By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-12-08 07:42:14
圣安东尼奥马刺队在客场以117-130的比分不敌克利夫兰骑士队（14胜10负）后，赛季战绩下滑至15胜7负。凭借手感火热的德文·瓦塞尔的出色发挥，马刺队在几乎整个上半场都压制着骑士队。然而遗憾的是，克利夫兰在第三节完全统治了圣安东尼奥。待硝烟散尽，骑士队单节打出了44-19的攻击波——这也彻底终结了比赛的悬念。
数据统计：马刺 vs 骑士
马刺 vs 骑士 – 最终评分
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
从表面数据看，福克斯似乎打出了一场稳健的比赛。他在33分钟内贡献了25分、9次助攻和5个篮板。但深入分析他的表现，便会发现其中的瑕疵。他的投篮效率不算特别高，而且处理球也有些草率。更糟糕的是，他在下半场的竞技水平有所下滑——尤其是在防守端。福克斯的表现并非一塌糊涂，但在今晚，他带来的麻烦比解决的方案要多。
评分: C+
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
半场结束时，马刺以72-64领先。而这8分领先优势的缔造者正是瓦塞尔。他在上半场独得25分，并以半场命中7记三分追平了队史纪录。无论防守多么严密，瓦塞尔总能洞穿篮网。此外，他在前两节的防守也充满强度。不幸的是，这样的好状态并未在下半场延续。瓦塞尔全场最终只得到28分，防守端的能量也在中场休息后有所下滑。但总的来说，他为圣安东尼奥在这场比赛中保留了一线生机，功不可没。
评分: B+
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯未能在克利夫兰为球队注入活力。他7次出手得到7分，且仅命中一记三分球。他努力了，但在有限的场上空间里举步维艰。巴恩斯在防守端的能量水平低于平常，不过他在保护篮板方面确实展现了零星的强硬。
评分: C
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼的表现无可指摘。他三分线外5投2中，两分球3投2中，并且罚球全中。他在另一端贡献了三次抢断，同时没有出现失误。在几位队友效率低下的情况下，尚帕尼打出了高效简洁的篮球，值得称赞。
评分: B
俾斯麦·比永博 (Bismack Biyombo)
由于文班亚马（小腿）和科内特（脚踝）因伤缺阵，比永博获得了首发机会。我对他本赛季的表现一直极其失望，所以他能在对阵骑士时打出还算不错的表现，着实令人有些意外。进攻端，他两次出手全部命中，并且没有完全拖后腿。防守端，比永博成功地干扰了对手的几次进攻。他依然算不上非常出色，但相对而言，这是朝着正确方向迈出的一步。
评分: B
杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)
索汉的出场时间达到了赛季新高的25分钟——其表现好坏参半。他又投丢了两个三分球（在赛季初13投7中后，他近8场比赛的三分球12投0中），并且在整场比赛中显得犹豫不决。他在防守端很努力，但执行力时有欠缺。索汉在篮下的终结不错，篮板球也抢得中规中矩，但他要在这支队伍中锁定一个可靠的位置，仍有很长的路要走。
评分: B-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
尽管队友提供的支持时好时坏，约翰逊再次高水平地扮演好了自己的角色。他在25分钟内通过持球冲击篮筐和搏得罚球，得到了14分。约翰逊在篮板拼抢上如同野兽一般。虽然在攻防两端都犯了些错误，但他在贡献进攻火力的同时，在防守端同样有所建树。总而言之，他的表现足以帮助马刺赢球。
评分: B+
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
好吧，看来这位新秀终究也是凡人。哈珀在克利夫兰的比赛中得分陷入挣扎。考虑到他之前让一切看起来都那么轻松，看到他无法将球放进篮筐着实令人震惊。哈珀全场11投1中，其中三分线外5投0中。他的罚球也只有4罚1中。这位新秀的投篮弧度很平，并且失去了往日的爆发力。值得称道的是，哈珀依然找到了帮助球队的方法。他送出了6次助攻，展现了超越同龄人的球场视野。同时，他也没有在防守端放弃，对于一个在得分上如此挣扎的年轻人来说，能看到这一点令人印象深刻。
评分: C-
大卫·琼斯·加西亚 (David Jones Garcia)
琼斯·加西亚被派上场以期注入活力……而他也确实挺身而出。在短短十分钟内，这位多米尼加共和国本土球员就贡献了9分和4次助攻。他投篮精准，没有失误，并且防守充满激情。虽然琼斯·加西亚未能扭转战局，但公平地说，他已经倾其所有。
评分: A-
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
布莱恩特在防守端很拼，沟通到位，并且全场奔跑目的明确。进攻端，这位新秀的事情进行得并不那么顺利。他全场4投仅1中，并且似乎对自己所有的决定都犹豫不决。
评分: C+
林迪·沃特斯三世 (Lindy Waters III)
沃特斯在他的6分钟出场时间里命中了一记三分球，并在防守端表现尚可。
评分: B
凯利·奥利尼克 (Kelly Olynyk)
奥利尼克在他出场的6分钟里看起来还不错。为什么他这场比赛只打了6分钟？我毫无头绪。
评分: B-
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
我不喜欢让比永博首发的决定。奥利尼克能给马刺带来更好的赢球机会。我也不明白索汉做了什么，值得获得这么多的出场机会。但从另一方面看，我欣赏约翰逊让哈珀在挣扎中继续比赛，以赛代练。这场比赛的根本问题在于，在缺少文班亚马和科内特的情况下，客场挑战一支强队是很难取胜的。
评分: C
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Cleveland Cavaliers – Game #22
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Cleveland Cavaliers – Game #22
The San Antonio Spurs dropped to 15-7 on the season after losing on the road to the Cleveland Cavaliers (14-10) by a final score of 130-117. Behind a red-hot Devin Vassell, the Spurs outplayed the Cavs for almost the entire first half. Regrettably, Cleveland dominated San Antonio in the third quarter. When the smoke cleared, the Cavs had won the quarter 44-19 — and that put an end to any suspense.
Stats: Spurs at Cavaliers
Spurs at Cavaliers – Final Grades
De’Aaron Fox
On the surface, it appears as if Fox had a solid outing. He finished with 25 points, nine assists and five rebounds in 33 minutes. A deeper look into his performance shows the flaws. He didn’t shoot especially well and he was sloppy with the ball. To make matters worse, his level of play in the second half dipped — particularly on the defensive end. Fox didn’t have a terrible game but he was more of a problem then he was a solution on this night.
Grade: C+
Devin Vassell
At halftime, the Spurs were up 72-64. The reason for that eight-point lead was Vassell. He had 25 points in the first half and tied a franchise record for most threes in a half with seven. No matter how tightly he was defended, Vassell was locating cord. Moreover, his defense in the first two quarters was intense. Unfortunately, the good times didn’t continue after intermission. Vassell finished with only 28 points and his defensive motor slowed following halftime. But, overall, he deserves credit for giving San Antonio a fighting chance in this game.
Grade: B+
Harrison Barnes
Barnes wasn’t able to provide a spark in Cleveland. He had seven points on seven shots and hit only one three-pointer. The effort was there but he struggled with limited spacing. Barnes’ energy level on defense was lower than usual but he did provide sporadic sturdiness on the boards.
Grade: C
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie has nothing to hang his head about. He was 2-for-5 from three-point land, 2-for-3 from two-point territory and hit his only free throw. He didn’t turn the ball over while swiping three steals on the other end. With a handful of his teammates dealing with inefficiency, Champagnie deserves credit for playing a clean brand of basketball.
Grade: B
Bismack Biyombo
With Wembanyama (calf) and Kornet (ankle) out with injuries, Biyombo got the start. I’ve been massively underwhelmed by his play this season so the fact that he was halfway decent against the Cavs was a bit of a surprise. Offensively, he finished both of his attempts and he wasn’t totally in the way. On defense, Biyombo was able to thwart a few possessions. He still wasn’t very good but, relatively speaking, this was a step in the right direction.
Grade: B
Jeremy Sochan
Sochan played a season-high 25 minutes — and the results were mixed. He missed two more three-pointers (after hitting seven of his first 13 threes on the season, he’s now 0-for-12 from deep in his last eight games) and was hesitant throughout the affair. His effort was good on defense but his execution was lacking at times. Sochan finished well near the rim and rebounded adequately but he still has a ways to go to lock down a dependable niche on this squad.
Grade: B-
Keldon Johnson
Despite uneven aid provided by his teammates, Johnson played his role at a high level once more. He scored 14 points in 25 minutes by attacking downhill and getting to the free throw line. Johnson was against a menace on the glass. While there were a few mistakes on either end, he was making things happen on defense in addition to his offensive production. All in all, he played well enough for the Spurs to win.
Grade: B+
Dylan Harper
Welp, I guess the rookie is, in fact, human. Harper struggled to score the ball in Cleveland. Considering how easy he has made everything seem, it was shocking to see him unable to put the ball in the basket. Harper was 1-for-11 from the field and 0-for-5 from three-point land. He also hit just one of four free throws. The rookie’s shot looked flat and he didn’t have his usual burst. To his credit, Harper still found ways to help the cause. He handed out six passes while flashing advanced court vision. Harper also didn’t give up on the defensive end, which was impressive to see from a youngster who was struggling so much to score.
Grade: C-
David Jones Garcia
Jones Garcia was called upon to provide a spark … and he was able to answer the call. In only ten minutes, the native of the Dominican Republic had nine points and four assists. He shot well, finished without a turnover and played inspired defense. While Jones Garcia wasn’t able to turn the tide, it’s fair to say he did just about all he could.
Grade: A-
Carter Bryant
Bryant played hard defensively, communicated well and ran the floor with purpose. Offensively, things didn’t go as swimmingly for the rookie. He was only 1-for-4 from the field and he seemed to second guess all of his decisions.
Grade: C+
Lindy Waters III
Waters hit a three-pointer and held up decently well defensively during his six minutes of action.
Grade: B
Kelly Olynyk
Olynyk looked fine during his six minutes. Why did he play only six minutes in this game? I have no clue.
Grade: B-
Mitch Johnson
I didn’t like the decision to start Biyombo. Olynyk gives the Spurs a better chance to win. I’m also not seeing what Sochan is doing to deserve extended looks. On the other side of the coin, I liked how Johnson let Harper play through his struggles. The bottom line of this game is it’s difficult to win a road game against a quality opponent without both Wembanyama and Kornet.
Grade: C
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk