🎧 Spurs Insider️ 播客: 更强硬:马刺为何必须停止“友善”

Spurs Insider Podcast, 2025-01-08 19:00:00

由生成式人工智能翻译,译文内容可能不准确或不完整,以原文为准。

专栏作家迈克·芬格(Mike Finger)和马刺随队记者杰夫·麦克唐纳(Jeff McDonald)以及汤姆·奥斯本(Tom Orsborn)讨论了马刺在过去两场比赛中第四节最后时刻表现挣扎的原因,克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)对得分的影响,以及达龙·福克斯(De’Aaron Fox)是否适合圣安东尼奥。

推荐阅读:

对于马刺的克里斯·保罗来说,得分也是工作的一部分

文班亚马(Wembanyama)学习变得强硬,马刺对抗人性

对于马刺的米奇·约翰逊来说,进步是常态

马刺再次错失领先优势,三点总结


以下是播客的文字稿:

迈克·芬格:从北美各地高度安全的绝密地点,这里是马刺内幕客场之旅版。我是你们的主持人迈克·芬格,与我们通常的《快报新闻》马刺随队记者杰夫·麦克唐纳和汤姆·奥斯本,以及体育编辑尼克·塔尔博特一起。杰夫和我位于寒冷的北方,而不是寒冷的南方。这周整个国家都很冷,不幸的是,当地球员也是如此。上次我们和你们谈话时,我记得我们预测了一个2胜2负的四场比赛,马刺也确实做到了。但他们以一种出乎意料的方式赢得了这两场胜利。现在杰夫,我们是在连续两场第四节错失领先优势后与听众们交谈。马刺王国一切都好吗?

杰夫·麦克唐纳:这真的很有趣。我想我预测的是1胜3负,所以他们实际上超出了我的预期。但事情发展成这样,很难不觉得他们错失了一些东西。你知道,在背靠背的第二晚对阵丹佛的比赛中,在主场第四节领先然后被逆转,然后对阵芝加哥的比赛中领先19分,进入第四节领先13分,在比赛还剩三分钟时领先7分,就这样被逆转,就像在芝加哥整场比赛都领先一样。芝加哥直到比赛还剩47秒才首次领先,而公牛需要的也仅仅是这些。赢得了比赛。所以,这就像米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)昨晚在那场比赛后所说的那样:在过去一百多分钟的比赛中,他们打得真的非常好,除了几段让他们输掉两场比赛的时间。所以,他们可以对他们所取得的成就感到一点欣慰,但他们仍然会觉得,伙计,他们本可以更贪婪一些,在那段时间里赢得更多胜利。

迈克·芬格:正如米奇·约翰逊所说,与人性作斗争。文班亚马(Victor Wembanyama)引用比尔·帕塞尔斯的话,正如我们经常在这个播客中做的那样,他说,我们可能应该有更多的胜利,但我们不配拥有更多的胜利,因为你就是你的战绩所说的那样。到目前为止,这支球队的情况就是这样。我确实认为,一支球队的在联盟中的位置,一个赛季的氛围,即使在一场背靠背的比赛中也能发生如此迅速的变化,这真是太神奇了。他们在丹佛取得了胜利,这个播客中的任何人都没有,我不确定马刺更衣室外是否有人认为他们能够去丹佛并在里高城赢得那场比赛,然后回来差点两次击败他们。与尼古拉·约基奇的两场史诗般的比赛。看看这周,想想他们取得了每个人都认为他们会取得的两场胜利,但天却塌下来了,这很奇怪。汤姆,天塌下来了吗?

汤姆·奥斯本:这很有趣,正如你指出的那样,我的情绪起伏不定。我在12月14日,在他们缺少人手的波特兰逆转取胜后写了一篇报道,讲述了他们进步了多少。在统计数据上,他们当时是NBA最好的关键时刻球队之一。现在不那么好了。但是,是的,我,你知道昨晚比赛的悲哀之处在于克里斯·保罗在丹佛比赛后在更衣室里告诉我,我会更多地参与进攻。他确实做到了。我的意思是,他的第四节表现出色,而且,你知道,他们浪费了这一点。

迈克·芬格:投进了一些关键球。

汤姆·奥斯本:对。

迈克·芬格:这甚至是那些比赛,就像一场接一场的投篮比赛,就像马刺过去常常打的比赛一样,那时候似乎一切都很重要。在其他比赛中,克里斯·保罗投进了一堆关键球。我的意思是,克里斯·保罗是他们昨晚第四节最好的球员。而且……

杰夫·麦克唐纳:他是那场比赛最后七分钟里唯一一个得分,投进运动战进球的球员。

汤姆·奥斯本:是的。而且还做了其他事情。我的意思是,他太棒了。

迈克·芬格:我们讨论了氛围或故事情节如何在每场比赛、每晚之间发生变化。昨晚似乎每分钟都在变化,杰夫和我坐在联合中心里讨论,当米奇让文班亚马坐在替补席上,而马刺每次文班亚马下场时都被压得喘不过气来的时候,马刺将如何度过最后几分钟。公牛队简直就是在屠杀他们。所以我相信马刺在比赛还剩五六分钟时领先三四分,杰夫,他们将如何度过这两分钟?米奇能让维克多在替补席上坐一两分钟吗?不知何故,在那段时间里,马刺实际上把领先优势扩大到了7分。你让文班亚马带着7分的领先优势回到场上,他是你最好的球员,你认为一切都很顺利,然后接下来发生了什么?10比0。

汤姆·奥斯本:10比0,是的。芝加哥的得分高潮。

迈克·芬格:就是这样。太疯狂了。整晚,马刺,你知道,直到最后,当维克多在场上的时候,马刺以压倒性优势赢得了比赛,而当维克多不在场上的时候,他们则以压倒性优势输掉了比赛。

汤姆·奥斯本:是的。

迈克·芬格:直到最后,情况完全逆转,当维克多坐在替补席上的时候,他们在第四节的几分钟内实际上赢得了比赛,而当维克多回来的时候,他们却被淘汰了。这只是…

汤姆·奥斯本:我想,他的正负值是-6,这通常会误导人,但这只是为了在最后时刻扭转局面。这不一定是维克多做了什么或没做什么造成的。有时,重复米奇·约翰逊的话,你是在与自满和一点点满足的人性作斗争。我认为这,这场比赛就是这场战斗的缩影,贯穿整个赛季。我认为在一个赛季中,你会与一点点满足感和一点点,呃,一种我们在新年前夜主场击败快船后就搞定一切的感觉作斗争,我们在这个播客中还没有提到这一点,在你客场击败丹佛之后,你认为你已经做到了。我的意思是,我想他们最高排在西部第几名?第七名?你在想季后赛,而不仅仅是附加赛。现在这将是一场战斗,而且它一直都会是一场战斗。但是,是的,就像汤姆说的,在82个赛季,82场比赛的过程中,潮起潮落有时非常惊人。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:记住,这是一支仍在学习很多东西的球队,这很有帮助。你知道,他们比去年有了突飞猛进的进步,但其中有一步是关于培养杀手本能,你知道,在比赛过程中,当你领先15分时,保持15分的领先优势,把它扩大到20分,而不是,就像,呃,我想是哈里森·巴恩斯昨晚在更衣室里跟我们说的那样,不要,你知道,当你领先15分时,不要等到只剩下8分时才恢复那种紧迫感。比如,你的紧迫感应该是到本节结束时把比分扩大到20分,诸如此类。我认为,我认为这就是,当这支球队,任何年轻球队真的,取得了一些成功时,有时会发生的情况,就像,好吧,你知道,我们仍然领先11分。好吧,我们仍然领先9分。好吧,我们,然后在你意识到之前,比赛就打平了,你就得进行一场战斗了。而且最好不要卷入街头斗殴,只是,你知道,当你领先的时候,保持领先,做那些让你领先的事情,继续做那些让你领先的事情。你会看到他们领先15分,感觉有点松懈,有人会投一个糟糕的三分球,或者有人会在背后传球失误,或者他们会尝试一个不应该尝试的空接,这只是你想让他们保持基本功,即使他们领先15分、17分、18分,也要保持领先,或者扩大领先优势,因为如果你和NBA的任何一支球队胡闹,就像我们昨晚看到的那样,他们可以反过来对付你。

迈克·芬格:公平地说,今年有很多次马刺是落后15、16分然后逆转的球队。所以,你知道,他们的对手,他们也反过来利用了同样的动态。

汤姆·奥斯本:维克多说他……

迈克·芬格:习惯于挥霍领先优势,是的。

汤姆·奥斯本:维克多,我不担心我们落后的时候,我担心我们领先的时候。

迈克·芬格:这太疯狂了。这在某种程度上是真的。这不仅仅是马刺,这不仅仅是一支年轻的球队,这是现代NBA,没有领先优势是安全的。但有时看看你对他们逆转的能力比你对他们阻挡对手的能力感觉更好,这很有趣。昨晚与公牛队的比赛就是这样一波又一波地袭来。科比·怀特(Coby White)的巨大扣篮。比赛中另一个改变的事情是,我们花了前三个季度的大部分时间来讨论迈克尔·乔丹的这支球队,每个人都害怕在维克多面前上篮。他最后盖了八个还是九个帽?

汤姆·奥斯本:是的。

迈克·芬格:而且,那些是他盖掉的投篮,有多少是他阻止他们尝试的,因为他们不想再尝试他了。然后是什么决定了比赛,科比·怀特在文班亚马上演的凶猛扣篮。那是一个非常精彩的回合。呃,我们想回顾一下整个星期更积极的氛围吗?那些,似乎是很久很久以前的事了。去年马刺和快船比赛的时候,但那是,那是一场相当不错、相当鼓舞人心的主场比赛,当地球员的全面努力。

汤姆·奥斯本:是的。从头到尾的胜利。

迈克·芬格:从头到尾的胜利。

汤姆·奥斯本:是的。感觉好像不是很久以前的事。

迈克·芬格:是的。然后,我想我们也低估了文班亚马和约基奇之间真正史诗般的、真正有趣的、真正来来回回的较量,我之前稍微提了一下。但我的意思是,这些比赛是你可以在未来几年里想象观看的那种比赛,对吧?

杰夫·麦克唐纳:是的,关于那两场比赛,我发现有趣的是,只是我,我想我还没有真正深入研究过,但当你观看它们时,掘金队正在使用,马刺队正在使用文班亚马的方式,就像掘金队已经习惯于使用约基奇的方式一样。这对我来说很有趣,这正是马刺所追求的原型。这并不意味着他们是完全相同的球员。我的意思是文班亚马会跳,而尼古拉不会。但他们都具备能够做任何事情的技能,你可以把他们放在任何位置,你可以把他们放在任何情况下,然后以这种方式寻找你的优势。这就是马刺对维克多所做的事情,米奇在丹佛的第一场比赛前告诉我们,是的,当我们赢得彩票得到文班亚马时,就像在我们见到他之前,我们正在翻看不同球队和球员的录像带,以及他们是如何被使用的,就像约基奇,约基奇和掘金的角色,我们集中注意力,因为我们可以设想构建一个进攻体系,就像掘金队围绕尼古拉·约基奇构建进攻体系的方式一样。所以当你观看这些比赛时,就有点像看到了马刺在未来设想的未来,你知道,当他们把一切都安排好的时候。他们可能需要更多的射手。就像约基奇有几个家伙,如果你包夹他,他可以把球传到三分线外,你就有一个人可能会投进。我不认为马刺现在有很多这样的球员,但再多几个接球就投的球员,让维克多对他们想让他做的很多事情更舒服,我想你知道,如果你看了掘金队的比赛,你就能看到马刺在未来想要什么。

迈克·芬格:是的。即使是那两个第四节和第二个加时赛,你也会看到维克多在一端做着约基奇的事情,而约基奇在另一端做着维克多的事情。这有点像他们之间的小型国际象棋比赛。我想是在丹佛的比赛中,维克多在罚球弧顶吸引了三个防守队员,他把球传给了凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)的空切。那完全是约基奇会在另一端做的动作。那完全是尼古拉会做的事情。我认为这很酷,看到这一点。圣安东尼奥比赛的结尾并不顺利,汤姆。你当时就在那里。有什么细节是你想要深入了解的,关于最后出了什么问题……我的意思是,你输给了,你输给了一个非常棒的球员,一个多次获得MVP的球员。输给丹佛加时赛没有什么丢人的,但是,但是关于最后是怎么输掉的,你印象最深的是什么?

汤姆·奥斯本:不仅仅是比赛的最后,还有第四节和加时赛,他们以41比19的比分被击败。就像进攻哑火了一样。在那场比赛中,克里斯,克里斯·保罗没有,在进攻端没有积极参与,没有像我们昨晚在芝加哥看到的那样积极寻找投篮机会。我认为这在其中起到了作用,你知道,因为他很被动,我认为这只是把一切都搞砸了。文班亚马在第四,加时赛也是,他后来承认他本可以更自信一些。所以,是的,这只是,你知道,积极主动,继续踩油门,或者用陈词滥调来说,但这,基本上就是它的全部内容。

迈克·芬格:现在连续两个第四节都出现了这种进攻哑火的情况,担忧程度如何?而且,你知道,不要针对任何人,但你看看你的得分王,文班亚马在对阵丹佛的第四节和加时赛中得到3分,在对阵芝加哥的第四节中没有得分。

汤姆·奥斯本:是的,只投了两次。这就是让我印象深刻的地方,我问了他这个问题,他说,是的,我本可以更自信一些。所以,是的。这只是一个,我几乎是在嘲笑我们自己,嘲笑整个媒体,嗯

迈克·芬格:明白你的意思?

汤姆·奥斯本:比赛……

迈克·芬格:如果我们,我的意思是,如果我们在四天前录制了这个播客,我们对维克多在第四节接管比赛的声音会有多大的不同……

汤姆·奥斯本:我们要工作到六月。

迈克·芬格:我们要工作到六月。我的意思是,维克多真的很,在他的百场比赛中。嘿,他庆祝了他的第一百场……

汤姆·奥斯本:他庆祝了他的21岁生日。他的前一百场比赛,有人会说他不关键,那是问题所在吗?就像他不是,他不是一个优秀的第四节球员,就像……

杰夫·麦克唐纳:在很长一段时间里,你几乎会说相反的话,比如有时他需要一段时间才能进入比赛状态,但到了第四节,你需要关键球的时候,文班亚马就会投进那些球。所以当最后两个,最后两个,他在第四节有点被动,或者可能是防守队员对他做了一些事情,让他无法发挥,他必须找到一个,找到一个反击的方法。

迈克·芬格:在某些方面,这听起来可能有点荒谬,我认为他受到了他对队友的极大信任的伤害。就像杰夫你昨晚对我提到的,他在第四节的几次突破,他把球带到油漆区,甚至没有看篮筐,他立刻就想把球传给比如说在底角的杰里米·索汉(Jeremy Sochan)或朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)或其他任何人。这几乎就像他非常相信那些家伙可以为他创造机会,以至于他放弃了自己可以投的更高命中率的投篮。如果这是对这样一个家伙的批评,那你可以接受。他相信,他相信他周围的人。

汤姆·奥斯本:我认为你说的完全正确。他也是他们最大的啦啦队长。我的意思是,他希望那些家伙做得更好,取得成功,有时这是以牺牲自己为代价的,牺牲球队为代价的,但不,我认为你,我认为你说的完全正确,迈克。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:我不一定介意在那种情况下把球传给空位的三分射手。我的意思是,这就是现在比赛的方式,但我也想说,我也想争辩说,如果你把球传出去,如果你进攻的结果是杰里米·索汉投三分,你就落入了防守的圈套。

迈克·芬格:是的。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:就像,如果你

点击查看原文:Getting meaner: Why the Spurs must stop being nice

Getting meaner: Why the Spurs must stop being nice

Columnist Mike Finger and Spurs beat reporters Jeff McDonald and Tom Orsborn discuss why the Spurs have struggled the last two games to finish in the fourth quarter, Chris Pauls’ impact on scoring and if De’Aaron Fox would be a fit in San Antonio.

Suggested reading:

For Spurs’ Chris Paul, points are part of the job too

Wembanyama learns to get mean as Spurs fight human nature

For Spurs’ Mitch Johnson, progress is routine

3 Takeaways as the Spurs blow another late lead

\

Here is the transcript of the podcast:

Mike Finger: From a highly secure network of top-secret locations across North America, this is the Spurs Insider road trip edition. I’m your host, Mike Finger, joined by our usual panel of Express-News Spurs beat writers, Jeff McDonald and Tom Orsborn, along with sports editor Nick Talbot. Jeff and I are in our secure locations in the frigid North, as opposed to the frigid South. The whole country is frigid this week, and so are the local cagers, unfortunately. When we talked to you last time, we had predicted, I believe, a two-and-two four-game stretch, which the Spurs got. But they got those two victories in an unexpected way perhaps. Now Jeff, we’re talking to the listeners after the second consecutive blown fourth-quarter lead. Is all okay in Spursland?

Jeff McDonald: It is kind of interesting. I think I predicted a one-and-three stretch, so they’ve actually outperformed my expectations. But then it’s hard to, the way things played out, it’s hard to like not feel like they left something on the table there. You know, being up in the fourth quarter at home on the second night of a back-to-back against Denver and then blowing it, and then up 19 against Chicago, and up 13 going into the fourth quarter and up seven with three minutes to go and just blowing it, like leading the whole game in Chicago. Chicago didn’t take its first lead until 47 seconds to go, and that’s all the Bulls needed. Won the game. So, it’s it’s kind of like what Mitch Johnson said last night after that game: like they’ve in the last hundred-some-odd minutes of basketball they’ve played really, really good, except for just a couple of stretches that cost them two wins. So, they can feel a little little good about what they uh have accomplished, but um they still have to feel like, man, they could have gotten greedy and gotten some more wins in that stretch.

Mike Finger: Fighting a little bit of human nature, as Mitch Johnson said. Victor Wembanyama, channeling Bill Parcells as we often do on this podcast, saying, um, we might we probably should have more wins, but we don’t deserve more wins because you are what your record says you are. And that’s been the case so far for this team. I do think it’s just amazing how quickly the outlook of a team’s um just spot in the in the league, just just the vibe of the season can change, um even during the course of one back-to-back where they got that victory in Denver that nobody on this podcast, and I’m I’m not sure anybody outside the Spurs locker room, thought they were going to be able to go to Denver and win that game, um in the mile-high city, and then come back and almost beat them twice. Just two epic games against Nikola Jokic. Um, it’s it’s just strange to to look at this week and think they got the two victories everybody thought they would, but the sky is falling. Tom, is the sky falling?

Tom Orsborn: Well, it’s it’s funny, as you you were pointing out, my kind of ebbs and flows. I I wrote a story on December 14th, uh after their shorthanded come-from-behind win in Portland, about how much they had improved. They they were one of at that point they were one of the best clutch teams in the NBA statistically. Um, you know, now not so much. But um, yeah, I I you know what was sad about last night’s game was Chris Paul after, you know, telling me in the locker room after the Denver game, I’m going to become more involved in the offense. He sure did. I mean that was a nice fourth quarter by him, and uh, you know, they squandered that.

Mike Finger: Hit some huge shots.

Tom Orsborn: Right.

Mike Finger: It’s it’s even those were those those games where just like it it’s shot-maker after shot-maker, like the the games that the Spurs used to play back in the day when it seemed like everything mattered. And other plays, Chris Paul hit a bunch of big ones. I mean Chris Paul was their best player in the fourth quarter last night. And…

Jeff McDonald: He was the only player to score a basket, a field goal for them in the final seven minutes of that game.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah. And doing other things too. I mean he was fantastic.

Mike Finger: And and we talk about how much the vibe or the storyline can change from game to game, night to night. It seemed like from minute to minute last night, uh Jeff and I sitting there in the in the United Center talking about um how the Spurs were going to weather those last couple of minutes when Mitch sent Victor Wembanyama to the bench and the Spurs just had been getting overwhelmed every time Wembanyama went to the bench. Um, the the Bulls were just killing them. And so I believe the Spurs lead was three or four with about five or six minutes to go Jeff, and how are they going to weather these two minutes? Can Mitch leave Victor on the bench for a minute, two minutes? Well somehow during that stretch the Spurs actually uh extend the lead to seven points. And you bring Victor Wembanyama back onto the floor with a seven-point lead, your best player, you think everything’s gold, and and I believe what happened next? Ten to nothing.

Tom Orsborn: Ten to nothing, yeah. Chicago run.

Mike Finger: And that was it. Pretty wild. All night long, the Spurs, you know, until the end, the Spurs overwhelmingly won the minutes when Victor was on the floor and overwhelmingly lost the minutes when Victor was off the floor.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah.

Mike Finger: Until the very end when that just completely flip-flopped and they actually won those those uh little bit of minutes in the fourth quarter where Victor was on the bench and then got wiped out when Victor came back in. It was it was just…

Tom Orsborn: He earned up as a minus six, I think, on the in the plus minus, which often can be misleading, but this just for that to flip like that at the end. And it wasn’t necessarily because of anything Victor did or didn’t do. It’s it’s sometimes to to repeat the Mitch Johnson phrase, you’re fighting the human nature of getting complacent and uh getting a little satisfied with yourself. And I think that’s um that game is kind of a microcosm of that fight over the course of a season. I think during the course in a season, you fight the human nature of getting a little satisfied and getting a little uh uh of a of a feeling that we figured it all out after you beat the Clippers at home on New Year’s Eve, which we haven’t mentioned on this podcast, after you beat Denver on the road, and think you’re think you’re in it. I mean they I think they got as high as what? Seventh place in the West? And you’re thinking playoffs, not just play-in playoffs. And now it’s going to be a fight, and it’s al- it always was going to be a fight. But uh yeah, the like like Tom said, the ebbs and flows during the course of an 82 season, 82-game season are are quite striking sometimes.

Jeff McDonald: And it helps to remember this is a team that’s still learning a lot of things. You know, they’ve they’ve come leaps and bounds from last year, um but there’s a step in there about, you know, developing a killer instinct and, you know, in the course of the game when you’re up 15, keeping it at 15, pushing it to 20, not um like uh I think it was Harrison Barnes talking to us in the locker room last night, um don’t you know, when you’re up 15, don’t wait till it’s eight to get that urgency back. Like your your urgency should be to push that out to 20 by the end of the quarter, and that sort of thing. And I think I think that’s kind of what what happens sometimes when this team, this any young team really, um has a little bit of success, it’s like, well, you know, we’re still up by 11. Well, we’re still up by nine. Well, we’re and then by the time you know it, it’s a tie ball game and you have a you have a fight on your hands. And and it’s always better to not get into a street fight, just, you know, when you’re ahead, stay ahead, and do the do the things that got you there, continue to do the things that got you there. Um, you know, you’ll see them be up 15 and kind of feeling loosie-goosie, and somebody will take a bad three, or somebody will throw a way behind-the-back pass, or they’ll try a lob that shouldn’t have been tried, and it’s it’s just you want them to stay fundamental, even when they’re up 15, 17, 18 points, to keep the lead there or or push the lead out because if you screw around with any team in the NBA, as we saw last night, they can come back on you.

Mike Finger: And to be fair, um there have been plenty of occasions this year where the Spurs have been the team that has been down 15, 16, and come back. So, you know, their opponent they’ve taken advantage of that same dynamic in reverse.

Tom Orsborn: And Victor said he’s…

Mike Finger: Due to blow leads, yeah.

Tom Orsborn: Victor, I don’t worry about when we’re behind, I worry about when we’re ahead.

Mike Finger: That’s crazy. And it’s sort of true. And that and that’s not just the Spurs, that’s not just a young team, that’s that’s the modern-day NBA where no lead is safe. But it does it it it is interesting to look at sometimes that you feel better about their ability to come back than you do about their ability to to hold the team off. That just came in waves last night with the with the Bulls. Um, huge huge dunk by Coby White. Another thing that flipped during the game is we spent most of the first three quarters talking about how uh this franchise of Michael Jordan, just everybody was petrified to go to the rim against Victor. Did he finish with eight or nine blocks?

Tom Orsborn: Yeah.

Mike Finger: And and uh those were the shots he blocked, how many did did he just prevent them from even trying because they didn’t want to try him anymore. And then what what decides the game, just a vicious thundering slam dunk by Coby White over Victor Wembanyama. Um, it was that that was a heck of a play. Uh do we want to go back and review more of the week as a whole, more positive vibes? Those uh it seems like a long, long time ago. It was last year when the Spurs played the Clippers, but that was a that was a pretty decent, pretty encouraging all-around uh home effort by the the local cagers.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah. Wire-to-wire win.

Mike Finger: Wire-to-wire win.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah. It doesn’t seem like a long time ago.

Mike Finger: Yeah. And then the the I think we’re also giving short shrift here to the really epic, really entertaining, really fun back-and-forth between Wembanyama and Jokic I mentioned a little bit earlier. But I mean those are the kind of games you can envision watching for years to come, right?

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, and what I found interesting about those pair of games, um is just I I didn’t I guess I hadn’t really delved too deeply into it, but then when you watch them, uh the the Nuggets are using the Spurs are using Wembanyama the way the Nuggets have grown to use Jokic. And that’s interesting to me that that’s kind of the archetype um that the Spurs are after. It’s not and it’s not that they’re the same player exactly. I mean Wembanyama jumps and Nikola doesn’t. But there’s just the the the the skill sets both of them have to be able to do basically anything, and you can play them anywhere, and you can put them in any sort of situation and just hunt your advantages that way. Um, that’s kind of what the Spurs are doing with Victor, and Mitch told us before that first game in Denver that yeah, when when we when we won the lottery to get Victor Wembanyama, like before we’d even met him, we were going through tapes of of different different teams and and players and how they’re used, and and like Jokic was Jokic and the Nuggets role we zeroed in on because we could envision running constructing an offense the way the Nuggets have constructed an offense around Nikola Jokic. So when you watch those games, it’s kind of like maybe seeing into the future a little bit of what the Spurs envision, um you know, when when they get everything on board. You know, they probably need more shooters. Like Jokic has a couple guys where if you throw that if you double-team him, he can whip it out there to the three-point line and you got a guy that’s probably going to knock it down. I don’t think the Spurs have an abundance of those yet, but a couple more catch-and-shoot guys, um get Victor more comfortable with a lot of the things that they want him to do, and I think you know, when you if you watch the Nuggets games, you can see what the Spurs are gunning for down the road.

Mike Finger: Yeah. And and even those two fourth quarters and overtime of the second one, you would see Victor doing Jokic things at one end of the floor and Jokic doing Victor things at the other end of the floor. It was kind of a mini back-and-forth chess match between them. Um, I think it was the game in in Denver when Victor drew like three defenders to him at the top of the key and he threw a pass to a cutter for Keldon Johnson. And that’s some that’s totally a play that totally a play that Jokic would have made at the other end of the floor. It was it was exactly what Nikola would have done. And I thought that was cool, um to see that. The was the um the end of the San Antonio game didn’t go great Tom. Uh, and you were you were there for that one. Uh, just any minutiae there that you wanted to get into of of what went wrong at the end of its… I mean you lose you lose to a heck of a player, a multi-time MVP. Like there’s no shame in losing to Denver in overtime, but uh but what what sticks out to you about how that one got away at the end?

Tom Orsborn: Well, not just the not just the end end of the game, but the fourth and overtime they were outscored like 41 to 19. It’s just like the offense blew a fuse. And that was the game in that that Chris wasn’t Chris Paul wasn’t uh a big participant offensively, wasn’t hunting shots and being aggressive like we saw last night in Chicago. And I think that that played a factor in that, you know, with him being passive, I think it just threw everything off. And uh and Wembanyama in the fourth uh overtime too, he admitted afterward that he could have been a little more assertive. So yeah, it’s just, you know, being aggressive and keeping the foot on the pedal or in the cliché, but that’s uh that’s basically what it came down to.

Mike Finger: What’s what’s the concern level that this kind of offensive power outage has happened in two straight fourth quarters now? And and you can, you know, not to single out anybody, but you look at your leading scorer, Wembanyama had three points in uh fourth quarter and overtime against Denver and was scoreless in the fourth quarter against Chicago.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah, took only two shots. That’s what stood out to me, and that’s I asked him about it, and he said, yeah, I could have been more assertive. So yeah. It’s just a uh I’m almost laughing at us, laughing at the whole media um

Mike Finger: Know what you mean?

Tom Orsborn: Games…

Mike Finger: After the if we I mean we if we would recorded this podcast four days ago, how different would we be sounding about how Victor is taking over fourth…

Tom Orsborn: We’re going to be working until June.

Mike Finger: We’re going to be working until June. And I mean Victor’s been a really For his hundred games. Hey, he celebrated his hundredth game of the…

Tom Orsborn: He celebrated his 21st birthday. His first hundred games, like would anyone say that he like he wasn’t clutch, that that was the issue? Like he wasn’t he wasn’t a good fourth-quarter player, like…

Jeff McDonald: For the for the longest time, that’s what you would almost would say the opposite, like sometimes it takes a while to get into a game, but man by fourth-quarter time and you need big shots, Victor Wembanyama’s hitting those things. So when the last two the last two, he’s been a little passive in the fourth, or maybe it’s something that the defenses are doing to sort of take him out of it, and he’s got to find a find a counter.

Mike Finger: In in some ways, and this is going to sound maybe a little ridiculous, um he’s been victimized by I think his immense trust in his teammates. Like it’s Jeff you mentioned to me last night about a couple of the drives that he had made in the fourth quarter where he gets the ball in the paint and really doesn’t even look at the rim, he’s immediately looking to fire a pass out to let’s say Jeremy Sochan in the corner or Julian Champagnie or whoever. And that’s almost like he has so much belief that those guys can make a play for him that he’s passing up the higher-percentage shot that he could take himself. And if that’s a criticism of a guy like that’s that’s one that you can live with. He believes that he believes in the guys around him.

Tom Orsborn: I think you’re you’re exactly right. He he’s their biggest cheerleader too. I mean he wants those guys to do well and to succeed, and sometimes it’s at its own detriment own detriment of the team, but no, I think you’re I think you’re exactly right about that, Mike.

Jeff McDonald: And I don’t necessarily mind the kick out to an open three-point shooter at that in in those situations. I mean that’s kind of what the game is these days, but I would also say I would also argue that if you’re kicking out if the result of your of your possession is a Jeremy Sochan taking a three-pointer, you’ve played into the defensive hands.

Mike Finger: Yeah.

Jeff McDonald: Like just just if you’re Wembanyama, take the layup. If it…

Mike Finger: That’s something he has to learn. He has to learn like that it’s sometimes the right pass isn’t the right pass, depending on the situation, depending on who the player is, where that player is, that type of thing. Hey, do you remember um there was a generational uh number-one lottery pick uh best biggest hyped prospect in years who came into the league early on and got a lot of crap for passing the ball in the fourth quarter?

Jeff McDonald: Are you talking about Andrea Bargnani?

Mike Finger: That one, and there was another one, uh you know, that and I’m not sure how the kid turned out, less something.

Tom Orsborn: Oh, Bronny’s dad.

Mike Finger: Bronny’s dad. Absolutely. So many times earlier in his career it was like why won’t LeBron James take the shot? He’s passing the ball, he’s afraid of the moment. I think he did okay. I think and I’m and Victor is not the same player that LeBron is obviously. But LeBron had that too where he thought as he’s making his move, even when he was, you know, 20 years old, 21 years old, 22 years old, the game’s on the line. I I remember this vividly, you know, he would make the the pass because he thought it was the right pass, and his teammate would miss the shot, and he would get all kinds of grief for being afraid to take the shot himself. But I think he he looked at the game the way Victor sort of does, and that hey, that guy’s open, and that’s the right pass, you know, I’m going to make it. Um, well he LeBron figured out uh when to be aggressive, and I think I think Victor will too.

Jeff McDonald: Yeah.

Mike Finger: Yeah. Anyway. I mean this is just a 21-year-old guy.

Jeff McDonald: Barely 21.

Mike Finger: Barely 21. Turned 21 in France before he turned 21 in the United States. That was interesting.

Jeff McDonald: That was Sandro coming through after the uh win in Denver when when uh Victor was doing his media in the hall Sandro just kind of bust busted up and uh announces that uh hey, he’s 21 in France now because that was his bir- you know his birthday was the next day.

Mike Finger: Uh-huh. So, it was a time zone joke. And as uh I pointed out off the air, like Sandro has a legitimate point there. Like I think Sandro understands the world better than most of us. And uh really, Victor should have been you should celebrate your birthday not based on where you are on your birthday, but where you were when you were born. So, I think Sandro was correct. He was born in France. He was 21 years old and when it was uh you know uh 10 p.m. in in uh Denver that night, he should have already been considered 21 because he was 21 in France. Sandro Sandro understands things that most of us don’t.

Jeff McDonald: So I’m going to just tell her when I was born on Jupiter and I’m 15 years old.

Mike Finger: Well there you go. I’m not sure people would buy that, but…

Jeff McDonald: I bet they would. Listen listen to Sandro more is my point.

Mike Finger: What else did we want to talk about this from the past four games? Any uh any more Keldon Johnson observations? Did we do that too much last week?

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, I don’t know. He’s just kind of where he I don’t know. He’s he’s back on he started the one game when Sochan was hurt and was fine. And now he’s back on the bench playing limited minutes and figuring things out. It doesn’t as we talked about last week, it doesn’t all look as spectacular often as it did earlier in the year when he was starting and playing 26 minutes a night. So it’s going to just be short bursts, and he’ll do good things and bad things.

Mike Finger: How’s uh how’s Devon how’s Devin Vassell doing? What’s your take on him?

Tom Orsborn: Well, I feel like you’re leading me. Uh, I did have a nice chat with Devin at shootaround before the Chicago game, and that seems like a long time ago too. Uh and I this this might eventually make it into express-news.com, the hard-copy edition of the Express-News, maybe not uh maybe not this week, maybe not today, but um just the idea of when Devin Vassell got hurt in last season, um he was a guy who was still averaging what? 18, 19 a game, still playing with a a rookie in Victor Wembanyama who whose game was not as complete as it is now, who wasn’t necessarily like as as um ball-dominant as he’s become. And so Devin Vassell, especially going back to the year before Victor was drafted, Devin had spent a lot of time with the Spurs as a number-one option and as the guy who felt like he had to hunt his shots, that he had to uh be the aggressive one, lead role, lead lead scorer role, all that kind of stuff. He comes back to the Spurs, um several weeks into this season after having offseason surgery, and he comes back as a backup and joins a a rotation in which Victor Wembanyama has become a much more complete uh dominant player, and you’re not going to you’re not going to have as many opportunities as Victor’s sidekick. And uh the point of the conversation with Devin is just uh he he admits that that Victor is doing so much that that his role is changing in a way. And uh he’s got to find his spots, and he’s got to remind himself that hey, he can’t just be floating around and watching them uh Victor dominate. Instead of um in instead of uh you know being the lead scorer, he can still be a second scorer, but in a way where he can keep his aggression. There’s that theme that Tom talked about with Chris Paul, you still need to find your aggressive spots. And I I I just think that’s interesting uh to see how even the role of a second player around Victor Wembanyama can change as Victor’s game grows. And I think Devin’s been pretty good lately. He wasn’t great last night against Chicago, but I I I I think he’s making progress in in figuring that out, as so many people are on that team are.

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, I think the process is good with him so far. I I think I think recently he’s missing shots. He’s missing shots, but if you figure that will that will iron itself out, but the the process is good. He’s getting he’s he’s looking for his looks, he’s getting the looks he wants. He’s been like a slam-dunking fool lately, getting in the paint and stuff. So, I, you know, I think his shooting percentages have not been what what what you’d want, and I think there’s an ebb and flow to that throughout the season and regression to the mean and yada yada, and once once that bounces back, you’ll you’ll see something pretty special from him, I think.

Mike Finger: When I asked uh Mitch about um what he’s doing better, Devin Vassell, that said he he’s better understanding what winning plays are, which I thought was a pretty high compliment of uh of Devin. Like I think that it it Mitch Mitch is not going to the issue um he’s not going to come out and rip players, but when he says something like that uh Jeff and Tom you can chime in on this, it seems like he’s pretty sincere when he offers uh uh compliments to people. Like it’s not it’s not hollow praise usually with him. So yeah.

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, I think they’re happy with him. Um, yeah, what what else do you want us to talk about this week?

Mike Finger: You want to talk about De’Aaron Fox?

Jeff McDonald: Sure. I’m going to throw out a grenade.

Mike Finger: Sure. When’s he showing up? We’re burying the lead. They’re not the Spurs are not going to make a midseason trade, a major midseason trade. Um, you might see something before the trade deadline, we got about a month. Um, I do think and and I mean this sincerely, like when I imagine which player uh best fits as a number-two guy to Victor Wembanyama or a fellow all-star caliber player to fit alongside Victor Wembanyama, um I have a hard time imagining somebody in terms of playing style at both ends of the floor, in terms of timeline, in terms of personality, all that stuff. I I have a hard time imagining a better candidate than De’Aaron Fox. That’s exactly the guy I want if I’m the Spurs. And so when you read reports that uh the Kings are are might have to consider moving him, and they’ve been playing better lately by the way since they fired Mike Brown and Doug Christie’s taken over, they’ve won a few games in a row and they’re probably not going to trade anybody during the season. They might not trade anybody during the offseason. But um when you read reports that they were considering it and that the Spurs were among the teams who had inquired, of course the Spurs were among the teams that would inquire. Like that would be uh front office malpractice if the Spurs wouldn’t inquire because that’s just like your dream target. Um, and I think that if that ever would come up, especially this offseason, if for some reason the Kings thing falls apart, if De’Aaron doesn’t want to sign an extension, that is exactly the kind of player you should be interested in if you’re the Spurs. He just fits so well. Um, and I’ll throw that out to the group.

Jeff McDonald: And you’re definitely reaching the point here eventually where it’s time to spend some of these picks and upgrade the roster. You can’t hold onto them forever. Uh, the the trick has always been, you know, who to spend the picks on and for how many and how much, and when is the right move to, you know, there’s there’s multiple moves you could make or try to make through throughout, you know, the course this rebuilding process. And the trick is doing doing the right one and not doing the wrong one. You know, sometimes you do the wrong one, it it does more harm than good, and you’ve wasted your picks and blah blah blah. Um, that’s always been the hard thing is knowing when to pull the trigger. But I agree with you, De’Aaron would be a he would that would be a nice little little two-man game between those two.

Mike Finger: I mean amazing. And and you talk about picking the right ones, not taking the wrong ones. Like if you longtime listeners of this podcast and readers of the newspaper know that uh I don’t think any of us, and I know I wasn’t ever a proponent of the Trae Young trade. And uh like I wouldn’t have done that. I think that De’Aaron Fox is a better fit. I think he’s a better defender. I think he he he the the timeline works. Um, I think personality-wise he’d fit in. He’s Texas guy. Not sure how much that matters, but it’s it’s part of it.

Tom Orsborn: Well, his wife has roots in San Antonio.

Mike Finger: Wife has roots in San Antonio. I think that uh you know, with with the Trae Young thing, there would be somewhat of a back-and-forth as to who the true star is. From everything I’ve I’ve gathered about De’Aaron Fox, I think he’d understand that he’s like one-B to Victor, um if not two. Um, I I just think that would be awesome. And it probably won’t happen, like these things hardly ever happen. But if if you’re out there pondering what move the Spurs make, what big splash they make, that’s the kind of move you’re interested in. And as Jeff said, uh they have all these picks coming up. They have this cap space, you’re going to you have to use it at some point. The key is to use it on the right type of move. And uh you know what I think I mentioned this to to a group of people talking about this yesterday here in Chicago. Like the uh I don’t think that the Spurs one-B or or uh second superstar is on the roster right now. I think they really like Keldon Johnson. I think they really like Devin Vassell, Jeremy Sochan, like those three guys are integral to the future. But when the Spurs compete for their next championship, I don’t think any of those guys is the second option that you dream of. I think that player’s still is outside the organization. And uh you’re probably not going to draft that guy, even though they have a lot of draft picks coming up. You’re you’re probably going to want to target somebody either in free agency or a trade. And I think that De’Aaron Fox is the kind of guy that could fit. Um, I’m not sure what people are supposed to do with this because I don’t think the trade’s happening during this season, and, you know, it’s just something to dream on, I guess.

Jeff McDonald: I was going to say, all that said, I don’t get the sense the Spurs are in this mode of like, oh, we’re right there, we need to do something right now to go out this season. I don’t I don’t I don’t If people are expecting that at this trade deadline, they’re probably going to be sorely disappointed. I think the the Spurs the whole this whole season was can we take a a palpable step forward? And so far they’ve done that. I think we were all saying if they’re competing for a play-in spot, if they’re competing for the play-in spot, you know, they’ve they’ve taken that step forward this year. That’s that’s a worthy goal. I don’t see them pushing all their chips into the middle middle and going all in uh just trying to make the playoffs this season. If they do, you know, if they if they can maybe there’s some minor moves, maybe this team is good enough to do it on its own. And if they do, great. But I don’t think that’s the that’s the overriding goal of this season is is oh my god, we got to make the playoffs, we’re right there.

Mike Finger: For a backup big maybe, you know, to to win the playoffs this year, I don’t know.

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, that’s an area of need. And I’m glad Jeff brought some uh a much-needed disclaimer there to to make it clear that we’re not pushing for a huge in-season trade because that’s not the goal at all. The the reason I bring up Fox is if that player is available at this moment, they would be targeting him not to try to make the playoffs this season. That wouldn’t that wouldn’t be the goal of that. It would be hey, this is a guy who could help us win championships in 2027 and 2028 and down the line, be here for the long haul. Um, the only reason you’d make that trade in-season is if you thought, you know, if we don’t make it now, someone else is going to make it and we’re not going to have that shot.

Mike Finger: Exactly. Or this is our or the or the deal is so good,

Jeff McDonald: Yeah.

Mike Finger: uh that that uh why why not make it now and go for it? You know the any deal like that just to make the contracts work it would be like a Keldon Johnson and Zach Collins plus just a bunch of your picks. And I think if that’s like Sacramento would’s I I and I don’t think Sacramento is going to do this, but if for some crazy reason Sacramento would say that’s what we want on February 4th, then I think you’d consider doing it. I I think the odds against that are astronomical. But um it’s something to to keep in mind heading into the offseason.

Jeff McDonald: We’re wasting everyone’s time.

Mike Finger: We’re wasting everyone’s time. But that’s what people listen to podcasts for, is to waste their own time, to dream.

Jeff McDonald: I mean, you wouldn’t be listening to this podcast if you cared about wasting your own time.

Mike Finger: Exactly. Exactly. It’s just another diversion to keep you uh uh uh from pondering just the bleakness of your own existence. And we’re glad to help you.

Jeff McDonald: And on that note, I don’t think about that.

Mike Finger: We’re glad we’re glad for 30 minutes every week to help you not ponder the bleakness of your own existence. Like that’s that’s our job’s here. And we’re we’re so glad that you come along. Um, we need to do the future uh prediction thing. That’s that’s the weekly routine. Um,

Jeff McDonald: Well it’s going to get bad.

Mike Finger: What’s what’s what’s what’s ahead Jeff? A Wednesday night game in Milwaukee against Giannis, uh two games that Tom will be covering in Los Angeles. Uh is there another one next Monday before we uh uh tape?

Tom Orsborn: They got two against Memphis at