马刺 @ 开拓者 109 - 120 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-04-07 15:27:15
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队打出了一场值得称赞的比赛，但最终在客场以120-109的比分输给了波特兰开拓者队。马刺队本赛季的战绩下滑到32胜46负，而开拓者队的战绩提升到35胜44负。
第一节结束时，情况对马刺队来说一片黯淡。开拓者队带着33-18的领先优势进入第二节。然而，值得赞扬的是，圣安东尼奥一直在努力比赛并展开反击。马刺队最终在上半场结束前将分差缩小到两分。
在第三节，马刺队又进行了几次反击。在最后一节，圣安东尼奥奋起反击，几次将分差缩小到两分。但最终，开拓者队投进了一些关键球，击退了所有反扑尝试。
数据：马刺队对阵开拓者队
马刺队对阵开拓者队 – 最终评分
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
对瓦塞尔来说，这又是稳定发挥的一场比赛。他得到21分，两分球9投5中，三分球7投3中。我喜欢他的投篮选择，也喜欢他没有试图做太多的事实。瓦塞尔唯一的进攻瑕疵是他的4次失误。在防守端，我再次对他打球感到满意。他以3次抢断领跑全队，并延续了本赛季强劲的防守表现。
评分：A-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔三分球5投1中，失误4次。尽管有这些缺点，这位新秀还是打出了一场精彩的比赛。他的12次两分球尝试命中一半，罚球9投7中。他传球非常好，并且在控球时保持冷静。在防守端，他有一些不确定的表现，但总体来说是积极的。卡斯尔的篮板能力是另一个加分项。这位新秀突然表现出他可能成为一名精英后卫篮板手的迹象。
评分：B+
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
优点：保罗以9次助攻领跑全队。在他出场的29分钟里，他4投3中两分球，并且有几次令人眼花缭乱的篮下动作。这位经验丰富的控球后卫减少了他的失误，并且他在防守端的努力值得称赞。缺点：保罗三分球2投0中。尽管在防守端付出了努力，但结果弊大于利。
评分：B-
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯出色的投篮赛季仍在继续。他从各个距离都投得很好，仅用9次投篮就得到17分。他在攻防两端都打出了干净利落的篮球。在篮板方面，巴恩斯比平时好得多。他的防守，在各个方面，也令人印象深刻。
评分：A-
比斯马克·比永博(Bismack Biyombo)
比永博进入首发阵容，并提供了意想不到的得分能力。他在20分钟内得到10分，同时展现出令人惊讶的手感。比永博的内线防守稳固，但他本可以在抢篮板方面做得更好。他的协防也需要改进。
评分：B
马拉基·布兰纳姆(Malaki Branham)
布兰纳姆以23分钟的出场时间领跑替补席，教练组倚重他是完全可以理解的。这位21岁的球员为马刺队提供了球队真正需要的得分选择。布兰纳姆投篮表现良好，得到17分。他的定点三分球和单打动作看起来都很流畅。布兰纳姆有时在防守上表现挣扎，但他的进攻能力弥补了当晚的不足。
评分：A-
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
哎呀，在全明星赛后经历了一段火热的状态之后，约翰逊似乎又回到了原点。对阵开拓者队，他11投1中，包括3次三分线外的失手。更糟糕的是，他失误3次，几乎没有防守。约翰逊在篮板方面表现出了一些活力，但总的来说，这是一个糟糕的夜晚。
评分：D-
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼在他出场的20分钟里没有得到太多空位机会。然而，他还是投中了3个三分球中的2个。在防守和转换方面，尚帕尼缺乏他通常的强度。
评分：C+
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利(Sandro Mamukelashvili)
马穆克拉什维利是另一位替补席上表现糟糕的球员。在13分钟内，他没有得到任何分数或篮板。他错失了所有3次三分球尝试，甚至没有尝试两分球。马穆有几次不错的传球，他的能量水平也足够……但他的整体表现真的很差。
评分：D
布雷克·韦斯利(Blake Wesley)
在对阵掘金队的比赛中6投5中之后，韦斯利自从那场比赛以来已经10投0中。他也没有为其他人创造机会，甚至没有以任何重要方式影响防守。在防守端，韦斯利打得很努力，时不时地做出一些贡献——但他现在太片面了。
评分：C-
乔丹·麦克劳克林(Jordan McLaughlin)
麦克劳克林替补出场10分钟，他有很多令人鼓舞的回合。他命中了所有两次投篮，包括一个漂亮的突破上篮得手。他的传球决定大多是积极的，并且他很好地执行了进攻战术。在防守端，他表现出健康的预判能力。总而言之，麦克劳克林继续看起来像是一个值得留下来作为控球后卫位置保险的人。
评分：B+
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
我喜欢约翰逊给了布兰纳姆更多的上场时间。事后看来，让麦克劳克林多打可能会对球队有所帮助。但是，总的来说，约翰逊一定很高兴他的队员再次进行了激烈的竞争。
评分：B+
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Portland Trail Blazers – Game #78
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Portland Trail Blazers – Game #78
The San Antonio Spurs put up a noble fight but ended up losing on the road to the Portland Trail Blazers by a final count of 120-109. The Spurs dropped to a record of 32-46 on the season, while the Blazers improved to 35-44.
At the end of the first quarter, things looked bleak for the good guys. The Blazers took a 33-18 advantage into the second quarter. However, to San Antonio’s credit, they kept playing hard and making runs. The Spurs ended up getting within two points of the Blazers before halftime.
In the third period, the Spurs made a couple more runs. In the final stanza, San Antonio battled back and got within two points a handful of times. In the end, though, the Blazers were able to hit enough clutch shots to ward off all of the comeback attempts.
Stats: Spurs at Blazers
Spurs at Blazers – Final Grades
Devin Vassell
It was another rock solid game for Vassell. He had 21 points and finished 5-for-9 from two-point range and 3-for-7 from three-point territory. I liked his shot-selection and I liked the fact that he didn’t try to do too much. Vassell’s only offensive blemish was his turnover total of four. Defensively, I was once again pleased by his play. He led the team with three steals and he continues his strong defensive end to the season.
Grade: A-
Stephon Castle
Castle was 1-for-5 from three-point range and turned it over four times. Despite those lowlights, the rookie put together another strong game. He hit half of his 12 two-point attempts and shot nine free throws, hitting seven. He passed the ball really well and remained under control while handling the ball. Defensively, he had some iffy possessions but was mostly a positive on that end. Castle’s rebounding was another plus. Out of nowhere, the rookie is showing signs that he might be an elite rebounder for a guard.
Grade: B+
Chris Paul
The good: Paul led the team in assists with nine. In his 29 minutes of play, he hit 3-of-4 two-pointers and had a couple dazzling moves going toward the basket. The veteran point guard limited his mistakes and his effort on defense was commendable. The bad: Paul was 0-for-2 from three-point range. Though the effort was there on defense, the results were more negative than positive.
Grade: B-
Harrison Barnes
Barnes’ great shooting season continues. He shot the ball well from all distances on his way to 17 points on only nine field goal attempts. He played a clean brand of basketball on both ends. Rebounding-wise, Barnes was much better than usual. His defense, in all facets, was also pretty impressive.
Grade: A-
Bismack Biyombo
Biyombo was in the starting lineup and delivered an unlikely scoring punch. He tallied ten points in 20 minutes while exhibiting a surprising amount of touch. Biyombo’s defense was solid on the interior but he could have been better rebounding the ball. His help-defense was also in need of work.
Grade: B
Malaki Branham
Branham led the bench in minutes with 23 and it was entirely understandable why the coaching staff leaned on him. The 21-year-old gave the Spurs a scoring option on the court that the team really needed. Branham shot well on his way to 17 points. Both his standstill three-pointers and his isolation moves looked smooth. Branham struggled to defend at times but his offensive aptitude more than made up for that shortcoming on this night.
Grade: A-
Keldon Johnson
Yikes, Johnson looks to be returning to earth following a torrid streak after the All-Star break. Against the Blazers, he was 1-of-11 from the field, including three misses beyond the three-point arc. To make matters worse, he turned it over three times and played little to no defense. Johnson showed some life on the boards in an otherwise dismal evening.
Grade: D-
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie didn’t get many open looks during his 20 minutes on the court. However, he was able to knock down two long balls on a total of three three-point attempts. Defensively and in transition, Champagnie lacked his usual amount of intensity.
Grade: C+
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Mamukelashvili is another player from the bench who had an outing to forget. In 13 minutes, he went without a point or a rebound. He missed all three of his three-point tries and didn’t even attempt a two-pointer. Mamu had a couple of good passes and his energy level was sufficient … but his overall production was really poor.
Grade: D
Blake Wesley
After going 5-for-6 against the Nuggets, Wesley is now 0-for-10 since that game. He’s also not making plays for others or even bending the defense in any significant manner. Defensively, Wesley is playing hard and making plays here and there — but he’s too one-dimensional right now.
Grade: C-
Jordan McLaughlin
McLaughlin got ten minutes off the bench and he had a lot of encouraging possessions. He hit both of his shots from the field, including a slick and-one in the lane. His passing decisions were mostly positive and he ran the offensive sets well. Defensively, he illustrated a healthy amount of anticipation. All in all, McLaughlin continues to look like a guy who could be worthwhile to keep around as insurance at the point guard position.
Grade: B+
Mitch Johnson
I like that Johnson gave Branham extended minutes. In retrospect, playing McLaughlin more likely would have aided the cause. But, overall, Johnson has to be pleased that his troops competed once again.
Grade: B+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk