马刺 vs 太阳 101 - 100 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-03-20 05:34:25
圣安东尼奥马刺在大部分时间里表现挣扎，一度落后两位数，直到维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 在最后时刻用一记后仰跳投绝杀菲尼克斯太阳。在这场马刺以101-100险胜的比赛中，虽然场面并不算精彩，但马刺最终还是涉险过关。
统计数据：马刺 vs 太阳
马刺 vs 太阳 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
文班亚马用这记绝杀球为自己的出色表现画上了圆满的句号，同时也帮助圣安东尼奥锁定了自2019年以来的首个季后赛席位。他在35分钟内20投10中，罚球12投全中，砍下34分。在进攻端，文班亚马打得既聪明又极具侵略性。防守端虽然不是他的最佳表现，但随着比赛的进行，他的状态也在提升。评价文班亚马今晚表现的最好方式，或许就是看看当他下场休息时马刺的表现有多糟糕。他不在场上的每一秒都显得无比漫长。庆幸的是，文班亚马出场时间足够长，足以让他书写这段令人难忘的英雄篇章。
评分：A-
达龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
说实话，福克斯在前三节的表现相当糟糕。他11投仅3中，出现了极其低级的失误，没能为队友创造太多机会，防守端也表现不佳。如果马刺输掉这场比赛，他将是头号罪魁祸首。幸运的是，对于福克斯和马刺来说，这位速度奇快的控卫在末节表现神勇。他在最后一节没有出现任何失误，同时6投5中。当圣安东尼奥需要在关键时刻打出关键表现时，福克斯做好了准备，并成功挺身而出。即便如此，马刺也无法承受福克斯像前36分钟那样挣扎的表现——尤其是在斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle) 因胯部伤势缺阵的情况下。
评分：B-
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
亮点：瓦塞尔贡献了顶级的防守。在卡斯尔缺阵的情况下，是瓦塞尔挺身而出，打出了马刺全队最出色的外线防守。他多次利用聪明的防守避免犯规，从而帮助马刺完成防守。此外，瓦塞尔的两分球3投全中。不足：瓦塞尔在三分线外仅7投2中。他出现了两次失误，且没能站上罚球线。
评分：B
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼在三分线外8投4中，命中了四个关键球。鉴于球队其他成员在三分线外合计仅26投6中（命中率23.1%），这种级别的投射准星显得尤为重要。我喜欢尚帕尼在防守端的努力，但他本可以更好地避免那些廉价的犯规。总的来说，圣安东尼奥的这位神射手表现尚可，但也没有什么特别值得大书特书的地方。
评分：B-
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯两次三分出手均偏出，在23分钟内仅抢到一个篮板。他的整体防守表现处于水准之下。巴恩斯通过冲击篮筐得分以及比平时稍好的传球保留了一些价值。但总的来说，他的表现还不足以让他稳固在首发阵容的讨论中。
评分：C-
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
哈珀错失了三个空篮，还有几次出手刷筐而出。他的运球和决策不像往常那样严谨。但是，尽管有这些低迷表现，哈珀在这次胜利中仍发挥了重要作用。在卡斯尔缺阵的情况下，这位新秀的组织能力显得格外宝贵。哈珀还贡献了高质量的防守，并在保护篮板方面提供了显著帮助。哈珀有过比这好得多的表现，但在今晚的艰难时刻，马刺依然可以依靠他。
评分：C
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊充满热情和活力地打球……一如既往。他在篮板球上拼抢积极，防守端表现也还算过得去。进攻端，约翰逊缺乏效率。他三分球3投0中，两分球7投3中，且没有获得罚球机会。考虑到圣安东尼奥今晚打得不够严谨，约翰逊能以零失误结束比赛是值得称赞的。
评分：C
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
委婉地说，科内特的表现令人失望。他移动不便，在场上跑动显得很笨重。他在15分钟内抢下四个篮板，但没有一个是关键篮板。进攻端，科内特基本上只是在场上挡路。希望他能尽快找回状态，因为他显然没有恢复到100%的情况。
评分：D
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
布莱恩特看起来像个迷失的新秀。他在10分钟的出场时间里仅有一次出手，那是一次失去控制的冲击篮筐。其余时间里，他在进攻端显得畏首畏尾。防守端，虽然能偶尔窥见他的潜力，但他大部分时间都显得不在状态。
评分：D
乔丹·麦克劳林 (Jordan McLaughlin)
麦克劳林显然是球队今晚的幕后英雄。他替补出场贡献了精彩的10分钟。在马刺反常地陷入传球困境时，正是麦克劳林上场润滑了球队的进攻齿轮。他做出了极其出色的决策，脚步也充满活力。在防守端，他是圣安东尼奥表现较好的球员之一，甚至在拼抢篮板时也竭尽全力。在球场两端，麦克劳林都做好了战斗准备，并在场上产生了立竿见影的影响。
评分：A
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
马刺在防守端缺乏强度，在进攻端缺乏专注——主帅米奇教练对这两点都负有责任。前三节的进攻策略非常难看，防守端也出现了太多的漏人。但值得称赞的是，米奇教练在第四节做出了正确的调整，为文班亚马创造了赢下比赛的机会。噢，还有，派上麦克劳林是一个拯救了比赛的决定。
评分：C
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Phoenix Suns – Game #70
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Phoenix Suns – Game #70
The San Antonio Spurs trailed by double-digits and struggled for much of the evening before Victor Wembanyama beat the Phoenix Suns with a fadeaway jumper in the closing seconds. There wasn’t much beautiful basketball to be seen during San Antonio’s 101-100 victory but the Spurs were able to do just enough to eke out the victory.
Stats: Spurs vs. Suns
Spurs vs. Suns – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Wembanyama put an exclamation point at the end of this fine performance by hitting the game-winner that clinched San Antonio’s first playoff berth since 2019. He finished with 34 points in 35 minutes by hitting 10-of-20 shots from the field and all 12 of his freebies. Wembanyama played a smart, aggressive brand of basketball on offense. Defensively, while it wasn’t his finest performance, he got better as the game progressed. Perhaps the best way to judge how Wembanyama played on this night was by witnessing how terrible the Spurs were when he was on the bench. Every moment he sat felt like an eternity. Thankfully, Wembanyama played long enough to author memorable heroics.
Grade: A-
De’Aaron Fox
Truthfully, Fox was pretty darn terrible in the first three quarters. He was 3-for-11 from the field, committed the sloppiest of turnovers, wasn’t making many plays for others and performed poorly defensively. If the Spurs lost this game, he would have been the main culprit. Fortunately for both Fox and the Spurs, the speedy point guard was very good in the final period. He finished the quarter without a turnover while hitting 5-of-6 shots from the field. When San Antonio needed a big play at a big moment, Fox was ready, willing and able to answer the ball. That said, the Spurs can’t afford for Fox to struggle like he did during the game’s first 36 minutes — especially when Stephon Castle (hip) isn’t suited up.
Grade: B-
Devin Vassell
The good: Vassell played outstanding defense. Without Castle, it was Vassell who stepped up and played San Antonio’s best perimeter defense. There were multiple occurrences where Vassell’s ability to wisely avoid a foul allowed the Spurs to get a stop. Vassell was also 3-for-3 on two-pointers. The bad: Vassell shot only 2-for-7 from deep. He turned it over twice and failed to get to the free throw line.
Grade: B
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie buried four important three-pointers on eight attempts. That level of marksmanship was especially needed because the rest of the team was 6-for-26 (23.1%) from deep. I liked Champagnie’s effort on defense but he could have been better about avoiding cheap fouls. All in all, San Antonio’s sharpshooter played decently well but it was nothing to write home about.
Grade: B-
Harrison Barnes
Barnes missed both of his three-point attempts and grabbed only one rebound in 23 minutes. His overall defensive performance was substandard. Barnes retained some value by getting buckets going to the hoop and his passing was a bit better than usual. But, overall, he didn’t do enough to keep his name in the starting lineup discussion.
Grade: C-
Dylan Harper
Harper missed three open layups and had a couple other shots rim out. His handle and decision-making were not as tight as usual. But, despite the lowlights, Harper played an important role in this win. Without the services of Castle, the rookie’s playmaking was extra valuable. Harper also played quality defense while also giving notable help on the boards. Harper has played much better but the Spurs were still able to lean on him when times got tough tonight.
Grade: C
Keldon Johnson
Johnson played with enthusiasm and vivacity … like he usually does. He fought on the glass and played decent-ish defense. Offensively, Johnson lacked efficiency. He was 0-for-3 from three-point territory, 3-for-7 on two-pointers and didn’t go to the free throw line. Considering San Antonio’s lack of carefulness, Johnson finishing without a turnover was commendable.
Grade: C
Luke Kornet
Kornet was underwhelming, to put it kindly. He wasn’t moving well and he lumbered his way up and down the court. He grabbed four rebounds in 15 minutes but none of the four were noteworthy. Offensively, Kornet basically just got in the way. Hopefully he loosens up soon because he was clearly not 100%.
Grade: D
Carter Bryant
Bryant looked like a lost rookie. His one shot in his ten minutes of action was an out of control drive to the cup. The rest of the time he looked timid on the offensive end. Defensively, there were glimpses of his potential but he was mostly out of sorts.
Grade: D
Jordan McLaughlin
McLaughlin was clearly the team’s unsung hero on this night. He gave the Spurs ten great minutes off the bench. With the Spurs uncharacteristically struggling to pass, it was McLaughlin who came into the game and greased the gears. He made outstanding decisions and had an extra amount of pep in his step. Defensively, he was one of San Antonio’s better performers and he even crashed the boards as hard as he could. On both ends of the court, McLaughlin came to play and made a palpable difference while he was out there.
Grade: A
Mitch Johnson
The Spurs lacked intensity on defense and focus on offense — and Coach Mitch doesn’t escape blame for either of those attributes. The offensive gameplan was unsightly in the opening three quarters. There were also too many defensive breakdowns. But give Coach Mitch credit for pushing the right buttons in the fourth quarter to give Wembanyama a chance to win the game. Oh, and playing McLaughlin was a game-saving type of move.
Grade: C
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk