马刺 @ 森林狼 109 - 114 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-05-10 19:07:49
圣安东尼奥马刺队在明尼苏达举行的第三场比赛中以 115-108 击败森林狼队，夺回了主场优势。凭借文班亚马统治级的表现，马刺队目前在系列赛中以 2-1 领先。比赛在第四节一度陷入胶着，但马刺队阵中有一名球员誓要将这场胜利收入囊中。
统计数据：马刺对阵森林狼
马刺对阵森林狼 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
考虑到这场比赛的重要性，这可能是文班亚马职业生涯至今的最佳表现。这也是我见过的马刺球员打出的最顶级表现之一。这位法国人在攻防两端都统治了比赛。防守端，他简直是个怪兽。5 次盖帽并不能完全体现他在禁区内的威慑力。他在外线的防守也非常出色，场上判断比以往任何时候都快。15 个篮板的表现非常棒且至关重要。文班亚马在进攻端同样出色，砍下 39 分，其中第四节独得 16 分。他两分球 13 投 10 中，三分球 5 投 3 中，罚球 12 投 10 中。再加上仅有一次失误以及极高的竞争意识，我已经词穷到无法形容文班在今晚的表现有多么惊人了。
评分：A+
达龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
比赛伊始，福克斯的表现似乎又要令人失望。他前 8 次出手仅命中 1 球，第一场比赛那种低迷的状态似乎又回来了。好在福克斯及时找回了状态，最后 11 次出手命中了 6 球。在那段时间里，他还送出 4 次助攻且仅有 1 次失误。我也很喜欢福克斯下半场的防守。总的来说，开局很糟糕，但他恢复得足够好，帮助马刺拿下了胜利。
评分：C+
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
亮点：斯蒂芬·卡斯尔的组织能力非常出色。他送出了 12 次助攻，其中包括几次关键传球。他还获得了 8 次罚球，在对方的高压防守下控球稳健，防守水平也很高。他的激情和斗志提振了马刺的士气。不足：卡斯尔全场 11 投仅 3 中，并且承担了全队 9 次失误中的 4 次。总体而言：卡斯尔今晚的表现瑕不掩瑜，在攻防两端都起到了积极的推动作用。
评分：B+
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell) 的数据看起来并不惊艳，但他却是这场胜利的关键一环。虽然他全场 14 投仅 6 中，但他的进球都非常及时，几乎凭一己之力多次止住了对方的反扑。他的传球也比平时更出色。此外，我认为瓦塞尔的防守做得非常好——尤其是单兵防守。他在季后赛中提升了强度，这非常令人欣慰。
评分：B+
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie) 是另一位表现优于数据统计的球员。他在 29 分钟内仅出手两次，但这两球都是三分。其中一记三分是在第四节的关键时刻命中的。尚帕尼还送出了几次聪明的传球，全场零失误，防守端也表现得可圈可点。话虽如此，他最突出的贡献是篮板球。他抢下了 12 个篮板，其中包括 4 个进攻篮板。尚帕尼的篮板球正让他成为马刺阵中非常宝贵的拼图。
评分：B
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 表现得挺不错。虽然我们在季后赛见过他更好的表现，但在关键时刻他顶住了压力。他全场 6 投 2 中，三分球两投全失……但他获得了 6 次罚球机会。重要的是，哈珀在第四节表现最出色。他在第四节两投全中，罚球也是两罚全中。哈珀的防守也非常好——特别是在下半场。这位新秀虽然在组织方面建树不多，但在攻防两端都展现了竞争意识，帮助马刺笑到了最后。
评分：B
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
亮点：凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson) 三分球 4 投 2 中，罚球 4 投 3 中。我喜欢他在进攻端的侵略性，他在防守端也很卖力。不足：约翰逊两分球 3 投仅 1 中，在 19 分钟内只抢到 2 个篮板。他需要更好地冲抢篮板，才能对得起他的上场时间。此外，他在第三场比赛中的防守失误也比平时多。
评分：C-
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
说实话，在文班开启传奇模式时，任何人都显得平庸。但卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet) 本可以做得更好。11 分钟仅有 1 个篮板是远远不够的。他的防守缺乏影响力，进攻端有时还会挡路。科内特在季后赛中一直表现不错，但这场比赛显然不在状态。
评分：C-
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant) 表现亮眼。他是唯一一个命中率达到五成的外线球员，三分球 2 投 2 中。他的两次出手都非常自信，投篮手型看起来完美无瑕。防守端，他的表现让我印象非常深刻。他脚步移动很快，力量强，轮转迅速，一点也不像个新秀。布莱恩特虽然只打了 8 分钟，但完全可以预见他未来会获得更多时间。
评分：B+
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
哎，哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes) 打了 6 分钟，没做什么贡献。值得称赞的是，他的抢断直接转化为布莱恩特的一记三分球——那球非常关键。除此之外，巴恩斯几乎没什么存在感。
评分：C
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson) 教练通过战术安排早早激活了文班亚马——这显然是本场比赛的重要基调。我大部分时间都很喜欢他的轮换，特别是第四节给布莱恩特上场时间非常有胆识。他在第四节也让哈珀掌控了一段时间局面，并且没有在那一节过度使用福克斯。防守策略有时显得没必要地复杂，但既然赢了球，也就没什么好抱怨的了。
评分：B
由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Minnesota Timberwolves – Game 3
Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Minnesota Timberwolves – Game 3
The San Antonio Spurs took back homecourt advantage by defeating the Timberwolves in Minnesota in Game 3 by a final score of 115-108. The Spurs are now up 2-1 in the series thanks to an all-universe showing by Wembanyama. The game was close in the fourth quarter but the Spurs had a player on their team who refused to be denied this victory.
Stats: Spurs at Timberwolves
Spurs at Timberwolves – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Considering what was at stake, this was probably the best performance of Wembanyama’s career. It was one of the best performances I’ve seen by a Spurs player. The Frenchman dominated the action on both ends. Defensively, he was a monster. His five blocks don’t tell the accurate tale of how much he shut down the paint. He was also very good on the perimeter and his processing was faster than ever. His rebounding (15) was awesome and hugely important. Wembanyama was equally as good on the offensive end. He had 39 points including 16 in the fourth quarter. He hit 10-of-13 two-pointers, 3-of-5 three-pointers and 10-of-12 free throws. Add in only one turnover and his very high competitiveness level and I’m running out of adjectives to describe just how amazing Wembanyama was on this night.
Grade: A+
De’Aaron Fox
To begin the contest, it looked like Fox was going to have a disappointing outing. He hit only one of his first eight shots from the field and the poor vibes from Game 1 were seemingly back. Thankfully, Fox was able to turn things around. Of his last 11 shots, he hit six of them. During that stretch, he also had four assists and only one turnover. I liked Fox’s defense in the second half, too. All in all, it was a bad start but he recovered well enough to help the Spurs get the win.
Grade: C+
Stephon Castle
The good: Castle’s playmaking was very good. He had 12 assists, including a handful of vital passes. He also got to the line eight times, handled the ball well despite heavy pressure and defended at a high level. His passion and edge gave the Spurs a lift. The bad: Castle was only 3-for-11 from the floor and was responsible for four of the team’s nine turnovers. Overall: Castle’s positives far outweighed the negatives on this night. He was definitely a force for good on both ends.
Grade: B+
Devin Vassell
Vassell’s stats don’t look like anything special but he was a key part of this victory. While he was only 6-for-14 from the field, his makes were timely and he almost single-handedly stopped a few runs. His passing was also better than usual. Moreover, I thought Vassell played really good defense — especially individually. He has turned up the volume in the playoffs, which has been really good to see.
Grade: B+
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie is another player who did better than his numbers would suggest. He made only two shots in 29 minutes but both of them were three-pointers. One of his threes was a huge shot at an important moment in the fourth quarter. Champagnie also made smart passes, finished without a turnover and played admirable defense. That said, his best trait of all was his rebounding. He had 12 boards, including four on the offensive end. Champagnie’s rebounding is turning him into a very valuable cog in San Antonio’s wheel.
Grade: B
Dylan Harper
Harper was pretty good. We’ve seen better out of him in the playoffs but he stood up during key moments. He was only 2-for-6 from the field and missed both of his three-point attempts … but he got to the free throw line for six attempts. Importantly, Harper was best in the fourth quarter. He was 2-for-2 from the field in the fourth, along with 2-for-2 at the line. Harper’s defense was also really good — particularly in the second half. The rookie didn’t do much playmaking but he competed on both ends and helped the Spurs get the last laugh.
Grade: B
Keldon Johnson
The good: Johnson was 2-for-4 from three-point territory and 3-for-4 at the free throw line. I liked his aggression on offense and he played hard on the defensive end. The bad: Johnson was 1-for-3 on two-pointers and only grabbed two rebounds in 19 minutes. He needs to rebound better to justify his minutes. There were also more than his normal amount of defensive mistakes in Game 3.
Grade: C-
Luke Kornet
I mean, anyone is going to look bad compared to Wemby is in legendary mode. But Kornet could have stepped up a lot more than he did. One rebound in 11 minutes isn’t going to cut it. His defense wasn’t impactful and he sometimes got in the way offensively. Kornet has played well in the playoffs but this wasn’t an example of that level of play.
Grade: C-
Carter Bryant
Big stuff from Bryant. He was the only perimeter player to hit at least half of his shots, as he finished 2-for-2 from three-point land. Both of his shots were confident and his stroke looked pristine. Defensively, I was pretty darn impressed. He moved his feet well, he was powerful, he rotated with quickness and he didn’t look like a rookie at all. Bryant only played eight minutes but it’s easy to imagine him playing a lot more.
Grade: B+
Harrison Barnes
Welp, Barnes played six minutes and didn’t do much. To his credit, his steal led directly to a three-pointer by Bryant — so that was big. Outside of that, though, Barnes rarely moved the needle.
Grade: C
Mitch Johnson
Coach Mitch helped unlock Wembanyama early with his playcalling — so that was obviously an important storyline. I liked his rotation for the most part. Specifically, giving minutes to Bryant in the fourth quarter was gutsy. He also let Harper run the show a bit in the fourth — and didn’t overplay Fox in the period. The defensive scheme sometimes felt needlessly complicated but it’s difficult to complain about the final results.
Grade: B
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk