马刺 vs 勇士 120 - 125 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-11-13 08:22:21
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队在一场比赛中以120-125的最终比分不敌金州勇士队。马刺队（目前战绩8胜3负）在大部分上半场占据主导，但老辣的勇士队凭借老将的经验以及斯蒂芬·库里 (Stephen Curry) 砍下的46分，成功逆转并锁定了胜局。此外，勇士队还多获得了20次罚球机会，而马刺队则出现了20次失误。综合来看，这场比赛对这支年轻的圣安东尼奥队伍而言，应当被视为一次宝贵的学习机会。
数据统计：马刺 vs. 勇士
马刺 vs. 勇士 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
优点：文班亚马砍下了31分、15个篮板和10次助攻的三双数据。这样的产出显然值得称赞，尤其是考虑到他在各个距离的投篮命中率都很不错。当他在进攻端打得果断时，总能带来好的结果。防守端，他封锁了禁区，在篮板拼抢上如同巨兽。
缺点：坦白说，文班亚马的表现并不像数据初看那般完美。他出现了8次失误，这在面对强队时是绝对不能发生的。他时常试图做得太多，结果让自己陷入麻烦。防守端，尽管他在内线的表现非常出色，但他的外线防守和换防表现却不尽如人意。别误会，他努力地扑防到了三分线附近，但他在外线的防守执行力有所欠缺。
评分: B+
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
唉。福克斯的表现简直是糟透了。他的数据看起来不算太差，但他的实际表现很糟糕。防守端，他是马刺队场上最薄弱的一环。他的身材在对位持球人时成为问题，并且在无球时他总是走神。他必须在无球防守上做得更好，才能不成为球队的防守漏洞。在对阵勇士的进攻端，福克斯的表现也很丑陋。他失误了六次，但这甚至还不足以完全描绘他的混乱状态。福克斯传出了很多糟糕的传球，在人群中运球很挣扎，除了单打独斗之外几乎做不了任何事。我不知道是哪里出了问题，但显然不对劲，就好像福克斯以前从未和他的任何队友一起打过球一样。希望他能尽快恢复状态。
评分: D-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔是马刺队本场表现最好的球员。当他坐在替补席上时，球队在场上就仿佛乱作一团。卡斯尔让马刺看起来像一支真正的篮球队，而这在今晚有时是一项艰巨的任务。他出手选择明智，传球精妙，并且以赢球的节奏在打球。卡斯尔目前对进攻的梳理非常出色，对场上局势的洞察力也很强。防守端，他本来也做得很好……直到犯规麻烦拖慢了他的脚步。事实上，犯规麻烦是今晚限制卡斯尔价值的主要因素。马刺需要他避免犯规麻烦，以保持攻防两端的流畅运转——但他没能做到。除此之外，卡斯尔这次的三双表现（23分，10个篮板，10次助攻）是他年轻职业生涯中最好的表现之一。
评分: A
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
对瓦塞尔而言，这是一场防守端很有意思的比赛。在卡斯尔陷入犯规麻烦后，瓦塞尔接过了盯防库里的任务。这个任务……并没有真正完成。但值得称赞的是，瓦塞尔付出了巨大的努力，并且在尝试完成这项任务时精神非常集中。这是自他新秀赛季以来，防守端投入度最高的表现之一。但是，是的，结果大多不理想——这主要归功于库里的伟大。进攻端，我不太喜欢瓦塞尔的投篮选择，但他命中了足够多的球，证明了他的出手是合理的。此外，他对球的保护也比平时做得更好。
评分: B
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯在大多数时间里都完成了他的本职工作。防守端，他在内线和外线都非常积极。他在那一端有所建树，不过如果篮板能抢得更好一些，帮助会更大。进攻端，他六次三分出手命中了一半，但如果能再多进一两个球，或许就能改变比赛的势头。巴恩斯获得了空位机会，如果他的投篮能再稳一些，他本可以打出一场精彩的比赛。
评分: B
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
优点：约翰逊再次成为篮板猛兽。他正在打出职业生涯篮板最好的一个赛季，尤其是在进攻篮板方面。约翰逊在攻防两端都打得很有身体对抗性。
缺点：约翰逊两次三分出手全部投失，并且没能站上罚球线。他在防守端的轮转有时会慢半拍。
评分: B-
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
科内特连续第二场比赛投篮6投6中。他正证明自己是一个致命的空接威胁。他的手感非常好，比赛阅读能力也很强。防守端，科内特的表现不太理想。他在面对金州勇士队的速度时显得很吃力。更糟糕的是，他在22分钟的上场时间里竟然一个篮板也没抢到。
评分: C+
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼的表现尚可。在替补出场的20分钟里，他命中了两个三分球，防守表现优于平均水平，并且在场上不遗余力地拼抢。他没有带来决定性的影响，但尚帕尼很好地扮演了自己的角色。
评分: B
杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)
索汉获得了六分钟上场时间，我认为他做得相当不错。他命中了一个三分球，抢下三个篮板，并且做出了明智的决策。在巴恩斯投篮不错、科内特与文班亚马搭档良好、约翰逊充分利用上场时间以及尚帕尼拉开空间的情况下，索汉该从哪里获得上场时间呢？我……我真的不知道。他在对阵勇士时表现不错，但他需要找到自己的定位，才能获得比零星上场时间更多的机会。
评分: B
林迪·沃特斯三世 (Lindy Waters III)
面对旧主，沃特斯出战了四分钟，没有太多建树。他投失了一个三分，但他的防守比预期的要好一些。
评分: 出场时间不足，不予评分
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
优点：文班亚马得到了很多高质量的触球机会。卡斯尔被放在了一个能让他尽情发挥的位置上。攻防两端的比赛计划足以赢下比赛。
缺点：福克斯完全游离于体系之外——部分责任应该由教练组承担。他似乎不知道自己在场上应该做什么。轮换阵容没有问题，但约翰逊未能做出正确的临场调整来遏制金州勇士队的进攻。
评分: C+
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Golden State Warriors – Game #11
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Golden State Warriors – Game #11
The San Antonio Spurs dropped a game against the Golden State Warriors by a final score of 125-120. The Spurs, 8-3, dominated much of the first half but the wily Warriors were able to walk them down and close out the game with a mix of veteran know-how and 46 points from Stephen Curry. Add in the fact that Golden State shot 20 more free throws and the Spurs turned it over 20 times and this is a game that should be classified as a learning opportunity for the young San Antonio squad.
Stats: Spurs vs. Warriors
Spurs vs. Warriors – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
The good: Wembanyama posted a triple-double of 31 points, 15 rebounds and ten assists. That production is obviously applause-worthy, especially considering he shot well from all distances. When he was decisive offensively, good things happened. Defensively, he shut down the paint and was a monster on the boards. The bad: Truth be told, Wembanyama wasn’t as good as those numbers appear at first glance. He had eight turnovers, which just can’t happen against a quality opponent. He too often tried to do too much and got himself in trouble. Defensively, as good as he was on the interior, his perimeter defense and perimeter switching left a lot to be desired. He efforted out near the three-point line, don’t get me wrong, but his execution on the perimeter was lacking.
Grade: B+
De’Aaron Fox
Ouch. Fox was pretty damn terrible. His stats don’t look terrible but he was bad. Defensively, he was the weakest link on the court for the Spurs. His size was an issue on the ball and he fell asleep all the time off the ball. He has to get a lot better defensively off the ball to not be a liability. Offensively against the Warriors, it was ugly for Fox. He turned the ball over six times and that doesn’t even begin to tell the tale of his discombobulation. Fox was throwing terrible passes, struggled to dribble in traffic and couldn’t really do anything other than go one-on-one. I don’t know what it was but something was amiss and it was like Fox had never played with any of his teammates before. Let’s hope for a recovery ASAP.
Grade: D-
Stephon Castle
Castle was the best player on the court for the Spurs. When he sat on the bench, you could almost hear the Benny Hill music start playing. Castle made the Spurs look like a real basketball team, which was sometimes a difficult task on this night. He took smart shots, made brilliant passes and played at a winning pace. Castle is running the offense great right now and seeing the court very well. Defensively, he was doing really good … until foul trouble slowed him up. In fact, foul trouble was the limiting factor on Castle’s value on this night. The Spurs needed him to stay out of foul trouble to keep things humming on both ends — and that didn’t happen. Otherwise, this triple-double performance by Castle (23 points, ten rebounds, ten assists) was one of the better showings of his young career.
Grade: A
Devin Vassell
This was an interesting outing for Vassell on the defensive end. After Castle got in foul trouble, Vassell got the job of trying to slow Curry. That … didn’t really happen. But to Vassell’s credit, he gave good effort and was mentally engaged when trying to complete that task. It was some of the best defensive effort that Vassell has given since his rookie season. But, yeah, the outcome was mostly poor — mostly due to Curry’s greatness. Offensively, I didn’t love Vassell’s shot-selection but he made enough shots to justify his attempts. He also took care of the ball better than usual.
Grade: B
Harrison Barnes
Barnes did his job for the most part. Defensively, he was really active both on the inside and outside. He was making plays on that end, although better rebounding would have really been helpful. Offensively, he hit half of his six three-point attempts but one or two more made shots could have shifted the momentum. Barnes was getting open so he could have had a big game if his shot was just a little bit more automatic.
Grade: B
Keldon Johnson
The good: Johnson was a beast on the boards once again. He’s having the best rebounding season of his career, particularly on the offensive end. Johnson played physically on both ends. The bad: Johnson missed both of his three-point attempts and failed to get to the free throw line. His rotations on defense were sometimes a step slow.
Grade: B-
Luke Kornet
For the second consecutive outing, Kornet was 6-for-6 from the field. He’s proving to be a deadly lob threat. He has very good hands and processes the game quickly. Defensively, Kornet didn’t look too hot. He had trouble against Golden State’s quickness. To make matters worse, he managed to not grab a rebound in 22 minutes of play.
Grade: C+
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie was decent enough. In 20 minutes off the bench, he hit a pair of three-pointers, played better than average defense and hustled all over the court. He didn’t move the needle a bunch but Champagnie played his role well.
Grade: B
Jeremy Sochan
Sochan got six minutes and I thought he did pretty good. He hit a three-pointer, grabbed three rebounds and made smart decisions. With Barnes shooting well, Kornet playing well next to Wembanyama, KJ making the most of his time and Champagnie spacing the court, where does Sochan get minutes? I … I don’t really know. He was doing good against the Warriors but he’ll need to carve out a niche to get more than sporadic minutes.
Grade: B
Lindy Waters III
Waters played four minutes against his former team and didn’t do much. He missed a three but his defense was a little bit better than expected.
Grade: Inc.
Mitch Johnson
The good: Wembanyama got a lot of quality touches. Castle is being put in a position to thrive. The gameplans on both ends were good enough to win. The bad: Fox is totally out of sync — and some of that blame should be on the coaches. He doesn’t seem to know what he should be doing out there. The rotation was fine but Johnson failed to push the correct buttons to slow down Golden State’s attack.
Grade: C+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk