马刺 vs 骑士 101 - 113 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-12-31 09:30:42
圣安东尼奥马刺以101-113的最终比分不敌克利夫兰骑士。这是圣安东尼奥遭遇的连续第二场失利，赛季战绩下滑至23胜9负。而骑士队则凭借这场胜利将战绩提升至18胜16负。
在前三节比赛中，马刺队之所以能紧咬比分，很大程度上是因为他们获得了比骑士队多得多的罚球机会。但到了第四节，克利夫兰队在三分线外找到手感，圣安东尼奥的罚球优势荡然无存，马刺队也未能将比赛的悬念维持下去。
这两场失利是典型的“后遗症”——在圣诞大战中战胜俄克拉荷马城雷霆后，球队状态出现了滑坡。希望马刺能尽快完成自我调整，重回胜利轨道。
数据统计：马刺 vs. 骑士
马刺 vs. 骑士 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
在输给爵士的比赛中，我对文班亚马的专注度和拼劲并不满意。而对阵骑士这场，我认为他的专注度和拼劲都回来了——只是效率欠佳。进攻端，文班亚马在冲击罚球线和控制失误方面做得非常出色，但他的投篮却反常地失准。在队友比以往更加依赖他的情况下，文班亚马在27分钟内砍下26分，但他的精准度不足伤害了球队。防守端，他努力去干扰每一次投篮，表现得非常积极——但很多时候他做得有些过火，在骑士队完成一次额外的传球后，篮下便门户大开。文班亚马拼尽了全力，但他需要更好地引导自己的能量。
评分: B
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
因伤缺席一场比赛后，福克斯在复出之战中做得显然不够。他两分球7投3中，三分球6投1中，总共只送出3次助攻。值得肯定的是，他全场只有两次失误，并且获得了6次罚球机会，但他在攻防两端都过于沉寂。在球队陷入得分困境时，福克斯需要将更多的责任扛在自己肩上。
评分: C
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
优点：卡斯尔的两分球命中率达到五成，罚球6罚5中，并送出了全队最高的8次助攻。他的组织进攻是全队最佳，而且我认为他在防守端的努力值得称赞。缺点：卡斯尔又投丢了3记三分球，并且出现了多达5次失误。失误和三分失准持续困扰着这位二年级后卫。他还陷入了犯规麻烦，没能打出马刺所需要的那种干净利落的篮球。
评分: C-
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
瓦塞尔没有产生太大影响。他两分球4投2中，三分球6投1中，并且没有获得罚球机会。在过去三场比赛中，他在99分钟的上场时间里总共只得到23分。他没有承担任何组织进攻的职责，防守表现也不达标。希望瓦塞尔能尽快反弹，因为他最近这些无精打采的表现对球队毫无帮助。
评分: C-
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
说到无精打采，巴恩斯在对阵克利夫兰的比赛中几乎无所作为。巴恩斯的表现如此懒散则更加糟糕，因为他本应是这支球队的老将领袖。然而他非但没能以身作则，反而在27分钟内7投1中，仅得到3分。在得分端如此令人失望的情况下，巴恩斯也没能在其他方面做出任何弥补。
评分: D+
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
我认为尚帕尼的表现足以帮助马刺拿下这场胜利。他在24分钟内高效地得到7分。更重要的是，他在防守端付出了巨大的努力，并且在篮板保护方面确实起到了重要作用。尚帕尼还控制住了自己的失误，同时保持了高昂的能量水平。
评分: B
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
科内特对阵骑士的表现非常出色。在23分钟内，他贡献了10分、9个篮板、3次助攻和1次盖帽。进攻端，他通过设置富有成效的掩护、明智地传球和将球放进篮筐来保持参与感。防守端，他很好地保护了篮筐，同时也做好了保护篮板的工作。虽然有一些地板球科内特本应控制住，但总的来说，他的表现坚如磐石。
评分: B+
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊在攻防两端都犯了一些错误。具体来说，如果他想获得更多的上场时间，就必须在防守端更加专注。而在进攻端，则没有太多可以苛责的地方。他的决策可以做得更好，但他在18分钟内还是高效地拿下了8分。
评分: C
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
对哈珀而言，这是一场表现起伏不定的比赛。大多数时候，我喜欢他的防守。进攻端，他的投篮表现足够好——尽管有几个内线出手机会他本应把握住。但哈珀两罚不中并出现四次失误，这让球队失望了。他在投篮和传球之间的选择也一反常态地糟糕。哈珀在场上一直犹豫不决，导致他打出了本赛季为数不多的几场看起来像个毛头小子的比赛。这位新秀在某些时刻似乎有望拯救马刺，但他没能连续做出足够多的明智决策。
评分: C
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
和哈珀一样，布莱恩特也曾接近为球队建功，但始终未能迈过那道坎。他两次出手全部投失——而且两次都是扣篮尝试。他有时能打出相当不错的防守，但也经常防守过度导致失位。他的能量很足，但比赛结束时，他在7分钟的上场时间里并没有为球队带来太多改变。
评分: C+
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊难以找到能赢球的阵容组合。他在第四节的轮换安排有很大的提升空间。当球队的进攻战术陷入僵化时，他没有做出太多调整。不过，防守端的比赛计划大体上还是可以的。
评分: C-
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Cleveland Cavaliers – Game #32
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Cleveland Cavaliers – Game #32
The San Antonio Spurs lost to the Cleveland Cavaliers by a final score of 113-101. San Antonio’s second consecutive defeat dropped their record to 23-9 on the season. The win improved the Cavs to 18-16.
The Spurs were able to hang tough for the first three quarters mostly due to the fact that they were getting to the free throw line a lot more often than the Cavs. In the fourth quarter, Cleveland got going from three-point range, San Antonio’s free throw advantage evaporated and the good guys were unable to keep things close.
These two losses are a classic tale of a hangover following the Christmas Day victory over the Oklahoma City Thunder. Let’s hope the Spurs are able to recalibrate soon and get back on the winning track.
Stats: Spurs vs. Cavs
Spurs vs. Cavs – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
I didn’t love Wembanyama’s focus or effort in the loss to the Jazz. Against the Cavs, I thought the focus and effort were there — he just lacked efficiency. Offensively, Wembanyama did a great job of getting to the free throw line and limiting his turnovers but his shooting was uncharacteristically wonky. With his teammates leaning on him more than usual, Wembanyama was able to put up 26 points in 27 minutes but his lack of precision hurt the team. Defensively, he was trying to contest a lot of shots and was impressively active — but too often he tried to do too much and left the basket open after the Cavs made an extra pass. Wembanyama tried hard but he needed to channel his energy better.
Grade: B
De’Aaron Fox
After missing a game due to injury, Fox simply didn’t do enough in his return. He was 3-for-7 from two-point range, 1-for-6 from three-point range and totaled only three assists. He deserves credit for turning the ball over just twice and getting to the line for six attempts but he was too quiet on offense and defense. With the team struggling to score, Fox needed to put more of the responsibilities on his shoulders.
Grade: C
Stephon Castle
The good: Castle hit half of his two-point attempts, shot 5-for-6 at the free throw line and totaled a team-high eight assists. His playmaking was the best on the team and I thought his defensive effort was applause-worthy. The bad: Castle missed three more three-pointers and turned the ball over five more times. Turnovers and missed threes continue to plague the second year guard. He also struggled with foul trouble and simply didn’t play the clean brand of basketball that the Spurs needed.
Grade: C-
Devin Vassell
Vassell didn’t make much of an impact. He was 2-for-4 on twos, 1-for-6 on threes and didn’t get to the line. In his last three games, he has only 23 points in 99 minutes. He didn’t handle any playmaking duties and his defense was substandard. Let’s hope Vassell bounces back soon because these listless performances as of late aren’t helping matters.
Grade: C-
Harrison Barnes
Speaking of listless, Barnes hardly did anything versus Cleveland. Listless play from Barnes is even worse because he’s supposed to be a veteran leader on this team. Instead of leading the way, he had three points in 27 minutes on 1-for-7 shooting from the court. Barnes didn’t do anything else to makeup for the fact that he was such a letdown scoring-wise.
Grade: D+
Julian Champagnie
I thought Champagnie did well enough for the Spurs to get this win. He efficiently scored seven points in 24 minutes. More importantly, he gave very good effort on the defensive end and was legitimately impactful on the glass. Champagnie also limited his miscues while keeping his energy high.
Grade: B
Luke Kornet
Kornet did really well against the Cavs. In 23 minutes, he totaled ten points, nine rebounds, three assists and a block. Offensively, he remained involved by setting fruitful screens, passing wisely and putting the ball in the basket. Defensively, he protected the rim reasonably well while taking care of business on the boards. There were some loose balls Kornet should have corralled but otherwise he was rock solid.
Grade: B+
Keldon Johnson
Johnson had a handful of mistakes on both sides of the court. Specifically, he needs to concentrate more on the defensive end if he wants to start to play more minutes. On the offensive end, it’s difficult to complain about much. His decision-making could have been better but he efficiently put eight points on the board in 18 minutes.
Grade: C
Dylan Harper
It was an up-and-down affair for Harper. I liked his defense for the most part. Offensively, he shot the ball well enough — even if there were a few more interior shots he should have made. But Harper let the team down by missing both of his free throws and turning the ball over four times. His shot-pass decisions were also uncharacteristically poor. Harper was constantly second-guessing himself and that resulted in him looking like a teenager for one of the few games this season. The rookie seemed to be on the verge of rescuing the Spurs at times but he couldn’t string together enough smart decisions.
Grade: C
Carter Bryant
Like Harper, Bryant was close to aiding the cause but couldn’t quite get over the hump. He missed both of his shots from the field — and both were dunk attempts. He played pretty good defense at times but also overextended too often. His energy was good but, at the end of the night, he didn’t move the needle much in his seven minutes of play.
Grade: C+
Mitch Johnson
Johnson struggled to find winning combinations. His rotation in the fourth quarter left a lot to be desired. He didn’t adjust much when the offensive sets got stale. The defensive gameplan was mostly fine, though.
Grade: C-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk