马刺 vs 独行侠 129 - 133 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-03-11 15:49:37
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
对于圣安东尼奥马刺队来说，这绝对是本赛季最令人沮丧的失利之一。在主场，他们输给了阵容不整的达拉斯独行侠队，后者只有8名球员能够上场。马刺队目前的战绩为26胜37负。
马刺队在第一节表现出色，以34-28领先。然而，从那以后，马刺队基本上只是满足于与独行侠队互换得分。当达拉斯在第四节开始加强防守时，马刺队无法达到同样的防守强度，最终在比赛最后阶段崩盘。
在没有 维克多·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)的情况下赢得比赛，事实证明非常困难。今晚，马刺队也缺少了他们可以说是第二好的防守球员 杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)，他因小腿挫伤而缺席。但是，很明显，当马刺队面对一支缺少9名球员，并且是背靠背第二场比赛的客场球队时，很难找任何借口。
数据：马刺 vs. 独行侠
马刺 vs. 独行侠 – 最终评分
迪阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
福克斯对阵独行侠时不够积极。他缺乏侵略性在防守端最为明显，在那里他通常只是走走过场。在进攻端，他没有充分地发起进攻。他的组织能力还可以——只是量不够。得分方面，福克斯效率不高。他很少站上罚球线，并且失误了三次。
评分：C-
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
就努力程度而言，我不能责怪瓦塞尔。在进攻端，他努力地向篮筐突破，有目的地跑动，并且在处理球方面做出了不错的决定。也就是说，他也需要更多地站上罚球线来提高效率。瓦塞尔在防守端再次表现活跃，但影响甚微。有时他过于投入，这实际上导致了他犯满离场。
评分：B-
克里斯·保罗 (Chris Paul)
我的意思是，很难对一位仅仅出场22分钟就拿下9次助攻，且仅失误1次的的控球后卫过于苛刻。保罗本可以在得分方面更具威胁性，并且在防守方面可以做得更好——但他在很大程度上完成了他的工作。这位老将控球后卫的高水平组织能力帮助马刺队保持在比赛中。
评分：B
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
哇。巴恩斯砍下了全场最高的29分，投篮14中12，其中包括三分球6中4。他还抢下了6个进攻篮板，并在38分钟内仅失误一次。说巴恩斯状态火热都太轻描淡写了。他的三分球看起来如丝般顺滑，他强壮的突破篮下也充分利用了达拉斯缺乏内线高度的弱点。如果没有巴恩斯的进攻贡献，马刺队早就完蛋了。在防守端，这位老将前锋被要求打了很多中锋位置——这不是最赏心悦目的景象。他不是一个优秀的篮筐保护者，也不是在内线对抗中最强壮的身体，但他尽了最大努力在非惯常位置上生存。
评分：A
俾斯麦·比永博 (Bismack Biyombo)
比永博再次首发担任中锋。他表现还算体面。当他在场上时，这是圣安东尼奥唯一拥有篮筐保护的时候。他在篮板方面也做得很好。但是，由于独行侠被迫打小个阵容，要求比永博长时间在外线游走，对他来说要求太高了。在进攻端，他没有充分利用自己身高的意识。
评分：C+
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔的投篮手感很糟糕。他三分球7投2中，两分球5投2中，罚球8投4中。这些数据都不能接受。在传球方面，卡斯尔做了一些好事，我喜欢他充满活力的比赛方式——但他整体的决策能力还有很多不足之处。他在进攻端的表现，嗯，就像一个新秀。在防守端，他的一些冒险得到了回报，但他在这方面的整体努力程度不足。
评分：C-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
虽然没有巴恩斯那么高效，但约翰逊也相差不远。他在29分钟内爆发砍下28分，三分球6投4中，并且仅失误一次。他结合了力量型的终结和灵巧的终结，以及他的外线投篮。约翰逊的不懈努力值得称赞，因为他显然是今晚圣安东尼奥进攻的心脏和灵魂。防守？是的，不，他今晚不是解决防守问题的方案。
评分：A-
朱利安·尚帕涅 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕涅冰冷的投篮手感延续到了另一场比赛。在过去的3场比赛中，他三分球9投1中。尚帕涅正在通过放松防守端的警惕来加剧他缺乏准星的问题。通常，他在防守端的竞争比周一晚上对阵独行侠队时更激烈。
评分：D+
布雷克·韦斯利 (Blake Wesley)
由于索汉缺席，韦斯利成为了额外上场时间的受益者之一。不幸的是，他并没有带来太大的改变。他在第四节命中了一个重要的三分球，并且没有失误……但这就是他积极方面的全部了。他没有承担组织进攻的职责。在防守端，韦斯利已经不再是本赛季早些时候在那一端引起轰动的球员了。
评分：C+
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利 (Sandro Mamukelashvili)
马穆克拉什维利在索汉缺席的情况下获得了一个机会，但他未能抓住。在进攻端，他的跑动不像往常那样疯狂。他在攻防两端的整体能量都被削弱了。马穆在篮板方面做得不错，但独行侠队有目的地孤立了他，并反复成功地直接攻击他。不好。
评分：D+
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
在 文班 (Wembanyama)、索汉和巴锡缺席的情况下，约翰逊采用小个阵容并不令人意外……但这些阵容并不奏效。在关键时刻，马刺队无法阻止对手得分。在进攻端，圣安东尼奥表现尚可，但教练组无法想出如何在球场上布置一个有竞争力的防守。
评分：C-
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Dallas Mavericks – Game #63
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Dallas Mavericks – Game #63
In what has to be considered one of the most disheartening losses of the season for the San Antonio Spurs, the good guys lost at home against a short-handed Dallas Mavericks squad that was only able to suit up eight players. The Spurs are now 26-37 on the season.
San Antonio played well in the first quarter and led 34-28 at the end of the period. However, from then on, the Spurs were basically happy to trade baskets with the Mavericks. When Dallas started to turn up the pressure on defense in the fourth quarter, the Spurs couldn’t match that defensive intensity and ended up folding down the stretch.
Winning games without Victor Wembanyama is proving to be quite difficult. Tonight, the Spurs were also without arguably their second best defender in Jeremy Sochan, who was out with a bruised calf. But, obviously, it’s difficult to lean on any excuses when the Spurs were going against a team missing nine players that was on the road on the second night of a back-to-back.
Stats: Spurs vs. Mavericks
Spurs vs. Mavericks – Final Grades
De’Aaron Fox
Fox was simply not aggressive enough against the Mavs. His lack of aggression was most notable on the defensive end, where he could usually be found going through the motions. Offensively, he wasn’t pushing the issue enough. His playmaking was okay — it was just lacking in volume. Scoring-wise, Fox was inefficient. He rarely got to the line and turned it over three times.
Grade: C-
Devin Vassell
Effort-wise, I can’t fault Vassell. Offensively, he was driving hard to the basket, running the court with purpose and making good decisions with the ball. That said, he too needed to get to the charity stripe more to add to his efficiency. Vassell was again active on defense but the impact was minimal. Sometimes he was caught doing too much, which actually played a role in him fouling out.
Grade: B-
Chris Paul
I mean, it’s difficult to be too mad at a point guard who tallied nine assists in only 22 minutes while turning it over just one time. Paul could have been more of a threat scoring-wise and could have held up a bit better on defense — but he did his job for the most part. That high level of playmaking out of their veteran PG helped keep the Spurs in the game.
Grade: B
Harrison Barnes
Well, damn. Barnes poured in a game-high 29 points on 12-for-14 shooting from the field, including 4-of-6 from three-point range. He also pulled down six offensive boards and turned it over just once in 38 minutes. To say Barnes had it going would be an understatement. His three-point shots looked silky smooth and his brawny drives to the cup took advantage of Dallas’ lack of size. The Spurs would have been toast without Barnes’ offensive contributions. Defensively, the veteran forward was asked to play quite a bit of center — and it wasn’t the prettiest of sights. He’s not much of a rim protector and isn’t the strongest body when battling in the paint but he did his best to survive out of position.
Grade: A
Bismack Biyombo
Biyombo got another start at center. He was decent. When he was on the court, it was the only time San Antonio had rim protection. He was also good on the boards. But with the Mavs forced to go small, it was too much to ask Biyombo to swim out on the perimeter for minutes on end. Offensively, he didn’t have the wherewithal to use his size to his advantage.
Grade: C+
Stephon Castle
Castle had a rough time shooting the basketball. He was 2-for-7 from three-point range, 2-for-5 inside of the arc and 4-for-8 at the free throw line. None of those marks are acceptable. Passing-wise, Castle did some good things and I liked the liveliness he played with — but his overall decision-making left a lot to be desired. He played, well, like a rookie on offense. Defensively, some of his gambles paid off but his overall effort on that end was lacking.
Grade: C-
Keldon Johnson
While not as insanely efficient as Barnes, Johnson was in the same zip code. He exploded for 28 points in 29 minutes while hitting 4-of-6 three-pointers and only turning it over once. He mixed in power finishes and deft finishes to go with his outside shooting. Johnson’s relentlessness was worthy of applause, as he was clearly the heart and soul of San Antonio’s attack tonight. Defense? Yeah, no, he wasn’t part of the solution on this night.
Grade: A-
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie’s cold shooting extended to another outing. He’s now 1-for-9 from three-point territory over his last three ballgames. Champagnie is compounding his lack of marksmanship by letting his guard down on the defensive end. He usually competes much more on that end than he did against the Mavericks on Monday night.
Grade: D+
Blake Wesley
With Sochan out, Wesley was one of the recipients of extra minutes. Unfortunately for him, he didn’t move the needle much. He hit a big three-pointer in the fourth quarter and didn’t turn the ball over … but that’s the end of his list of positives. He didn’t handle playmaking duties. Defensively, Wesley was a shadow of the player who earlier in the season was making noise on that end of the court.
Grade: C+
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Mamukelashvili had an opportunity with Sochan sidelined but he wasn’t able to take advantage. Offensively, his movement wasn’t as frenetic as usual. His overall energy was muted on both ends. Mamu did fine on the boards but the Mavs purposefully isolated him and had repeated success going right at him. Not good.
Grade: D+
Mitch Johnson
It wasn’t a surprise that Johnson went with mini-ball lineups with Wembanyama, Sochan and Bassey on the sidelines … but those lineups didn’t work. When it mattered, the Spurs weren’t capable of getting stops. Offensively, San Antonio was fine but the coaching staff couldn’t figure out how to put a competent defense on the court.
Grade: C-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk