卡斯尔和维克托·文班亚马的挡拆中,他找到了自己的位置,投进了一个精彩的球。有时候你就是会输给全联盟级别的球员打出的全联盟级别的表现。而且,嗯,我……我认为——

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :是的,那正是凯尔特人前一晚所做的。

迈克·芬格 :完全正确。全联盟级别的球员打出的表现。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :嗯,比如回到维克托,当他被选中时,每个人都想要一个模板。比如他像谁?他……他能成为谁?他是……他是扬尼斯吗?他是这个吗?他是那个吗?我从一开始就觉得,他应该像一个7英尺4英寸的凯文·杜兰特 (Kevin Durant)。就像凯文·杜兰特但更高。是的。对我来说,我的意思是,就找到……就找到场上那些你可以投出无人能盖的跳投的位置,并做到出手就有。德克 (Dirk) 也有点那样。呃,而那正是我……那正是我看那场波士顿比赛时所看到的,他在……他在做凯文·杜兰特做的事情,就在那里。而且我想,请多来点这个。就像我知道他……我知道每个人都希望他7英尺4英寸,在低位,多扣篮,其中一些也应该被融入进来。呃,显然他能投三分,他也应该投一些。但对我来说,他的看家本领应该像凯文·杜兰特的中距离比赛。如果他能做到以凯文·杜兰特那样的命中率投进那些球,我……我认为……我认为对很多人来说,比赛就结束了。

迈克·芬格 :谁是史上最好的……谁是史上最好的中距离射手,基本上?是的。是的。嗯,那很好。

嗯,嗯,不,不,不,我同意你。但……但我试图表达的是,他不可能一上来就……就立刻成为那样的人。我认为过去两年半的时间让他越来越接近你所说的那样。而且他必须去……他必须尝试很多事情,他必须向防守展示很多东西,他必须让他周围的球队学到很多东西,然后你才能达到那种自动化的程度,即每个人都知道在这种情况下球会去哪里,而他们仍然无法阻止。对阵波士顿时,就是这样。对阵明尼苏达时,也几乎是这样。嗯,只是有时候你必须投进那些球。我……我只是试图在这里指出,尽管我们谈论了马刺的进攻有多挣扎,球队如何有点撞墙,有点累了,但在过去一周左右的时间里,仍然有一些积极的发展。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :从氛围上说,发生的事情是,我想可能就是12月的那一周,那10天,把人们的期望值设得比应有的要高了。而且理由很充分。我的意思是,你连赢八场,三次击败雷霆,终结俄克拉荷马城的16连胜。你当然会感觉在世界之巅,每个人都会想把你封为……你知道,下一个……下一个接班人。而他们只是回到了现实。他们回到了他们……我的意思是,如果他们没有……他们可能有同样的战绩,但如果以不同的方式取得,我……我不知道我们是否会如此……感觉像是坐过山车。

我的意思是,事实是,自圣诞节以来他们就没那么好了。就像那是他们本赛季至今的巅峰,就是圣诞节。他们……他们自那以后,我不知道他们是否打过一场让我觉得,“哇,他们这场比赛从头到尾都打得太棒了”的比赛。他们赢了一些我们可能没想到的比赛。他们也输了一些我没想到的比赛,但我不记得有任何一场像圣诞节那样的比赛。那简直就像是一堂大师课。而在他们作为一支球队成长的这个阶段,期望他们每晚都上一堂大师课可能是不公平的。所以我想如果你只是……如果你只是从……再次,从宏观的、3000、3万英尺的视角来看这支球队……他们排在西部第二,你看看他们的战绩,你只需要对他们的进步感到高兴,并意识到这不会是线性的。他们会有一些比赛让你……如果你是球迷,会让你想撕掉自己的头发,或者让你想,他们在干什么?进攻怎么了?或者……你知道,斯蒂芬·卡斯尔或者这个那个球员在干什么?但如果你看整个……整个球队的进步,他们远超任何人预期的进度。

汤姆·奥斯本 :我……是的,我会把“高兴”改成“欣喜若狂”。我的意思是,你……你正艰难地度过赛季的一个艰难阶段,同时……战胜了湖人,客场战胜了波士顿,你在背靠背的第二晚再次惜败给森林狼。我的意思是,是的,西部第二。我的意思是,那……那对于一支……这很磨人。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :真的,是的,真的就是……就是那……那……那12月的那10天让每个人都误以为马刺……你知道,是不可战胜的,他们不应该在主场输给犹他,他们不应该输掉这场或那场比赛。而他们就是会。他们在某些位置上仍然年轻。赛季就是会对球队这样。有赛程导致的失利,有……

汤姆·奥斯本 :这就是NBA,是的。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :是啊,是啊。所以我不认为这值得恐慌,但是,你知道,我能理解为什么……为什么人们的期望可能会有点失常。

汤姆·奥斯本 :失常。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :嗯,嗯,基于他们在圣诞节前对俄克拉荷马城所做的一切。我认为……我认为我们可能有点……有点得意忘形了。我知道很多,每一个现存的NBA播客,你知道,都想把他们封为下一个了不起的事物,而那是……

迈克·芬格 :还有别的NBA播客?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :我们已经玩过这个梗了。你不用再来一次了。

迈克·芬格 :好吧,既然我们在玩老掉牙的梗,我能……我能做我每周一次的关于一个从不上场球员的采访报告吗?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :是的,那……那就像你的专长,对吧?你写的关于不上场球员的专栏是最好的。你下次应该写一篇关于威利斯·霍尔 (Willis Hall) 的。他也不上场。

迈克·芬格 :我觉得那是个好提议。是个好主意。嗯,顺便说一句,我……我可能因此获奖。还有,呃,在我进入我的每周环节之前,体育编辑尼克·塔尔博特 (Nick Talbot),他一如既往地在收听并指导我们的播客,一直在催我,我……我说这个都忍不住笑,催我为奖项评选挑选我们2025年最好的播客。那……老兄,想到某个评委坐在房间里,听着杰夫·麦克唐纳、汤姆·奥斯本和我的插科打诨,然后决定这是否……你知道,这是否值得获奖?就像……你怎么评判?做笔记说他们这里本该提到这个,他们本该……那句话非常不专业。嗯,我不知道,老兄。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :哦,听着,我……我只想说我……我不……我不相信……我不……我认为艺术是主观的。我本来就不相信给艺术颁奖。你知道,但是……能被提名就是一种荣幸。

迈克·芬格 :我们被提名了吗?我想我们是自己在提名自己。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :我想我们是自己在提名自己。

迈克·芬格 :总之,回到每周……关于从不上场球员的环节,嗯,在一周前与卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant) 进行了一次非常非常好的坐下来访谈后,他被下放到G联赛打了一场比赛,但……正如汤姆在波士顿报道的,他仍然是马刺当前计划中非常重要的一部分。嗯,而且可能很快就会再次上场。嗯,上周有机会和播客的朋友迈克尔·莱特 (Michael Wright) 一起,在对阵湖人比赛后和杰里米·索汉聊了聊。而促成那次谈话的部分原因是他又和贾里德·范德比尔特 (Jared Vanderbilt) 发生了点小摩擦,其中杰里米还是典型的杰里米,说他们只是进行了一次友好的来回交流,而且……一个家伙情绪稳定,而他自己则非常快乐。这就是人们喜欢杰里米·索汉的地方,他就是成功激怒了贾里德·范德比尔特,而杰里米表现得就像在公园散步一样。但是……他非常直率坦诚地承认,是的,他无法不去想他在圣安东尼奥的时光可能即将结束,无论是在这个月交易截止日前还是在这个休赛期。他的上场时间不多了。他在那场比赛中上场了,他在孟菲斯的比赛中上场了,他在前一晚的孟菲斯比赛中贡献了一些不错的上场时间,虽然时间不多。但是……他有一段不错表现。他在对阵湖人时的表现没那么成功,但仍然做了一些不错的事情。我想自那以后,在这趟客场之旅中,他的上场时间……非常零星。他……他只是继续……在轮换阵容的边缘。而且……你知道,就个人而言,杰里米和媒体之间有过起伏,原因可以理解。但我……我确实认为他真的很想留在这里。嗯,而且……如果事情不顺利,如果他必须离开,而且他可能是马刺本月在交易中能提供的最具吸引力的筹码之一,嗯,那会有点伤感。呃,在别的地方,在一支有更多三分射手围绕他的球队里,对他来说可能更好,我认为他需要那个。我认为要让他融入,他需要不被期望成为那个三分射手。而在这支球队,很难再隐藏一个没有远投威胁的球员了。所以,嗯,你知道,他仍然是一个可靠的防守者。问题是,马刺的……他们的防守并不差。即使在他们撞上所谓的“墙”时,他们的防守仍然远高于平均水平。所以,呃,我们会看看结果如何,但他……他意识到了这一点。他继续保持积极。他继续是一个好队友。维克托·文班亚马对他和他的态度说过一些非常非常好的话。凯尔登·约翰逊也对他和他的态度说过一些好话。我们只能看事情如何发展了。但是,嗯,是的,如果你想知道他是否意识到他可能不会永远是马刺球员,他……他意识到了,并且仍然……在努力坚持下去。所以,这个环节就到这里。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :好的。那很好。是的。我……我确实……我确实很喜欢他和……贾里德·范德比尔特的小摩擦。那有点老派杰里米的感觉。那很好,它提醒了我,我……我……我有两个孩子。呃,一个快到青春期了,所以差不多是两个青少年了,那……那……那让我想起了他们。就像其中一个挑起事端,然后说,什么?我什么都没做。我只是……我只是过去看看他是否还好。你知道,就像……我就是喜欢他对那件事的反应。

汤姆·奥斯本 :这周在更衣室和卢克·科内特 (Luke Cornett) 坐下来聊他……他对喜剧的热爱,我玩得很开心。然后在波士顿,可能是我见过最有趣的致敬视频。呃,凯尔特人队在里面穿插了很多他的……不是穿插,大部分都是关于他的……庆祝动作、笑话和俏皮话,而且……看那个视频非常有趣。

迈克·芬格 :他们把他那个……我去年在那里看到的最搞笑的事情,就是他为年度人物奖竞选,反对德里克·怀特 (Derek White) 的那个……竞选视频,放进去了吗?

汤姆·奥斯本 :是的,他们……他们把所有东西都放进去了。那是个……那是个非常棒的视频。

迈克·芬格 :是的。杰夫刚才提到了他的孩子,他今天早上有一个非常好的……关于蓝天侦察兵的笑话,让我笑得很开心,我猜是我们……我们的朋友,波士顿凯尔特人队的乔·马祖拉 (Joe Mazzulla),在杰伦·布朗对马刺的判罚感到不满几天后,乔·马祖拉对……在凯尔特人最近一场比赛中的某件事感到不满,他……他在赛后新闻发布会上连续回答了六、八个问题,用的都是“非法掩护,非法掩护,非法掩护”这句话。这让杰夫·麦克唐纳说了什么?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :我不记得了,你读给我听。

迈克·芬格 :嗯,我手头没有,但我想是关于你和你的孩子睡觉时间的事?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :是的,那就像我睡觉时试图让我的孩子们放下他们的iPad一样。

迈克·芬格 :那很不错。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :是的,有时候,有时候灵感早上第一时间就来了。

迈克·芬格 :太棒了。好的。那么,我们接下来有一……一个重要的一周,一如既往。看看这里的赛程,在马刺今晚于俄克拉荷马城对阵雷霆——一场杰夫·麦克唐纳称之为不可能赢的比赛之后,这支本地球队将回到主场,在周四迎战扬尼斯·阿德托昆博 (Giannis Antetokounmpo) 和密尔沃基雄鹿队。周六在这里的霜冻银行中心再次对阵森林狼和安特·爱德华兹,力求复仇。然后在马丁·路德·金纪念日有一个下午场比赛,下午4点开球,对阵犹他爵士队,之后我们将在周二早上再次于我们的安全地点集会,进行下一期播客。

我们将看看,我们将看看如果马刺能越过那堵墙,他们是会继续打肉搏战,还是会找到解决办法。下次再见,照顾好彼此,保持真实。

由生成式人工智能翻译,译文内容可能不准确或不完整,以原文为准。

点击查看原文:Beating expectations and the Thunder

Beating expectations and the Thunder

Columnist Mike Finger and beat reporters Jeff McDonald and Tom Orsborn discuss if the Spurs can knock off the Thunder again and how expectations have changed for the team already this season.

Suggested reading:

Can Wembanyama stay healthy enough to win Defensive Player of the Year?

Can the Spurs make it four in a row over the vaunted Thunder?

Why there will be no more Sixth Man of the Year talk for Spurs’ Wembanyama

Will Spurs trade Jeremy Sochan? ‘It’s impossible not to think about’

3 Takeaways as Spurs fall in Wembanyama’s starting return

Here is the transcript of the podcast:

Mike Finger: From a highly secured network of top secret locations across the central time zone, this is the Spurs Insider. I am Mike Finger, joined as always by Express News Spurs beat writers Jeff McDonald and Tom Orsborn.

And at the risk of divulging Jeff’s secret location and at the risk of making this podcast obsolete by the time a lot of you listen to it on Wednesday morning, Jeff’s location is pretty close to a group of people and an opponent that has been the cure for what ails the Spurs so far this year. Will that continue? We’ll find out on Tuesday night.

But for the state of the Spurs, let’s go to Jeff McDonald. What’s going on?

Jeff McDonald: I thought that was a very enthusiastic intro. That was nice. I liked it. You do well right before we go on, you sound like you just woke up, and as soon as you hit 3, 2, 1, you’re automatically ready to go.

Mike Finger: I’m a professional, Jeff.

Jeff McDonald: There’s no— there’s no warm up. He’s a gamer. There’s no warm ups. You know, even Pavarotti’s got to warm up in a dressing room. None of that. You just go right into it. It’s great.

Mike Finger: I appreciate being appreciated.

Um, are are you in a city that’s going to cure what ails the Spurs? Are they going to be able to just turn it on like the host of the Spurs Insider podcast turns it on whenever the lights are bright, whenever the people are listening and watching? Are they going to be able to match my example, Jeff, against the Oklahoma City Thunder?

Jeff McDonald: I was gonna say, we could stop being cryptic. I’m here in Oklahoma City for the game that’s going to occur tonight. Um, this is Tuesday morning, so a lot of this will be obsolete. I just want to point out, every single prediction I’ve made in the Oklahoma City Spurs uh uh series so far has been wrong. I’m 0 for three in the way that the Spurs are three and 0. So, but uh, yeah, I don’t I don’t think they’re going to win tonight. So, I’ll put that on record now and and by the time people hear hear this, um, you know, they’ll they’ll know whether I was right or wrong.

Mike Finger: The hardcore fans listen on Tuesday afternoons after our uh our fine producer Monty Bot gets it up. So this this could be a pre-game podcast for the most devoted listeners.

Jeff McDonald: I just think—

Mike Finger: And they and they want to hear you, the the most devoted pre-game listeners want to hear you use the word that you’ve used three times before this season about Oklahoma City Thunder because they think that it it has to do, they think it’s good luck. So go ahead and use the word, Jeff.

Jeff McDonald: It’s just the Bart Simpson meme right now. Just say the word.

Mike Finger: Yes.

Jeff McDonald: I will. But first, I just think those poor little scrappy Thunders are due. Like they’re they’re tired of being bullied by the big bad bullying Spurs. You know.

Mike Finger: So what does that make this for the Spurs?

Jeff McDonald: And and the Thunder are playing well. You know, they’ve won three in a row. You know, they weren’t playing so well after the last time they met the Spurs on Christmas day. They went they went six and six in their next 12, but now they’ve righted the ship and they’re they’re back to being the big bad Thunder again. Uh, they’ve won three in a row. So I think this makes this game…

Mike Finger: Difficult.

Say it, say the word.

Jeff McDonald: Difficult. Um, uh…

Mike Finger: People wanted you to say another word.

Jeff McDonald: Unwinnable.

Mike Finger: Yes.

Jeff McDonald: It’s unwinnable.

Mike Finger: It’s unwinnable.

All right, I did it. I performed. I feel like a trained seal, but I performed.

Jeff McDonald: Where’s my fish? Where’s my tuna?

Mike Finger: [sighs] I don’t know. Um, are the Spurs struggling? Five and five over the last 10. I mean, by by the standards of the previous six seasons, they’re on a hot streak. By the standards of what we’ve seen from the local cagers over the previous two and a half months, this is uh this is this has been a part of the season where they’re starting to face some challenges, it seems.

Tom Orsborn: I was uh, I was just gonna say, I I, you know, they they they beat the Lakers at home, they they beat the Celtics on the road. You know, they lose close one in at Minnesota on the second night of a back-to-back. Um, I’m not, you know, if I’m a Spurs fan, I’m not complaining too much.

Mike Finger: I remember in our last podcast, I believe it was the wise Tom Orsborn who said that with the four games they had coming up, that they better win the one in Memphis last Tuesday night because the next three were going to be tough. And that’s the one they didn’t get. And they ended up almost getting the next three. They got the next two and were in control in Minnesota and looked like they were going to get the three that looked difficult. And uh things did not work out down the stretch against Minnesota. But all this all of this is to say is that they’ve been at their best against some of the best opponents. And uh if they’ve if they’ve taken some step backs in the more quote-unquote winnable games, um, I guess that’s just part of growing as a team and learning how to have the focus every night.

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, well that was, that was a great uh Victor Wembanyama quote after the Memphis game when they lost, kind of speaking to that and the way they play to the um, you know, played down or up to various opponents. And I’m trying to get it right, but the quote was along the lines of, you know, the the good thing is we find out that we can compete with anybody and look anybody in the eye. But the bad thing is we tend to look everybody in the eye. And I thought that was a great great quote, especially from a 7’4" man.

Mike Finger: Uh-huh.

Tom Orsborn: What were you trying to say earlier when when we were cutting you off so rudely as we so often do?

That’s all right. They um, um, yeah, the win in Boston, that was that was a good one. I was there for that one and it was it was a quality, quality win to say the least. Um…

Mike Finger: I heard the refs won it for them.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah, yeah, yeah. Sour grapes, sour grapes. Jaylen Brown, not too happy about the officiating in that game.

Mike Finger: That that is a season-long trend for the Spurs. I’m not sure people realize how big of an advantage that the local cagers have. And often times, like every NBA fan base in the country, like every sports fan base in the world, there’s a tendency for the fans of a team, the people who follow a team to think that their team gets a raw deal from the officiating. Um, the Spurs have a huge advantage in in free throw margin. I I believe it’s the biggest in the league, Jeff. And that makes a lot of sense with the way they play. Um, they have three guys in the backcourt who we’ll get into probably later in this podcast who like getting downhill, who like attacking the rim, who like getting to the basket. They have the the biggest matchup advantage in the league, I mean that literally in biggest in that he’s 7’4" Victor Wembanyama. He’s going to get a lot of free throws. The three guards are going to get a lot of free throws. They don’t take as many three-pointers as everybody else does. So it makes sense that you’d get to the free throw line more than say the Boston Celtics who shoot more three-pointers than just about anybody in the league. Like that makes sense that that disparity would exist. So I think in some cases it is Jaylen Brown, um, showing some some sour grapes there. Um, I I I understand that there were some calls that probably could have gone either way that the Spurs might have got a little more of advantage than they usually do. But all this is to say, I think most nights the Spurs are going to shoot more free throws than the opponent. And uh that has to do with uh making up the the the deficit that they have on three-point line. Does that make sense?

Tom Orsborn: Yeah, and the uh, before you get to that, the the great Dan Shaughnessy of the Boston Globe took Jaylen Brown to task, um, the day of the game in his column, just it wasn’t a column centered on him, but it was the notes column just saying, uh, you know, he he’s complaining about a lot these days and just, you know, settle down and stop complaining.

Mike Finger: So… He’s having a heck of a year.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah, but he’s he’s that’s kind of his MO.

Jeff McDonald: Well, I’m complaining about a lot these days too, so maybe I have some sympathy.

Tom Orsborn: But your complaints are legitimate.

Jeff McDonald: Ah, that’s true. That’s true. They put pineapple on my pizza.

Mike Finger: What do you think about the Spurs offense and the just in in general? You you look at the trend over the past few weeks, they’re not scoring as much as they used to. The efficiency numbers are dropping. What’s what’s sort of notable about that is the defense is retaining, if not improving upon, its dominance from early in the season. Like the defense is there, they’re just playing a lot of rock fights, it seems these days. It’s not the the beautiful game victories that we saw for a lot of November and December. These they’re they’re struggling with teams and the defense is staying there for the most part, but the the offense is not scoring as much or as efficiently as it once was. And I’m I’m wondering, Jeff, you’ve been with the team the last few few days, what’s the what’s the plan there?

Jeff McDonald: Well, the first part is to try to diagnose what’s going on and um, it could be kind of a chicken and an egg thing, but the first thing you notice just just from the 3,000 foot view, bird’s eye view, is those guards that you alluded to earlier, De’Aaron Fox, but particularly Steph Castle and Dylan Harper are not wreaking the same sort of havoc they were back in uh December back when the Spurs were on an eight game winning streak, beating the Thunder three times and everybody wanted to anoint them as the the next big three or something. Um, they’ve been very inefficient. Steph Castle’s been very inefficient. Dylan Harper seems to have hit kind of a rookie wall. They’re not getting into the paint as well at as at will uh the way they they were during that stretch. I think teams have adjusted to how those guys like to play as the game as the season’s worn along. I think those guys, especially the young guys are worn out. I think there’s just been a lot of travel, a lot of games. Um, we’ve kind of detailed that. I think they’re kind of hit hit kind of what they call uh the dog days of the of the season for those young guys. And I think it’s something a lot of young guys go through. They just got to push through. We’ve kind of been talking to a lot of the guys about that.

And so once the, but but the other part of it is they’re not making three-pointers. Like if one of those two things were were true, I think things would loosen up a bit. Um, and I can’t decide if they’re not making the three-pointers because the looks aren’t as good because the guards aren’t getting to the paint as well, or if the guards are unable to get to the paint as well because the three-pointers aren’t going down. But the three-point game has been pretty atrocious for the past month uh as well. And that’s that’s something that, I mean, we kind of predicted it coming into the season and then they started the season and like they had some guys that started hot, like Harrison Barnes was Mr. 100%. And uh, you know, Julian Champagnie, who’s been up and down, was was up. And uh Devin Vassell had some big games and he’s been out, that has not helped. Um, but now they’re kind of back to who they they’re kind of regressed to the mean three-point wise. And so it’s kind of um, when you can’t make three-pointers in this day and age, it makes everything else a lot harder. So it’s either it’s combination of that. I know you the offense works in symbiosis. You hit the outside shots, the inside shots um open up. You get into the paint, it opens up the the outside shots. And with both of those things failing right now, it has been like a rock fight to be able to score.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah, the the Celtics noticeably sagged off those guys to double double Wemby. So, yeah, I mean it like you said, it affects everything and that’s pretty much why he struggled in the first half in Boston. They just they just left Castle alone, Harper, and and uh doubled Wemby a lot.

Mike Finger: In the middle of Jeff’s excellent soliloquy there analyzing the Spurs offensive woes, I was going to ask him what the great Manu Ginobili would say about this and he he he used it in the middle of it. He beat me to it. It was uh Manu always talked about regression to the mean and Jeff slipped that in there just like uh the Manu Ginobili of this podcast. Excellent job there, sir.

Jeff McDonald: Thank you. I mean because they are probably a 30ish percent team. So if they’re going to shoot 40 for a month, they’re probably going to shoot 20 for a month. And that’s where we are now. They’re shooting 20 for a month.

Mike Finger: And that leads us to the fact that if you cannot count on them keeping up their three-point rate from early in the season, which was above expectations and probably beyond realistic, um, expectations of what what this team should be doing, then you need to be more consistent with your strengths and that’s what you talked about in terms of attacking the rim and getting more from your downhill guards. And yes, both of those guys, I’m talking about Stephon Castle and Dylan Harper, have been in the league less than what, 16 months. Um, they’re both young guys and it’s natural that they’re going to hit their their rough spots. But I think you can expect more improvement there and more of a of an upswing there than everybody starting to hit 40% from three-point range again. Yes. Um because I don’t think this team is going to be a 40%, 38%, 37% three-point shooting team. Um, it would be nice if they could do that, but that’s just asking too many guys to shoot better than they’ve ever shot before. And that could lead you into to questions about should they add more guys who can make three-pointers, um, on down the line. But I think if you’re going to look for improvement from this team in the next day, week, month, what have you, um, I think it’s more likely to come from those guards being more like the Spurs want those guards to be rather than everybody hitting 40% from three-point land again.

Jeff McDonald: I think when it comes to the three-point shooting, it it is what we thought it was when the season started. Like to get to the next level, they’re going to have to add more consistent three-point shooting. And whether that’s this year at the trade deadline or in the summer, um, it’s something that that’s going to have to be addressed. I think everybody knows that too. I don’t think it’s a surprise to the front office that they they can’t hit threes at the the rate that they need to. But they they need that guy where it seems like every team has them that that I watch watch play the Spurs. like the ball swings around and, oh, it’s that guy. Well, this is automatic. Um, for a while that was Harrison Barnes this year, but again, expecting him to shoot better than he’s ever shot before for an entire season is probably unrealistic. They need a guy that is just that guy. Um, and I don’t know if that’s something you go get at the trade deadline right now. I don’t know if that’s this is too soon or if it’s something you work on during the summer. But they need they need that guy to take the next jump, I think. when you’re talking about winning winning playoff series and things like that.

Mike Finger: While considering that question, and I’m sure that other astute followers of the Spurs have thought about this, but I I I’m not sure I’ve seen it discussed much. Um, could this team really miss Devin Vassell, too? Like is is is that part of why the offense doesn’t look as good? Could he be that key key piece that just provides that shooting threat and and makes the whole thing go or is is is that overstating his importance?

Jeff McDonald: No, I don’t think he’s the I don’t think he’s the lynchpin, but I think when you’re going through some sort of offensive slump, having as many guys as possible who have a chance of breaking that drought um is helpful. I mean, and there have been times throughout the season where the Spurs are going through a lull and it’s, you know, Vassell that hits a couple of 12-footers or hits some some open threes that kind of loosens the lid a little bit. And sometimes it’s been other people, but just I think just in terms of of um, just probability and percentages, having more guys who are able to break a break a cold spell is is helpful and that’s where they missed him I think when you’ve had these lulls in the middle of the game where it’s just kind of Steph Castle trying to make something happen and losing the ball or uh guys missing shots or just having a having a Devin Vassell who has, he’s one of those guys that does have spots on the floor where he feels like he’s automatic. Like you can run a play for him, um, to get him like a little 12-footer on the baseline and he feels automatic there. And to have that kind of guy just to break a drought in the course of a game, uh they they have missed that. I really I really do. I don’t think he’s the lynchpin to the entire offense that makes it go or anything like that, but he is a valuable piece of it that has been missing.

Tom Orsborn: He’s shooting, I didn’t think I noticed he’s shooting 38%, yeah, shooting about 38% from from deep this season and yeah, they which is good. He’s getting closer. He’s getting closer. In Boston, I talked to him a little bit and he’s getting closer to two-on-two work. So is Mitch said he’s trending in the right direction.

Mike Finger: The um, the thing that goes along with that is with Devin being out is Mitch Johnson is basically since Vassell has been out playing a consistent group of eight guys, whereas at the start of the year you were seeing 10, sometimes 11. and it’s I mean eight guys every night that you can be sure are gonna play every night. Um, that ninth and 10th spot has been Landy Waters, has been Kelly Olynyk, has been some Jeremy Sohan, but not really I think when you when you only have eight guys in the rotation who are playing every night, that could be a big burden on those eight guys. And uh, I I guess that’s a way of saying there’s a spot open if even if Devin Vassell comes back, there’s a spot open if the Spurs would go out and get another rotation piece. It wouldn’t have to necessarily have to be a starter. It would not have to be a guy who’s playing 30 minutes a night, but I think that there is a spot available for that shooter that Jeff is talking about, that guy who can play some defense and who when the ball is swung in his direction can hit it. Now, can they get that guy? Is that guy available for what the Spurs can offer? I’m not sure. We have what, three, four weeks to find out before the trade deadline. Um, but I think that is the spot in the rotation that the Spurs would target if they were to add someone at the deadline.

Um, the in terms of the starting lineup, there’s a spot now filled by Victor Wembanyama and he apparently is there to stay.

Jeff McDonald: Well, unless he gets hurt again.

Mike Finger: Yeah.

Jeff McDonald: But yeah, that’s the plan. He’s he’s back in the starting lineup and playing um, once you get to the high 20s, where he’s allowed to play in the high 20s minutes-wise, that makes it easier to start him. I kind of got where we can talk about the Memphis thing where they got to the end of that game and their best player was unavailable for the final three and a half minutes of a one-point game because—

Mike Finger: Go ahead and talk about that.

Jeff McDonald: Because they ran out of minutes. Hey, he was at 20 and that’s hard. It’s hard to, it’s it’s hard to divide 20 minutes uh for a guy. If you think about it, it’s five minutes a quarter. Now what do you do with that? Does did you did you it’s the first five minutes of the quarter, is it the last five minutes? How do you split up? And that’s the one where it makes a lot of sense to do what they did um when he first came back from the calf strain and just sit him for an entire quarter. And now you’re doing now you’re doing 20 minutes out of three quarters. But but but we talked to Mitch about that the next the next before the next game, wherever that was or I can’t I can’t I guess I was back at home. And he kind of indicated they thought about that again, but they don’t like that. Even though it worked, even though they won that game where Victor played only the last three quarters, they didn’t like what it did to the rotation. They didn’t like how Victor has to come in after an entire the what the the phrase Mitch used was the game takes on its own personality and Mitch and Victor has to come in after a quarter and figure out how to fit into that personality. And that’s not fair to him and it’s not fair to the other guys who have to um, you know, figure out how to fit in around that. You know, they’ve already been playing one way for an entire quarter. Now here comes they just didn’t really like how it felt. Um, I guess it doesn’t matter now because he’s at 27, 28 minutes and trending upwards there. So you don’t have to worry about it as much. It’s easier to divvy his minutes um between four quarters and you can start him and finish him um as they as they did in um wherever I was last. I can’t remember. Minnesota.

Tom Orsborn: Well, well then in Boston you see him finish with those two clutch 15 footers in the last two minutes. So it was a perfect perfect example of what you get when he’s on the floor in those situations.

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, but a lot of people were curious, you know, in Memphis, you lose the game by a point and your best player just has to sit there and watch the last three and a half minutes and you’re just not going to deviate from that. And once the game is under, like that that’s those are front office decisions. Like Mitch I got I guess I need to say this out loud. Mitch has no control over that. He has control over how the minutes are divvied up, but he’s given a number. And once the game starts and you get to the final three minutes, like he’s not allowed to go, yeah, but it’s a one-point game, we’re going to play him anyway. Like he just doesn’t have that authority and he’s not he’s not in the position of his career where he’s just going to go rogue and and in the guts of a game and defy what the the number he’s been given. So you can you can argue that they could have been divvied up better so that Victor’s Victor’s available at the at the end of that game, but how is the question. Um, so that’s that. It wasn’t like, I will say, if you remember how that Memphis game ended, Jock Landale was taking two free throws to um to kind of try to, I think it was to put Memphis up three, and missed them both. But Victor was up off the bench, I know this because we have floor seats there in Memphis. Victor got up off the bench while Landale was going to attempt the second free throw and came over to Mitch. There was probably about 15 seconds left and is trying to get him trying to convince Mitch to put him back in the game. Call timeout, put him back in the game. And I think, I don’t know this, probably could have asked this, but I think if Jock Landale had made that free throw and the clock was stopped, Mitch might have called timeout and put Victor in for the final, say, 16 seconds for for a final play. But because Landale missed, they decided to get the rebound and try to go, which isn’t a bad, isn’t a bad uh strategy when you’ve got uh De’Aaron Fox with the ball in his hands. But De’Aaron got down there and kind of didn’t didn’t have anywhere to go and just kind of made a mistake, made a bad play and the game was over. But I think Vic was trying to get back into that game if he could for a final possession, and I think they might have done it if if the clock had stopped.

Mike Finger: The next night was Lakers at home and you brought while I was thinking about this, you did bring this up because I I I found it so interesting. I was going to bring it up about Mitch talking about how they did not like the way they divvied up Victor’s minutes in the cup in which they they knocked off, they ended Oklahoma City’s 16-game winning streak and got maybe their most rousing victory of the year. And I I found that so striking that he said, now, yeah, we’re not going to do that anymore even though it worked. It was just something that they didn’t want to they didn’t want to continue that. Um and I guess it makes sense. It’s it’s weird though to not want to do something that worked. I I understand the point. And the Spurs did get out to a big deficit in that Oklahoma City game in in Las Vegas. It it probably wouldn’t have worked every night. They they had the right sort of confluence of events to make it pay off.

And again, we’re talking about something that that probably will not be relevant anymore because Victor’s minutes restrictions are gone and he’s a starter again. But I thought that was a really cool, in in maybe their most memorable victory of the season, they they pulled that off in a way that I thought was so cool and that they they made Victor play a three-quarter game and uh and had him on the court at the end. And uh as Tom said, when he’s on the floor at the end of games, a a thing that stood out to me about the end of the Celtics victory is for everything that Victor has gone through high and low in terms of figuring out what he is on the court, figuring out how he’s best deployed, um, shooting three-pointers, fadeaways, trying to post up at the rim, trying to get lobs, um, trying to be a guard, trying to be a center. Like when the Spurs drafted Victor Wembanyama, 7’4" Frenchman, um, going to change the game. One thing that I had in my head, and I think a lot of fans had in their head, was this is a guy who when the game is on the line, a guy with with a with jump shot touch, with skill, with the ability to do all kinds of things. This is a guy you can throw the ball to in a Tim Duncan-like spot. and Tim probably posted up a little closer than Victor did in Boston. Both of the post-ups in Boston were free throw line extended, 15-18 feet, and just let him make an unguardable shot. They were the the the the two shots in Boston were sort of fadeaways, which I know aren’t the highest percentage shot on the basketball floor, but for Victor, they’re pretty high percentage.

And to me that was like the culmination of make people respect your three-point shot, make people respect the idea that De’Aaron Fox might take a shot here. Make people respect the fact that you got to pay attention to Stephon Castle and Keldon Johnson and whoever else is on the floor at that time. Make make somebody guard Victor one-on-one and then make that shot unguardable.

And Victor did that twice against Boston. And uh one was in the last two minutes and one was in the I think the second to last possession. And he made them both. And uh I think he’s going to make a lot of them.

Tom Orsborn: It was a pretty good pretty good contested uh effort by a seven-footer.

Mike Finger: Yes. And and uh he’s not going to make them all, but I I I think this is a a long convoluted um ridiculous way to say that I think the Spurs are figuring out more and more how they want to win games and and where they need to be at the end of games. And even though they’re not winning these games, the the game Jeff covered in Minnesota, like we talked about the three guards not having a great game, but didn’t, correct me if I’m wrong Jeff, but didn’t De’Aaron Fox hit a pretty big shot in the last 30 seconds there to give them a brief lead?

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, he hit a couple big shots down the stretch, yeah, after being being pretty middling the entire second half.

Mike Finger: It’s not like my my point is it’s not like this team has just been lost at sea and and and not understanding how to score when the game’s on the line. Even in these losses, even in these games that haven’t gone well, it seems like they have an idea of what they’re trying to accomplish, whether that’s getting the ball to Victor in the spots where he likes it or letting De’Aaron Fox do exactly what they traded for him to do. Um, there was another Victor didn’t have quite the same position against the Timberwolves on that uh on that elbow jumper um in in on the last possession that he had against Boston, but it was still a shot that they liked him taking. He just didn’t make it. And at the other end, Ant Edwards just made an all-world play.

Um, Mitch was really upset about it. I think he thought there might have been a moving screen, something like that. But uh, Ant was in a pick and roll against Steph Castle and Victor Wembanyama, and he got to his spot and made a heck of a shot. And sometimes you’re going to lose to all-league players making all-league plays. And um, I I think—

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, that’s what that’s what the Celtics did the night before.

Mike Finger: Exactly. All-league player making it.

Jeff McDonald: Um, like going back to Vic, like when he was drafted, everybody wants a comp. Like who who’s he like? What what could he be? And is he is he Giannis? Is he this? Is he that? And I always thought from the beginning, he should be like a 7’4" Kevin Durant. Like Kevin Durant but taller. Yeah. And to me, I mean, get those, just find that those spots on the floor where you can make a jumper that nobody can block and be automatic at it. Dirk was kind of that way too. Uh, and that’s what that’s what I that’s what I saw watching into that Boston game was he’s he’s doing the Kevin Durant stuff um right there. And I think I’m more of that, please. Like I know he I know everybody wants him to be sev- 7’4" and in the post and dunk a lot, and some of that should be incorporated too. Uh, obviously he can make three-pointers and he should take some of those. But to me, his bread and butter should be like Kevin Durant mid-range game. And if he can get to where he can make those at a Kevin Durant-like clip, I I think I think it’s game over for a lot of people.

Mike Finger: Which who’s the best who’s the best mid-range shooter of all time, basically? Yes. Yes. Well, that’s good.

Um, um, no, no, no, I agree with you. But but I think what I was trying to get at is he couldn’t have come in and and just been that right away. I think that the the last two and a half years have led to him getting closer and closer to being exactly what you said. And that he had to go he had to try a lot of things, and he had to show defenses a lot of things, and he had to let the team around him learn a lot of things before you can get to the point where it’s automatic, where everybody knows where the ball’s going in these situations and they still can’t stop it. And against Boston, that’s the way it worked. Against Minnesota, that’s the way it almost worked. Um, just sometimes you have to make the shots. I I’m just trying to uh to point out here that even though we talked about how much the Spurs offense is struggling and how the team is hitting kind of a wall and and kind of getting tired, there still been some positive developments over the past week or so.

Jeff McDonald: what’s happened what’s happened vibes-wise is just, I think probably that week, those 10 days in December probably set expectations higher than they probably needed to be. And for good reason. I mean, you win eight in a row, you beat the Thunder three times, you end Oklahoma City’s 16-game winning streak. Of course you’re going to be on top of the world and everybody’s going to want to anoint you as the um, you know, the the the next in line. And they’ve just come back down to Earth. They’re back to who they I mean, if they had not had the they could have the same record but it came in a different way and we I don’t know that we would be so um, it would feel like such a roller coaster.

I mean, the truth of the matter is they haven’t been as they they haven’t been as good since Christmas Day. Like they have that was like the zenith of their season so far was Christmas Day. They they have not, I don’t know that they played a game since then where I was like, wow, they just played that game like awesome start to finish. They’ve won some games we didn’t maybe think they were going to win. They’ve lost some games that I didn’t think they were going to lose, but I don’t remember just a Christmas Day-like game. Like that was just like a master class. And it’s probably not fair to expect them to have a master at this point in their growth as a team to have a master class every night. So I think if you just if you just think about it from from again, the the 3,000, 30,000 foot view of what this team like it they’re second place in the West, you look at their record, like you just have to be happy with the progress and realize it’s not going to be linear. They’re going to have some games that make you want to tear your hair out if you’re a fan or make you wonder, what are they doing? What’s going on with the offense? Or what does, you know, Steph Castle or this guy or that guy doing? But if you look at the entire progress of the of the team, like they’re way ahead of schedule of where anybody thought they were going to be.

Tom Orsborn: I I would yeah, I would change happy to elated. I mean, you’re you’re grinding through a tough, you’re grinding through a tough part of the season with with a a win over the Lakers, a win at Boston, you barely lose to the to the Timberwolves again on the second of a back-to-back. I mean, and yeah, second in the West. I mean, that’s that’s pretty damn good for a team that… it’s a grind.

Jeff McDonald: It’s really, yeah, it’s really just that that that that that those 10 days in December just tricked everybody into thinking the Spurs, you know, are unbeatable and they shouldn’t lose to Utah at home and they shouldn’t lose this game or that game. And they just are. They’re still young and in spots. The season does that to teams. There’s schedule losses, there’s…

Tom Orsborn: That’s the NBA, yeah.

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, yeah. So I don’t think it’s cause for panic, but you know, I can understand why why people’s expectations might have gotten a little out of whack.

Tom Orsborn: Out of whack.

Jeff McDonald: Um, um, based on what they did against Oklahoma City leading up to Christmas Day. I think the I think we probably got a little little over our skis. I know a lot, every NBA podcast in existence, you know, wanted to anoint them as the the next best thing and it was…

Mike Finger: They’re other NBA podcasts?

Jeff McDonald: We’ve already had we’ve already done this bit. You don’t have to do it again.

Mike Finger: Well, since we’re doing old tired bits, can I can I do my weekly report on an interview with a guy who never plays?

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, that that’s gonna that’s like your forte, right? You wrote the you write the best columns on dudes that do not play. You ought to do one on Willis Hall next. He also doesn’t play.

Mike Finger: I think that’d be a good call. That’s a good idea. Um, by the way, I I could win an award for that. Also, uh before I get into my weekly segment, like uh sports editor Nick Talbot, who’s listening as he always does guiding our guiding our podcast, has been pressing me to, I can’t even say this without laughing, to choose our best podcasts of 2025 for award submission. And that man, that’s the thought of like a judge sitting in a room somewhere listening to Jeff McDonald and Tom Orsborn and I do our shtick and deciding is this, you know, is is this worthy of award consideration? Like how how are you gonna judge taking notes like they should have mentioned this here, they should their well that line was very unprofessional. Um I don’t know, man.

Jeff McDonald: Oh, look, I I just have to say I don’t I don’t I don’t believe in I don’t I think art is subjective. I don’t believe in giving awards for art anyway. You know, but but it’s an honor just to be nominated.

Mike Finger: Are we nominated? We’re nominating ourselves, I think is what’s happening.

Jeff McDonald: I think we’re nominating ourselves.

Mike Finger: Anyway, back to the weekly uh segment about the guy who never plays, um a week after a very, very nice sit-down interview with Carter Bryant who got sent down to the G-League for a game, but is is still very much part of the Spurs present plans, as Tom reported in Boston. Um, and probably will be playing again soon. Um, got a chance to talk along with friend of the podcast Michael Wright to Jeremy Sohan after the Lakers game on last week. And part of what precipitated that was he got into another little deal with Jared Vanderbilt in which Jeremy was typically Jeremy, talking about how he just had a friendly back and forth and that uh one guy was emotionally stable and he was quite joyful. And that’s what people love about Jeremy Sohan and that he just got under the skin of Jared Vanderbilt and Jeremy acted like he was taking a walk in the park. But uh he he was very blunt and candid about the fact that yes, he has been unable to not think about the fact that his time in San Antonio might be coming to an end, whether it is this month before the trade deadline or this off season. He’s not playing as much. He played in that game, he played in the Memphis game, he he gave some good minutes in that Memphis game the night before, it wasn’t a lot of minutes. But uh he had a nice little stint. He had a less successful stint against the Lakers but still did some good things. I think since then on this road trip, he’s it’s been very sparing. He’s he just continues to um to be on the margins when it comes to the rotation. And um you know, just speaking personally, there’s been ups and downs with Jeremy with the media for understandable reasons. But I I I do think he really wants to be here. Um and I it’s it’s it’s if it does not work out and if he has to go, and he might be the most attractive one of the most attractive pieces the Spurs have to offer in a trade this month, um it’ll be a little sad. Uh it might be better for him somewhere else to fit on a team with more three-point shooting around him, which I think he needs. I think for him to fit in, he needs to not be expected to be the three-point shooter. And on this team, it’s just hard to hide another player who isn’t a threat from the arc. And so, um you know, he continues to be a solid defender. The problem is like the Spurs just their defense isn’t hurting. Their defense continues to be well above average even when they’ve hit their so-called wall. So, uh we’ll see how it works out, but he’s he’s aware of it. He is continuing to be positive. He continues to be a good teammate. Victor Wembanyama has had some really, really nice things to say about him and his attitude. Keldon Johnson said some nice things to say about him and his attitude. We’ll just see how it works out. But, um, yes, if if you’re wondering if he’s aware that he might not be a Spur forever, he is he is aware of that and still uh trying to plug through. So, there’s that segment.

Jeff McDonald: All right. That was good. Yeah. I I did I did enjoy the little uh dust up with uh Jared Vanderbilt. That was kind of old school Jeremy. That was nice and it reminded me, I have uh I have I have two kids. Uh one’s about to be a teenager, so almost two teenagers and that that that reminded me of them so much. Like one of them instigating something and being like, what? I didn’t do anything. I was just I was just over there seeing if he was okay. You know, like I was I just loved his reaction to that.

Tom Orsborn: I had fun sitting down with Luke Cornett, uh, in the locker room this week to talk about his, uh, love of comedy and then in Boston, probably the most entertaining tribute video I’ve ever seen. Uh, Celtics sprinkled in a lot of his, didn’t sprinkle in, most of it was on his, uh, celebrations and jokes and quips and, uh, it was quite entertaining to watch that.

Mike Finger: Did they include his one— the funniest thing I saw up there when we were up there last year was the uh the campaign video that he did against Derek White for Man of the Year.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah, they they had everything in there. It was it was it was a really good video.

Mike Finger: Yeah. Jeff had a Jeff was mentioning his kids, he had a really good um, blue scout sky joke this morning that that made me chuckle a lot where I guess our our friend Joe Mazzulla of the uh Boston Celtics was was upset after a couple days after Jaylen Brown was upset about the officiating against the Spurs, Joe Mazzulla was upset about something in the in the in the Celtics most recent game where every he answered every question, like six, eight in a row in his postgame press conference with the phrase illegal screen, illegal screen, illegal screen. And that led Jeff McDonald to say what?

Jeff McDonald: I don’t remember, you read it to me.

Mike Finger: Well, I don’t have it in front of me, but I think that something about you and your kids at bedtime?

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, that’s me trying to get my kids off their iPads at bedtime.

Mike Finger: That’s pretty good.

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, sometimes, sometimes it come to me first thing in the morning.

Mike Finger: That’s great. All right. Well, we have a a big week ahead, as we always do. Looking at the schedule here, after the Spurs face the Thunder in Oklahoma City tonight in a game that Jeff McDonald called unwinnable, the local cagers return home for a game against Giannis Antetokounmpo and the Milwaukee Bucks on Thursday. Back against the Timberwolves and Ant Edwards trying to get revenge on Saturday here at the Frost Bank Center and a Martin Luther King Day matinee, a 4:00 PM start against the Utah Jazz on Monday before we convene again at our secure locations on Tuesday morning for the next podcast.

We’ll see how, we’ll see what happens if the Spurs can get past that wall, if they can continue to have rock fights, or if they figure it all out. Until next time, take care of each other and keep it real.