By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-10-10 13:54:17
由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队以112-107战胜迈阿密热火队，将季前赛战绩提升至2胜0负，而热火队则遭遇失利，战绩跌至0胜3负。马刺队在比赛末段打出一波9-0的攻势，最终在迈阿密惊险取胜。圣安东尼奥将于周五迎来他们季前赛的第三场比赛，对手是犹他爵士队。
数据统计：马刺 vs. 热火
马刺 vs. 热火 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
在季前赛初期，文班亚马一直受困于失误问题。委婉地说，他处理球的决策还不够果断。尽管如此，文班亚马的传球看起来有所进步，并且他的武器库里显然增添了新元素。他现在并不依赖于三分球。这是一种永久性的改变，还是仅仅是季前赛的试验？我想我们很快就会找到答案。
评分: B-
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
优点：在缺席了首场季前赛后，瓦塞尔看起来活力十足。无论有球还是无球，他都非常积极。防守端，他也有一些令人印象深刻的拼搏瞬间。缺点：瓦塞尔的投篮选择有些随意。随着马刺队天赋的不断积累，他真的需要学会如何在进攻体系中打球。
评分: B-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊在两场季前赛中的表现确实非常出色。他的打法充满身体对抗性，而且他看起来和以往一样强壮。他将自己的失误控制在最低限度，并专注于发挥自己的优势。表现很棒。
评分: A-
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯是一名老将，所以他清楚季前赛没必要倾尽全力——而他的表现也确实如此。不过，从积极的方面看，很高兴看到他投进了几个三分球，并且在场上偶尔展现出了拼劲。
评分: C+
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
马刺本赛季将再次急需投射能力，而尚帕尼正试图证明自己能够提供这一点。对阵热火的比赛中，他三分球7投5中——其中有几个是实打实的高难度出手。只要他能在常规赛中保持接近这种水准的投射表现，尚帕尼就会一直留在轮换阵容中。
评分: A-
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
布莱恩特持球不稳，并且在攻防两端的决策都非常值得商榷。进攻端他有时不知道该做什么，防守端又偶尔会送出无谓的犯规。但是，天啊，他展现出的闪光点着实令人兴奋。防守端，他利用自己惊人的身材和运动能力终结对手的进攻回合。进攻端，他也开始展现出比外界预期更强的实力。当马刺队在这场季前赛中需要得分时，挺身而出的通常是布莱恩特。他的跳投看起来不错，并且似乎能够通过运球稳定得分。
评分: A-
亚当·弗拉格勒 (Adam Flagler)
弗拉格勒的身材或技术并不会让你眼前一亮，但他是一名扎实的球员，在奥斯汀（马刺发展联盟球队所在地）会很有价值。他战术执行力强，能用投篮为球队拉开空间，并在防守端展现出防守智慧。
评分: B
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
虽然只打过两场季前赛，但科内特的表现真的非常出色。他终结充满力量，篮板能力极强，阅读比赛速度快，并且能送出明智的传球。科内特能和文班亚马搭档吗？现在看来，这似乎是一种可能。
评分: B+
林迪·沃特斯三世 (Lindy Waters III)
沃特斯拥有教科书般完美的投篮姿势，并且打球充满韧劲。仅凭这两点，就应该能让他在球队中赢得一席之地。
评分: B
大卫·琼斯·加西亚 (David Jones Garcia)
在夏季联赛中，琼斯·加西亚看起来像一个高大强壮的后卫，能在场上随心所欲地到达任何位置。不幸的是，在真正的NBA级别对抗下，琼斯·加西亚显得身材矮小，运动能力也并不特别突出。
评分: C+
俾斯麦·比永博 (Bismack Biyombo)
我搞不懂为什么在2025年的一场季前赛里，比永博还能获得11分钟的上场时间。
评分: C
哈里森·英格拉姆 (Harrison Ingram)
英格拉姆可能是最引不起人兴趣的新秀之一了。他不是一个糟糕的篮球运动员，但在他目前的成长阶段，我看不到他有任何值得培养的优点。
评分: B-
米卡·波特 (Micah Potter)
波特能投三分。但能不能投进，就完全是另一回事了。
评分: C+
莱利·米尼克斯 (Riley Minix)
米尼克斯在六分钟的上场时间里没能展现太多东西。如果能给他更多时间就好了。
评分: 不予评级
斯坦利·乌穆德 (Stanley Umude)
乌穆德有几次处理球的思路是对的，但他的终结能力实在有待提高。
评分: 不予评级
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
除了前面提到的出场时间分配问题，我对约翰逊本场比赛的执教没有其他意见。
评分: B-
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Miami Heat – Preseason Game #2
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Miami Heat – Preseason Game #2
The San Antonio Spurs moved to 2-0 in the preseason with a 112-107 victory over the Miami Heat, who dropped to 0-3 with the loss. The Spurs finished the game on a 9-0 run to escape Miami with a win. San Antonio plays their third game of the preseason on Friday versus the Utah Jazz.
Stats: Spurs at Heat
Spurs at Heat – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Early on in preseason play, Wembanyama has had trouble with turnovers. His decisions with the ball aren’t crisp, to put it gently. That said, Wembanyama’s passing looks improved and he has clearly added elements to his game. He’s not relying on three-pointers right now. Is that a permanent change or just some preseason experimentation? I guess we’ll find out.
Grade: B-
Devin Vassell
The good: Vassell looked spry after missing the first preseason game. He was active with and without the ball. Defensively, there were moments of impressive effort. The bad: Vassell’s shot-selection was iffy. With the Spurs amassing more talent, he’s really going to have to learn how to play within an offense.
Grade: B-
Keldon Johnson
Johnson has looked really good in the two exhibition games. He’s playing a physical brand of basketball and he appears to be as strong as ever. He’s keeping his mistakes to a minimum and sticking to his strengths. Good stuff.
Grade: A-
Harrison Barnes
Barnes is a vet so he knows he doesn’t have to go all out in preseason — and it shows. On the positive side, though, it was good to see him knock down a couple three-pointers and hustle here and there.
Grade: C+
Julian Champagnie
The Spurs will desperately need shooting again this season and Champagnie is attempting to prove that he’s capable of providing just that. He hit 5-of-7 three-pointers against the Heat — and a couple of them were legitimately difficult attempts. Champagnie will stay in the rotation as long as he can shoot it anywhere close to this well in the regular season.
Grade: A-
Carter Bryant
Bryant is loose with the ball and makes highly questionable decisions on both ends. He doesn’t always know what to do on offense and will sometimes hack for no reason on defense. But, man, the glimpses are exciting. Defensively, he uses his imposing frame and athleticism to swallow up possessions. Offensively, he’s starting to show he’s better than advertised. When the Spurs needed a bucket in this preseason game, it was usually Bryant stepping up. His jumper looks good and it looks like he should be able to score consistently off the dribble.
Grade: A-
Adam Flagler
Flagler doesn’t blow you away with size or skill but he’s a solid player who would be valuable in Austin. He runs plays well, can space the floor with his shot and exhibits wherewithal on the defensive end.
Grade: B
Luke Kornet
It has only been two preseason contests but Kornet has looked really good. He finishes with power, rebounds extremely well, processes the game quickly and makes wise passes. Can Kornet play next to Wembanyama? It’s looking like a possibility.
Grade: B+
Lindy Waters III
Waters has a picture-perfect shooting stroke and plays with grit. Those two traits alone should allow him to make this squad.
Grade: B
David Jones Garcia
In summer league, Jones Garcia looked like a big and powerful guard who could get to any spot on the floor he wanted. Unfortunately, against true NBA competition, Jones Garcia looks small and not especially athletic.
Grade: C+
Bismack Biyombo
I’m not sure why Biyombo is getting 11 minutes of playing time in a preseason game in 2025.
Grade: C
Harrison Ingram
Ingram is about as uninteresting of a prospect as they come. He’s not a bad basketball player but I don’t see any strengths to build off of at this point of his development.
Grade: B-
Micah Potter
Potter can shoot threes. Making threes is a different matter altogether.
Grade: C+
Riley Minix
Minix wasn’t able to show much in his six minutes. More minutes would have been nice.
Grade: Inc.
Stanley Umude
Umude had the right idea a few times but his finishing of plays left a lot to be desired.
Grade: Inc.
Mitch Johnson
Outside of the aforementioned minutes-related issues, I didn’t have an issue with how Johnson coached this game.
Grade: B-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk