By Boxscorehistory | Pounding The Rock (PtR), 2026-03-20 12:30:00
哇！这场比赛中马刺有一些阶段的表现简直惨不忍睹，但他们还是在关键时刻发力之前，成功将分差保持在可追逐的范围内。最重要的是，维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 用一种我通常非常讨厌的策略结束了比赛：在比赛即将结束时，他在外线原地运球消耗时间，尝试突破篮下，最后却选择了一个难度极高的中距离后仰跳投。然而，既然球进了，我现在要坚称这是一个我始终毫无保留支持的绝妙计划。
无论如何，这类比赛的数据评分通常都不太好看，因为胶着的比赛往往是由微弱的数据差值决定的。因此，赢球方的表现与其他获胜球队相比，评分通常并不高。即便如此，数据中的模式依然独特且具有参考价值，昨晚的情况正是如此：
- 正如上面的数据表所示，马刺在关键领域出现了一系列糟糕的评分，包括投篮出手数 (FGA)、投篮命中数 (FGM)、三分出手数 (3PA) 和三分命中数 (3PM) 的差值分别为 -8、-3、-2 和 -1。这些差距部分源于菲尼克斯在篮板和失误方面的优势，尽管另一个因素是马刺更有可能通过走上罚球线来结束进攻回合（稍后详述）。
- 由于圣安东尼奥的投篮和三分球总出手数及命中数较少，太阳队在运动战中多得了 7 分。这个结果虽然不是致命伤，但自 2012-2013 赛季开始以来，只有 5.65% 的获胜球队（16,712 支中的 945 支）在运动战得分落后至少这么多时仍能取胜。
- 马刺成功克服了运动战的糟糕表现，这得益于他们在罚球线上显著更高的产量（+6 次罚球）和效率（+14.83 个百分点）。这两项优势结合在一起，为圣安东尼奥多带来了 8 个罚球命中，这最终足以确保胜利。
- 马刺在罚球线上的表现最令人惊叹之处在于，这与他们在运动战中的挣扎形成了鲜明对比。事实上，自 2012-2013 赛季开始以来的 16,712 场常规赛中，这是仅有的第 34 次出现获胜球队在投篮命中率不高于 42.17% 且三分命中率不高于 29.14% 的情况下，仍能保持至少 91.3% 的罚球命中率。
- 最后，虽然上面的团队数据表中没有涵盖，但本场比赛另一个引人注目的地方是马刺在进攻端对文班的依赖程度。一个直观的体现是文班的得分占全队总分的比例（34/101 = 33.66%），这是他在为圣安东尼奥效力的 172 场比赛中排名第三高的得分占比。尽管马刺肯定希望追求今年一直以来所强调的更均衡的进攻产出，但再次确认文班既能成为防守端的大杀器，又能在几乎其他所有人都难以得分时撑起球队进攻，这确实令人欣慰。
什么是团队数据评分？
简而言之，这些数据评分是对基础统计数据中胜负方差值的评估，评分标准基于获胜球队在特定参考期内相对于其他 NBA 获胜球队的差值。可以将其视为一份成绩单，用于了解特定获胜者的表现与其他获胜者相比如何。所使用的参考期从 2012-2013 赛季开始至今，且仅包含相同类别的比赛（即常规赛和季后赛不会进行跨类别比较）。
数据来源： 用于创建这些数据评分的基础数据收集自 Basketball Reference。在所有情况下，数据均在比赛结束后的次日早晨收集。虽然罕见，但在数据收集后确实会发生赛后统计数据修正，并可能影响最终结果。
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Box Grades: Spurs punch their ticket to the Playoffs in dramatic comeback win
Box Grades: Spurs punch their ticket to the Playoffs in dramatic comeback win
Wow! This game contained some cringe-worthy stretches of play by the Spurs, but they did just enough to stay in striking distance before finally finding an extra gear in crunch time. To cap it all off, Victor Wembanyama ended the game with a strategy that I typically hate: dribble the ball in place on the perimeter with time winding down, attempt to drive to the basket, and then settle for an absurdly difficult midrange fadeaway. However, because it worked I will now insist that it was an awesome plan that I always supported without reservation.
In any case, games like this typically produce a lot of bad box score grades, simply because close games are generally decided by narrow box score margins. As a result, the winner’s performance does not usually grade well relative to other winners. Even so, patterns in the data can still be unique and informative, as was the case last night:
- As the box score above shows, the Spurs compiled a series of bad grades in critical areas, including FGA, FGM, 3PA, and 3PM differentials of -8, -3, -2, and -1 (respectively). These margins arose in part from rebounding and turnover battles that favored Phoenix, although another factor was that the Spurs were slightly more likely to end their offensive possessions with a trip to the free throw line (more on that later).
- Because San Antonio took and made fewer overall field goals and three-pointers, the Suns scored seven more points from the field. That outcome isn’t a death knell, but since the start of 2012-2013 only 5.65% of winning teams (945 of 16,712) have been outscored by at least that much from the field.
- The Spurs managed to overcome their poor performance from the field with notably better volume (+6 FTA) and efficiency (+14.83 percentage points) from the free throw line. These two advantages combined to generate eight more made free throws for San Antonio, which ended up being just enough to secure the win.
- What’s most remarkable about the Spurs’ performance at the charity stripe is its striking contrast with their struggles from the field. In fact, this contest marked just the 34th time in 16,712 regular season games dating back to the start of 2012-2013 in which a winning team that shot no better than 42.17% from the field and 29.14% from distance managed a FT% of at least 91.3%.
- Finally, although it’s not covered in the team box score above, another striking thing about this game was how heavily the Spurs leaned on Wemby for offensive production. One way to illustrate this is to look at the share of the team’s points scored by Victor (34/101 =33.66%), which is the third highest point share that he has recorded in 172 games with San Antonio. Although the Spurs will surely want to aim for the much more egalitarian distribution of offensive production that has defined the team this year, it is nice to reaffirm that Wemby can be a defensive menace and keep the team afloat offensively when almost everyone else is struggling to score.
What are Team Graded Box Scores?
Very briefly, these box scores grade winner-loser differentials for basic box score statistics, with the grade being based on the winning team’s differential relative to other NBA winners during a defined reference period. Think of it like a report card for understanding how a given winner performed relative to other winners. The reference period used runs from the start of the 2012-2013 season to the latest date of play, including only games in the same season category (i.e., regular season and playoff games are not compared to each other).
***Data Source:*The underlying data used to create these box scores was collected fromBasketball Reference. In all cases, the data are collected the morning after the game is played. Although rare, postgame statistical revisions after data collection do occur and may affect the results after the fact.
By Boxscorehistory, via Pounding The Rock