1998-05-24, By Kevin O’Keeffe
“海军上将”的告别之旅只是传言?但谁放出了这个风声?
马刺球迷在过去 12 天里,每当谈到交易中锋大卫·罗宾逊(David Robinson) 的话题时,都会燃起一股热情,这让人耳目一新。
但为什么罗宾逊,这位经历了又一次令人失望的季后赛表现的球员,应该免受这种猜测的影响呢?
事实上,只有罗宾逊的慈善事业和普遍良好的品行,才让他没有遭到将自己送往其他球队的呼声,考虑到他将在下个赛季获得 1140 万美元的薪水。
这个数字在 1999-2000 赛季将上升到 1330 万美元,在 2000-2001 赛季将上升到 1470 万美元。
而罗宾逊,将在 8 月 6 日迎来 33 岁生日,他仅仅在经历了严重的背部问题后恢复了一年,尽管他的背部似乎在上个赛季表现良好。
还要记住,罗宾逊的膝盖一直疼痛,而且这种疼痛不会消失。
但让我们在关于交易或不交易大卫·莫里斯·罗宾逊这件事上澄清一些事情:
这不是个人恩怨。
马刺球迷们,请让我们停止用“但他是一位心地善良的人,他乐善好施,喜欢宠物,热爱他的母亲”来为罗宾逊辩护。
难道有人质疑过他是一个好人吗?
即使在我的专栏文章中,在罗宾逊在犹他系列赛第四场比赛中关键时刻消失和崩溃之后,我从来没有对他本人进行过批评。
听着,这是关于一位超级巨星在球队需要他时没有发挥出应有的水平。他的很多队友私下里也向我表达了相同的观点。
但是,关于罗宾逊将在今年夏天被交易的消息来自马刺官员。
虽然马刺董事长彼得·霍尔特(Peter Holt) 否认他组织内的任何成员与任何人谈论过罗宾逊,但我被告知马刺管理层至少有一名成员致电 TNT 广播团队谈论交易罗宾逊。
截至昨天,至少有五位 NBA 球探和经纪人告诉我,关于罗宾逊可能被交易的消息在联盟中是公开的秘密。
这些人没有凭空捏造这个消息。尤其是在你考虑到他们每个人都提到了罗宾逊为什么可能被交易的原因时:
“经济原因。”
如果你没有关注,现在马刺是蒂姆·邓肯(Tim Duncan) 的球队了。
在 1999-2000 赛季结束后,邓肯将可以自由离开圣安东尼奥。会有很多球队准备好给邓肯开出支票。
只有在霍尔特没有采取必要措施,在 1998-99 赛季结束后与邓肯签下一份长期续约合同的情况下,才会出现这种情况。那是俱乐部可以正式与邓肯谈判的第一时间(wink, wink)。
而这就是罗宾逊不能在今年夏天被交易的原因。
想象一下,在 2000-2001 赛季,没有罗宾逊也没有邓肯。
啊…我无意破坏你的星期天。
在锁定邓肯续约之前,马刺不能交易罗宾逊。
至于一些关于交易罗宾逊的猜测,比如涉及奥兰多的佩尼·哈达威(Penny Hardaway) 和尼克·安德森(Nick Anderson),华盛顿的朱万·霍华德(Juwan Howard) 和卡尔伯特·切尼(Calbert Cheaney),夏洛特的格伦·莱斯(Glen Rice) 和安东尼·梅森(Anthony Mason),底特律的格兰特·希尔(Grant Hill) 和布莱恩·威廉姆斯(Brian Williams),这些交易都不值得用罗宾逊来交换。
我们不能忘记,罗宾逊的存在保证了球队在常规赛中获得 55-60 场胜利。
因此,霍尔特应该公开声明,不会交易大卫·莫里斯·罗宾逊,以结束所有关于这方面的对话。
嗯…霍尔特还没有这样做,对吧?
点击查看原文:Admiral's Bon Voyage just rumor? But who planted it?
Admiral’s Bon Voyage just rumor? But who planted it?
The passion aroused in the Spurs’ faithful during the last 12 days whenever the issue of trading center David Robinson is brought up is refreshing.
But why should Robinson, who suffered through yet another disappointing playoff performance, be immune to such speculation?
Really, only Robinson’s philanthrophy and generally wonderful demeanor keeps there from being a groundswell to send him elsewhere, considering he’ll make $11.4 million next season.
That figure rises to $13.3 million in 1999-2000 and $14.7 million in 2000-2001.
And Robinson, who will be 33 on Aug. 6, is only a year removed from major back problems, although it appeared his back held up well this past season.
Remember, too, Robinson was hampered with soreness in his knees … and that’s not going to go away.
But let’s get a few things straight on the matter of trading - or not trading - David Maurice Robinson:
It isn’t personal.
Spurs’ fans, please may we cease with the “But He’s A Wonderful Man Who Gives To Charity, Pets His Dog, and Loves His Mother” defense for Robinson.
Has anyone ever disputed the fact that he’s a good guy?
Even in my column following his disappearance and collapse in the clutch in Game 4 in the Utah series, never once did I criticize Robinson personally.
Listen, it’s about a superstar not performing when the team needed him. Many of his teammates noted the same to me in private.
But word that Robinson would be available this summer emanated from Spurs officials.
While Spurs chairman of the board Peter Holt denies that anyone from his organization has talked to anyone about Robinson, I was told at least one member of the Spurs’ front office called one of the TNT broadcast crew regarding trading Robinson.
As of yesterday, no fewer than five NBA scouts and agents told me it was common knowledge around the league that Robinson could be available.
Those people didn’t come up with that out of thin air. Especially when you consider that each mentioned why Robinson could be available:
“Economic reasons.”
If you haven’t been paying attention, the Spurs are now Tim Duncan’s team.
And following the 1999-2000 season, Duncan will be free to leave S.A. There will be no shortage of teams ready to write checks to Duncan.
That’s only if Holt doesn’t do what he has to do and get Duncan signed to a long-term extension following the 1998-99 season. That’s the first time the club may officially negotiate with Duncan (wink, wink).
And therein lies the reason Robinson cannot be traded this summer.
Imagine the 2000-2001 season with neither Robinson nor Duncan.
Ugh … I didn’t mean to spoil your Sunday.
The Spurs can’t trade Robinson before locking up Duncan.
Regarding some of the speculated swaps out there, involving Robinson - Orlando’s Penny Hardaway and Nick Anderson, Washington’s Juwan Howard and Calbert Cheaney, Charlotte’s Glen Rice and Anthony Mason, Detroit’s Grant Hill and Brian Williams - none bring equal value for Robinson.
Lest we forget, Robinson’s presence guarantees 55-60 wins during the regular season.
So Holt should end all conversation by stating on the record that there will be no trade of David Maurice Robinson.
Hmmmm … Holt hasn’t done that yet, has he?
By Kevin O’Keeffe, via San Antonio Express-News