By Boxscorehistory | Pounding The Rock (PtR), 2026-03-22 14:48:49
像这样的比赛很有趣，因为参赛的两支球队追求的目标截然不同。此外，由于这些目标完全背道而驰，比赛结果要么意味着双赢，要么意味着双输。在昨晚的比赛之前，印第安纳步行者队正处于15连败中，为了在即将到来的选秀中获得最佳的乐透签概率，他们还需要更多的失利来稳固这一位置。与此同时，圣安东尼奥马刺队在进入比赛时，仍有微弱的机会追赶雷霆队以争夺西部第一。因此，步行者的胜利对双方来说都会是一种失望，尽管这能给步行者的球员和球迷带来一丝慰藉。幸运的是，马刺轻松取胜，两支球队都得到了他们在本赛季继续追求目标所需的结果。
由于这场比赛的特点是首节便领先13分的大胜，随后便是一路稳扎稳打走向胜利，因此本场比赛取得的技术统计差值并不算特别夸张。即便如此，仍有一些引人注目的亮点值得关注：
- 马刺在这场比赛中获胜的一个关键因素是投篮总次数上的显著优势（投篮出手数 +12），这主要源于他们在总篮板球上的巨大优势（+23），其中包括在进攻篮板上的 +9 优势。
- 除了出手次数，圣安东尼奥在投篮命中率上也有虽然不算惊人但很有意义的优势（+2.87个百分点）。综合来看，这些优势使得马刺在投篮命中数（FGM）上领先了9个。
- 遗憾的是，马刺并非事事顺心，美中不足的是步行者在远投方面的出色表现。尽管步行者的三分出手次数仅多一次（35次对34次），但马刺在三分命中率上的显著劣势（-7.48个百分点，尽管其三分命中率达到了38.24%），使得印第安纳在三分命中数（3PM）上领先了3个。
- 三分球的优势远不足以确保步行者的胜利，但足以产生这样一个罕见的统计奇观：昨晚的比赛是自2012-2013赛季以来，在16,728场常规赛中，仅有的第28次出现一支球队在出手35次以上且三分命中率至少为45.71%的情况下，仍然输掉至少15分。
- 罚球得分在这场比赛中最终打成了平手，两支球队在这一项上都得到了15分。圣安东尼奥的出手次数少了两次，因此他们在罚球命中率上的优势（+9.29个百分点）远高于平均水平，但由于双方的出手次数都较低，这种差值略显误导（当总出手数较低时，微小的差异也会产生巨大的百分点差距）。无论如何，由于两队合计仅在罚球线上出手36次，而马刺在运动战中比步行者多得15分，罚球极不可能成为本场比赛的决定性因素。
什么是球队评分技术统计表？
简而言之，这些技术统计表对胜负双方的基础数据差值进行评分，评分标准基于获胜球队相对于特定参考时期内其他NBA获胜球队的差值。可以将其看作是一张成绩单，用于了解某一获胜球队相对于其他获胜球队的表现。所使用的参考时期从2012-2013赛季开始到最近的比赛日，且仅包含相同赛季类别的比赛（即常规赛和季后赛不会相互比较）。
数据来源： 用于创建这些技术统计表的基础数据收集自Basketball Reference。在所有情况下，数据都是在比赛结束后的次日早晨收集的。虽然罕见，但数据收集后确实会发生赛后统计数据修正，并可能在事后影响结果。
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Box Grades: Spurs blow out Pacers early, cruise to win
Box Grades: Spurs blow out Pacers early, cruise to win
Games like this are interesting in that the two teams playing are pursuing fundamentally different goals. Furthermore, because these goals are so diametrically opposed, the game’s outcome either means that both teams win or both lose. Coming into last night’s game, Indiana was riding a 15-game losing streak to the best lottery odds available in the upcoming draft, but more losing needs to be done to secure that position. At the same time, San Antonio entered the game with long-shot odds of catching the Thunder for first seed in the West. As such, a Pacers win would have been a disappointment for both sides, even if it would have given Indiana’s players and fans a welcome respite. Fortunately, the Spurs won handily, and both teams got exactly what they needed to continue pursuing their goals this season.
Because the game was characterized by a 13-point first quarter blowout followed by a steady march to victory, the box score differentials achieved in this contest weren’t especially gaudy. Even so, there are a number of striking highlights to consider:
- One key aspect of the Spurs’ victory in this game was a substantial advantage in shot volume from the field overall (+12 FGA), which largely stemmed from their exceptional edge in total rebounds (+23), including a +9 edge on the offensive glass.
- On top of volume, San Antonio had a meaningful if unspectacular edge in FG% (+2.87 percentage points). Collectively, these advantages allowed the Spurs to achieve a FGM margin of +9.
- Alas, it wasn’t all jam for San Antonio, with the biggest fly in the ointment being Indiana’s excellent performance from distance. Although the Pacers only had one more three-point attempt (35 vs. 34), the Spurs’ notable disadvantage in 3P% (-7.48 percentage points, despite logging a 3P% of 38.24%) allowed Indiana to produce a 3PM margin of +3.
- This edge from three wasn’t nearly enough to secure the win for the Pacers, but it was sufficient to produce this rare statistical feat: last night’s contest marked just the 28th time in 16,728 regular season games since the start of 2012-2013 that a team lost by at least 15 points while shooting at least 45.71% from three on 35+ attempts.
- Scoring from the free throw line ended up being a wash in this game, with both teams scoring 15 points in this area. San Antonio had two fewer attempts, so their edge in FT% (+9.29 percentage points) was well above average, but the low volume on both sides makes this differential a bit misleading (large percentage-point margins can emerge from small differences when overall volume is low). In any case, because both teams combined to take just 36 shots from the charity stripe, and the Spurs outscored Indiana by 15 from the field, free throws were highly unlikely to be a decisive factor in this game.
What are Team Graded Box Scores?
Very briefly, these box scores grade winner-loser differentials for basic box score statistics, with the grade being based on the winning team’s differential relative to other NBA winners during a defined reference period. Think of it like a report card for understanding how a given winner performed relative to other winners. The reference period used runs from the start of the 2012-2013 season to the latest date of play, including only games in the same season category (i.e., regular season and playoff games are not compared to each other).
***Data Source:*The underlying data used to create these box scores was collected fromBasketball Reference. In all cases, the data are collected the morning after the game is played. Although rare, postgame statistical revisions after data collection do occur and may affect the results after the fact.
By Boxscorehistory, via Pounding The Rock