By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-11-30 07:40:12
这无疑是他们本赛季最重磅的一场胜利，圣安东尼奥马刺队最终以139-136的比分击败了丹佛掘金队。这场胜利不仅为马刺锁定了C组头名，也让他们成功晋级NBA杯锦标赛。
第三节一度落后18分之多，但马刺队上演了惊天逆转。他们的进攻端火力全开，防守也及时提升了强度。关键时刻，圣安东尼奥命中多记决定性投篮，最终惊险地拿下这场令人印象深刻的胜利。
数据统计：马刺 vs 掘金
马刺 vs 掘金 – 最终评分
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
优点：福克斯送出12次助攻，其中8次直接转化为三分球。他的组织串联贯穿全场，并且在保护球方面做得很好。得分方面，他通过迅猛的突破冲击篮筐，也创造了大量高质量的投篮机会。防守端，福克斯表现不算特别突出，但基本守住了自己的位置。缺点：第四节，他6投仅1中，最终以一场低效的个人进攻表现收场。更糟糕的是，他全场只获得了三次罚球机会，还出现了一些不合理的强行出手。综合来看：对福克斯而言，这算是一场低于水准的发挥，但他的组织能力和传球为他挽回了相当一部分价值。
评分: C+
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
瓦塞尔命中了本场比赛最关键的两记投篮。在比赛末段比分胶着时，他连续命中两记三分球，为我们锁定了胜局。瓦塞尔在第四节独得18分，其中三分球4投4中。毫无疑问，没有他砍下的35分，马刺不可能赢下这场比赛。他从比赛一开始就手感火热，并一直保持到了最后。尽管他的出手选择并非总是最佳，但他火热的手感让我完全不介意他尽情开火。再加上强硬的防守，这无疑是瓦塞尔本赛季的最佳一战。
评分: A+
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯在三分线外手感挣扎，最终仅6投1中。然而，他通过其他方式弥补了这一点。他利用技巧在三分线内得分，传球比平时更好，防守强度也高于往常。马刺需要巴恩斯的投篮更准一些，但面对掘金，他已经做得足够好，仍然是场上的一个积极因素。
评分: B-
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼连续第三场比赛篮板上双。而且这些并非侥幸得来的篮板——他积极冲抢，在内线长人堆里奋力拼抢。尽管他全场15投6中的命中率不算亮眼，但尚帕尼通过10罚10中，贡献了至关重要的25分。他紧贴掩护跑位，出手果断，这为他赢得了更多罚球机会。我欣赏尚帕尼的防守和他展现出的整体拼劲。没有他的出色发挥，马刺赢不了这场比赛。
评分: A
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
科内特的表现有很多值得称道之处。防守端，他坐镇禁区，护框出色，在外线的移动也比平时更敏捷。进攻端，他的终结能力很强，并且正是他两次助攻瓦塞尔投进了那两记杀死比赛的三分球。科内特在攻防两端都打出了积极的表现，这是马刺在缺少那位核心球员的情况下仍能保持竞争力的主要原因。
评分: B
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊充分利用了他的22分钟上场时间。他的篮板能力持续作为其一大优势脱颖而出。他在篮板上的积极性似乎也点燃了队友们的激情。进攻端，约翰逊投篮精准，减少了失误，并始终保持着攻击模式。当他持球冲击篮筐时，几乎无人能挡——尤其是当他像本场对阵掘金时一样做出明智决策的时候。
评分: A-
杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)
我是说，嗯……我想这对索汉来说，算是朝着正确方向迈出的一小步吧。他的篮板抢得不好，很快就陷入了犯规麻烦，并且还错失了一些空位投篮机会。但他在防守端的韧性显而易见，并且在保持进攻流畅性方面做得更好了。然而，如果索汉想成为这支球队的长期战术拼图，马刺终究需要他能命中外线投篮并抢下更多篮板。
评分: B-
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
这是哈珀伤愈复出后的第二场比赛，他的状态看起来好多了。他不再像回归首秀时那样气喘吁吁，而是在撕裂丹佛队的防线。他展示了自己冲击篮筐的能力，同时也为队友送出了极为精妙的传球。哈珀的中距离投篮看起来非常柔和，决策也无可挑剔。哦，还有他的防守，简直是接近精英级别。他在15分钟内贡献了三次抢断，并打出了强悍的单防表现。
评分: A-
凯利·奥利尼克 (Kelly Olynyk)
奥利尼克表现得相当不错。他在马刺需要时命中了一记关键三分，并始终保持着进攻侵略性，为队友创造了更轻松的得分环境。防守对奥利尼克来说不是易事，但他努力拼搏，在防守端没有让对手轻易得手。
评分: B
林迪·沃特斯三世 (Lindy Waters III)
在他出场的8分钟里，沃特斯防守专注，并命中了一记三分球。除此之外，他的表现比较沉寂。
评分: B
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
布莱恩特则完全不是沉寂。他打出了极具存在感的6分钟，当尘埃落定时，马刺因他的上场而变得更好。防守端，他时而在外线飞奔协防，时而尽全力去防守约基奇。我喜欢他的协防意识，他在防守端展现的运动能力简直是肉眼可见的天赋。进攻端，布莱恩特命中了一记三分，并且出手依旧毫不犹豫。
评分: B+
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
面对掘金，约翰逊做出了许多正确的决策。事实上，他是马刺能赢下这场比赛的主要功臣之一。他在比赛末段的战术布置几乎无懈可击，轮换安排也相当合理。约基奇是不可阻挡的，但教练组很好地对他采用了不同的防守策略，让他不得不持续思考。干得漂亮。
评分: A-
由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Denver Nuggets – Game #18
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Denver Nuggets – Game #18
In what has to be their biggest win of the season, the San Antonio Spurs defeated the Denver Nuggets by a final score of 139-136. The victory clinched Group C for the Spurs and allowed San Antonio to advance in the NBA Cup.
Trailing by 18 points in the third quarter, the Spurs turned things around. Their offense caught fire and their defense stiffened up just enough. Down the stretch, San Antonio hit big shots to escape with the very impressive win.
Stats: Spurs at Nuggets
Spurs at Nuggets – Final Grades
De’Aaron Fox
The good: Fox tallied 12 assists, eight of which led to three-pointers. His playmaking was solid throughout and he did a good job of taking care of the ball. Scoring-wise, he had some speedy moves to the rim and got a lot of quality looks. Defensively, Fox wasn’t special but he held up reasonably well. The bad: In the fourth quarter, he was only 1-for-6 from the field to finish an inefficient affair. Fox made matters worse by getting to the line only three times and forcing up a few ill-advised attempts. Net-net: This classifies as a sub par outing for Fox but his playmaking and passing retained a healthy portion of his value.
Grade: C+
Devin Vassell
Vassell hit the two biggest shots of the game. With the score tied late, he hit back-to-back three-pointers to give the good guys the lead for good. In total, Vassell had 18 points in the fourth quarter, including 4-for-4 shooting from deep. It goes without saying that the Spurs don’t win this game without his 35 points. He came out of the gates on fire and never let up. While his shot-selection wasn’t always great, he was so on fire that I didn’t mind that he was letting it fly. Add in some hardnosed defense and this was undoubtedly Vassell’s best outing of the season.
Grade: A+
Harrison Barnes
Barnes had struggles from three-point range, finishing just 1-for-6 from range. However, he made up for those struggles in other ways. He used craft to score inside of the arc, he passed the ball better than usual and he was more intense on defense than normal. The Spurs need Barnes to shoot straighter but he did enough against the Nuggets to remain a positive force.
Grade: B-
Julian Champagnie
For the third straight game, Champagnie finished with double-digit rebounds. And these aren’t fluke rebounds — he’s crashing the glass and fighting amongst the trees. While his 6-for-15 shooting from the field isn’t much to write home about, Champagnie was able to tally 25 vital points by going 10-for-10 at the free throw line. He’s coming off screens tightly and he’s making quick decisions shooting the ball, which is leading to more free throws. I liked Champagnie’s defense and his overall effort level. The Spurs don’t win this game without a big performance from him.
Grade: A
Luke Kornet
There was a lot to like with how Kornet played. Defensively, he was stout in the paint, guarded the rim well and moved his feet on the perimeter better than usual. Offensively, he was finishing off plays well and he authored both assists on Vassell’s pair of dagger three-pointers. Kornet playing at a positive level at both ends of the court is a leading reason why the Spurs are able to compete without you know who.
Grade: B
Keldon Johnson
Johnson took full advantage of his 22 minutes. His rebounding continues to stand out as a major strength. His activity on the glass seems to fuel his teammates. Offensively, Johnson shot it straight, limited his miscues and remained in attack mode. When he’s going downhill, he’s tough to stop — especially when he’s making smart decisions like he was against the Nuggets.
Grade: A-
Jeremy Sochan
I mean, uh, I guess this was a small step in the right direction for Sochan. He didn’t rebound well, he got in foul trouble quickly and he passed up wide open looks. But his tenacity on defense was palpable and he did a better job of keeping things flowing on offense. Eventually, though, the Spurs need Sochan to hit perimeter shots and to rebound better if he’s going to be a long-term fit on this roster.
Grade: B-
Dylan Harper
In his second game back from injury, Harper looked a lot better. He wasn’t gasping for air like he was in his return. Instead, he was slicing and dicing Denver’s defense. He showed off his ability to get to the rack while also making the slickest of passes to his teammates. Harper’s midrange shots looked smooth and his decision-making was pristine. Oh, and his defense was borderline elite. He swiped three steals in 15 minutes and played strong one-on-one defense.
Grade: A-
Kelly Olynyk
Olynyk did pretty good. He hit a big three-pointer when the Spurs needed it and he kept his foot on the gas to make life easier for his teammates. Defense wasn’t as kind to Olynyk but he battled and didn’t give up much on that end.
Grade: B
Lindy Waters III
In his eight minutes, Waters was engaged defensively and hit a three-pointer. Otherwise, he was pretty quiet.
Grade: B
Carter Bryant
Bryant was anything but quiet. He played a loud six minutes and, when the dust settled, the Spurs were better off. Defensively, when he wasn’t flying around the perimeter, he was doing his best to defend Jokic. I liked his help on D and his athleticism on that end jumped off the screen. Offensively, Bryant hit a three-pointer and he’s remaining hesitationless.
Grade: B+
Mitch Johnson
Johnson did a lot right against the Nuggets. In fact, he’s a main reason why the Spurs won this game. His late-game playcalling was virtually flawless. His rotation made a lot of sense. Jokic is impossible to defend but the coaching staff did well to throw different looks at him to keep him thinking. Well done.
Grade: A-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk