By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-07-04 08:15:58
圣安东尼奥马刺在比赛末段发起反扑，但最终仍以87-88惜败于迈阿密热火，未能取得夏季联赛开门红。马刺此役缺少了杰登·昆坦斯 (Jayden Quaintance) 和卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)，但他们派出了2026届选秀中的三名成员：26号秀小塔里斯·里德 (Tarris Reed Jr.)、42号秀贾科比·吉莱斯皮 (Ja’Kobi Gillespie) 以及44号秀马利克·布朗 (Maliq Brown)。昆坦斯因膝伤将缺席整个夏季联赛，而布莱恩特将在比赛转战拉斯维加斯后登场。
数据统计：马刺 VS 热火
马刺 VS 热火 – 最终评分
小塔里斯·里德
亮点：里德在人堆中抢下了几个篮板，展现了不俗的大局观，对抗力量也如宣传般强硬。他的手感尚可，罚球也稳稳命中。不足：在面对对方的七尺长人时，里德有时显得有些畏首畏尾。他打得过于无私，在自己有出手机会时依然选择传球。有时在明明可以上去拼抢篮板或保护篮筐的情况下，里德甚至没有做出尝试。在他开场前几次触球中，他投出了一个三分三不沾，此后便再也没有尝试过外线出手。总结：表现中规中矩，但他需要学会如何在面对高度时利用自己的身体，同时他打球的积极性也需要更足。
评分：C
贾科比·吉莱斯皮
对于一个三分球8投2中、两分球9投1中的球员，很难说出太多赞美之词——但吉莱斯皮的实际表现要好于这些数据所反映的情况。他投丢的大多数球都是不错的出手机会。他的控球很稳健，能找到自己的节奏点，处理球耐心，极少出现慌乱。吉莱斯皮最终送出了8次助攻，且仅有1次失误，不过他的传球功底其实并没有数据看起来那么优秀。他的视野有时有些局限，经常漏掉处于空位的队友。防守端，我喜欢他的积极性和预判能力。
评分：C
马利克·布朗
对于一个上赛季在杜克大学三分球仅有30投5中的球员来说，他的投篮手型看起来相当不错。尽管出手时有一点点停顿，但布朗本场三分球4投2中。他在篮下也有几次令人印象深刻的终结。作为一个在进攻端本不被看好的新秀，他在自己的首场夏季联赛中展现出了不错的进攻状态。防守端，布朗虽然没有产生极大的影响力，但他展现了极快的手速，并且显然在防守端拥有极高的球商。
评分：B+
埃马努埃尔·米勒
你可能还记得埃马努埃尔·米勒 (Emanuel Miller) 的名字，因为他去年确实进入过马刺一线队的大名单。他当时签下的是一份双向合同，但从未在NBA常规赛中登场，只在发展联盟（G-League）打过球。在这场比赛中，米勒的表现并不出彩。他显然拥有出色的身体素质，并在冲击篮筐、拼抢篮板和防守时展现了这一优势。他送出了3次助攻，但他的控球显得有些挣扎，得分效率低下，也没能展现出他在这场比赛中本该发挥的、能稳定军心的老将作用。
评分：C
迈尔斯·凯利
迈尔斯·凯利 (Miles Kelly) 是球队的第五位首发，他的表现相当不错。他在冲击篮筐时显得非常灵动。他在外线的跳投动作十分流畅。凯利的决策有时有些犹豫，但至少他的动作看起来像一个NBA级别的球员。我不确定他是否拥有标准的NBA身材，但他看起来确实是本届夏季联赛中值得持续关注的球员。
评分：B+
RJ·戴维斯
替补登场的RJ·戴维斯 (RJ Davis) 表现得相当丝滑。自我上一次看他打球以来，他的控卫技巧有了明显的提升。他的控球很稳，传球也十分精准。他在外线三分球5投3中，并且是全队唯一没有出现失误的球员。身材矮小将始终是限制戴维斯上限的因素，但对他来说，这是一场不错的首秀。
评分：B+
杰登·纳恩
杰登·纳恩 (Jayden Nunn) 从贝勒大学毕业时并没有受到太多关注，但他上赛季在奥斯汀马刺队表现强劲，而今晚他的发挥也极其出色。他全场5投3中，其中包括一记三分球。他还送出了替补席最高的4次助攻。防守端，纳恩在仅有的18分钟出场时间里就贡献了4次抢断和1次盖帽。让我们拭目以待他能否保持这样的竞技状态。如果可以，他或许能获得一份训练营邀请。
评分：A-
RJ·梅伦德斯
首先，RJ·梅伦德斯 (RJ Melendez) 得赶紧处理一下他那偏分发型。他的发型太让人分心了，以至于让人忽略了他原本相当不错的表现。他投中了两个三分球，并且在持球时显得游刃有余。防守端，他贡献了全队7次盖帽中的4次。梅伦德斯看起来比我上一次看他打球时更具运动天赋。希望他在下一场比赛前能找个理发师。
评分：B+
李贤重
这位来自韩国的球员（李贤重 (Hyunjung Lee)）表现尚可。他的三分球出手感觉不错，但外线只有3投1中。他在场上奔跑积极，打法无私，以他的身高而言，身体协调性相当不错。至于防守端……好吧，这确实会是一个挑战。李贤重看起来具备NBA级别的投射能力，但他的防守实在有些糟糕。热火队针对他进行单打，而他对此无能为力。为了他自己着想，希望他能找到在防守端生存下来的办法——至少在夏季联赛这个级别上是如此。
评分：B-
大卫·穆奥卡
作为一名替补中锋，大卫·穆奥卡 (David Muoka) 拥有不错的身材和运动能力。至于他的技术水平如何，还要看他后续能否获得足够的出场时间来供我们评判。
评分：暂无
科利斯·威廉姆森
科利斯·威廉姆森 (Corliss Williamson) 面临着艰巨的任务，因为球队最核心的培养对象表现起伏不定，而几位边缘新秀则凭借表现为自己争取到了更多的戏份。值得称赞的是，他的轮换阵容大体上合理，马刺也在比赛末段获得了逆转赢球的机会。
评分：B
由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
查看原文：Summer League Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Miami Heat – Game #1
Summer League Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Miami Heat – Game #1
The San Antonio Spurs staged a late comeback but ultimately lost their summer league opener to the Miami Heat by a final score of 88-87. The Spurs didn’t have Jayden Quaintance or Carter Bryant, but they did have three members of their 2026 draft class: Tarris Reed Jr. at No. 26, Ja’Kobi Gillespie at No. 42 and Maliq Brown at No. 44. Quaintance is sitting out all of summer league due to a knee injury but Bryant will play once the scene shifts to Las Vegas.
Stats: Spurs vs. Heat
Spurs vs. Heat – Final Grades
Tarris Reed Jr.
The good: Reed grabbed a few rebounds in traffic, flashed advanced court vision and was as strong as advertised. His touch was decent and he hit his free throws. The bad: Reed looked timid at times going up against seven-footers. He was too unselfish and passed when he had opportunities. Reed sometimes didn’t attempt to rebound or protect the rim when there was an opportunity to at least give effort. He airballed a three-pointer on one of his first touches and then never looked to shoot from deep again. Overall: It was an okay-ish showing but he’ll need to learn how to use his body against height and his motor needs to run hotter.
Grade: C
Ja’Kobi Gillespie
It’s tough to say a whole lot of good about a dude who shot 2-for-8 on three-pointers and 1-for-9 on two-pointers — but Gillespie was better than those numbers suggest. Most of his misses were good looks. His ball-handling was good, he got to his spots, he operated with patience and was rarely in a rush. Gillespie finished with eight assists and only one turnover, although his passing wasn’t as good as those numbers suggest. His court vision was iffy at times, as he missed open teammates quite often. Defensively, I liked his activity level and his anticipation.
Grade: C
Maliq Brown
For a guy who was 5-for-30 on three-pointers last season at Duke, his stroke looked pretty good. Although there is a little bit of a hitch, Brown was 2-for-4 on three-pointers. He also had a couple impressive finishes around the rim. For being an offensively challenged prospect, he looked good on that end in his first summer league game. Defensively, Brown didn’t have a huge impact but his fast hands were on display and he clearly has a high IQ for how to operate on that end of the court.
Grade: B+
Emanuel Miller
You might remember Miller’s name for actually being on the big boy Spurs last year. He was on a two-way contract but never played in an NBA game — only down in the G-League. In this game, Miller didn’t have an outing to remember. He obviously has an athletic body that he showed off when driving to the rim, attacking the boards and playing defense. He had three assists but his ball-handling was a struggle, he was inefficient scoring the ball and wasn’t the calming veteran presence that he probably should have been this game.
Grade: C
Miles Kelly
Kelly was the team’s fifth starter — and he did well. He was slithery when going toward the rim. His jumper looked smooth on the perimeter. Kelly’s decision-making was iffy at times but he at least moved like an NBA player. I’m not sure he has legit NBA size but he looked like someone to keep an eye on during this summer league run.
Grade: B+
RJ Davis
Davis looked pretty smooth coming off the bench. His point guard skills have improved since the last time I saw him play. His ball-handling is pretty good and his passes were on target. He was 3-for-5 from downtown and was the only player on the team to not turn the ball over. The lack of size will always limit Davis but this was a good opening game for him.
Grade: B+
Jayden Nunn
Nunn wasn’t much of a prospect coming out of Baylor but he had a strong campaign with the Austin Spurs last season and he was pretty darn good tonight. He was 3-for-5 from the field, including a three-pointer. He also had a bench-high four assists. Defensively, Nunn tallied four steals and a block in only 18 minutes. Let’s see if he can keep up this level of play. If he does, he could get a training camp invite.
Grade: A-
RJ Melendez
First of all, Melendez needs to do something about that combover. His hair was a distraction from what was otherwise a pretty good showing. He hit a pair of three-pointers and looked competent with the ball in his hands. Defensively, he tallied four of the team’s seven blocked shots. Melendez looked more athletic than the last time I watched him play. Let’s hope he finds a barber prior to the next game.
Grade: B+
Hyunjung Lee
The native of South Korea was decent. His three-pointers looked good coming out of his hands but he was only 1-for-3 from deep. He ran the court well, played an unselfish brand of basketball and looked coordinated for his size. Defensively … yeah, that’s going to be a challenge. Lee looks like he could be an NBA level shooter but his defense was pretty darn bad. The Heat attacked him and he couldn’t do much. For his sake, let’s hope he finds ways to survive on that end — at least on the summer league level.
Grade: B-
David Muoka
Muoka has good size and athleticism for a backup center. We’ll see if he plays long enough to truly judge his skill level.
Grade: Inc.
Corliss Williamson
Williamson had a difficult task because the most important developmental pieces were uneven, while several fringe prospects forced their way into bigger roles. To his credit, the rotation mostly made sense and the Spurs were positioned to steal the game late.
Grade: B
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk
