🎧 Spurs Insider️ 播客: 迪伦·哈珀领衔圣安东尼奥的梦幻选秀二人组

Spurs Insider Podcast, 2025-06-27 00:50:00

由生成式人工智能翻译,译文内容可能不准确或不完整,以原文为准。

专栏作家迈克·芬格 (Mike Finger) 和随队记者杰夫·麦克唐纳 (Jeff McDonald)、汤姆·奥斯本 (Tom Orsborn) 讨论了马刺队在选秀中选中迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 和卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant) 的情况,解释了他们为何在凯文·杜兰特 (Kevin Durant) 的交易谈判中划清界限,并展望了哪些自由球员可能会在七月来到圣安东尼奥。

建议阅读:

马刺队选中迪伦·哈珀和卡特·布莱恩特,收获良才

关于迪伦·哈珀你需要知道的五件事

马刺队不愿为凯文·杜兰特交易放弃未来

以下是播客内容:

迈克·芬格 (Mike Finger) :来自北美各地高度保密的顶级机密网络,这里是马刺队选秀后特别版《马刺内幕》。我是主持人迈克·芬格,一如既往地与我们的《快报新闻》马刺随队记者团成员杰夫·麦克唐纳 (Jeff McDonald) 和汤姆·奥斯本 (Tom Orsborn) 在一起。我得在播客开始时打断他们,因为他们俩关系太好了。他们正在谈论选秀、杰夫的纽约之行,以及迪伦·哈珀和卡特·布莱恩特。

我只想直接进入正题。杰夫,你在现场。你说曼哈顿那家酒店很不错。对于马刺队在2025年NBA选秀繁忙的第一个夜晚所做的一切,你有什么看法?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 (Jeff McDonald) :你知道吗?我已经报道了近20次选秀了,从来没有一位总经理在选秀夜后出来说:“哎呀,我们搞砸了。这次选秀对我们来说真糟糕。”这总是每年最乐观的夜晚。

但我认为,这一次他们不是在吹嘘。我想他们,我想他们确实做到了,如果马刺队能提前坐下来,规划一个合理的选秀方案,他们就得到了他们想要的两个人在第二顺位和第十四顺位。

显然,迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 是意料之中的事,因为马刺队在选秀日到来时仍然手握榜眼签。至于卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant) ——我向你保证,我今年某个时候会把他叫成布莱恩特·卡特,因为我老是搞不清他名字的顺序——马刺队原本以为需要向上交易才能得到他。他们在选秀榜单上将这位来自亚利桑那州的前锋排得很高。他们最终没有向上交易,但他还是落到了他们手中,这让他们感到惊喜,所以我想可以说他们昨晚得到了心仪的球员。这并非寻常的选秀夜虚张声势。这是实实在在的。

迈克·芬格 : 就像你用你那句饱经沙场的老练智慧开场独白时说的那样,每位总经理都这么说。每位在首轮第一顺位之后选人的总经理都说:“我们差点就交易上去得到这家伙了。”每位总经理都这么说。

然而,在这种情况下,你可以看到许多模拟选秀都预测卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant) 会在前十顺位被选中,或者至少在第14顺位之前。他有可能在马刺队第14顺位选中他之前就已经被摘走,这并非不可思议。

在某些方面,汤姆,我认为这次选秀的主题,或者说马刺队这次选秀的整体故事,是它有点像马刺队过去三年选秀新篇章的一个缩影,这些球员都是大家梦寐以求的,能够立即带来改变的球员。我认为迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 符合这个模式,他可能不是像维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 那样的建队核心,但肯定与文班亚马 (Wembanyama) 和斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle) 类似,现在又加上迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)。你知道,前五顺位的球员,被寄予厚望能立即上场发挥作用,成为扭转局面的关键人物。

然后是来自“老旧箱子”的选秀,就是马刺队在2010年代经常选择的那种球员,他们可能需要一些磨练,可能不会立即上场,但他们有能力让马刺队耐心等待,并在未来真正成长为一名球星。如果你观看了本赛季印第安纳波利斯步行者 (Indianapolis Pacers) 和俄克拉荷马城雷霆 (Oklahoma City Thunder) 之间的NBA总决赛,你会发现场上总是充满了能防守所有人并能投进三分球的球员。年轻的卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant) 正符合这个模式。他可能不会立即上场,但我认为杰夫说得对,他是一个非常适合马刺队、并能在未来发挥重要作用的球员。

汤姆·奥斯本 (Tom Orsborn) :是的。我只想说,步行者队代表的是印第安纳州,而不仅仅是印第安纳波利斯。

迈克·芬格 : 那么俄克拉荷马城雷霆队呢?他们不代表整个州,只代表这座城市吗?

汤姆·奥斯本 : 你说的是印第安纳波利斯步行者队。

迈克·芬格 : 是的。他们来自印第安纳波利斯。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 你说得对。我只是在逗你,迈克。

迈克·芬格 : 好的。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 但布莱恩 (Bryan) 也指出,我昨晚问他关于人们对哈珀 (Harper) 位置重叠的批评或担忧,比如与斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle) 和达龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox) 的后场拥挤问题等等。

他再次重申了他经常强调的主题:现在联盟是一个无位置篮球联盟。位置不再那么重要了。他们得到了两个非常全面的球员。我认为他们俩都能防守四种位置。卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant) 肯定可以。而且,他们对此非常满意。他们多年来一直都是这样做的。他们不看位置,他们选择他们认为能产出最多的最佳球员,而昨晚他们确实得到了两名这样的球员。在他们看来,是的。

迈克·芬格 : 是的。我认为无位置概念在防守端绝对适用。问题将出现在进攻端,因为当你拥有多个持球主导型的球员时,你就不能真正说它是无位置的,因为在比赛的关键时刻,总得有人持球,诸如此类。但我认为这很有机会对他们来说运作得相当好,杰夫。

在谈到哈珀 (Harper) 时,他是一个马刺队想要的球员。他也是其他球队想要的球员。在这次选秀之前,或者说在整个选秀季之前,有一个故事线,我想我们已经知道几周了,那就是马刺队会选择迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 并保留这个选秀权。但这个选秀权是其他球队想要的,其他球队曾努力尝试从他们手中得到这个选秀权,试图说服他们:“嘿,你们的球员冗余太多了,持球主导型球员已经太多了。为什么不向下交易呢?”

马刺队抵制住了。他们似乎真的相信迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 确实适合球队,并且他们保留了这个选秀权。你对此有何看法?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 他们是在押宝天赋,对此我非常赞同。我只是个无名小卒,我不是选秀球探,但当你和那些专业人士交谈时,他们真的认为迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 有机会成为一个非常非常特别的球员。他就是一个冲向篮筐的力量,而且不仅仅是凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson) 早期的那些年,他只是埋头猛冲。那不是迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 的比赛风格。他非常灵巧。

当你看到他的一些集锦时——我不想给这孩子施加压力——但他看起来有点吉诺比利式的 (Ginobili-esque),他能够巧妙地突破到篮下,灵活地绕过防守者,那种灵巧,那种脚步。他是一个篮球世家出身的孩子。我们知道他的背景,你知道,他父亲是罗恩·哈珀 (Ron Harper),五届NBA总冠军。他哥哥也在联盟打球。他真的把他的母亲视为家里的篮球奇才。她从他一年级起就在各种级别执教他。所以他是一个懂球的人。

而在场外,他也很,你知道,我昨天和这两位选秀球员都聊了,你不可能在和一个人聊五分钟后就了解他的一切,但你可以有所感觉,你可以得到一种氛围。这两个孩子都显得非常老练、自信自在。就像我们去年谈论斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle) 时说的那样,当你和他们交谈时,你不会真正意识到他们只有19岁。所以我认为所有这些因素都会对迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 非常有利。我认为他会非常适应。

我想他很可能就是那种如果你没有在榜眼签选中他,如果马刺队交易了那个选秀权,你在五年或十年后回过头来会意识到那是个多么愚蠢的决定的人。所以我认为他们做了显而易见、简单而明智的事情,选择了当时选秀榜上最好的球员。

迈克·芬格 : 有一种奇怪的氛围,一种现象,当你选了维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama),然后第二年又选了一个年度最佳新秀,而且你很久没有赢球了,然后你又手握榜眼签时,人们似乎忘记了拥有榜眼签是一件多么重要的事情。这几乎就像——我不想代表所有听众,我也不想代表所有马刺球迷——但似乎有一种不耐烦情绪。就好像对在选秀中又得到一个建队核心型球员感到厌倦了,你知道,我们,我们在这个播客里也曾犯过谈论凯文·杜兰特 (Kevin Durant) 的错误。外面有各种各样的交易,我认为这个夏天每个人都焦躁不安,可以理解地,希望马刺队能做出一个大动作,引进一名老将,并开始争夺赛区冠军和NBA总冠军。

这几乎是——也许只有我有这种感觉——你几乎会忘记,在如此人才济济的选秀中拥有榜眼签,是一件非常非常重要的事情。就像迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 一样,如果联盟中有多少其他球队昨天选中了迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 会立即期望他成为他们的建队核心,如果他不是已经成为了他们的建队核心?能得到这样一个球员是巨大的,巨大的成功。他只是碰巧加入了一支已经拥有几位未来建队核心的球队。但马刺队保留那个选秀权,抵制了杰夫所说的那些示好,我认为这是一个明智的长期举动,而且可能也是一个相当不错的短期举动。

我们可以谈谈这个。我们今天时间很充裕,就这支球队如何为2025、2026赛季做准备。迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 会上场打球。我不认为他会首发。如果我们想在这里开始玩“梦幻阵容经理”游戏,我仍然认为你会有达龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox) 交易后的那个首发五人组。我认为你会以福克斯 (Fox)、瓦塞尔 (Vassell)、卡斯尔 (Castle)、巴恩斯 (Barnes) 和文班 (Wemby) 作为赛季的开局。但哈珀 (Harper) 可以替补上场,作为第二阵容的核心打很多分钟。是的,我认为非常合理地认为这支球队明年会更上一层楼,汤姆。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 布莱恩 (Bryan) 昨晚也指出,他们还有些工作要做。

迈克·芬格 : 我的意思是,我们来看看阵容。我刚才提到了首发阵容。你们现在的替补。我认为你们有四名非常可靠的替补球员,你们可以放心让他们打很多分钟,他们是哈珀 (Harper)、凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)、朱利安·尚帕涅 (Julian Champagnie) 和杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sohan)。那里有四个人。明显的漏洞是尺寸。你们需要一个替补内线,你们可能需要两名替补内线。但我的意思是,杰夫,他们有九名球员,我觉得他们在一个轮换阵容中表现稳定。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 是的,他们现在正在构建这个东西。你大概能看到他们的愿景了。就像你提到的,仍然存在漏洞,未来也会有。我认为一些球迷感到焦躁不安的原因是,你必须意识到这个夏天之后,球队不一定就要成为一个完全体。你希望朝着那个完全体迈进,但他们并不是在这个夏天之后推出一个阵容,然后说:“是的,这就是我们现在要争取冠军的球队。”这不是它的运作方式。他们还有很多年可以来构建这个东西。他们正在接近他们所设想的愿景。所以我想,我想那,请继续。

迈克·芬格 : 说得对。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 我认为你会在自由球员市场看到他们寻求一些额外的尺寸。我认为你会看到他们寻求更多的投射能力。昨天的选秀中他们没有很好地解决这两个需求。我认为卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant) 可以成为你们的射手。我不确定他第一年就能做到,但我认为他们就是把他看作一个能投出40%三分命中率并防守所有人的球员。

迈克·芬格 : 他们喜欢很多那样的球员。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 所以我认为他确实有帮助。他最终会帮助解决那个需求。我不确定他第一年能打多少时间。但我想他们,是的,除了选秀之外,他们还有其他解决需求的方式。你仍然不必一次性完成所有事情。我知道球迷们现在就想要看到完全体,但我认为还需要几年时间。

迈克·芬格 : 就你所言,这个夏天到目前为止一直提醒着我们,他们将此视为一个长期项目,并且他们期望在未来很多很多年里都能保持竞争力。卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant) 正符合这一点。我的意思是,他不是那种能立即“即插即用”的球员,但当马刺队开始达到巅峰时,他可以发挥巨大的作用。让我们回到杜兰特 (Durant) 的事情上,因为我们在上次播客中讨论过。从那以后我们没有再见面。

结果有点像我们在那期播客中讨论的那样,我们当时提出了马刺队可能不会逾越的底线。如果你看看休斯顿火箭 (Houston Rockets) 为了得到他所做的交易,那笔交易略微超出了我们在播客中精确提出的报价,我记得大概是德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell) 和哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes),你知道,加上配平的薪水,德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell) 和哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes),再加上第14顺位选秀权,基本上就是这些。四枚(选秀权)可能再加一些次轮签,就能换来凯文·杜兰特 (Kevin Durant)。这几乎就是火箭队所做的。他们用杰伦·格林 (Jalen Green) 取代德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell) 做了小幅升级。杰伦·格林 (Jalen Green) 的身价可能更高一些。他们的选秀权是第10顺位而不是第14顺位。

马刺队本可以轻易地通过加入斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle),或者,比如说,亚特兰大老鹰 (Atlanta Hawks) 2027年的首轮选秀权,另一个未来的首轮签来超越那个报价。马刺队没有那样做,因为他们考虑的是长远发展。所以这笔交易最终达成了与更合理的球队——休斯顿火箭 (Houston Rockets)。你们两位有任何关于马刺队避开这笔交易,划清界限并着眼未来的想法吗?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 我认为交易凯文·杜兰特 (Kevin Durant) 对休斯顿火箭 (Houston Rockets) 来说很有意义,他们的重建项目比马刺队更进一步。他是一个可以,你知道,表面上可能让他们更上一层楼的球员,至少他们是这么想的。我认为马刺队现在还没有处于那个位置。所以这几乎是一个奢侈品,而你愿意为一个奢侈品付出多少呢?这不是必需品,而是一种想要。我认为这又是一个明智的举动。

因为这会让你付出斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle) 或者榜眼签的代价,我认为就他们正在构建的体系而言,他们对放弃任何一项资产都没有兴趣。而当这些都是明确的拒绝时,太阳队就会礼貌地回绝,然后继续前进。所以我认为,我认为这笔交易对火箭队来说有意义,对马刺队来说意义不大,我认为对这笔交易最有意义的球队提出了最好的报价。

迈克·芬格 : 是的。是的。我想我之前提到了,就是选秀顺位靠后的球队试图得到榜眼签的推动力。费城 (Philadelphia),或者任何其他球队,马刺队也抵制了这一点。而你也报道了,你认为哈珀 (Harper) 绝对值得费城76人 (Sixers) 提出的任何向下交易一个选秀权的报价。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 是的,我认为明智的举动是选择迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 并让他放手去打。

迈克·芬格 : 是的。听起来不错。汤姆,还有什么……

汤姆·奥斯本 : 迪伦·布鲁克斯 (Dylan Brooks) 走了。文班 (Wemby),我的意思是,他不是离开了联盟,但是,你知道,乌度卡 (Udoka) 用迪伦·布鲁克斯 (Dylan Brooks) 防守文班 (Wemby) 的那种防守,对文班 (Wemby) 来说有点痛苦,所以他不必再应对了。

迈克·芬格 : 这将是那场正在形成的宿敌对决的新特点。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 对,是的。

迈克·芬格 : 你不认为菲尼克斯太阳 (Phoenix Suns) 会像火箭队 (Rockets) 那样阻碍马刺队,所以文班 (Wemby) 可能松了一口气。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 是的,我喜欢迪伦·布鲁克斯 (Dylan Brooks) 在那场宿敌对决中的作用。我觉得那很有趣。

迈克·芬格 : 是的。雷霆 (Thunder) 队,我们在谈论宿敌对决,马刺队将谁视为未来十年的主要对手?

汤姆·奥斯本 : 俄克拉荷马城雷霆队 (Oklahoma Thunder)。

迈克·芬格 : 俄克拉荷马城雷霆队 (Oklahoma Thunder)。你知道,他们已经迈出了那一步。我想,要谈谈马刺队这个夏天在做什么,你知道,萨姆·普雷斯蒂 (Sam Presti),我们20多年前在阿拉莫穹顶 (Alamodome) 的走廊里见过他,汤姆。那个戴着眼镜的孩子走过来,怎么说呢,我可能以前在播客里讲过这个故事。我当时还是个年轻的无名小卒,不像今天这样是个年迈的无名小卒。在马刺队比赛前走在阿拉莫穹顶 (Alamodome) 的走廊里,那时我还在为约翰尼·拉登 (Johnny Luddon)、巴克·卡维 (Buck Carvey) 和格伦·罗杰斯 (Glenn Rogers)、汤姆·奥斯本 (Tom Orsborn) 写第三版的边栏文章。然后这个戴眼镜的孩子说:“嘿,迈克,你今天好吗?我今天在报纸上读了你的文章。”我有点受宠若惊地说:“哦,非常感谢。”我踱步到约翰尼·拉登 (Johnny Luddon) 身边,他是我们《快报新闻》长期的马刺随队记者,现在他在做什么,雅虎体育 (Yahoo Sports) 的负责人。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 全球。他掌管着全球。

迈克·芬格 : 他掌管着全球。我说:“约翰尼,外面有个戴眼镜的孩子,他穿着西装,他说他读了我今天体育版第12页上的边栏文章。”我只是想知道那个人是谁。约翰尼说:“如果那个人向你打招呼,对他客气点,因为他将来会管理一支NBA球队。”而那个人就是萨姆·普雷斯蒂 (Sam Presti),他确实管理过一支NBA球队,也赢得过NBA总冠军。

但他有点是在马刺队的学校里学到的。他学习了马刺队如何组建球队的方式。现在他反过来为马刺队提供了一个模板。我想马刺队这个夏天所做的一切,正是普雷斯蒂 (Presti) 两三年前在雷霆队 (Thunder) 所做的,当时他们手握所有这些选秀权,他们的球迷都准备好让他们做出大动作了。而他们决定在首轮选择两名球员,而不是将选秀权交易换来老将。在某一个首轮,我想他们用榜眼签和第12顺位,或者榜眼签和第13顺位,与马刺队昨天的情况非常相似,他们选择了切特·霍姆格伦 (Chet Holmgren) 和杰伦·威廉姆斯 (Jalen Williams)。如果榜眼签和第14顺位能像雷霆队 (Thunder) 的榜眼签和第12顺位那样发挥作用,我想马刺球迷会非常非常高兴。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 是的,你有所发现了。

迈克·芬格 : 是的。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 我想如果这两个球员都能成功,那会加速这个过程。

迈克·芬格 : 我试图表达的观点是,雷霆队 (Thunder) 从未真正做出过立即赢球的举动。他们没有,他们没有追逐凯文·杜兰特 (Kevin Durant)。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 对。

迈克·芬格 : 他们增加的球员是什么?艾赛亚·哈尔滕施泰因 (Isaiah Hartenstein) 和亚历克斯·卡鲁索 (Alex Caruso)。当他们准备好冲顶时,他们添加的是这类球员。我认为马刺队会比雷霆队 (Thunder) 更具侵略性,但那种耐心和循序渐进的蓝图就在那里。我想马刺队只会坚持下去。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 是的。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 话虽如此,雷霆队 (Thunder) 三年前还没进季后赛,现在他们是冠军了。所以如果你做对了,它发生的速度可能比你想象的要快。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 是的。布莱恩 (Bryan),布莱恩 (Bryan),你知道,老生常谈警告来了,但布莱恩 (Bryan),你知道,我昨晚问他关于大局如何形成,以及这是否是他设想的方式,以及他们离季后赛还有多近。他说,你知道,我们只是脚踏实地,埋头苦干。希望有一天我们抬头看时,我们已经达到了我们想要达到的位置,而不是揠苗助长。我想这总结了杰夫刚才说的,迈克。用他自己的话来说,他就是这么说的。

迈克·芬格 : 我很感谢那里出现的老生常谈警告,因为那里简直有九个老生常谈。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 对,对,是的,连续三个。但我的意思是,他基本上就是这个意思,你知道,没有短期解决方案,要循序渐进,你知道,不要跳过步骤,就像波波维奇 (Pop) 一次又一次说的那样。我的意思是,他们非常非常严格地遵守着那个计划。

迈克·芬格 : 汤姆做得非常好,多年来,他一直非常出色地抄写每一次采访,他会戴着耳机,逐字逐句地记录,一丝不苟,他的同事们非常欣赏。现在有了技术,有些应用程序可以自动完成,汤姆会整理并确保每个字都准确无误。但你有没有注意到汤姆给我发了那个——我想我知道接下来会发生什么。——昨晚布莱恩·莱特 (Brian Wright) 采访的文字记录,汤姆刚才用的那个陈词滥调,不是“不要把车放在马前 (not putting the cart before the horse)”。汤姆,你看到文字记录里那个车是在什么前面了吗?

汤姆·奥斯本 : 我正在这里找。啊,是的,是的,是的,那个灵车 (hearse),是的。

迈克·芬格 : 车,不要把车放在灵车前面。这你也不应该做。我想你也不应该那样做。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 我必须尽快把那些引语发给杰夫,这样他才能从布鲁克林赶回他的酒店,所以没有时间整理太多。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 我大概明白了他在说什么,他想表达什么,所以我,是的,它没有让我困惑。

迈克·芬格 : 你把“灵车”写进了报纸。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 我没有把“灵车”写进报纸。我想那也许应该成为新的陈词滥调。也许我们可以说“不要把车放在灵车前面”。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 是的。我喜欢这个。

迈克·芬格 : 杰夫提到了雷霆队 (Thunder) 的事情,说冠军来得可能比你想象的要快,这是真的。三年前他们没有进入季后赛,现在他们是冠军了。但有些球迷确实已经做好了准备,有些球迷抱有很高的期望。几周前在报纸上,我想我正在写关于凯文·杜兰特 (Kevin Durant) 的想法,其中有一句话大概是说,你知道,即使凯文·杜兰特 (Kevin Durant) 来到这里,马刺队明年也赢不了总冠军。然后我收到了一位读者的邮件,一位非常体贴的读者。我喜欢所有花时间发传统邮件的读者,他说:“你怎么能那样说?你怎么能说一支拥有维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 和凯文·杜兰特 (Kevin Durant) 的球队明年不指望赢得总冠军?那将是史无前例的。”

但事实是,它不会发生得那么快。马刺队明年不可能赢得总冠军。很抱歉,如果这对某些人来说是爆炸性新闻的话。但这在联盟历史上从未发生过。它不会发生。你不能从没进季后赛直接变成冠军,而你的阵容里没有人真正有过季后赛经验。没有人赢得过季后赛系列赛。哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes) 可能是例外。达龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox) 还没有赢得过季后赛系列赛。其他人都没进过季后赛。你需要一步一步来。有些陈词滥调之所以是陈词滥调,是有原因的。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 一支拥有德文·布克 (Devin Booker) 和凯文·杜兰特 (Kevin Durant) 的球队去年怎么会没进季后赛呢?

迈克·芬格 : 对。没错。没错。所以当你明白这些步骤时,第一步,恕我直言,维克托 (Victor) 的第一步是进入季后赛,然后输球,有点尴尬,有点意识到他需要改进的所有方面。明年将凯文·杜兰特 (Kevin Durant) 加入进来,并不会改变这一点。那支球队仍然需要进入季后赛并输球。看看雷霆队 (Thunder)。他们需要先打一年季后赛。他们去年不也是西部第一吗?没错。

他们经历了常规赛的突破,看起来像是西部最好的球队。那支西部第一的球队必须经历季后赛的磨砺。这是可以理解的。沙伊·吉尔杰斯-亚历山大 (Shai Gilgeous-Alexander)、杰伦·威廉姆斯 (Jalen Williams)、切特·霍姆格伦 (Chet Holmgren) 这些球员,他们都必须先进入季后赛并输球。马刺队也会这样做。你知道还有谁吗?他被老将包围着,经历过许多许多季后赛,被放置在完美的位置。另一个第一次进入季后赛就输球的人是蒂姆·邓肯 (Tim Duncan)。蒂姆·邓肯 (Tim Duncan) 必须进入季后赛。我记得他新秀赛季输给了犹他爵士 (Utah Jazz)。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 是的。

迈克·芬格 : 这不是,而且他身边有大卫·罗宾逊 (David Robinson) 和肖恩·埃利奥特 (Sean Elliott) 和艾弗里·约翰逊 (Avery Johnson) 以及一支伟大的球队。你认为可以跳过那一步,那是不现实的。维克托 (Victor) 总是这么说。就像汤姆 (Tom) 说的,格雷格·波波维奇 (Gregg Popovich) 总是这么说。你不能跳过某些步骤。所以这支马刺队 (Spurs) 正走在明年进入季后赛并输球的轨道上,那会很棒,因为那正是他们需要做的。这就是休斯顿火箭 (Houston Rockets) 去年所做的。他们作为西部第二种子进入季后赛,但因为没有准备好而被“羞辱”了,因为他们怎么可能准备好呢?现在他们准备明年迈出不同的一步,这就是为什么他们更适合杜兰特 (Durant)。所以,我想马刺队现在所做的一切都完全合理。明年你进入季后赛,输球,然后明年你也许可以增加更多符合特定需求的新援。

我不是说——我想继续谈谈马刺队休赛期的其他部分——我不是说他们已经完成了。但我只是觉得有必要提醒大家关于这些步骤以及那些有道理的“老生常谈”。杰夫,你有什么要补充的吗?我知道你得赶飞机。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 不,我只是觉得你说的很对,我想如果有人看了总决赛,就会知道那和常规赛是不同的比赛。强度水平提高了。我不是在说那种,我的意思是压力当然也很大,球迷当然也很吵,但场上的实际比赛,每个人都像生命取决于此一样打好每一个回合。你看到雷霆队 (Thunder) 打球,就像肉搏战一样。而且判罚尺度也不同。在季后赛中你有时可以把对手打得七荤八素。而你就是没准备好。

一支年轻的球队,一个年轻的球员,在他们真正被迎头痛击几次之前,是没有准备好的。所以他们必须去那里,被狠狠地教训一顿,才能明白这到底是怎么回事。所以那是这支球队的下一步。马刺队就是这样看待的。这也不是他们倾尽所有去争取凯文·杜兰特 (Kevin Durant) 或克里斯塔普斯·波尔津吉斯 (Kristaps Porzingis) 的原因。我不认为那会让他们倾尽所有,但无论如何,有什么最新消息?那就是他们会要波尔津吉斯 (Porzingis)。当时有真正的兴趣。如果他们只是白送。没错。

那正是他们正在寻找的。那正是马刺队目前在那些交易中寻找的。如果你只是白送,我们会帮忙。但如果它会让我们付出任何我们看重的东西,那么我们现在就不是那么感兴趣了。这是因为他们还有一些步骤要走,才能准备好说:“好吧,我们今年要冲击总决赛了。”你知道,我们的争冠窗口现在正式开启了。他们还需要走一些步骤才能达到那个阶段。

所以,你知道,两年后,无论是两年后的凯文·杜兰特 (Kevin Durant),马刺队可能更愿意,你知道,为此付出代价。但现在时机不对,因为他们还有步骤要完成。

迈克·芬格 : 汤姆,你刚才想插话吗?

汤姆·奥斯本 : 哦,我只是,这有点说晚了,但我还是想说。你让我想起了,你知道,我们正在谈论季后赛、总决赛、强度,这让我想起了上赛季末的克里斯·保罗 (Chris Paul),你知道,当我问他德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell) 在赛季末段表现出色时,克里斯·保罗 (Chris Paul) 像他一贯那样实话实说。他笑了笑说:“伙计,你得记住这不是真正的NBA。”你知道,季后赛完全不同。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 哦,你还记得他对斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle) 的建议吗?去看看总决赛。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 是的,是的,没错。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 你知道,即使那样克里斯 (Chris) 也说,你不亲自上场打球,仍然无法完全体会到那种效果,但至少坐在前排亲眼看到一切是如何提升的,那是有帮助的。我不知道斯蒂芬 (Steph) 有没有去看比赛,下次见到他我们得问问。

你提到了克里斯 (Chris),我想,我想我们会想念他的。我不,我觉得这已经很清楚了,但万一有人想知道,我认为既然马刺队又选了一个控球后卫,他现在就不会回来了。

迈克·芬格 : 说到这个,我粗略算了下,我相信在15人的大名单上,目前有12个位置是确定下来的。现在两个首轮新秀也已确定。这就剩下三个位置要填补。你可以想象其中一个位置他们会用中产特例来引进一名球员,很可能是一名内线球员,一个大家可能知道的高到中等关注度的球员。

我不太确定他们能否得到布鲁克·洛佩斯 (Brook Lopez) 或克林特·卡佩拉 (Clint Capela),这是我从球迷那里听到的一些他们非常感兴趣的名字。比如,这两位球员都会很棒。我不确定那是否会发生。我想提一个不是那个级别的名字,只是一个猜测,一个我认为会非常适合这里的人,是年轻的格尔雄·亚布塞莱 (Gerschon Yabusele)。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 是的。

迈克·芬格 : 我两年前在巴黎看过他打球。如果看过奥运会的人还记得的话,不仅仅是决赛,而是整个两周期间,法国队 (Team France) 有时表现挣扎,年轻的维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 有时也表现挣扎,但亚布塞莱 (Yabusele) 在很长一段时间里是场上表现最好的球员。他就像一个非常非常凶悍的家伙。而且,你知道,他不会是一个统治级的NBA内线球员。他有点身材偏小。他可能不会成为首发。但我知道维克托 (Victor) 喜欢他,而且我知道马刺队对他非常尊重。如果能做到这一点,我认为他会非常适合,能再添一名法国队友。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 那会解决你们前场的一些强硬度问题。我的意思是,他是一个非常身体对抗的家伙。我记得他在费城76人 (Sixers) 队对阵马刺队 (Spurs) 在圣安东尼奥 (San Antonio) 的比赛中,简直把他们打得狼狈不堪。所以,是的,你知道,你在奥运会上看到了他,那赛季我对阵马刺队的比赛后,我说,是的,这就是他们需要的那种球员。那种,那种可以得到的球员。

迈克·芬格 : 但你,你觉得布鲁克·洛佩斯 (Brook Lopez) 不会给他大学老队友米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson) 留点面子吗?那才是关键因素。我想,我不知道我们播客里现在有没有薪资专家,但我认为中产特例大约是1400万美元,布鲁克 (Brook) 可能想要更多。但他曾和马刺队教练米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson) 在斯坦福 (Stanford) 大学一起打球,顺便说一句,还有大个子托德·芬格 (Todd Finger)。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 我记得他。

迈克·芬格 : 我以前写过一些关于斯坦福 (Stanford) 大学进入NCAA锦标赛的事情。我报道过那个球队一天。但是,没有,那个。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 塔吉教练。

迈克·芬格 : 那会很酷,是的。布鲁克·洛佩斯 (Brook Lopez) 去年我觉得他不是表现最好的。我认为他的三分命中率有所下滑。他的整体数据也有所下滑。但作为维克托 (Victor) 的替补,那正是马刺队会寻找的类型。也许布鲁克 (Brook) 会给他老队友一些折扣,给他一个合同。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 我的意思是,米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson) 在大学时期为布鲁克·洛佩斯 (Brook Lopez) 创造了那么多得分机会,基本上让他成为了乐透秀,对吗?有了那么多的助攻和那么多的。

迈克·芬格 : 没错。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 布鲁克 (Brook) 应该回报,我认为。

迈克·芬格 : 我觉得那会是,我觉得,而且我读过休斯顿火箭 (Houston Rockets) 过去曾大力争取布鲁克斯 (Brooks) (此处应是Lopez笔误,根据上下文“Brook might want more than that.”,以及后文“Although they just re-signed Stephen Adams, so I don’t know if there’s overlap there.”,应指Brook Lopez)在过去曾大力争取他,现在可能还在大力争取。尽管他们刚刚续约了斯蒂芬·亚当斯 (Steven Adams),所以我不确定是否存在重叠。但那将是一个完美的类型。在自由球员市场上还有其他什么猜测吗?我们下次还会再见面。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 你觉得查尔斯·巴锡 (Charles Bassey) 怎么样?

迈克·芬格 : 是的,我不知道。我不知道查尔斯·巴锡 (Charles Bassey) 的未来。我不认为他会是优先考虑的对象。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 不,我不是说他有什么优先权。我只是说。

迈克·芬格 : 不,不,我没有,我也没有说你是。抱歉,汤姆。但是我想可能有一个位置,你可以想象他们现在有三个空位。你用其中一两个来找像布鲁克·洛佩斯 (Brook Lopez) 这种类型,像亚布塞莱 (Yabusele) 这种类型。然后也许是最后一个。我抱有希望,我交叉手指。播客上不偏袒。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 不。

迈克·芬格 : 新闻席上不偏袒。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 我知道你要说什么。

迈克·芬格 : 记者席上不偏袒。你不应该在乎,但请把桑德罗 (Sandro) 带回来。只是为了我自己的理智,只是为了我们自己的理智。作为在联盟报道82场比赛赛季中的一员,能有一个见到你似乎很高兴的人。我来到球馆。汤姆从不高兴见到我。杰夫从不高兴见到我。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 不,我见到你时是主动不高兴。

迈克·芬格 : 没错。迈克尔·C·莱特 (Michael C. Wright) 从不高兴见到我。记者席上没人高兴见到我。米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson) 不高兴见到我。

汤姆·奥斯本 : 郊狼 (Coyote) 从来不高兴见到我。

迈克·芬格 : 桑德罗 (Sandro) 总是,桑德罗 (Sandro) 总是假装很高兴见到我。所以把他带回来吧。球迷们爱他。拜托,把桑德罗 (Sandro) 带回来。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 我想说的是:我认为如果他们有这个位置,如果没有其他更明确的、他们应该做的阵容选择,我想他会回来的。我想他就是那种在可能的情况下,你会带回来的球员。

迈克·芬格 : 他是绝对的,他也是理想的第15人。我的意思是,按老将底薪。你不需要让他上场。当他上场时,他很令人愉悦。训练也很努力。我应该当桑德罗 (Sandro) 的经纪人。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 你可以给他比底薪稍微多一点的钱,如果你想的话。

迈克·芬格 : 是的。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 : 如果他回来了,迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 最好小心他的车轮。

迈克·芬格 : 好的,杰夫正努力从纽约市赶回圣安东尼奥,参加本周末迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 和卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant) 的新闻发布会。我们下次见到你时会谈论此事。我们下次见到你时会谈论自由球员市场。届时应该会有些协议达成,也许还有交易。下次再见,保重,保持真实。

[音乐渐弱]

点击查看原文:Dylan Harper leads a dream draft duo for San Antonio

Dylan Harper leads a dream draft duo for San Antonio

Columnist Mike Finger and beat writers Jeff McDonald and Tom Orsborn discuss the Spurs’ draft selections of Dylan Harper and Carter Bryant, explain why they drew a line in the sand on the Kevin Durant trade talks, and look at which free-agent targets might be on their way to San Antonio in July.

Suggested reading:

Spurs strike gold in Dylan Harper and Carter Bryant

Five things to know about Dylan Harper

Spurs won’t give up future for Kevin Durant trade

Here is the transcript of the podcast:

Mike Finger: From a highly secured network of top-secret locations across North America, this is the Spurs Insider post-draft edition. I’m your host Mike Finger, joined as always by our panel of Express News Spurs beat writers Jeff McDonald and Tom Orsborn, who I had to cut off when we started this podcast because they get along so well. They’re talking about the draft, they’re talking about Jeff’s travels to New York City, they’re talking about Dylan Harper and Carter Bryant.

And I just wanted to jump right into this. Jeff, you were there. You were at what you said is a lovely hotel there in Manhattan. What is your takeaway from what the Spurs did in a busy first night of the 2025 NBA draft?

Jeff McDonald: You know what? I’ve covered almost 20 of these now, and never once has the GM come out after the draft night and said, “Boy, we screwed that up. That was a really bad draft for us.” It’s always the most optimistic night of the year.

But I think, I think this time, I think they’re not blowing smoke. I think they, I think they had, if they could have, if the Spurs could have sat down beforehand and drawn out a reasonable scenario for what they wanted to get out of the draft, they got the two guys that they wanted at those spots at two and 14.

Obviously, Dylan Harper, that was that was kind of a foregone conclusion after the Spurs made it to draft day still in possession of the number two pick. And with Carter Bryant, who I guarantee you I’m going to call Bryant Carter at some point this year, because I can’t get those two, the two names in the right order. With him, the Spurs were thinking they were going to have to trade up for him. They had him very high on their draft board, the forward from Arizona. They didn’t end up making a deal to trade up, but he fell to them anyway, and they were pleasantly surprised, so I think you can say they got their men last night. It wasn’t the normal draft night bravado. It’s legit.

Mike Finger: And like you said in your wise battle-hardened way to start that soliloquy, like every GM says that too. Every GM that picks after the first pick said, “We nearly tried to trade up to get this guy.” Like every GM says that.

In this case though, you can look at many, many, many mock drafts that had Carter Bryant going in the top 10, or at least ahead of number 14. It wasn’t just it’s not unthinkable that he could have been gone before he got to the Spurs at 14.

And in some ways, Tom, I think a theme of this draft, or just the overall story of this draft for the Spurs, is it’s kind of one pick from the new column of these picks the Spurs have made the last three years of guys that everybody wants, guys that can immediately come in and make a difference. I think Dylan Harper fits the mold, not necessarily the franchise star that Victor Wembanyama was, but certainly of Wembanyama and Stephon Castle, now Dylan Harper. You know, top five picks that are expected to play right away, expected to be a difference-maker.

And then there’s a pick from the old box, the kinds of picks that the Spurs were making, say throughout the 2010s, of guys that might need a little seasoning, that might not step in right away, but kind of have the ability to at least give the Spurs the ability to wait on them and really turn into something down the line. If you watch the NBA Finals this season between the Indianapolis Pacers and the Oklahoma City Thunder, the court is just constantly loaded with guys who can defend everybody and who can make three-pointers. And Young Carter Bryant fits that mold. He might not play right away, but I think Jeff is right when he said that it’s a guy that really fits and could be a big factor for them down the road.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah. I just want to say the Pacers represent the whole state of Indiana, not just Indianapolis.

Mike Finger: So is it the Oklahoma Thunder then? They don’t represent the entire state, they just represent the city?

Tom Orsborn: Well, you said Indianapolis Pacers.

Mike Finger: Yeah. Well, they’re from Indianapolis.

Tom Orsborn: You’re right. I’m just giving you a hard time, Mike.

Mike Finger: Okay.

Tom Orsborn: But yeah, Bryan pointed out too, I asked him about the, you know, the criticism or concern I should say that people have had about, you know, position overlap with Harper, you know, with Steph Castle and De’Aaron Fox and crowded backcourt and all that stuff.

And he once again reiterated his often repeated theme that it’s a positionless league right now. It just doesn’t matter as much. And they got two guys that are very versatile. I think both of them can guard, you know, four positions. Carter Bryant certainly can. And, you know, they they’re very happy about that. They’ve been doing that for years now. They they aren’t looking at positions, they’re going with the best players that they think can, you know, produce the most and they certainly got two of them last night. In their minds, yeah.

Mike Finger: Yeah. And I think the positionless thing definitely fits on defense. The question will come on the other end because when you have multiple ball-dominant types of guys, that’s where you can’t really say it’s positionless because somebody has to have the ball in their hands with the game on the line, all that kind of stuff. But I think that that has a chance of working out pretty well for them, Jeff.

The, in talking about Harper, he’s a guy who the Spurs wanted. He’s a guy who other teams wanted. One storyline heading into this draft, heading into this draft season really, I think we’ve known for a few weeks that the Spurs were going to take Dylan Harper and hold on to that pick. But that was a pick that other teams wanted, that other teams made efforts to try to get that pick from them, trying to say that, “Hey, there’s too much redundancy there, that you have too many ball-dominant guys already. Why don’t you like to trade down?”

The Spurs resisted that. They they really seem to believe that Dylan Harper does fit and they hung on to that pick. Just what’s your takeaway there?

Jeff McDonald: That they’re betting on the talent there, and which I, I applaud that move. I mean, I, I’m a nobody. I, I’m not a draft scout, but when you talk to people that are, they really think Dylan Harper has a chance to be a really, really special player. Just just a force going to the rim, and not just, not just, not just those like early Keldon Johnson years where he would just put his head down and go. That’s not Dylan Harper’s game. He’s very crafty.

When you watch some of his, I don’t want to put this on the kid, but when you watch some of his highlights, he looks Ginobili-esque with the way he’s able to kind of work his way to the rim, slither around people, the craftiness, the footwork. He’s a he’s a basketball kid. And we know his history, you know, his dad’s Ron Harper, five-time NBA champion. His brother’s in the league. And he really credits his mom as being the basketball sort of savant in the family. She’s the one that coached him since he was in the first grade at various levels. So he’s a guy that knows the game.

And then off the court is very, you know, I talked to both those draft picks yesterday, and you don’t, you don’t know everything about a kid, obviously, when you talk to him for five minutes, but you can get a feel for, you can get a feel, you can get a vibe. And both those kids seem very polished and comfortable in their skins and kind of like we said with Steph Castle last year, you don’t you don’t really realize they’re 19 when you’re talking to them. And so I think all those things are going to be, play really well for Dylan Harper. I think he’s going to fit in great.

I think he’s will probably be the type of guy that if you didn’t take him at number two, if the Spurs had traded that pick, you look back in five years or 10 years and realize that was pretty dumb. So I think they did the obvious, easy, smart thing and took the best player on the board there.

Mike Finger: One kind of weird vibe, phenomenon kind of thing that sets in after you have drafted Victor Wembanyama and then drafted another Rookie of the Year the next year, and when you haven’t won in a long time, and then you have the number two pick in the draft is people sort of forget how big a deal it is to have the number two pick in the draft. It’s almost like, and I don’t want to speak for all the listeners out there. I don’t want to speak for Spurs fans everywhere. But it’s almost like there’s this impatience. It’s like boredom with getting another franchise type player in the draft when, you know, we, we were guilty on this podcast of talking about Kevin Durant. You know, there’s all kinds of trades out there and I think this is the summer where everyone’s antsy, understandably, for the Spurs to make a big type move to to get a veteran in here and to and to start competing for conference championships and NBA championships.

It’s it’s almost and and maybe I’m the only one guilty of this, but it’s almost like you you lose sight of the fact that having the number two pick in a draft this loaded is is a really big deal. And like Dylan Harper, if if how many other teams in the league if they would have drafted Dylan Harper yesterday would immediately expect that he’s going to become their franchise player, if he’s not their franchise player already? Like it’s a huge, huge deal to get a guy like that. And he just happens to be joining a team that already has a couple of franchise players of the future. But for the Spurs to hold on to that pick, to resist the overtures, as Jeff said, I think it was a it was a wise long-term move and probably a pretty decent short-term move.

We can talk about this. We got plenty of time today, just how this team is shaping up for 2025, 2026. Dylan Harper’s going to play. I don’t think he’s going to start. If if we want to start playing like fantasy lineup manager right here, I still think you have the the starting five that started right after the De’Aaron Fox trade. I think that that’s how you open the season with Fox, Vassell, Castle, Barnes, and Wemby. But Harper can come in and play a lot of minutes leading that second unit. And yeah, I think it’s it’s very fair to think that this team takes another step forward next year, Tom.

Tom Orsborn: Got a little work to do as Bryan pointed out last night though, still.

Mike Finger: I mean, what what let’s go down the lineup. I just mentioned the starting lineup. Your reserves right now. I think you have four very four four backups that you feel comfortable playing a lot of minutes in in Harper, in Keldon Johnson, Julian Champagnie, and Jeremy Sohan. That’s that’s four guys there. The obvious hole is size. You need a backup big man, you might need a couple backup big men. But I mean, they’ve they’ve got nine guys, Jeff, who I feel comfortable in a in a in a in a rotation.

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, they’re building this thing out now. You can kind of see the vision. And like you mentioned, there’s there’s still holes, there’s going to be holes. I don’t think I think where some of the antsiness gets in among parts of the fan base is you got to you got to realize it doesn’t have to be a finished product after this summer. Like you want to take steps towards that finished product, but they’re not rolling out a roster after this summer going like, “Yep, this is our team we’re going to try to win a title with right now.” It’s that’s that’s not the way it works. Like they still got years to to build this thing out. And they’re getting closer to the kind of vision that they’re, you know, that they have. And so I think, I think that, go ahead.

Mike Finger: That was right.

Jeff McDonald: I think you’ll see them look for some additional size during free agency. I think you’ll look to see, you’ll see them look for some more shooting during free agency. They didn’t super address either of those needs in the draft yesterday. I think I think Carter Bryant can can be your shooter. I don’t know that he’s that in year one, but I think that’s what they see him is, is a guy that can hit 40% from three and defend everybody.

Mike Finger: They like a bunch of those guys.

Jeff McDonald: So I think I think he does help. He will eventually help address that need. I don’t, I don’t know how much he plays in year one. But I think they’re, yeah, they’re other, they’re other tools for addressing needs besides just the draft. And you don’t you still don’t have to do it all at once. I know fans want the finished product right now, but it’s still a couple years away, I think.

Mike Finger: And to your point, this was this this whole summer so far has been a reminder that they see this as a long-term project and that they expect to contend for many, many, many, many years to come. And Carter Bryant fits that. I mean, he’s he’s not a guy that is going to be plug and play right away, but he could make a big difference when the Spurs start to peak. And let’s let’s go back to the Durant thing because we talked about that in our last podcast. We have not met since.

It sort of worked out like we discussed on that podcast where we came up with a line that the Spurs probably would not cross. And if you look at the deal that Houston made to acquire him, it was a deal that slightly beat precisely the offer that we made on the podcast, which I believe was something like Devin Vassell and Harrison Barnes, you know, the matching salaries, Devin Vassell and and Harrison Barnes, plus the number 14 pick and and that’s basically it. Four and maybe some seconds for Kevin Durant. And that’s almost what the Rockets did. They they had a slight upgrade with Jalen Green instead of Devin Vassell. His stock on him might be a little higher. Their pick was number 10 instead of number 14.

The Spurs could have easily trumped that by adding a Stephon Castle, by adding, let’s say, the the Atlanta Hawks first-round pick in 2027, another another future first. The Spurs did not do that because they’re thinking long-term. And so the deal was made to the team that made more sense, the Houston Rockets. Either one of you guys, any thoughts on the Spurs kind of steering away from that deal, kind of drawing a line in the sand that they would not cross and moving on to the the the future?

Jeff McDonald: I think trading for Kevin Durant makes a lot of sense for the Houston Rockets, who are a little a little bit further along in their little rebuilding project than the Spurs are. Like he is a guy that can, you know, ostensibly take them to the next level maybe, or at least that’s what they’re thinking. I don’t think the Spurs are really in that position yet. And so it was almost a luxury item and how much do you want to give up for a luxury item? It wasn’t a need, it was a want. I think it I think it was again, probably a wise move.

Because it was going to cost you either Steph Castle or the number two pick and I think with what they’re building, I don’t think they were interested in giving up either one of those assets. And when those are flat noes, it becomes just kind of a no thank you from the from the Suns and they move on. So I I think that I I think the deal makes sense for the Rockets, didn’t make as much sense for the Spurs and I think the team that it made the most sense for made the best offer.

Mike Finger: Yeah. Yeah. And the the I think I referenced this earlier, but just the the push from from teams lower in the draft to try to get that number two pick. Philadelphia, whoever it might be, the Spurs resisted that too. And you did cover that. You think that Harper is is well worth whatever might have been offered from the Sixers to move down a pick.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah, I think the wise move was to take Dylan Harper and and let him let him cook.

Mike Finger: Yeah. Sounds good. Tom, any…

Tom Orsborn: Dylan Brooks, Dylan Brooks gone. Wemby, I mean he’s not gone from the league, but, you know, that that defense that Udoka employed against Wemby with Dylan Brooks on him, that was that was that was a pain a little bit for Wemby, so he doesn’t have to deal with that.

Mike Finger: That will be a that’ll be a new facet to that budding rivalry.

Tom Orsborn: Right, yeah.

Mike Finger: You don’t figure that the Phoenix Suns are going to be quite as as in the Spurs’ way as the Rockets were, so Wemby might have been breathing a sigh of relief there.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah, I like I like the Brooks factor in that rivalry. I thought that was fun.

Mike Finger: Yeah. The Thunder, well, we’re talking about rivalries, who who’s the Spurs see as a as maybe their chief nemesis in the decade?

Tom Orsborn: Oklahoma Thunder.

Mike Finger: The Oklahoma Thunder. You know, that’s that they they took their step. And I I think to get into what the Spurs are doing this summer, you know, Sam Presti, who we saw roaming the hallways of the Alamodome 20 something years ago, Tom. Just the the kid in the glasses who walked by, what, my I might have told the story on the podcast before. I’m just a young nothing, as opposed to an old nothing as I am today. Walking down the the hallway of the Alamodome before a Spurs game, when I’m writing like third sidebars for Johnny Luddon and Buck Carvey and and Glenn Rogers, Tom Orsborn. And this this kid in glasses says, “Hey, Mike, how are you doing today? Read your story in the paper today.” And I kind of said, “Oh, thank you very much.” I walked I’ve strolled over to Johnny Luddon, our long-time Spurs beat writer for the Express News, who now runs what, Yahoo Sports.

Jeff McDonald: The world. He runs the world.

Mike Finger: He runs the world. I said, “Johnny, there’s this kid in glasses out there who was like wearing a suit and he said that he read like my sidebar that was on page 12 of the sports section today.” And I’m just wondering who that is. And Johnny said, “If that guy said hello to you, be nice to him because he’s going to run an NBA team someday.” And that’s and that’s who it was. It was Sam Presti, who did run an NBA team, who won an NBA title.

But he he he kind of learned at the school of the Spurs. He did things the Spurs’ way of how on how to build a team. And now he’s kind of providing a template for the Spurs in return. Like I think this what the Spurs are doing this summer is exactly what Presti did with the Thunder two, three years ago, when they had all these picks, and their fans were ready for them to make a big move. And they decided to make two picks in the first round rather than trade them for veterans. And in one first round, I think with pick two and 12, or two and 13, something very similar what the Spurs had yesterday, they took Chet Holmgren and Jalen Williams. And if that if two and 14 work as well as two and 12 did for the Thunder, I think Spurs fans are going to be really, really happy.

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, you’re beyond to something there.

Mike Finger: Yeah.

Jeff McDonald: I think I think that would that would fast forward the process a little bit if both those guys pan out.

Mike Finger: Well, the the point I was trying to make is like the Thunder did not make the win-now move really ever at any point. They did not, they did not chase the Kevin Durant.

Tom Orsborn: Right.

Mike Finger: Their additions were what, Isaiah Hartenstein and Alex Caruso. The when they were ready to to get over the top, those were the type of players that they added. And I think the Spurs will be a little more aggressive than the Thunder were, but that blueprint is there for patience and for step-by-step. And I think the Spurs are just going to stick to that.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah.

Jeff McDonald: All that’s said, the Thunder were not in the playoffs three years ago, and now they’re champions. So it can happen faster than you think if you do it right.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah. Bryan, Bryan, you know, cliché warning here, but Bryan, you know, I asked him last night about the how the big picture is coming together and if he if this is how he envisioned it, you know, working out and, you know, how much closer they are to the playoffs. And he said, you know, we’re just putting one foot in front of the other, keeping our head down. Hopefully we look up someday and we’re right where we want to be by not putting the cart before the horse. I think that sums up what Jeff just said, Mike. In his own words, that’s how he’s putting it.

Mike Finger: I I appreciate the cliché warning there because there were like nine of them.

Tom Orsborn: Right, right, yeah, three in a row. But I mean, that’s basically what he’s saying, you know, no no short-term fix, do it methodically, you know, don’t skip steps like Pop has said over and over again. I mean, they’re they’re following their, they’ve been very, very disciplined with following that plan.

Mike Finger: Tom does a great job of, and for many years, he did a great job of transcribing every interview and he would do with headphones and do it word by word and it was meticulous and and his co-workers really appreciated it. And now with technology, there’s there’s there’s applications that can kind of do it automatically and Tom cleans it up and make sure every word is right. But did you notice Tom sent me the the the I know where this is going, I think. The transcript of the of the Bryan Wright interview last night, and the the cliché that Tom just used, it was not putting the cart before the horse. Did you did you see what what what the the cart was ahead of, Tom, in that transcript?

Tom Orsborn: I’m trying to find it here. Yeah. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, the hearse, yeah.

Mike Finger: The cart, don’t put the cart in front of the hearse. Which also you should not do. I don’t think you should do that either.

Tom Orsborn: I had to get those, I had to get those quotes to Jeff quickly so he could get back from Brooklyn to to uh to his hotel, so didn’t have time to clean it up too much.

Jeff McDonald: I I I kind of understood where he was going, what he was going for there, so I yeah, it didn’t confuse me.

Mike Finger: You put hearse in the newspaper.

Jeff McDonald: I didn’t put hearse in the newspaper. I think that should maybe that should be the new cliché though. Maybe we can don’t put the cart before the hearse.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah. I like it.

Mike Finger: Jeff mentioned that the with the Thunder thing that the that titles can come quicker than you think and that’s true. You know, three years ago they weren’t in the playoffs and now they are. But I had like some fans are really ready for this and some fans have high expectations. And in in the newspaper a couple of weeks ago, I think I was writing about the the Kevin Durant idea and had a line in there about how, you know, even if Kevin if Kevin Durant comes here, the Spurs aren’t going to win a title next year. And I had a reader email, very thoughtful reader. Love all the readers who take the time to to send the old-fashioned emails, saying, “How could you say that? Like, like how could uh how could how could a team with the how could you say that a team with Victor Wembanyama and Kevin Durant not expect to win a title in year one? That would be unprecedented.”

But it’s just it it does not happen that fast. There’s no way that the Spurs are going to win a title next year. I’m sorry if that’s breaking news to some people. But it just does not happen in the history of the league. Like it does it doesn’t You don’t you don’t go from out of the playoffs to into to a champion when nobody on your roster really has has any postseason experience. Has won a playoff series. Like Harrison Barnes might be it. De’Aaron Fox hasn’t won a playoff series yet. Nobody else has been in the playoffs. You need to go step by step. Some clichés are clichés for a reason.

Tom Orsborn: How how could a team with Devin Booker and Kevin Durant not make the playoffs last year?

Mike Finger: Right. Exactly. Exactly. And and so when you understand what the steps are, that the first step, I’m sorry to be blunt, but the first step for Victor is to get into the playoffs and lose and sort of be embarrassed and sort of realize all the ways that he needs to improve. Like adding Kevin Durant to the mix next year was not going to change that. Like they that team still needed to get to the playoffs and lose. You look at the Thunder. They needed to get to the playoffs one year. Weren’t they the number one seed a year ago too? Correct.

They had they had their regular season breakthrough where they looked like the best team in the Western Conference. That team that was number one in the in the Western Conference had to take its postseason lumps. And understandably. Like you can you all those guys, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Jalen Williams, Chet Holmgren, they had to get to the playoffs and lose first. The Spurs are going to do that. You know who else who was surrounded by veterans, who had been through many, many postseasons, like dumped into the perfect position. Another guy who had to go to the playoffs and lose his first time was Tim Duncan. Like Tim Duncan had to go to the playoffs. And I think they lost to the Jazz his rookie year.

Tom Orsborn: Yes.

Mike Finger: It’s just not and he had David Robinson and Sean Elliott and Avery Johnson and a great team around them. You it’s just unrealistic to think that you can skip that step. Victor says it all the time. Like Tom said, Greg Popovich said it all the time. You cannot step skip certain steps. And so this Spurs team is on track to get to the playoffs next year and lose and it’ll be great, because that’s exactly what they need to do. That’s what the Rockets did last year. They got to the playoffs as the number two seed, were sort of humbled by not being ready for it because how could they have been ready for it? And now they’re ready to take a different step next year, which is why they were a better fit for Durant. And so like I I think that what the Spurs are doing now makes total sense. You you get to the playoffs next year, you lose, and then maybe you can add more pieces next year, once that fit specific needs.

And I’m not I want to get into the rest of the Spurs off season too. I’m not saying that they’re done. But I just I just thought that was worth reminding everyone about the steps and the dumb clichés that are clichés for a reason. Anything to add on that, Jeff? I know you’re you got a plane to catch.

Jeff McDonald: No, I just I think you’re spot on and I think if anybody watched the finals, it’s a different game than the regular season. It’s the intensity level is up. And I’m not talking about like the, I mean the pressure is up obviously, and the fans are loud obviously, but the actual game on the floor, everybody is playing every possession like their lives depended on it. And you watch the Thunder play, it’s like hand-to-hand combat. And it’s officiated differently. You can you can you can beat the crap out of people in the playoffs sometimes. And you’re just not ready for that.

A team, a young player, a young team is not ready for that until they’ve actually been hit in the mouth a few times. So they they’ve got to go there and just get their butts kicked by it to know what it’s all about. And so that is the next step for this team. And that’s kind of how the Spurs are approaching it. That’s not why they’re shoving, that’s why they are not shoving all their chips into the middle of the pile to go get Kevin Durant or to go get Kristaps Porzingis. I don’t think that would have cost all their chips, but anyway, what’s the latest? That’s what they would have taken Porzingis. Like there was legitimate interest there. Like if if you’re just going to give them away. True.

That’s kind of what they’re looking for. That’s kind of what the Spurs are looking for from those deals right now. If you’re just going to give them away, we’ll we’ll we’ll help. But if it costs us anything we care about, then we’re not really all that interested right this second. And it’s because they’re they’re still they’re still steps to cover before they’re ready to be like, “All right, we’re we’re we’re shooting for the finals this year.” You know, we’re this is our championship window is now officially open. They still got some steps to cover before they’re there.

And so, you know, two years from now, whoever the Kevin Durant is from two years from now, from now, the Spurs might be way more amenable to, you know, giving up stuff for that. But the time is not right because they’ve got steps to cover.

Mike Finger: Tom, you were trying to break in there?

Tom Orsborn: Oh, I was just it it’s kind of past the point of saying it, but I’ll say it anyway. You reminded me of, you know, we were talking about the playoffs, the finals, the intensity, and just brought to mind Chris Paul last late last season, you know, when I asked him about Devin Vassell playing well down the stretch and Chris Paul keeping it real like he always did. You had a little a little chuckle and said, “Man, you got to remember this isn’t the real NBA.” You know, it’s it’s it’s so different in the playoffs.

Jeff McDonald: Oh, you remember his advice to Steph Castle? Go watch the finals.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah, yeah, exactly.

Jeff McDonald: You know, and even then Chris said, you still don’t get the full effect without playing in it, but at least being there on the front row and seeing just how everything is ramped up is helpful. And I don’t I don’t know if Steph made it to a game or not, we’ll have to ask him the next time we see him.

And you brought up Chris, I guess, I guess we’re going to miss him. I don’t I don’t I think it’s pretty, it’s been pretty clear, but just in case people are wondering, I don’t see him coming back now that the Spurs have drafted another point guard.

Mike Finger: Well, to segue into that, um that that leaves the way I have it counted, I believe there are uh 12 spots filled for sure on on a 15-man roster. Um, now that the two first rounders are are penciled in there. Um, that leaves three spots to fill. And you figure one of them is they have a mid-level exception to use where you can go after somebody probably a big man, uh that that people might know a high to medium profile type of guy.

Um, I’m not sure they’re going to be able to get a Brook Lopez or Clint Capela, which is uh some of the names I hear from fans that that they’re really interested in. Like uh that both of those guys would be great. I’m not sure that would happen. I’m going to throw out a name that is not of that level and uh just a just a guess and a guy I think who would really fit here is uh young uh Gerschon Yabusele.

Jeff McDonald: Yes.

Mike Finger: Who I watched with the watched him in Paris a couple of summers ago. If people who watched the the the Olympics remember, and not just the championship game but the whole two weeks where Team France was kind of struggling at times and young Victor Wembanyama was kind of struggling at times, Yabusele for long stretches was the best player on the floor. Like he he was a bad, bad man. And, you know, he’s not going to be a dominant NBA big man. He’s sort of undersized. He might he’s not going to be a starter. Um, but I know Victor loves him and I know the Spurs have a lot of respect for him. And if if that can be done, uh, I think he’d he’d fit in great to get another Frenchman alongside.

Jeff McDonald: That would that would solve a little bit of your toughness issues on the on the front court. I mean, he’s a really physical dude. I remember the game he played for the Sixers against the Spurs in San Antonio just just beat them up. So, yeah, and you know, you saw him in the Olympics, and I came out of that game against the Spurs this summer, this that season going, yeah, that’s the kind of guy they need. That’s the kind of, the kind of guy that’s attainable.

Mike Finger: But you don’t, you don’t think Brook Lopez would give his old college teammate, Mitch Johnson, this That’s that’s the factor there. Like, like this, I think, uh, I don’t know if we have a capologist on the show right now, but I think the mid-level exception is something like 14 million and Brook might want more than that. Um, but he played with Spurs coach Mitch Johnson at Stanford, alongside big man Todd Finger, by the way.

Jeff McDonald: Who I remember.

Mike Finger: Wrote something about it back in the day when Stanford was in the NCAA tournament. I covered that team for a day. Um, but no, that.

Tom Orsborn: Coach Taj.

Mike Finger: That would be cool, yeah. Uh, Brook Lopez, I don’t think had his best year last year. I think his his three-point percentage slipped a bit. His overall numbers slipped a bit. But to be a backup for Victor, like that’s exactly what the Spurs would be looking for. And maybe Brook will cut his old teammate some slack and and give him a deal.

Jeff McDonald: I mean, all the buckets that Mitch Johnson set Brook Lopez up for in college, basically basically made him a lottery pick, right? Like with all the assists and all the.

Mike Finger: Exactly.

Jeff McDonald: Brooks got to pay it back, I think.

Mike Finger: I think that would be I think I think the and this I’ve I’ve read that the Rockets have pushed hard for Brooks uh in the past and might still be pushing hard for them. Although they just re-signed Stephen Adams, so I don’t know if there’s overlap there. But uh that would be that would be a perfect type guy. Uh any any other guesses on the free agent market? We’ll we’ll meet again um.

Tom Orsborn: You think Charles Bassey, I guess?

Mike Finger: Yeah, I don’t know. I don’t know the future of Charles Bassey. I don’t think he’s going to be a priority.

Tom Orsborn: No, I’m saying I’m not I’m not saying he’s a priority by any means. I’m just saying.

Mike Finger: No, no, I’m no, I’m not saying that you are either. I’m sorry, Tom. Uh but I think that there’s probably a spot where you you figure they have three open spots now. You use two of one or two of them on like a Brook Lopez type, like a Yabusele type. And then maybe that last one. Hopefully, I’m keeping my fingers crossed. No rooting on the podcast.

Tom Orsborn: No.

Mike Finger: No rooting in the press box.

Tom Orsborn: I know what you’re going to say.

Mike Finger: No rooting on press row. You’re not supposed to care, but please bring back Sandro. Like just for my own sanity, just for our own sanity. As someone in there to get you through an 82-game season of covering the NBA, to have a guy who just seems happy to see you. I curl up to the arena. Tom’s never happy to see me. Jeff is never happy to see me.

Jeff McDonald: No, I’m I’m actively unhappy to see you.

Mike Finger: Exactly. Michael C. Wright’s never happy to see me. None of the press has happy to see me. Mitch Johnson’s not happy to see me.

Tom Orsborn: Coyote is never happy to see me.

Mike Finger: Sandro was always Sandro always pretended to be happy to see me. So bring the guy back. The fans love him. Come on, bring Sandro back.

Jeff McDonald: Here’s here’s what I’m going to say. I think if they have the spot, if there’s not a clear other thing they should do with the roster spot, I think he’ll be back. I think he’s the type of guy you bring you bring back if you can.

Mike Finger: He’s the absolute he’s the ideal 15th man, too. I mean at a at a vet minimum. Like you don’t have to play him. When he plays, he’s a joy to watch. Works hard in practice. I should be I should be Sandro’s agent.

Jeff McDonald: You can get him a little more than the minimum too, if you want.

Mike Finger: Yeah.

Jeff McDonald: What happens if he comes if he comes back, Dylan Harper better watch his wheels.

Mike Finger: Well, I know Jeff is uh is trying to get out of New York City to get back to San Antonio for an introductory press conference with Dylan Harper and Carter Bryant this weekend. We will talk about that the next time we see you. We will talk about free agency the next time we see you. There should be some agreements in place, maybe a trade. Until we see you next time, take care of each other and keep it real.

[Music fades out]