马刺 vs 独行侠 126 - 116 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-03-13 15:00:06
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
这一次，圣安东尼奥马刺队成功击败了阵容不整的达拉斯独行侠队。这场126-116的胜利终结了马刺队的三连败，并将他们的战绩提升到27胜37负。
比赛初期，圣安东尼奥的进攻陷入停滞。第一节的大部分时间里，马刺队都无法得分，反而不断失误。
谢天谢地，在第一节仅得到20分后，马刺队在第二节奋起直追，砍下44分。下半场，圣安东尼奥的防守加强。马刺队在第四节完全掌控了局面，最终轻松获胜。
总而言之，在经历了几场令人沮丧的比赛后，这对马刺队来说是一场令人感觉良好的胜利。
数据：马刺 vs. 独行侠
马刺 vs. 独行侠 – 最终评分
达龙·福克斯(De’Aaron Fox)
虽然福克斯的投篮效率不是最高的，但他整体表现出色。他能够随意进入禁区，瓦解了达拉斯的防守，并为他的队友创造了空间。福克斯打法积极，同时也找到了队友，几乎获得了三双。在防守端，他比平时更活跃，施加了大量的压力。马刺队在交易时想得到的就是这种能够改变比赛的福克斯。
评分：A
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
瓦塞尔对阵独行侠的比赛表现全面。他两分球6投4中，送出6次助攻，抢下10个篮板，并且只有1次失误。他也在防守端有所表现，这是他最近做得越来越多的事情。瓦塞尔的三分球投篮不太稳定（8投2中），但他没有让它对比赛的其他方面产生负面影响。这种表现朝着正确的方向迈出了一步。
评分：B+
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
对于这位经验丰富的控球后卫来说，这又是一个高效的夜晚。保罗在短短25分钟内送出9次助攻，三分球6投3中。他的防守乏善可陈，但态度是端正的。保罗今晚最明显的缺点是对球的控制不够，失误的程度几乎前所未见。
评分：B
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
可以肯定地说，巴恩斯很乐意继续与独行侠交手。在过去的这两场比赛中，他投篮21投18中，三分球7投5中。就像周一那样，巴恩斯利用他的力量在阵容不整的独行侠身上得分。他还利用了任何空位机会，果断出手。巴恩斯在防守端没有做出什么惊天动地的事情，但也没有成为累赘。
评分：A-
俾斯麦·比永博(Bismack Biyombo)
比永博的数据并没有以积极的方式引人注目，但他表现不错。他在攻防两端和转换中的不懈努力具有感染力。人们通常可以发现他正在破坏独行侠试图完成的任何事情。比永博在篮板方面也做得很好，并减少了他的失误。
评分：A-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔打得不好。4次失误，4次犯规，27分钟内只得到8分？是的，这场比赛不会增加他赢得最佳新秀奖的机会。但说实话，我认为这实际上展现了卡斯尔的一些成长。这位新秀没有让糟糕的比赛变得更糟，而是停止强行进攻，转而开始做一些小事。他的防守比平时更好，他的传球也更流畅。干得漂亮，菜鸟。
评分：D+
杰里米·索汉(Jeremy Sochan)
在因小腿瘀伤缺席一场比赛后，索汉重返赛场，看起来相当不错。他愿意投三分球，这有助于创造空间。无论他是静止在禁区内还是从外线冲击篮筐，他都充满热情地攻击篮筐。索汉的传球很聪明，在24分钟内没有出现一次失误，并且在篮板方面也很活跃。防守时好时坏，但他确实有几次非常扎实的防守。
评分：B+
朱利安·尚帕涅(Julian Champagnie)
尚帕涅在三分线外的挣扎延续到了另一场比赛。不过，好消息是，他一直在坚持比赛。尚帕涅充满力量地冲击篮筐，有目的地跑动，并充满激情地争抢松散球。我喜欢他打球的锐气——即使有投丢的三分球和扣篮。
评分：B-
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊充分利用了他的17分钟。虽然他甚至没有尝试一次三分球，但他通过冲击禁区弥补了这一点。他的投篮中只有两次是在篮筐之外——而且没有一次超过离篮筐七英尺。约翰逊的进攻取得了回报，投篮命中率很高，并获得了四次罚球机会。然而，比他的得分更重要的是，约翰逊挺身而出真正激励了他的队友。他左右飞扑，至少在今晚，他是球队的心脏和灵魂。
评分：A
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利(Sandro Mamukelashvili)
马穆克拉什维利像往常一样充满热情地比赛，但并没有产生太多实际的贡献。如果说有什么的话，他在防守端缺乏身高或速度使得在他上场的五分钟内很难隐藏他。
评分：C-
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
我总体上喜欢约翰逊的执教。当福克斯表现出色时，依靠他是一个很好的学习经验，对所有参与者都是如此。约翰逊让卡斯尔在挣扎中成长，这是一个优点。公平地说，KJ应该有更多的上场时间，因为他表现得很好，而且投入了大量的精力。
评分：B+
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Dallas Mavericks – Game #64
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Dallas Mavericks – Game #64
This time, the San Antonio Spurs took care of business against a short-handed Dallas Mavericks squad. The 126-116 victory snapped a three-game losing streak for the Spurs and improved their record to 27-37.
Early on, San Antonio’s offense was stuck in the mud. There were long stretches in the first quarter where the Spurs couldn’t score and were instead turning it over.
Thankfully, after scoring only 20 points in the first quarter, the Spurs bounced back with 44 points in the second quarter. In the second half, San Antonio’s defense stiffened. The Spurs were in full control in the fourth period and were able to waltz to the win.
All in all, this was a feel-good win for the Spurs after a few frustrating games.
Stats: Spurs vs. Mavericks
Spurs vs. Mavericks – Final Grades
De’Aaron Fox
It wasn’t the most efficient shooting performance for Fox but he played well overall. His ability to get into the paint whenever he wanted broke down Dallas’ defense and created space for his teammates. Fox was aggressive but he also found his teammates on his way to a near triple-double. Defensively, he was more active than usual and applied a healthy amount of pressure. This game-changing version of Fox is who the Spurs had in mind when they made the trade.
Grade: A
Devin Vassell
Vassell had a well-rounded outing versus the Mavs. He was 4-for-6 from two-point range, handed out six assists, grabbed ten rebounds and only turned it over once. He was also making plays on the defensive end, which is something he has done a lot more lately. Vassell’s three-point shooting was wonky (2-for-8) but he didn’t let it negatively impact the other aspects of his game. This type of outing is a step in the right direction.
Grade: B+
Chris Paul
It was another productive evening for the veteran point guard. Paul handed out nine assists in only 25 minutes, while hitting 3-of-6 shots from deep. His defense was nothing to write home about but the effort was there. The glaring negative for Paul on this night was his looseness with the ball; it was at a level you almost never see.
Grade: B
Harrison Barnes
It’s safe to say that Barnes would love to keep going against the Mavs. In these last two games, he’s 18-for-21 from the field and 5-for-7 from three-point land. Like he did on Monday, Barnes used his power to score over the short-handed Mavericks. He also took advantage of any open looks with a decisive decision. Barnes didn’t do anything too dramatic on the defensive end but he also wasn’t a liability.
Grade: A-
Bismack Biyombo
Biyombo’s numbers don’t jump off the page in a positive manner but he was good. His relentless hustle on both ends of the court and in transition was contagious. He could usually be found blowing up whatever it was that the Mavs were trying to accomplish. Biyombo also did well on the glass and limited his mistakes.
Grade: A-
Stephon Castle
Castle didn’t have a good game. Four turnovers, four fouls and only eight points in 27 minutes? Yeah, this game won’t further his chances to win the ROTY trophy. But, honestly, I thought it actually exhibited some growth for Castle. Instead of making a bad game even worse, the rookie stopped pushing the issue and instead started doing the little things. His defense was better than usual and his ball-movement was snappier. Good look, rook.
Grade: D+
Jeremy Sochan
After missing a game with a bruised calf, Sochan was back in action and looked pretty darn good. He was willing to fire three-pointers, which helped create spacing. He attacked the rim with gusto, no matter if he was sedentary in the paint or if he was crashing the hoop from the perimeter. Sochan made smart passes, went without a turnover in 24 minutes and was alive on the glass. Defense was more hit-or-miss but he did have a handful of really solid possessions.
Grade: B+
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie’s struggles from three-point territory carried forward to another game. The good news, though, is that he kept playing. Champagnie went to the rim with power, ran the court with purpose and hustled for loose balls with passion. I liked the edge he played with — even though there were missed threes and a missed dunk along the way.
Grade: B-
Keldon Johnson
Johnson took full advantage of his 17 minutes. Although he didn’t even attempt a three-pointer, he more than made up for it by battering the paint. Only two of his shots were away from the basket — and none were further than seven feet from the rim. Johnson’s attacking paid dividends with a good shooting percentage and four free throw attempts. However, more than his scoring, it was Johnson putting his body on the line that truly inspired his teammates. He was diving left and right and, on this night at least, he was the heart and soul of the team.
Grade: A
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Mamukelashvili played with enthusiasm like usual but there wasn’t a whole lot of tangible production. If anything, his lack of size or quickness on defense made it difficult to hide him during his five minutes on the court.
Grade: C-
Mitch Johnson
I liked Johnson’s coaching for the most part. Leaning on Fox when he was playing well was a good learning experience for everyone involved. Johnson let Castle play through his struggles, which was a plus. To be fair, though, KJ should have played more minutes with how well he was playing and how much effort he was putting into it.
Grade: B+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk