马刺 @ 森林狼 112 - 125 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-12-02 21:02:24
圣安东尼奥马刺队的两连客场连胜在明尼苏达被森林狼队终结。马刺队实际上在前三节的每一节结束时都保持领先，但森林狼队在末节打出一波14-2的攻击波，一举拉开比分，最终以125-112冲刺取胜。
数据统计：马刺 vs 森林狼
马刺 vs 森林狼 – 赛后评分
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
马刺队能在半场时取得领先，很大程度上归功于福克斯撕裂明尼苏达防线的能力。前两节，他11投8中，其中三分球4投2中，砍下19分。福克斯在上半场也没有出现失误，他总能游刃有余地找到空位。不幸的是，下半场情况就没那么顺利了。森林狼队派上了更高大的防守者来对位福克斯，这在一定程度上导致了他效率的下降。他的组织进攻一直没能打开局面。值得称赞的是，我认为福克斯在整场比赛中都保持了相当顽强的防守。总而言之，他的下半场表现令人失望，但如果没有他，马刺队会陷入巨大的困境。
评分: B
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
眼下，瓦塞尔的中距离投篮似乎是弹无虚发——无论出手难度多大。遗憾的是，在明尼苏达，这种准星没能延续到三分线外。虽然他的两分球11投9中，但三分线外却是9投仅1中。不过说实话，更好的三分出手选择本可以帮助到瓦塞尔。其他方面，他在防守端很努力，并且充满决心地奔跑全场。
评分: B
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯在任何距离上都没能找到手感。他三分线外4投1中，三分线内5投1中。他的出手选择没有问题……只是难以将球投进。他的防守表现平平，尽管巴恩斯在篮板方面的表现比平时要好。总的来说，在这晚，马刺队需要巴恩斯在25分钟内贡献不止5分。
评分: C
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
和巴恩斯很像，尚帕尼也频频打铁。他三分线外6投1中，甚至没有尝试过一次两分球出手。面对森林狼队，他的打法过于单一。尚帕尼还重蹈覆辙，又犯了在进攻端投篮不中后防守强度随之下降的坏习惯。
评分: D
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
对科内特来说，这并不是一个收获满满的夜晚。进攻端，他难以找到空位，并且有几次处理球显得草率。他有几个巧妙的传球，但这差不多就是他在进攻端的所有亮点了。防守端，科内特的表现也好不到哪里去。他的篮板球表现差强人意，护筐也不如往常那样坚决。
评分: C-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊的发挥是本场比赛的一线亮点。他命中了4次三分出手的一半，并且冲击篮筐时如同一辆带有柔和手感的推土机。约翰逊以5次罚球尝试领衔全队，并且在篮板方面再次展现出野兽般的表现。他在26分钟内得到22分，让圣安东尼奥在比赛的大部分时间里能够紧咬比分。特别是在下半场，把球交给约翰逊是马刺队的最佳选择。
评分: A-
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
哈珀以其出色的突破和终结能力而著称。在对阵森林狼队的比赛中，他的表现甚至超出了预期。他冲击篮筐时展现出的力量和技巧令人惊叹，篮下终结能力也极其出色。这位19岁的新秀让一切看起来毫不费力——这真是一场视觉盛宴。不过，在这场比赛中，哈珀没有展现出他比赛的太多深度。他得分非常出色，但组织进攻方面并不突出。部分原因是明尼苏达的防守策略，但这位新秀本可以把分寸拿捏得更好一些。哈珀的持球防守很好，但在其他方面贡献不多。
评分: B+
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
布莱恩特在场上的15分钟里，数据上的贡献微乎其微——但他的实际影响力远超数据所能体现的。这位新秀在防守端的积极性为球队带来了积极影响。进攻端，布莱恩特打得很有目的性，迫使明尼苏达队不得不对他加以防范。这位年轻人目前通过了“眼缘测试”……希望他能尽快在数据上有所体现。
评分: B
凯利·奥利尼克 (Kelly Olynyk)
奥利尼克在他14分钟的上场时间里表现不错。明尼苏达队给了他空间，这位大个子抓住了机会，果断地、频繁地攻击篮筐。奥利尼克在篮板球方面也做得很好，并且在攻防两端都打出了聪明的篮球。当他在场上时，球队运转得更加流畅；回过头看，他或许应该获得更多的上场时间。
评分: B+
杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)
我不确定我是否见过索汉如此挣扎。防守端，他表现得相当糟糕。他的防守轮转换位多次出错，导致对方优秀的射手获得大空位机会。更糟糕的是，索汉既没有抢篮板，也没有在内线进行身体对抗。进攻端，对手放他投篮，但他却不敢出手。毫无疑问，索汉需要找到节奏，否则他的上场时间将会被削减。
评分: D-
林迪·沃特斯三世 (Lindy Waters III)
沃特斯在场上时，对球队的表现既无功也无过。他的防守中规中矩，在8分钟内没有得分，但有几次不错的传球。
评分: B-
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊本赛季在第四节的执教表现一直不错，但在明尼苏达他却陷入了困境。他在第四节的进攻战术布置收效甚微，防守策略也被对手洞穿。整晚的三分线防守都是个问题。在轮换方面，早点换下索汉会是更好的选择，尤其因为这是一个给布莱恩特更多锻炼时间的黄金机会。
评分: C
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Minnesota Timberwolves – Game #19
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Minnesota Timberwolves – Game #19
The San Antonio Spurs saw their two-game road winning streak come to an end in Minnesota against the Timberwolves. The Spurs actually led the game at the end of each of the first three quarters but the Timberwolves blew the game open with a 14-2 run in the final period to sprint to a 125-112 victory.
Stats: Spurs at Timberwolves
Spurs at Timberwolves – Final Grades
De’Aaron Fox
The Spurs were winning at halftime in large part due to Fox’s ability to shred Minnesota’s defense. In the first two quarters, he had 19 points on 8-of-11 shooting from the field, including 2-for-4 from deep. Fox also had no turnovers in the first half, as he was able to routinely find open space. Unfortunately, things didn’t go as swimmingly after halftime. The Timberwolves threw longer defenders at Fox and that played a part in him slowing down. His playmaking never got going. To Fox’s credit, I thought his defense remained relatively tenacious throughout. All in all, it was a disappointing second half but the Spurs would have been in a world of hurt without him.
Grade: B
Devin Vassell
Right now, it seems like Vassell is automatic from the midrange — no matter how difficult the attempt. Sadly, that marksmanship didn’t extend beyond the three-point line in Minnesota. While he hit 9-of-11 two-pointers, he was only 1-for-9 from downtown. Honestly, though, better shot-selection from three-point range would have helped Vassell. Otherwise, he gave effort on defense and ran the court with determination.
Grade: B
Harrison Barnes
Barnes never got going — from any distance. He was 1-for-4 from three-point range and 1-for-5 inside the arc. His shot-selection was fine … he just struggled to convert. His defense was average, although Barnes did better than usual on the glass. Overall, the Spurs needed more than five points in 25 minutes from Barnes on this night.
Grade: C
Julian Champagnie
Much like Barnes, Champagnie was firing blanks. He was 1-for-6 from three-point territory and didn’t even attempt a two-pointer. He was much too one-dimensional against the Timberwolves. Champagnie also reverted to the bad habit of letting his defensive intensity fade after missing shots on the other end.
Grade: D
Luke Kornet
It wasn’t the most fruitful night at the office for Kornet. Offensively, he struggled to find open spaces and he was sloppy with the ball a couple times. He had a couple slick passes but that was about the extent of his positives on that end. Defensively, Kornet wasn’t a whole lot better. His rebounding left a lot to be desired and he wasn’t defending the rim as stubbornly as normal.
Grade: C-
Keldon Johnson
A silver lining was Johnson’s play. He hit half of his four three-pointers and was a bulldozer-with-touch going to the rim. Johnson led the team with five free throw attempts and he was also a beast on the boards once again. His 22 points in 26 minutes allowed San Antonio to keep it close for a majority of the ballgame. In the second half, particularly, giving the ball to Johnson was the Spurs best option.
Grade: A-
Dylan Harper
Harper was advertised as a great driver and finisher. He was even better than advertised against the Timberwolves. The strength and craft he exhibited going to the rim was marvelous and his finishing at the rim was stupendous. The 19-year-old rookie makes it look easy — it’s truly a sight to behold. In this outing, though, Harper didn’t show much depth to his game. He scored very well but his playmaking didn’t stand out. Part of that was Minnesota’s strategy but the rookie could have tiptoed the line a little cleaner. Harper’s defense was good on the ball but he didn’t do much in other areas.
Grade: B+
Carter Bryant
Bryant’s tangible production was minimal during his 15 minutes on the court — but he was actually a lot more impactful than the numbers would suggest. The rookie’s activity on defense made positive things happen for the good guys. Offensively, Bryant played with purpose and forced Minnesota to account for him. The youngster is passing the eye-test right now … let’s hope that the tangible production comes along sooner than later.
Grade: B
Kelly Olynyk
Olynyk did well during his 14 minutes of court time. Minnesota was giving him space and the big man took advantage by looking at the rim early and often. Olynyk also did good work on the boards and played a smart brand of basketball on both ends. Things ran more smoothly when he was on the court; he probably should have played more in retrospect.
Grade: B+
Jeremy Sochan
I’m not sure I’ve ever seen Sochan struggle this much. Defensively, he was pretty darn bad. His rotations were wrong a number of times, which left good shooters wide open. To make matters worse, Sochan wasn’t rebounding or being physical in the paint. Offensively, he’s being dared to shoot but he isn’t letting it fly. It goes without saying that Sochan needs to find a rhythm or else he’ll see his minutes disappear.
Grade: D-
Lindy Waters III
Waters didn’t especially hurt or help the squad while he was on the court. His defense was adequate and he went scoreless in his eight minutes but he did have a couple of good passes.
Grade: B-
Mitch Johnson
Johnson has coached well in fourth quarters this season but he struggled in Minnesota. His offensive playcalling was ineffective in the fourth and the defensive schemes were exposed. Defending the three-point line was an issue all night. Rotation-wise, pulling the plug on Sochan earlier would have been better, especially because this was a golden opportunity to give Bryant more run.
Grade: C
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk