By Boxscorehistory | Pounding The Rock (PtR), 2026-05-09 17:30:00
哇哦。我必须承认，我曾竭尽全力试图以平常心对待这场比赛，因为我担心圣安东尼奥马刺 (San Antonio Spurs) 在第二场取得大胜后可能会产生自满情绪。此外，我觉得明尼苏达森林狼 (Minnesota Timberwolves) 可能是那支更拼命、更有动力的球队，因为如果他们赢得第三场，将给马刺在第四场带来巨大的压力，而马刺很可能缺乏应对这种压力的经验。
事实证明，我的担忧在一定程度上是合理的。首先，森林狼确实展现出了惊人的比赛强度。其次，马刺的许多球员在压力之下确实显得有些畏缩，至少在投篮效率方面是这样。事实上，除了文班，马刺其他球员的投篮命中率仅为 38.81%。幸运的是，维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 贡献了一场足以载入史册、令人瞠目结舌的表现，这也使得这份评分数据表变得非常有趣。让我们回顾一下其中的亮点：
注： 既然我们已经进入了季后赛，用于评分的参考周期也从 2012-2013 赛季以来的常规赛样本，转变为 2012-2013 赛季以来的季后赛样本。除非下文另有说明，否则该样本集包含附加赛。截至 2026 年 5 月 9 日结束，该样本组共包含 1,179 场比赛。
决定比赛的因素
- 森林狼在比赛中占据了一些关键优势，包括在前场篮板上取得了 +7 的领先。这一优势是他们获得更多运动战进攻机会的原因之一，其中包括多出 14 次投篮出手，并且（由于他们的投篮选择）多投了 7 个三分球。
- 然而，明尼苏达拥有更多出手次数的另一个原因是，他们的犯规更多，且犯规时机更糟。因此，马刺比对手多获得了 12 次罚球，并在罚球命中数（FTM）上取得了 +7 的领先。考虑到比赛其余部分的走势，罚球线上的这一优势绝对是决定性的。
- 投篮效率方面的情况则喜忧参半。一方面，马刺在投篮命中率（FG%）上领先 7.5 个百分点，这使得他们在上述出手数差距悬殊的情况下，依然在投篮命中数（FGM）上取得了 +1 的微弱优势。马刺在三分命中率（3P%）上也保持了微弱优势（+1.36 个百分点），但他们的罚球命中率（FT%）差距却是令人失望的 -9.96 个百分点。话虽如此，必须指出的是，银黑军团在比赛收官阶段的罚球表现非常出色。
罕见的数据统计
- 文班非凡的夜晚创造了许多罕见的数据。首先也是最重要的，他的表现标志着自 1996-1997 赛季以来，仅有三位球员在季后赛中单场砍下至少 39 分、15 个篮板和 5 次盖帽。另外两次均出自沙奎尔·奥尼尔 (Shaquille O’Neal) 在 2000-2002 年湖人三连冠时期的巅峰表现。
- 文班的这场比赛也是在同样的 30 个赛季里，第 12 次有球员在正式季后赛中以不超过 18 次投篮出手砍下 39+ 分。需要指出的是：在这 12 场比赛中，有 8 场涉及了更多的罚球次数，其中包括奥尼尔在一场令人震惊的比赛中尝试了 39 次罚球。
- 我已经提到马刺在投篮出手数（FGA）和三分出手数（3PA）上的差距分别为 -14 和 -7。自 2012-2013 赛季以来，这是季后赛赢球方在 FGA 和 3PA 差值如此糟糕（或更糟）的第 29 场比赛，因此这相当罕见（在参考周期内大约每 41 场比赛出现一次）。尽管罕见，但我们应该停下来思考一下，从获胜方的角度来看，这种投篮出手数的劣势往往并不一定是“坏事”。这是因为——当一支获胜球队的投篮次数明显少于对手时，通常是因为他们有更多的回合以罚球结束，本场比赛正是如此。
- 昨晚的比赛是自 2012-2013 赛季以来 1,179 场季后赛中，第 21 次（即该时期内大约每 56 场季后赛出现一次）获胜球队在罚球出手数（FTA）领先 12 次或以上的同时，犯规数劣势不低于 -2 次。
什么是球队评分数据表 (Team Graded Box Scores)？
简而言之，这些数据表对胜负双方的基础统计数据差值进行评分，评分标准基于获胜球队相对于特定参考周期内其他 NBA 获胜球队的差值表现。可以把它看作是一份成绩单，用来了解某场比赛的获胜者相对于其他获胜者的表现如何。使用的参考周期从 2012-2013 赛季开始直至最近的比赛日，且仅对比相同类型的赛季（即常规赛和季后赛不会相互比较）。
数据来源： 用于创建这些数据表的基础数据收集自 Basketball Reference。在所有情况下，数据均在比赛结束后的次日早晨收集。虽然罕见，但数据收集后可能会发生赛后统计修正，并可能影响最终结果。
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Box Grades: Wembanyama’s historic night powers Spurs over Wolves
Box Grades: Wembanyama’s historic night powers Spurs over Wolves
WOW. I must admit, I did my level-best to enter this game with muted expectations, as I was concerned that the Spurs could be feeling a bit overconfident after their dominant Game 2 win. Furthermore, I felt that Minnesota might be the more desperate and motivated team, as a Game 3 win for them would have put tremendous pressure on San Antonio in Game 4, and the Spurs may very well have lacked the experience to deal with that.
As it turns out, my concerns were partly justified. First, the Timberwolves did play with incredible intensity. Second, many of San Antonio’s players did appear to wilt a bit under this pressure, at least in terms of shooting efficiency. In fact, outside of Wemby, the Spurs shot just 38.81% from the field. Fortunately, Victor logged a truly jaw-dropping performance for the ages, which contributed to a very interesting graded box score. Let’s review some of the highlights:
Note: Now that we’ve moved into the postseason, the reference period used for grading changes from the set of regular season games since 2012-2013 to the set of postseason games since 2012-2013. Unless otherwise noted below, this set DOES include play-in games. As of the end of May 9, 2026, this group include 1,179 games.
Factors that decided the game
- The Timberwolves held some key advantages in this game, including a +7 edge on the offensive glass. This advantage was one reason that they had significantly more offensive opportunities from the field, including 14 more field goal attempts and (because of their shot selection) 7 more threes.
- However, another reason that the Minnesota had more shot attempts is that they fouled San Antonio more and at worse times. Consequently, the Spurs attempted 12 more free throws and had a FTM margin of +7. Given how the rest of the game played out, this edge at the free throw line was absolutely decisive.
- The story with respect to shooting efficiency is mixed. On the one hand, San Antonio held a 7.5 percentage-point advantage in FG%, which allowed them to earn a FGM differential of +1 despite the aforementioned disparity in attempts. The Spurs also held a small edge in 3P% (+1.36 percentage points), but their FT% margin was a disappointing -9.96 percentage points. Having said this, it is critical to note that the Silver and Black were excellent from the free throw line to close out the game.
Rare Box Score Stats
- Wemby’s extraordinary night produced a lot of rare outcomes. First and foremost, his performance marked just the third time since the start of the 1996-1997 that any player has recorded 39+ points, 15+ rebounds, and 5+ blocks in a postseason game. The other two occasions were vintage Shaq performances during the 2000-2002 Lakers three-peat.
- Victor’s game was just the 12th time in the same 30-season period that a player has scored 39+ points on no more than 18 field goal attempts in a true playoff game. Important to point out: eight of those 12 games involved more free throw attempts, including a truly astonishing game in which Shaq attempted 39 shots from the charity stripe.
- I already mentioned that the Spurs had FGA and 3PA margins of -14 and -7, respectively. This is the 29th contest in which a postseason winner has had FGA and 3PA margins that bad or worse since the start of 2012-2013, so it is pretty rare (about once per 41 games in the reference period). Rare though it may be, we should pause and consider this kind of winner-loser field goal attempt disparity is often not bad from the winning team’s perspective. This is because – when a winning team takes significantly fewer shots than its opponent – it is generally because more of its possessions end with free throws, as was the case in this game.
- Last night’s game was just the 21st time in 1,179 postseason games since 2012-2013 (i.e., about 1-in-56 postseason games during the period) in which the winning team achieved a FTA margin of +12 or better while having a foul differential no better than – 2.
What are Team Graded Box Scores?
Very briefly, these box scores grade winner-loser differentials for basic box score statistics, with the grade being based on the winning team’s differential relative to other NBA winners during a defined reference period. Think of it like a report card for understanding how a given winner performed relative to other winners. The reference period used runs from the start of the 2012-2013 season to the latest date of play, including only games in the same season category (i.e., regular season and playoff games are not compared to each other).
***Data Source:*The underlying data used to create these box scores was collected fromBasketball Reference. In all cases, the data are collected the morning after the game is played. Although rare, postgame statistical revisions after data collection do occur and may affect the results after the fact.
By Boxscorehistory, via Pounding The Rock