By Jacob Douglas | Pounding The Rock (PtR), 2026-04-27 23:15:00
圣安东尼奥马刺队在周日对阵波特兰开拓者队的比赛中取得了 3-1 的领先。尽管在上半场一度落后 19 分，但马刺队在下半场发起了猛烈的反击，以 73-35 的比分压制了开拓者，最终以 114-93 赢下了第四场比赛。
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 在第四战中从脑震荡保护协议中复出，并像第一场比赛那样统治了赛场。文班亚马接管了防守端，并为马刺队提供了足够的进攻火力以取得领先。他的全明星搭档德阿伦·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox) 为他提供了强力支援，后者砍下全场最高的 28 分。目前在 FanDuel 上，马刺队被看好在圣安东尼奥赢下第五战并晋级西部半决赛，赔率为 -650。
文班亚马和福克斯将领衔我们的第四战球员评分。温馨提示，这些评分基于每位球员的场上表现，不仅限于统计数据。“B”级代表个人的平均水平。如果球员上场时间少于 5 分钟或仅在垃圾时间出场，其评分将显示为“不完整”。
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
34 分钟，27 分，11 篮板，3 助攻，4 抢断，7 盖帽，4 失误，3 犯规，17 投 9 中，三分 4 投 1 中，正负值 +28
波特兰在能够冲击篮筐时表现最强，但在面对文班亚马时，他们无法做到这一点。7 次盖帽和 4 次抢断足以说明问题，但正如我们所知，文班的影响力更多体现在那些让对手不敢出手的投篮或无法传出的球。开拓者全场仅在禁区得到 38 分。文班亚马有效地封锁了他们最强大的进攻武器：禁区得分。
文班亚马在上半场在进攻端表现得有些保守。在努力找回节奏的过程中，他投出了一些相当令人费解的三分和中距离跳投。一旦他开始在篮筐附近开启空接盛宴，马刺队的进攻便趋于稳定并击溃了开拓者。他的投篮选择使这门功课没能拿到 A+，但他已经非常接近了。
评分： A
德阿伦·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
39 分钟，28 分，6 篮板，7 助攻，1 抢断，2 盖帽，3 失误，1 犯规，17 投 11 中，三分 8 投 4 中，正负值 +21
这可能是福克斯作为马刺球员表现最好的一场比赛。他当然有过得分更高的夜晚，但就影响力和比赛重要性而言，这场比赛更胜一筹。福克斯是带领球队重回比赛并扩大领先优势的进攻引擎。他非常清楚何时需要冲击禁区，并投进了一些打击对手士远投。
我也非常喜欢福克斯在本系列赛中的表现。当他与德尼·阿夫迪亚 (Deni Advija) 对位时，他敢于与其进行身体对抗，并在遏制对方突破方面做得非常出色。当文班亚马在场时，他在领防端表现得极具侵略性，不断制造失误。在周日的比赛中，他在第一节完成了一次不可思议的三分封盖。这种攻防两端的影响力正是圣安东尼奥在接下来的季后赛中需要福克斯提供的。
评分： A+
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
26 分钟，16 分，1 篮板，8 助攻，1 抢断，1 失误，5 犯规，14 投 6 中，三分 6 投 3 中，正负值 +17
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle) 的防守努力令人难以置信。尽管身背四次犯规，他依然在第三节被留在场上，足见其影响力。在马刺开始反击波特兰时，他在防守端仿佛无处不在。进攻端，他的表现起伏不定，但他投进定点三分的能力改变了开拓者防守他的方式。现在已经到了我认为对手不能再用大个子防守他并完全放空他的地步了。
评分： B+
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
29 分钟，8 分，3 篮板，1 抢断，1 犯规，6 投 3 中，三分 4 投 2 中，正负值 +22
在本系列赛中写朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie) 的简评几乎变得有些枯燥了。他只是在履行职责。当机会出现时，他能投进空位三分，防守端也表现得足够出色，不会被对手针对。他增加了几次突破，攻击波特兰极具侵略性的扑防。随着系列赛的进行，他似乎越来越有信心，这对马刺的季后赛前景是个好兆头。
评分： B
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
35 分钟，11 分，6 篮板，3 助攻，1 抢断，1 盖帽，2 失误，3 犯规，9 投 5 中，三分 3 投 1 中，正负值 +14
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell) 在第四战的投篮选择要好得多。他在第三节投进了一些关键球，帮助马刺重回比赛。他是下半场锁死开拓者的防守组的一员。虽然这不是一场爆发性的进攻表演，但他以重大方式帮助了球队。
评分： B+
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
25 分钟，3 分，2 篮板，1 助攻，1 抢断，3 犯规，6 投 1 中，三分 2 投 0 中，正负值 +4
圣安东尼奥的替补席整体表现挣扎。开拓者的替补得分以 34-24 领先马刺替补。迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 在经历了第三战的爆发表现后，在第四战表现沉寂。哈珀的表现不算出色，但也谈不上糟糕。他没有出现失误，所以他在持球时并没有伤害球队。当卡斯尔陷入犯规麻烦时，哈珀提供了一个稳健的持球点来保持势头。
评分： C
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
12 分钟，2 分，7 篮板，1 抢断，1 失误，1 犯规，7 投 1 中，正负值 -10
这不是卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet) 表现最好的一场比赛。他在进攻篮板上依然有影响力，但他无法在内线完成终结，这在下半场伤害了圣安东尼奥。随着文班亚马回归，科内特回到了较小的替补角色，他将被寄予厚望在主力休息时保持防守端的稳健。
评分： C-
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
11 分钟，2 分，2 篮板，1 助攻，1 犯规，2 投 1 中，三分 1 投 0 中，正负值 +8
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes) 完成了他在本系列赛至今最有影响力的表现，他抢下了一个关键的进攻篮板并完成扣篮，在第三节帮助马刺取得领先。他在 11 分钟的上场时间里展现了稳定的老将风范。在第三节比分胶着时，米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson) 选择让他上场而不是卡特·布莱恩特，这是一个英明的决定。
评分： B-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
17 分钟，9 分，1 篮板，1 助攻，1 抢断，1 犯规，5 投 3 中，三分 2 投 1 中，正负值 -5
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson) 极度需要一场找回状态的比赛。虽然不像哈珀在第三战那样引人注目，但感觉约翰逊打出了那种能为接下来的季后赛建立信心表现。他终于在篮下完成了更多得分，并在马刺打出进攻高潮时留在场上。很高兴看到他能在第五战中延续这种表现。
评分： C+
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
6 分钟，6 分，1 篮板，1 助攻，1 失误，1 犯规，3 投 2 中，三分 3 投 2 中，正负值 -3
米奇在这场关键比赛中选择了信任老将。卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant) 仅通过垃圾时间才达到了上场时间要求。很高兴看到他投进空位三分。他在出手时看起来自信多了。
评分： C
乔丹·麦克劳克林 (Jordan McLaughlin)
2 分钟，2 分，1 助攻，1 抢断，1 犯规，1 投 1 中，正负值 +2
J-Mac 回归了。很高兴看到他在垃圾时间投进抛投。
评分：不完整 (Incomplete)
比斯马克·比永博 (Bismack Biyombo)
2 分钟，0 分，正负值 +2
比斯马克·比永博 (Bismack Biyombo) 获得了上场机会，但在垃圾时间没有产生实质性影响。
评分：不完整 (Incomplete)
林迪·沃特斯三世 (Lindy Waters III)
2 分钟，0 分，正负值 +2
垃圾时间竟然一次三分尝试都没有？加油啊，林迪·沃特斯三世 (Lindy Waters III)，果断出手！
评分：不完整 (Incomplete)
梅森·普拉姆利 (Mason Plumlee)
2 分钟，0 分，正负值 +3
这是“普拉姆利百万富翁”在马刺队的首次季后赛出场。不知何故，当其他垃圾时间球员的正负值都是 +2 时，梅森·普拉姆利 (Mason Plumlee) 却是 +3？
评分：不完整 (Incomplete)
未激活名单： 哈里森·英格拉姆 (Harrison Ingram)、大卫·琼斯-加西亚 (David Jones-Garcia)、伊曼纽尔·米勒 (Emanuel Miller)
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Spurs vs. Trail Blazers player grades: Fox and Wembanyama dominate Game Four
Spurs vs. Trail Blazers player grades: Fox and Wembanyama dominate Game Four
The San Antonio Spurs took a 3-1 lead against the Portland Trail Blazers on Sunday. Despite trailing by 19 points in the first half, the Spurs came back with a vengeance, outscoring the Blazers 73-35 in the second half to win Game Four 114-93.
Victor Wembanyama returned from concussion protocols in Game Four and dominated as he did in Game One. Wembanyama owned the defensive end of the floor and gave the Spurs just enough offense to pull ahead. He was aided by his All-Star running mate, De’Aaron Fox, who led all scorers with 28 points. The Spurs are now -650 favorites on FanDuel to win Game Five in San Antonio to advance to the Western Conference Semis.
Wembanyama and Fox will lead our Game Four player grades. As a quick reminder, these grades are based on each player’s on-court performance, going beyond just the stat sheet. A “B” grade represents the average performance for an individual. If a player logs fewer than 5 minutes or plays only in garbage time, their grade will be incomplete.
Victor Wembanyama
34 minutes, 27 points, 11 rebounds, 3 assists, 4 steals, 7 blocks, 4 turnovers, 3 fouls, 9-for-17 shooting, 1-for-4 threes, +28
Portland is at its best when it can get to the rim. They could not do that against Wembanyama. Seven blocks and four steals speak for themselves, but as we all know with Wemby, it’s more about the shots that don’t go up or the passes that don’t get made that define his impact. The Blazers only scored 38 points in the paint. Wembanyama effectively shut down their most potent offensive weapon: paint scoring.
Wembanyama settled a lot offensively in the first half. He put up some fairly baffling threes and mid-range jumpers as he tried to get back in a rhythm. Once he started to feast on lobs around the rim, the Spurs settled in offensively and blew out the Blazers. His shot selection keeps this from being an A+ game, but he was pretty darn close.
Grade: A
De’Aaron Fox
39 minutes, 28 points, 6 rebounds, 7 assists, 1 steal, 2 blocks, 3 turnovers, 1 foul, 11-for-17 shooting, 4-for-8 threes, +21
This may have been Fox’s best performance as a Spur. He has certainly had bigger scoring nights, but in terms of impact and stakes, this takes the cake. Fox was the offensive engine that got them back into the game and helped them extend the lead. He was smart about when he needed to get into the paint, and made some momentum-shattering shots from deep.
I have really liked what I’ve seen from Fox in this series, too. When he’s been matched up with Deni Advija, he’s gone chest to chest with him and done an admirable job shutting down his drives. With Wembanyama in the game, he’s been aggressive at the point of attack, creating turnovers. On Sunday, he had an incredible blocked three-point shot in the first quarter. That two-way impact is exactly what San Antonio needs from Fox for the rest of the playoffs.
Grade: A+
Stephon Castle
26 minutes, 16 points, 1 rebound, 8 assists, 1 steal, 1 turnover, 5 fouls, 6-for-14 shooting, 3-for-6 threes, +17
Castle’s defensive effort has been incredible. He was left in for the third quarter despite playing with four fouls because of how impactful he has been. It felt like he was everywhere defensively as the Spurs started to storm back against Portland. Offensively, it was an up-and-down game, but his ability to hit spot-up threes has changed how the Blazers have to guard him. It’s to the point now where I don’t think they can continue to put a big on him and leave him completely alone.
Grade: B+
Julian Champagnie
29 minutes, 8 points, 3 rebounds, 1 steal, 1 foul, 3-for-6 shooting, 2-for-4 threes, +22
It’s almost getting boring to write the Champagnie blurb in this series. He’s just doing his job. He hits open threes when they come his way, and he plays good enough defense not to get burned. He has worked in a few more drives, attacking the aggressive Portland closeouts. He seems to be gaining confidence as the series progresses, which is a good sign for the Spurs’ playoff chances.
Grade: B
Devin Vassell
35 minutes, 11 points, 6 rebounds, 3 assists, 1 steal, 1 block, 2 turnovers, 3 fouls, 5-for-9 shooting, 1-for-3 threes, +14
Vassell’s shot selection was much better in Game Four. He made some clutch shots in the third quarter to help the Spurs get back into the game. He was a part of the defensive unit that locked down the Blazers in the second half. It wasn’t an explosive offensive game, but he helped the team in a major way.
Grade: B+
Dylan Harper
25 minutes, 3 points, 2 rebounds, 1 assist, 1 steal, 3 fouls, 1-for-6 shooting, 0-for-2 threes, +4
San Antonio’s bench struggled overall. The Blazers’ bench outscored the Spurs’ bench 34-24. Harper was quiet in Game Four after his coming-out party in Game Three. It wasn’t a great game from Harper, but it’s hard to call it a bad one either. He has 0 turnovers, so he didn’t hurt them with the ball in his hands. When Castle was in foul trouble, Harper gave them a solid ball-handler to keep the momentum going.
Grade: C
Luke Kornet
12 minutes, 2 points, 7 rebounds, 1 steal, 1 turnover, 1 foul, 1-for-7 shooting, -10
This was not Kornet’s best game. He was still impactful on the offensive boards, but his inability to finish inside hurt San Antonio in the first half. With Wembanyama back, Kornet returns to a smaller bench role where he will be relied on to keep the defense in a decent spot while the starters rest.
Grade: C-
Harrison Barnes
11 minutes, 2 points, 2 rebounds, 1 assist, 1 foul, 1-for-2 shooting, 0-for-1 threes, +8
Barnes had his most impactful play of the series so far when he made a big offensive rebound and then slammed it to give the Spurs the lead in the 3rd. He was a steady veteran presence in his 11 minutes. It was an inspired choice by Mitch Johnson to go to him over Carter Bryant when things got close in the third quarter.
Grade: B-
Keldon Johnson
17 minutes, 9 points, 1 rebound, 1 assist, 1 steal, 1 foul, 3-for-5 shooting, 1-for-2 threes, -5
Johnson needed a comeback game in a bad way. It wasn’t as loud as Harper’s in Game Three, but it felt like KJ had the type of performance that would build the confidence he needs going into the rest of the playoffs. He finally scored around the rim a bit more and was on the floor during the Spurs’ big run. It would be great to see him build off this performance in Game Five.
Grade: C+
Carter Bryant
6 minutes, 6 points, 1 rebound, 1 assist, 1 turnover, 1 foul, 2-for-3 shooting, 2-for-3 threes, -3
Mitch went with the vets in this key game. Bryant only meets the minute requirement by playing in garbage time. It was great to see him knock down open three-pointers. He looked much more confident letting it fly.
Grade: C
Jordan McLaughlin
2 minutes, 2 points, 1 assist, 1 steal, 1 foul, 1-for-1 shooting, +2
It was the return of J-Mac. I loved to see his floater go in garbage time.
Grade: Incomplete
Bismack Biyombo
2 minutes, 0 points, +2
Biyombo got into the game but made no real impact in garbage time.
**Grade:Incomplete
Lindy Waters III
2 minutes, 0 points, +2
Not a single three-point attempt in garbage time? Come on, Lindy, get those shots up!
Grade: Incomplete
Mason Plumlee
*2 minutes, 0 points, +*3
First Spurs’ playoff minutes for Plumdog Millionaire. Somehow, he was +3 when the rest of the garbage time players were +2?
**Grade:Incomplete
Inactives: Harrison Ingram, David Jones-Garcia, Emanuel Miller
By Jacob Douglas, via Pounding The Rock