By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-03-28 16:11:10
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队给了东部联盟最佳球队一个苦战，但最终好人还是功亏一篑。这场胜利使克利夫兰骑士队的战绩提高到59胜14负，而马刺队的战绩则降至31胜41负。
圣安东尼奥上半场打得断断续续，但表现得足够好，以54-49仅落后五分进入半场休息。马刺队在第三节取得领先，并一直打到最后一节。在最后几分钟，骑士队投中了一些关键球，避免了被爆冷的命运。
如果有所谓的“精神上的胜利”，那么这场比赛应该算在圣安东尼奥的名下。马刺队在攻防两端都打出了非常扎实的篮球，使比赛保持胶着。克利夫兰最终赢得了比赛，但银黑军团应该为他们的努力感到自豪。
数据：马刺队 vs 骑士队
马刺队 vs 骑士队 - 最终评分
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
我对瓦塞尔的表现感到满意。他高效地得到22分，同时送出4次助攻。他的投篮选择很明智，很少尝试做太多。在防守端，瓦塞尔全神贯注。有一些不明智的犯规，但除此之外，他在攻防两端都做得很好。
评分：A-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
没有人会指责这个孩子的努力。在32分钟内，卡斯尔贡献了22分、11个篮板和8次助攻，竭尽全力。他的投篮不够精准（他错失了很多他想重新投进的篮下投篮），罚球失准，并且有一些不合时宜的失误，但如果没有这位新秀的全能表现，马刺队甚至不会进入比赛状态。他在防守端表现出色，在进攻端有所作为，积极争抢进攻篮板，并且在球场两端努力奔跑。卡斯尔并不完美，但他在克利夫兰表现得非常出色。
评分：A-
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
保罗出场33分钟，这是他一个多月以来上场时间最长的一次。虽然他作为老将的智慧和冷静帮助马刺队维持局势，但这位39岁的控球后卫10投仅2中，助攻率也低于平时。我实际上喜欢保罗的防守，但更多的实际贡献会有助于球队。
评分：C+
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
骑士队阻止了巴恩斯的三分球，但他仍然找到了贡献的方法。他的投篮足够好，得到10分，而他干净的篮球风格导致没有失误或犯规。巴恩斯在防守端的动作不够快，虽然他在防守端的能量水平高于平时。总而言之，巴恩斯本可以打得更好，但他顶住了骑士队的压力。
评分：B-
俾斯麦·比永博(Bismack Biyombo)
比永博只打了15分钟，但他肯定让人感受到了他的存在。他的护筐很棒，他的篮板非常好，他的拼劲不懈。在进攻端，他经常出现在正确的位置，并且能够以5投4中的命中率得到8分。马刺队在这个夜晚不可能对他们的首发中锋有更高的期望了。
评分：A-
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
优点：约翰逊在替补出场的27分钟内贡献了17分和10个篮板的两双。他充满激情地冲击篮筐，他的终结手感很娴熟。在防守端，他积极竞争，并且能够在防守端有所作为。缺点：约翰逊的外线投篮失准。在他尝试的至少距离篮筐五英尺的九次投篮中，他只命中了两次。当他运球时，他也错过了几个空位的队友。
评分：B
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
对于尚帕尼来说，这是一个充满冒险的夜晚。作为两次恶意犯规的受害者，他相当好地克服了身体对抗。虽然他的投篮命中率本可以更高，但他命中了全部五个罚球，并且还抢下了七个篮板。此外，尚帕尼的防守表现大于负面影响。
评分：B-
杰里米·索汉(Jeremy Sochan)
与替补席上的其他人一样，投篮效率并不是索汉今晚的朋友。他在篮下错失了四次机会，他的传球还有很多不足之处。抢篮板是索汉可以做得更好的另一个领域。在防守端，他在外线表现不错，但在内线不够稳固。
评分：C
布雷克·韦斯利(Blake Wesley)
韦斯利有过几次积极的时刻，但在对阵骑士队时大多表现挣扎。在防守端，他经常试图做太多。在进攻端，克利夫兰并没有太注意他，而韦斯利并没有抓住机会。总而言之，他的能量不如我们最近习惯的那样高。
评分：C-
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利(Sandro Mamukelashvili)
考虑到马穆克拉什维利只打了7分钟，他填满了数据表。在那段时间里，他想办法投丢了三个三分球，送出了三次助攻，抢下了两个进攻篮板，并且完成了一次抢断。马穆的防守是个问题，这很可能导致了他上场时间不足。
评分：C+
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
我对约翰逊的轮换没有太多问题。保罗可能打得时间有点太长了，但其余的都很好。在战术安排方面，我喜欢他让卡斯尔掌握了这么多球权。克利夫兰的身材在第四节确实伤害了马刺队，而约翰逊似乎不太愿意适应这一事实。总而言之，这场比赛有很多学习机会——所以单凭这一点就应该让教练组认为这是一次成功的比赛。
评分：B+
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Cleveland Cavaliers – Game #72
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Cleveland Cavaliers – Game #72
The San Antonio Spurs gave the best team in the Eastern Conference a run for their money but the good guys ultimately came up short. The win improved the Cleveland Cavaliers to 59-14, while the Spurs dropped to a record of 31-41.
San Antonio played a herky-jerky first half but got it going well enough to head into halftime down only five points, 54-49. The Spurs took the lead in the third quarter and kept playing well into the final period. In the closing minutes, the Cavs hit enough big shots to avoid the upset.
If there’s such a thing as a moral victory, this should count in San Antonio’s column. The Spurs played very solid basketball on both ends of the court to keep things close. Cleveland pulled out the win at the end but the Silver and Black should be proud of their effort.
Stats: Spurs at Cavaliers
Spurs at Cavaliers – Final Grades
Devin Vassell
I was pleased with how Vassell played. He put up 22 efficient points while handing out four assists. His shot-selection was wise and he rarely tried to do too much. Defensively, Vassell was locked in. There were a few ill-advised fouls but otherwise he did quality work on both sides of the ball.
Grade: A-
Stephon Castle
No one can fault the kid’s effort. In 32 minutes, Castle tallied 22 points, 11 rebounds and eight assists while leaving his heart on the floor. He didn’t shoot the straightest (he missed a lot of shots in the lane that he’d like to have back), flubbed his free throws and had some untimely errors but the Spurs wouldn’t have even been in the game without the rookie’s all-around performance. He was really good on defense, he made plays on offense, he crashed the offensive glass and he ran the court hard both ways. Castle wasn’t perfect but he was damn good in Cleveland.
Grade: A-
Chris Paul
Paul played 33 minutes, the most minutes he’s been on the court in more than a month. While his veteran wisdom and calmness helped keep the Spurs afloat, the 39-year-old point guard was only 2-for-10 from the floor and his assist rate was lower than usual. I actually liked Paul’s defense but more tangible production would have helped the cause.
Grade: C+
Harrison Barnes
The Cavs were running Barnes off the three-point line but he still found ways to chip in. He shot well enough on his way to ten points, while his clean brand of basketball resulted in no turnovers or fouls. Barnes’ lack of quickness hurt a bit on defense, although his energy level on that end was higher than normal. All in all, Barnes could have played better but he held his own against the Cavs.
Grade: B-
Bismack Biyombo
Biyombo only played 15 minutes but he definitely made his presence felt. His rim protection was great, his rebounding was very good and his hustle was relentless. Offensively, he was routinely in the right positions and was able to post eight points on 4-for-5 shooting. The Spurs couldn’t have expected much more out of their starting center on this night.
Grade: A-
Keldon Johnson
The good: Johnson posted a double-double of 17 points and ten rebounds in 27 minutes off the bench. He attacked the rim with gusto and the touch on his finishes was deft. Defensively, he competed and was able to make a few plays on that end. The bad: Johnson’s perimeter shooting was off. Of the nine shots he attempted at least five feet from the basket, he only made two. He also missed a couple open teammates when driving the ball.
Grade: B
Julian Champagnie
It was an adventurous evening for Champagnie. The recipient of a pair of flagrant fouls, he battled through the physicality reasonably well. While he could have shot better from the field, he hit all five of his freebies and also corralled seven rebounds. Additionally Champagnie’s defense was more positive than it was negative.
Grade: B-
Jeremy Sochan
Like the rest of the bench unit, shooting efficiency wasn’t Sochan’s friend tonight. He had four misses right at the rim and his passing left quite a bit to be desired. Rebounding is another area Sochan could have been better. Defensively, he was pretty good out on the perimeter but wasn’t sturdy enough on the interior.
Grade: C
Blake Wesley
Wesley had a couple positive moments but mostly struggled against the Cavs. Defensively, he routinely tried to do too much. Offensively, Cleveland wasn’t paying too much attention to him and Wesley didn’t take advantage. Overall, his energy wasn’t as high as we’ve become accustomed to as of late.
Grade: C-
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Mamukelashvili stuffed the stat sheet considering he only played seven minutes. In that time, he found a way to miss three three-pointers, hand out three assists, grab two offensive boards and swipe a steal. Mamu’s defense was an issue, which likely led to his lack of minutes.
Grade: C+
Mitch Johnson
I didn’t have too many problems with Johnson’s rotation. Paul probably played a few too many minutes but the rest was fine. Playcalling-wise, I liked that he kept the ball in Castle’s hand so much. Cleveland’s size really hurt the Spurs in the fourth quarter and Johnson didn’t seem too interested in adjusting to that fact. All things considered, there were a lot of learning opportunities in this game — so that alone should make this a successful outing in the eyes of the coaching staff.
Grade: B+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk