By Boxscorehistory | Pounding The Rock (PtR), 2026-04-27 12:30:00
真是半场表现天差地别！老实说，半场临近时，我还在安慰自己：对于一支年轻、缺乏经验，且在缺少超级巨星的情况下刚刚拼下关键第三场胜利的球队来说，这场比赛的表现虽然令人遗憾，但也是可以理解的挫折。这当然不是理想的情况，但我一直告诉自己，这将是又一次季后赛的磨砺，最终会通向胜利。
幸运的是，我那些言不由衷、强行找补的自我心理建设很快就被喜悦所取代。第三节初，马刺在短短 2 分半钟的时间里打出一波高潮，将 15 分的分差缩小到仅剩 4 分。值得称赞的是，波特兰在遭受这波冲击后并没有立即崩盘，该节剩余时间双方陷入拉锯战，三节战罢比分定格在 74 平。开拓者在第四节开局几分钟内依然紧咬比分；然而，到该节中段，圣安东尼奥已经建立了两位数的领先优势，并随着比赛接近尾声不断扩大。
在完成这次逆转的过程中，马刺成为了 NBA 季后赛历史上唯一一支在半场落后 15 分或以上的情况下，最终反赢 15 分或以上的球队。正如你所料，这样的表现产生了一些惊人的数据，我们将在下文进行讨论：
注： 随着我们进入季后赛，用于评分的参考周期从 2012-2013 赛季以来的常规赛变更为 2012-2013 赛季以来的季后赛。除非下文另有说明，否则该数据集包含附加赛。截至 2026 年 4 月 26 日末，该群体包括 1,151 场比赛。
决定比赛的因素
- 这场比赛的整体数据统计掩盖了两队在比赛过程中表现的剧烈波动。当然，这里讨论的因素仍然完全有效，但必须指出的是，马刺队基本上所有的关键优势都是在下半场建立的。
- 圣安东尼奥在这场比赛中投入了大量精力在“产出”（Stocks，即抢断 + 盖帽），全队共计 22 次，而波特兰只有 11 次。开拓者的总数虽然不算惊艳，但也完全拿得出手；不幸的是，文班亚马一个人就追平了对方全队。
- 马刺队窒息的防守带来了 -5 的失误差，这帮助他们建立了 +7 的投篮尝试 (FGA) 优势。然而，圣安东尼奥投篮次数更多的另一个原因是他们的犯规次数更多，且犯规时机更糟，这让波特兰在罚球尝试 (FTA) 上获得了 +6 的优势。
- 开拓者在罚球线上的显著优势（罚球命中数 +5）被马刺在运动战中的巨大优势完全淹没。这部分归功于出手量，但主要是投篮命中率（高出 9.43 个百分点）和三分命中率（高出 10.17 个百分点）带来的巨大差距。结果，圣安东尼奥多投进了 11 个球，多进了 4 个三分球，在运动战得分上比波特兰多出了 26 分。
罕见的数据统计
- 上文提到维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 在这场比赛中有 11 次“产出”（7 次盖帽和 4 次抢断）。自 1996-1997 季后赛开始以来，只有其他 7 位球员在正式的季后赛（即不含附加赛）中达到或超过这一数据。
- 马刺全队 22 次“产出”的壮举虽然没那么罕见，但也绝不寻常。在 2012-2013 赛季以来的 1,151 场季后赛中，22 次以上的“产出”共出现过 30 次，其中获胜方 22 次，落败方 8 次。这大约每 39 场比赛才会发生一次，或者说每个季后赛出现两次多一点。
- 这场比赛是自 2012-2013 赛季以来，第 19 场获胜方助攻差达到 +12 或以上，且总助攻数不超过 26 次的季后赛。
- 在自 1996-1997 季后赛开始以来的 2,380 场正式季后赛中，这仅是第 29 次出现某支球队（无论胜负）全队录得 10 次以上盖帽，但队内只有不超过 3 名球员有盖帽入账的情况。此外，这也是同期内第 21 次出现单场比赛中同一支球队有 9 名或更多球员至少贡献 1 次抢断。
什么是球队评分数据表？
简而言之，这些数据表对胜负双方的基础统计数据差异进行评分，评分标准基于获胜方相对于特定参考周期内其他 NBA 获胜方的差异。可以把它看作是一份成绩单，用来了解某一获胜方的表现相对于其他获胜方如何。所使用的参考周期从 2012-2013 赛季开始到最近的比赛日，仅包含相同赛季类别的比赛（即常规赛和季后赛不进行对比）。
数据来源： 创建这些数据表所使用的底层数据收集自 Basketball Reference 。在所有情况下，数据都是在比赛结束后的次日早晨收集的。尽管罕见，但数据收集后可能会发生赛后统计修正，并可能影响最终结果。
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Box Grades: Dominant second half propels Spurs to 3-1 lead
Box Grades: Dominant second half propels Spurs to 3-1 lead
Talk about a tale of two halves! I’ll be honest, as halftime approached, I was comforting myself with the argument that this game represented an unfortunate but understandable stumble for a young, inexperienced team that was still coming off a critical Game 3 win without its superstar. It certainly wasn’t an ideal scenario, but I kept telling myself that this would be another one of those playoff scars that ultimately leads to winning.
Fortunately, my insincere, grasping rationalizations quickly gave way to delight, as the Spurs narrowed a 15-point deficit to just four via a 2-and-a-half minute burst early in the third. To their credit, Portland did not immediately crumble after this onslaught, as the remainder of the quarter was a back-and-forth affair that ended with the score knotted up at 74. The Blazers continued to keep things close for several minutes in the fourth; however, by the middle of the quarter San Antonio had a double-digit lead that continued to grow as the game drew to a close.
In pulling off this comeback, the Spurs became the only team in NBA playoff history to win a game by 15+ after being down by 15+ at half. As you might imagine, a performance like this produces some wild stats, as we will discuss below:
Note: Now that we’ve moved into the postseason, the reference period used for grading changes from the set of regular season games since 2012-2013 to the set of postseason games since 2012-2013. Unless otherwise noted below, this set DOES include play-in games. As of the end of April 26, 2026, this group include 1,151 games.
Factors that decided the game
- This is one of those games in which the overall box score obscures wild variation in play for both teams over the course of the game. Of course, the factors discussed here are still completely valid, but it is important to note that essentially all of the Spurs’ key advantages were built in the second half.
- San Antonio invested heavily in stocks (steals + blocks) in this game, logging 22 as a team to Portland’s 11. That Blazers total is unspectacular but perfectly respectable; unfortunately for them, Wemby matched it by himself.
- The Spurs’ stifling defense produced a turnover margin of -5, which helped them build a FGA edge of +7. However, another reason that San Antonio attempted more field goals is that they fouled more often and at worse times, giving Portland a +6 advantage in FTA.
- The Blazers’ notable edge at the free throw line (+5 FTM) was completely swamped by the Spurs’ massive advantage from the field, which was partly driver by volume but mostly the result of big margins in FG% (+9.43 percentage points) and 3P% (+10.17 percentage points). As a result, San Antonio made 11 more shots, four more threes, and outscored Portland by 26 from the field.
Rare Box Score Stats
- I mentioned above that Victor had 11 stocks in this game (seven blocks and four steals). Only seven other players have met of surpassed this total in a true playoff game (i.e., no play-in contests) since the start of the 1996-1997 postseason.
- The Spurs’ team total of 22 stocks is not nearly as rare a feat, but still far from common. In the 1,151 postseason games since 2012-2013, a stock total of 22+ has happened 30 times, including 22 times for winners and eight times for losers. That’s about once in every 39 contests, or a bit more than twice per postseason.
- This was just the 19th postseason contest since 2012-2013 in which a winning team had an assist margin of +12 or more while having no more than 26 assists.
- In the 2,380 true playoff games played since the start of the 1996-1997 postseason, this game marked just the 29th time that any team (winner or loser) recorded 10+ blocks as a team while no more than three members of that team had a block. Furthermore, it is was just the 21st time in the same period that 9+ players on one team had at least one steal.
What are Team Graded Box Scores?
Very briefly, these box scores grade winner-loser differentials for basic box score statistics, with the grade being based on the winning team’s differential relative to other NBA winners during a defined reference period. Think of it like a report card for understanding how a given winner performed relative to other winners. The reference period used runs from the start of the 2012-2013 season to the latest date of play, including only games in the same season category (i.e., regular season and playoff games are not compared to each other).
***Data Source:*The underlying data used to create these box scores was collected fromBasketball Reference. In all cases, the data are collected the morning after the game is played. Although rare, postgame statistical revisions after data collection do occur and may affect the results after the fact.
By Boxscorehistory, via Pounding The Rock