By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-11-11 07:45:25
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
尽管圣安东尼奥马刺队在下半场遭遇了一些波折，但维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 在关键时刻挺身而出，最终以121-117的比分率队击败芝加哥公牛队。此役过后，马刺队战绩提升至8胜2负，而公牛队则遭遇了本赛季主场首败，战绩变为5胜1负。
数据统计：马刺 vs. 公牛
马刺 vs. 公牛 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马
文班亚马基本上是凭借一己之力为马刺赢下了这场比赛。在比赛还剩一分钟，马刺队落后三分的情况下，这位法国人命中一记三分球追平比分。紧接着，他完成了一次成功的防守，随后又命中一记三分，为圣安东尼奥锁定了胜局。他整个第四节的表现都堪称惊艳。文班亚马打满了整节，投篮8中6，其中三分球3投3中，独得18分。防守端，他整晚都如同一头猛兽。他的护筐能力非常出色，轮转换位也十分及时。进攻端，文班亚马以令人艳羡的效率总计砍下38分，并且分享球也做得很好。总的来说，这对他而言是一场伟大的比赛——而观赏他在第四节彻底统治比赛的过程，则是一种极大的享受。
评分：A
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
优点：福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox) 得到21分，两分球8投7中，罚球4罚4中。他无私地分享球权，送出了5次助攻。在对持球人的防守上，他做得相当不错。缺点：尽管他的一些数据可能看起来很漂亮，但我对福克斯本场的表现并没有太深的印象。进攻端，他出现了6次失误，三分线外6投仅1中。诚然，他有几次失误可能是由于对手犯规未被吹罚造成的，但他控球的随意性令人担忧。此外，他的无球防守意识非常糟糕。公牛队多次通过简单地攻击福克斯本该防守的球员而大获成功。总而言之，福克斯需要打得更有纪律性，才能为更高水平的胜利做出贡献。
评分：C-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
这小伙子真了不得。卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle) 全场贡献19分、11次助攻、5个篮板和3次抢断，并且只有1次失误。这是这位二年级生连续第三场比赛助攻上双。卡斯尔的持球组织进攻表现杰出。具体来说，他执行挡拆战术的能力堪称炉火纯青——尤其是他通过高吊传球找到科内特的时机把握。当他选择自己进攻时，卡斯尔总能用一系列华丽的脚步一路杀到篮下。再加上他强悍的防守，他的表现甚至超出了人们最乐观的预期。卡斯尔最终需要将他的三分命中率提升到一个至少还算过得去的水平，但除此之外，他已经是一名非常优秀的篮球运动员了。
评分：A
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell) 在他出场的21分钟里没有太多建树。他最终得到4分和4个篮板。然而，必须指出的是，他是因为偏头痛而被迫离场。因此，我无法对他过多苛责——尤其因为他本身也没有犯什么大错。赛场上能看到瓦塞尔有些心不在焉……但事实证明这是事出有因的。
评分：B-
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes) 今晚在场上相对沉寂。他命中了一记三分球，在罚球线附近完成了一次打三分，并在防守端付出了努力。除此之外，他的比赛亮点不多。话虽如此，他防守端的努力因其提升的身体对抗强度而值得注意。当巴恩斯在防守端真正全力以赴时，他可以成为一名高于平均水准的防守者。否则，他就只能算一般水平。
评分：B-
朱利安·尚佩尼 (Julian Champagnie)
我的天，尚佩尼 (Julian Champagnie) 的表现实在是太糟糕了。我不知道他是如何能在替补阵容中获得最多出场时间的。他全场5投0中，且全部来自三分线外。其中有几次出手是糟糕透顶的投篮选择。然后，更糟糕的是，他在上半场就出现了3次失误。尚佩尼的进攻表现不能再差了。但值得称赞的是，他没有让糟糕的进攻表现影响他在防守端的投入程度。实际上，他在防守端做得还算不错到良好，这挽回了他的一些整体价值。
评分：D
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
欢迎回来，卢克。科内特 (Luke Kornet) 回归阵容，并立刻成为球队运转中重要的一环。他在第四节与文班亚马一同出场了9分钟，这对组合看起来棒极了。这两位高大的球员在防守端封锁了禁区。进攻端，科内特在第四节完成了三次扣篮，其中包括两次来自卡斯尔的空接。除了扣篮、篮板、护筐和出人意料的优秀外线防守之外，科内特还展示了他被低估的传球能力。他是一个聪明的球员，在攻防两端都清楚自己的位置。考虑到他融入球队的效果如此之好，管理层现在肯定为这笔运作感到得意。
评分：A-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson) 继续坚持发挥自己的优势。他冲击篮板，在篮下得分，并以永不枯竭的热情打球。当马刺在本场比赛中陷入低迷时，约翰逊几次挺身而出。然而，他在第四节的表现低于平均水准，这无疑拉低了他的整体影响力。
评分：B
杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)
随着科内特的回归，索汉 (Jeremy Sochan) 只打了十分钟。他的表现也并没有给教练组更多让他上场的理由。防守端，他很积极，但没有起到太多正面作用，而且他的篮板保护很差。进攻端，索汉大多数时候只是碍事，他犹豫的出手也伤害了球队的空间。
评分：D+
林迪·沃特斯三世 (Lindy Waters III)
沃特斯 (Lindy Waters III) 命中了一记三分，防守表现尚可，并在需要时组织了进攻。他没有给比赛带来明显的改变，但表现稳健。
评分：B-
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant) 完成了一次聪明的空切并上篮得分，并且时不时地展现了他的运动能力。
评分：不予评级
凯利·奥利尼克 (Kelly Olynyk)
奥利尼克 (Kelly Olynyk) 有几次巧妙的传球，其中一次助攻促成了布莱恩特的唯一进球。
评分：不予评级
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson) 的一些决策确实有些奇怪。他令人费解地在半场就让12名球员轮番上阵。尽管尚佩尼是进攻端的灾难，他却给了尚佩尼比其他任何替补都多的时间。当索汉在场上效果不佳时，感觉他坚持用得太久了。但是，嘿，约翰逊凭借执教了一场极其精彩的第四节，弥补了他许多值得商榷的决定。他让文班亚马在有利的位置接球进攻。派上科内特是一个改变比赛走向的决定。将球权持续交到卡斯尔手中也收到了立竿见影的效果。那第四节的执教表现，是我在后波波维奇时代见过的米奇最好的执教之一。
评分：B+
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Chicago Bulls – Game #10
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Chicago Bulls – Game #10
While the San Antonio Spurs hit some bumps in the road in the second half, Victor Wembanyama came up big when it mattered most in order to down the Chicago Bulls by a final score of 121-117. The win improved the Spurs to 8-2, while the Bulls dropped to 5-1 at home.
Stats: Spurs at Bulls
Spurs at Bulls – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Wembanyama basically won this game for the Spurs. With the good guys trailing by three points with a minute remaining, the Frenchman hit a three-pointer to tie it. He followed that up with a stop and then another three-pointer to give San Antonio the lead for good. His fourth quarter on the whole was marvelous. Wembanyama played the entire period and had 18 points on 6-for-8 shooting from the field, including 3-of-3 from deep. Defensively, he was a beast all night long. His rim protection was very good and his rotations were timely. Offensively, Wembanyama totaled 38 points with enviable efficiency and shared the ball well. Overall, it was a great game for him — and to watch him thoroughly dominate the fourth quarter was a lot of fun.
Grade: A
De’Aaron Fox
The good: Fox scored 21 points and was 7-for-8 from two-point range and 4-for-4 at the free throw line. He handed out five assists while sharing the ball unselfishly. Defensively, he was pretty good on the ball. The bad: While some of his numbers may look beautiful, I wasn’t too impressed with Fox’s outing. Offensively, he turned the ball over six times and he was 1-for-6 from three-point territory. Sure, a couple of his turnovers may have been caused by uncalled fouls but his looseness with the ball was troubling. Moreover, his defensive awareness away from the ball was really poor. The Bulls had a lot of success simply going to the player who Fox was supposed to be guarding. All in all, Fox needs to play a more disciplined style of basketball in order to contribute to winning at a high level.
Grade: C-
Stephon Castle
Damn, this kid is good. Castle totaled 19 points, 11 assists, five rebounds and three steals while turning the ball over only once. It was the sophomore’s third straight game with double-digit assists. Castle’s playmaking with the ball was outstanding. Specifically, his running of pick-and-rolls was sublime — especially when he was finding Kornet with lobs. When he called his own number, Castle had a handful of slick moves to get all the way to the rim. Add in rugged defense and he’s shattering even the loftiest of expectations. Castle needs to eventually hit three-pointers at a halfway respectable rate but otherwise he’s already a very good basketball player.
Grade: A
Devin Vassell
Vassell didn’t do much in his 21 minutes of action. He finished with four points and four rebounds. However, it must be noted that he was forced out of the game due to a migraine. For that reason, I can’t criticize him much — especially because he wasn’t doing anything too negative to begin with. Vassell could be seen going through the motions … but there turned out to be an explanation.
Grade: B-
Harrison Barnes
Barnes had a relatively muted night at the office. He hit a three-pointer, finished off a three-point play in the lane and gave good effort on defense. There wasn’t much more to his game than that . That said, his effort defensively was notable due to a heightened amount of physicality. When Barnes is really playing hard on defense, he can be an above average player on that end. Otherwise, he’s only average-ish.
Grade: B-
Julian Champagnie
Yikes, Champagnie was pretty darn bad. I don’t know how he led the bench unit in minutes. He was 0-for-5 from the field, which all came from three-point range. A couple of his attempts were the results of horrendous shot-selection. Then, to make matters worse, he turned the ball over three times in the first half. Champagnie’s offensive play couldn’t have been much worse. To his credit, though, he didn’t let his poor offensive play take away from his defensive intensity. He was actually decent to good on defense, which salvaged some of his overall value.
Grade: D
Luke Kornet
Welcome back, Luke. Kornet returned to the lineup and immediately became an important cog in the wheel. He played nine minutes alongside Wembanyama in the fourth quarter and the pairing looked fantastic. They two tall human beings shut down the lane on defense. On offense, Kornet had three dunks in the fourth, including a pair of alleyoops from Castle. Besides dunks, rebounds, rim protection and surprisingly good perimeter defense, Kornet showed off his underrated passing ability. He’s a smart player who knows where to be on both ends of the court. The front office has to feel smart right about now with how well he’s fitting in.
Grade: A-
Keldon Johnson
Johnson continues to stick to his strengths. He’s pounding the boards, scoring at the rim and playing with relentless enthusiasm. When the Spurs hit lulls in this game, Johnson came to the rescue a couple times. However, his play in the fourth quarter was below average, which definitely lowered his overall impact.
Grade: B
Jeremy Sochan
With the return of Kornet, Sochan only played ten minutes. He didn’t exactly give the coaching staff reasons to play him more. Defensively, he was active but he wasn’t doing a whole lot of good and his rebounding was poor. Offensively, Sochan mostly just got in the way and his reluctance to shoot hurt the spacing.
Grade: D+
Lindy Waters III
Waters hit a three-point, played adequate defense and ran the show when necessary. He didn’t move the needle a noticeable amount but he was solid.
Grade: B-
Carter Bryant
Bryant had a smart cut that led to a layup and flashed his athleticism here and there.
Grade: Inc.
Kelly Olynyk
Olynyk had a couple crafty passes, including a dish that led to Bryant’s only bucket.
Grade: Inc.
Mitch Johnson
There were certainly some strange decisions by Johnson. He inexplicably played 12 players in the first half. He played Champagnie more than anyone off the bench even though Champagnie was an offensive abomination. It felt like he stuck with Sochan too long when it wasn’t working. But, hey, Johnson made up for a lot of his questionable decisions by coaching a helluva fourth quarter. He got Wembanyama in advantageous positions. Going with Kornet was a game-changing decision. Keeping the ball in Castle’s hands paid immediate dividends. That fourth quarter coaching was some of the best coaching I’ve seen from Mitch in the post-Pop era.
Grade: B+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk