[PtR] 圣安东尼奥对阵金州勇士，最终比分：马刺凭借身体对抗强势逆转，126-113 击败对手

PtR · 2026 年2 月 12 日 07:00

By Jacob Douglas | Pounding The Rock (PtR), 2026-02-12 05:57:01

金州勇士队开局表现火热，充分利用了圣安东尼奥马刺队处于背靠背第二场的疲态。他们在三分线外手感发烫，首节便以 38-31 取得领先。马刺队随后发起反击，通过不断冲击篮筐并在内线碾压勇士队，最终以 126-113 逆转取胜。第三节一波 24-8 的高潮抹平了分差，随后圣安东尼奥在第四节强势收尾，在末节以 32-19 的比分压制金州。

马刺队由其球星领衔。德阿伦·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox) 全场掌控进攻节奏，16 投 11 中砍下全场最高的 27 分，并贡献 8 次助攻和 3 次抢断。维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 在上半场表现沉寂，但在圣安东尼奥下半场的逆转中发挥了至关重要的作用，全场贡献 26 分、9 个篮板和 2 次盖帽。他在第四节防守端全神贯注，完全打乱了勇士队的进攻节奏。

圣安东尼奥在内线得分上以 60-42 领先勇士，并抢下了 14 个进攻篮板。马刺队在下半场通过提升身体对抗强度扭转了局势，最终挺进胜利。

在斯蒂芬·库里 (Stephen Curry) 缺阵的情况下，金州勇士队得到了德雷蒙德·格林 (Draymond Green) 的经典表现，他得到 17 分、12 个篮板和 8 次助攻，领跑全队。

这场胜利将马刺队的连胜纪录扩大到 6 场，并将战绩提升至 38 胜 16 负。接下来，他们将迎来为期一周的全明星赛休整期。

观察心得

马刺队在首节让勇士队拿到了 38 分，这感觉像是前一晚圣安东尼奥在首节轰下 47 分的翻版。勇士队首节投篮命中率高达 57%，并命中了 5 记三分球。
这是金州勇士队一场充满斗志、作风硬朗的表现。对于一场周三晚上的常规赛来说，主场观众的情绪非常高涨。在缺少关键球员的情况下，勇士队的打法堪称教科书：传导球流畅，在攻防两端都异常拼命，并且严格执行战术方案。直到马刺队在下半场提升了对抗强度，局势才开始脱离他们的掌控。
圣安东尼奥表现最出色的时段出现在各节末尾。马刺队在第二节末段凭借一波进攻高潮将分差缩小到 4 分。他们在第三节末段打出 24-8 的冲击波，将比分追至 94 平。在这两个阶段，当勇士队外线投篮失准时，圣安东尼奥都在坚持不懈地冲击内线。
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson) 在第三节为马刺队奠定了基调，他连续三次突破篮下得分开启了反击高潮。约翰逊替补出场贡献 21 分和 6 个篮板。当圣安东尼奥在第四节需要关键进球时，他挺身而出。
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant) 在上半场看起来状态不错，在 9 分钟的出场时间内斩获 8 分和 5 个篮板。但随着马刺队在下半场全力追分，这位新秀再未获得上场机会。这可能预示着，当到了季后赛这种关键时刻，布莱恩特可能会被排除在轮换阵容之外。
第四节出现了一个有趣的瞬间，当时迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 在防守端漏掉了格林，导致对手轻松上篮。米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson) 立即叫了暂停，并对哈珀严厉训诫。不过他最终还是选择信任这位新秀，让其打完了比赛。哈珀全场表现稳健，替补出场贡献 14 分、8 次助攻和 5 个篮板。
圣安东尼奥马刺队终于终结了面对金州勇士队的劣势。这对马刺队来说是一个艰难的对手，因为勇士队拥有出色的进攻空间和传导球能力，足以利用马刺防守体系中的漏洞。而在进攻端，金州勇士队往往逼迫对手通过外线跳投来解决问题。周三晚上，圣安东尼奥展示了击败他们的蓝图——渗透内线，而不是满足于外传后的跳投。

由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。

点击查看原文：San Antonio vs. Golden State, Final Score: Spurs bully their way to a 126-113 comeback win

San Antonio vs. Golden State, Final Score: Spurs bully their way to a 126-113 comeback win

The Golden State Warriors came out hot to take advantage of a San Antonio Spurs team on the second night of a back-to-back. They were red-hot from three and jumped out to a 38-31 lead in the first quarter. The Spurs fought back by getting to the basket and crushing the Warriors in the paint on their way to a 126-113 win. A 24-8 run in the third quarter tied the game, and then San Antonio finished strong in the fourth, outscoring Golden State 32-19 in the final frame.

The Spurs were led by their stars. De’Aaron Fox was in control offensively all game, scoring a game-high 27 points on 11-16 shooting, adding 8 assists and 3 steals. Victor Wembanyama was quiet in the first half, but was crucial to San Antonio’s second-half comeback with 26 points, 9 rebounds, and 2 blocks. He was locked in defensively in the fourth quarter and completely disrupted the Warriors’ offensive attack.

San Antonio outscored the Warriors in the paint 60-42 and grabbed 14 offensive rebounds. The Spurs turned things around with their physicality in the second half, propelling them to victory.

With Stephen Curry out for the game, Golden State got a vintage performance from Draymond Green, who led the team with 17 points, 12 rebounds, and 8 assists.

The win extends the Spurs’ winning streak to 6 and improves their record to 38-16. They’ll now get a week off for the All-Star break.

Observations

The Spurs gave up 38 first-quarter points against the Warriors, which felt like the inverse of San Antonio scoring 47 points in the first frame the night before. The Warriors shot 57% from the field and knocked down 5 three-pointers.
This was a gritty, hard-nosed performance from Golden State. The crowd was really into it for a Wednesday night regular-season game. The Warriors played exactly how you should when you’re down key players. They moved the ball well, played really hard on both ends, and stuck to their scheme. It wasn’t until the Spurs matched their physicality in the second half that things started to slip away for them.
San Antonio’s best work came at the end of quarters. The Spurs cut the lead to four with a late-second-quarter hot streak. They rode a 24-8 run at the end of the third quarter to tie the game at 94. In both stretches, San Antonio relentlessly attacked the paint while Golden State missed shots from deep.
Keldon Johnson set the tone for the Spurs in the third quarter, kicking off their run by scoring on three-straight drives to the basket. Johnson had 21 points and 6 rebounds off the bench. When San Antonio needed clutch buckets in the fourth quarter, KJ delivered.
Carter Bryant looked good in the first half, tallying 8 points and 5 rebounds in his 9 minutes. The rookie didn’t touch the floor in the second half as the Spurs fought to claw back into the game. This may be a sign that when the games really matter, come playoff time, Bryant may be the odd man out of the rotation.
A funny moment in the fourth quarter happened when Dylan Harper lost Green defensively, leading to an open layup. Mitch Johnson immediately called a timeout and had some choice words for Harper. He ultimately stuck with the rookie, who closed out the game. Harper had a solid game with 14 points, 8 assists, and 5 rebounds off the bench.
San Antonio finally got the monkey off their back by beating Golden State. This is a difficult matchup for the Spurs, as the Warriors have the floor spacing and passing to take advantage of the Spurs’ defensive scheme. On the other end, Golden State forces teams to beat them with jump shots. On Wednesday night, San Antonio displayed the blueprint for beating them – penetrating the paint and not settling for kick-out jumpers.

By Jacob Douglas, via Pounding The Rock

PtR · 2026 年2 月 12 日 09:00

热评：

Spur_Monkey:

当马刺在三分线以内发起进攻时，表现要好得多。

让三分球成为某种手感火热或出现绝对空位时的“奢侈品”……而不应将其作为核心策略。

我认为统计规律最终会起作用……很难在一整场比赛中都维持滚烫的三分手感，一旦勇士队的投篮开始打铁，比赛的天平就开始倾斜了——同时也得益于马刺对油漆区的冲击……说的就是你，凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson) 和迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)！

另外，德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell) 最近在专注于中距离投篮而非三分球时，表现似乎要好得多。我非常喜欢他的中距离表现。
下半场的外线防守也进步了很多，这产生了巨大的影响。

最后……我对马刺这套十人轮换阵容感觉非常好。

我觉得这套阵容非常稳固，很高兴他们没有试图去打乱它。

维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)、德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)、斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)、哈珀、瓦塞尔、朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)、凯尔登、卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)、哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes) 以及……卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)。

期待布莱恩特能获得更多上场时间。
巴恩斯本场比赛的正负值最高，我认为尽管他的三分球不像以前那么准了，但他仍然做了很多能给比赛带来积极影响的事情……不过从长远来看，他是这套阵容中让我感到最不确定的人选。

weerogue:

感谢分享文章。

看到结尾处的一段话，我产生了一个疑问（重点由我标注）：

勇士队拥有能够利用马刺防守体系的场上空间和传导球能力

马刺的防守体系究竟是什么？

背景说明：我从未打过高水平的篮球比赛，也没能像我希望的那样观看那么多比赛或分析——所以这是一个对我们的策略和战术感到好奇的人提出的真诚疑问。

这个网站上有很多非常棒的文章，我非常感激，我很想阅读更多关于战术方面的内容——比如我们是如何布置的，我们在尝试什么，什么时候在调整和实验等等。

Manu99:

我认为我们的主要体系被称为“漏斗式诱导（funnelling）”：你会有意让持球者过掉你，并将他驱赶到油漆区，在那里他会发现文班已经准备好封盖一切了。因此，你可以在对方第一次尝试三分投篮时进行强力干扰，因为你知道对方球员一旦过掉第一道防线，想在油漆区得分将非常困难。但是，如果他们能将球传导出去并进行有效的轮转，那么创造一个空位三分机会就变得相当容易。这可能就是为什么我们本赛季在面对金州勇士和菲尼克斯太阳这样拥有大量优秀射手的球队时打得比较艰难。但我认为在过去的几个月里，我们在防守这一环节也改进了很多。

zeato:

“漏斗式诱导”的另一个弱点是面对那些有效投篮命中率（efg）在55%到60%之间的精英级中距离得分手。
每种防守策略都有其弱点。

联防在面对拥有一两名三分命中率超过40%的射手的球队时很脆弱。

人盯人在面对强力掩护时很脆弱。

换防在面对有针对性的单打（ISO）时很脆弱。

包夹在面对小球阵容或“五外”进攻时很脆弱。

第1、2、3、4点在面对那些能从任何地方投篮、并能反复利用掩护攻击防守弱环同时避开防守专家的顶级巨星时，都会显得无能为力。

关于第5点，竞争者球队通常拥有一名进攻无解、迫使防守方必须包夹的球星，这就会导致漏人。各支球队最终学会了在赛前做足球探工作，放空对方阵中的非射手；作为回应，现在的球队变得更加注重进攻，排出的全套阵容都能投三分。

spiceymeatball:

我不介意深入探讨一下这个问题。

波波维奇的防守正统思想是在外线进行人盯人的“追防”，正如 Manu99 所说，去诱导持球者，而持球者往往是在打挡拆。进攻方的大个子（通常但不总是中锋）会给主要持球人设置掩护，然后向外弹出或向篮下切入。在其他战术（如今在一些球队中更常见）中，掩护设置好后，主控卫会进行渗透以试图压缩防线，并将球分给在外线等待的射手。

在这种更常规的体系中，防守方通常会要么 (a) 换防，即离持球人最近的防守者去对位他，而最初的主防者去对位大个子或参与掩护的另一人，或者是离他最近的另一名后卫。或者 (b) 防守者从掩护上方挤过追防（有时也从下方绕过，尽管这不是最优选择）。当防守者从后面追赶（希望能紧贴其后）时，防守方中锋会上提来遏制挡拆持球者。所以这就像一种“夹击”——持球者被前后包夹了。

每种体系都有优缺点，球队会研究对手的进攻方案和个人球员的倾向。换防看起来很合理，除了 NBA 中很少有球队拥有5个强力防守者，所以可能会发生换防后，持球者利用面对更弱或更矮小的防守者的优势进行得分。通常防守方会试图阻止进攻方持球者发起半场进攻的某些初始动作：例如，某些后卫偏好向某一侧运球或移动，因此你会调整防守角度强迫他走另一侧（弱侧）。或者阻止进攻球员到达他最喜欢的投篮点。

你永远不可能完全“锁死”另一支球队，你是在根据他们的优势和倾向，结合你自己防守的强项和弱点，努力强迫他们进行概率最低的投篮。

这其实只是一个比较表面化的概述，现在的防守和进攻已经变得更加复杂，场上会同时发生多个动作，或者在无球端发生二次动作来创造传球选择等。

由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。

点击查看原文：

Spur_Monkey:

Spurs do much better when they play inside the 3 point line.

Let 3’s be a luxury when someone heats up, or open looks appear… but not a strategy.

I think eventually the statistics win… it’s hard to sustain hot 3 point shooting for an entire game and once the Warriors shots stopped falling, the game tilted on it’s axis - along with the Spurs attacking the paint… looking at you KJ and Harper!

Also Vassell seems to play much better when he focuses more on his mid-range than the 3 lately. I like his mid-range a lot.
The perimeter defence was much better in the second half too which made a huge difference.

Lastly… I feel very good about this Spurs 10 man rotation.

I think it’s really very solid and I’m actually really glad they didn’t try to mess with it.

Wemby, Fox, Castle, Harper, Vassell, Champs, KJ, Kornet, Barnes and… Bryant.

Looking forward to Bryant getting more minutes.
Barnes had the highest +/- for the game and I think even though his 3 isn’t falling as well as he used to, he still does lots of things that impact the game positively… long term though, he’s the one I feel most uncertain about in this lineup.

weerogue:

Thanks for the article.

Question prompted by one of the statements right at the end (emphasis added by me):

the Warriors have the floor spacing and passing to take advantage of the Spurs’ defensive scheme

What is the Spurs defensive scheme?

For context, I am not someone who has ever played basketball at a decent level and I also don’t get to watch as much games/analysis as I would like - so this is a sincere question from someone curious about our strategy and tactics.

There’s a lot of great writing on this site for which I am very grateful and I would love to read more about the tactical side of things - how we are setting up, what we are trying, when we are adapting and experimenting etc.

Manu99:

I think our main scheme is something called “funnelling”: you kind of let the player with the ball beat you and drive him into the paint where he finds Wemby ready to block everything. So you can contest hard on the eventual first 3 pt attempt, knowing that it would be very hard for the opposite team to score in the paint once they passed the first man. BUT, if they can kick out the ball and rotate effectively, it becomes quite easy to create and open 3pt shot. This is probably why we struggled this season against teams with a lot of good shooters, like Golden State and Phoenix. But I think we have improved a lot also in this defensive aspect in the last months.

zeato:

Another weakness of funneling is midrange from offense star calibers with 55 to 60% efg
Every defense strategy has weakness.

Zone is weak against teams with one or two shooters that can shoot above 40% three

Man-to-man is weak against heavy screens

Switch defense is weak against selective ISO ball.

Double team is weak against smallball or 5-man out offense

points 1, 2, 3, 4 are weak against unstoppable star caliber talents who can shoot anywhere and repeatedly attack the weaklink on defense using screens while avoiding the defense specialist.

point 5, contenders usally have one star caliber with unstoppable offense that forces defense to double team which leaves someone open. Teams eventually learned to scout pre-game and leave the non-shooter, and in response teams have become more offense oriented with a full lineup of players who can shoot three.

spiceymeatball:

I don’t mind taking a more in-depth stab at this.

Pop’s defensive orthodoxy was to play man to man ‘chase’ defense at the perimeter and as Manu99 said, to funnel the ball handler who more often than not is playing pick and roll. The big on offense (often but no always the center) sets the pick (screen) on the primary defender and pops outside or drops towards the rim. In other sets (more often these days with some teams) the pick is set and the primary ballhandler (guard) penetrates to try to collapse the defense and kick the ball out to outside waiting shooters.

In this more conventional scheme, teams will typically either (a) switch in which case the nearest defender to the ballhander will take him on and the initial primary defender takes on either the big or other person doing the pick, or the other guard closest to him. Or (b) the defender chases over the top of the screen (sometimes under, though it’s not optimal)). As the defender chases from behind (hopefully close behind) the defending center moves up to stop the pick and roll ballhandler. So it’s kind of a pincer - the ballhandler is sandwiched from the front and at his back.

There are plusses and minuses to every scheme and teams look at opposition offensive schemes and individual player tendencies. Switching seems logical except that few teams in the NBA have 5 strong defenders, so a switch can occur in which the ballhandler takes advantage of a weaker or smaller player on him, for example. Often defenses try not to permit certain initiating actions by the offensive ballhandler initiating the half court offense: for example, certain guards favor dribbling or moving to one side, so you angle defenses to force him to his other (weaker) side. Or deny the offensive player to get to his favorite shooting spots.

You’re never going to completely ‘stop’ another team, you try to force them into the worst odds to shoot, given their strengths and tendencies, balanced against your own defense’s strengths and weaknesses.

This is really more or less a superficial overview and defenses and offenses have become more sophisticated these days, where multiple actions are taking place or secondary actions are happening away from the ball to set up passing options, etc.

via Pounding The Rock