By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-01-08 18:38:09
由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
在一场令人沮丧的失利中，圣安东尼奥马刺最终以114-110负于芝加哥公牛。这是一场马刺本该赢下的比赛。这场失利使圣安东尼奥的战绩跌至18胜18负。而公牛的战绩则提升至17胜19负。
马刺开局强劲，在第一节结束时以29-20领先。好家伙们在第二节继续保持强势。进入第三节，圣安东尼奥的领先优势一度扩大到19分。
遗憾的是，马刺放松了油门，让公牛重新回到了比赛中。圣安东尼奥开始打一种随意的篮球，充斥着不明智的投篮和胆怯的防守。公牛则持续努力，马刺在第四节陷入得分荒。芝加哥以32-15赢下第四节，圣安东尼奥彻底崩盘。
数据：马刺对阵公牛
马刺对阵公牛 – 最终评级
维克托·文班亚马(Victor Wembanyama)
直到第四节开始之前，文班亚马都打得很好。他投篮命中率高，篮板球积极，传球聪明，并且出色地防守篮筐。看起来他将带领马刺取得另一场令人印象深刻的胜利。不幸的是，第四节改变了文班亚马和马刺的一切。他在最后一节4投0中，看起来很疲惫，无法创造出高质量的投篮机会。文班亚马在第四节的防守仍然不错，但马刺迫切需要他出手并命中关键球——但这并没有发生。
评分：C
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
首先，我认为瓦塞尔的防守非常出色。他积极、强硬、专注，他的两次抢断和三个盖帽就是证明。不幸的是，球场的另一端对瓦塞尔来说并不那么友好。实际上，情况依旧：糟糕的三分球命中率，弧线内值得商榷的投篮选择，以及在圣安东尼奥需要他得分时出现的许多问题。瓦塞尔的传球比平时要好，但他仍然难以融入球队的战术体系。
评分：C-
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
保罗试图扛起球队，带领他们走向胜利。然而，他没能完全做到。尽管如此，他还是打出了近期最全面的表现。保罗的得分回来了——他在第四节拿下了球队15分中的7分。这位控球后卫总共送出9次助攻，只有1次失误，再次以极高的智慧掌控着进攻。我喜欢保罗的防守，他展现出了大量的领导力。总而言之，马刺对他们39岁的地板将军的要求不能再高了。
评分：A-
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯的进攻效率不高，但我并不介意他的投篮选择，而且他很好地分享了球。他的防守和篮板球都处于合格水平。巴恩斯最近状态火热，所以这对他来说算是略有退步。
评分：C+
杰里米·索汉(Jeremy Sochan)
索汉在最近因背部问题缺席一场比赛后，看起来仍然没有完全恢复。他缺乏一些灵活性，这影响了他的防守端表现和篮板球的争夺。他在对阵公牛的比赛中有一些防守亮点，但他曾经表现得更好。在进攻端，索汉的表现还不错。他命中了一记三分球，完成了篮下终结，并减少了失误。希望索汉能尽快恢复健康。
评分：C+
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊在篮下的终结做得很好，但三分球再次失准。本赛季他的三分球命中率只有27.6%。希望他的投篮能有所回升，因为这将为他打开更多的突破路线。在对阵公牛的比赛中，他的防守表现平平无奇，有好球也有坏球。
评分：B-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
有几段时间，卡斯尔看起来像是场上最好的组织者。他持球时表现出色——要么找到得分途径，要么用完美的传球找到队友。卡斯尔有一些失误，但他在进攻端看起来非常稳健。在防守端，我也认为这位新秀表现出色。他专注于自己的职责，让芝加哥队的日子不好过。
评分：A-
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼本场比赛三分球9投4中，没有投两分球。鉴于他自从替补出场以来三分球一直投得很好，我不能责怪他的选择。我也认为尚帕尼在防守端的表现中规中矩。
评分：B+
查尔斯·巴塞(Charles Bassey)
巴塞再次获得了担任球队替补中锋的机会。他的表现并不算出色。每当巴塞上场，公牛就会攻击他并且取得成功。作为文班亚马的替补很困难，但防守端的下降幅度不能像对阵公牛时那么大。巴塞在篮板上做得不错，但他需要做得更多才能赢得轮换阵容中的位置。
评分：C
特雷·琼斯(Tre Jones)
琼斯命中了他唯一的投篮，并且像疯子一样追逐每一个类似于地板球的机会。我真的很喜欢他的传球，他的防守也还不错。如果琼斯希望在这个球队中获得更大的位置，他需要开始更多地得分。
评分：B
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
我一直批评约翰逊在最近的第四节比赛中没有让文班亚马得到足够的休息。好吧，他在对阵公牛的第四节尝试让文班亚马休息，但情况并没有真正改变。我想这取决于文班亚马如何弄清楚如何在关键时刻有所发挥。事后看来，卡斯尔本应该在对阵公牛的比赛中打更多的时间。多让尚帕尼上场可能也不会有什么坏处。
评分：B-
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Chicago Bulls – Game #36
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Chicago Bulls – Game #36
In a disheartening loss, the San Antonio Spurs fell to the Chicago Bulls by a final score of 114-110. This was a game the Spurs should have won. Instead, the loss dropped San Antonio to 18-18. The win improved the Bulls to 17-19.
The Spurs got off to a strong start and led 29-20 at the end of the first quarter. The good guys kept rolling in the second quarter. To begin the third period, San Antonio’s advantage grew to as large as 19 points.
Sadly, the Spurs took their foot off the gas and allowed the Bulls back into the game. San Antonio began playing a casual brand of basketball that featured ill-advised shots and timid defense. The Bulls kept playing hard and the Spurs hit a dry spell in the fourth quarter. Chicago won the fourth 32-15 as San Antonio completed their collapse.
Stats: Spurs at Bulls
Spurs at Bulls – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Up until the start of the fourth quarter, Wembanyama was having a great game. He was shooting well, rebounding with purpose, making smart passes and defending the rim exquisitely. It looked like he was going to lead the Spurs to another impressive win. Unfortunately, the fourth quarter changed everything for Wembanyama and the Spurs. He was 0-for-4 in the final stanza and looked tired and unable to generate high-quality shots. Wembanyama’s defense was still good in the fourth but the Spurs desperately needed him to take and make big shots — and that didn’t happen.
Grade: C
Devin Vassell
First of all, I thought Vassell played really good defense. He was active, physical and attentive, as evidenced by his two steals and three blocks. Unfortunately, the other end of the court wasn’t as kind to Vassell. It was, actually, more of the same: bad three-point shooting, questionable shot-selection inside of the arc and a lot of hiccups when San Antonio needed him to score. Vassell passed the ball better than usual but he’s still struggling to play within the team concepts.
Grade: C-
Chris Paul
Paul tried to put the team on his back and carry them to victory. However, he couldn’t quite do it. He still finished with his most well-rounded outing in quite a while. Paul’s scoring was back — and he scored seven of his team’s 15 points in the fourth quarter. The point guard totaled nine assists and only one turnover while once again orchestrating the offense with extreme wisdom. I liked Paul’s defense and he exhibited a ton of leadership. All in all, the Spurs couldn’t have asked for much more out of their 39-year-old floor general.
Grade: A-
Harrison Barnes
Barnes had an inefficient offensive performance but I didn’t mind his shot-selection and he shared the ball well. His defense and rebounding were at adequate levels. Barnes had been hot recently so this was a little bit of a step backwards in that regard.
Grade: C+
Jeremy Sochan
Sochan still doesn’t look 100% after missing a game recently with a back issue. He’s lacking a little bit of mobility, which hurts him on the defensive end and when it comes to rebounding the basketball. He had moments on defense against the Bulls but he’s been better. Offensively, Sochan was mostly fine. He hit a three-pointer, finished at the rim and limited his mistakes. Let’s hope Sochan can soon look healthy once again.
Grade: C+
Keldon Johnson
Johnson finished well in the lane but once again struggled from downtown. He’s now shooting 27.6% from three-point range on the season. Hopefully his shooting comes around because that’ll open even more driving lanes for him. Defensively against the Bulls, there was nothing to write home about. He had a mixed bag of good plays and bad plays.
Grade: B-
Stephon Castle
There were a few stretches where Castle looked like the best playmaker on the court. He was cooking with the ball in his hands — either finding avenues to score or hitting teammates with perfect passes. Castle had some errors here and there but he looked damn solid offensively. Defensively, I also thought the rookie performed well. He was locked in on his duties and made life difficult for Chicago.
Grade: A-
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie finished the game 4-for-9 from three-point range and didn’t shoot a two-pointer. With as well as he’s been shooting threes since moving to the bench, I can’t blame his decision-making. I also thought Champagnie was average on the defensive end of the court.
Grade: B+
Charles Bassey
Bassey got another chance at being the team’s backup center. It wasn’t exactly a pretty performance. Whenever Bassey entered the game, the Bulls attacked him and had success. It’s difficult being Wembanyama’s backup but the defensive dropoff can’t be as big as it was against the Bulls. Bassey did good work on the boards but he needs to do more to win that spot in the rotation.
Grade: C
Tre Jones
Jones hit his only shot from the field and was hustling like a madman to anything resembling a loose ball. I really liked his passing and his defense was mostly fine. Jones needs to start scoring more if he hopes to carve out a larger niche on this team.
Grade: B
Mitch Johnson
I’ve been critical of Johnson not resting Wembanyama enough in recent fourth quarters. Well, he tried resting Wembanyama in the fourth against the Bulls and nothing really changed. I guess it’s up to Wembanyama to figure out how to produce down the stretch. In retrospect, Castle likely should have played more against the Bulls. More Champagnie likely wouldn’t have hurt either.
Grade: B-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk