马刺 @ 森林狼 124 - 141 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-03-10 14:51:10
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队早早落后，最终以141-124的比分输给了明尼苏达森林狼队。这场失利让马刺队的战绩降至26胜36负，这是本赛季马刺队首次落后50%胜率达到10场。
森林狼队拿下了比赛的前7分，为当晚的比赛定下了基调。明尼苏达在第一节结束时以37-29领先，马刺队再也没能真正追回来。他们零星地发起了一些半心半意的反击，但森林狼队最终轻松获胜。
马刺队在很长一段时间里表现得还算不错，但明尼苏达队火热的投篮手感让圣安东尼奥队始终无法靠近。森林狼队的三分球命中率达到了50%（42投21中），罚球也只失手了一个（15罚14中）。
数据：马刺队 vs 森林狼队
马刺队 vs 森林狼队 – 最终评分
德阿隆·福克斯(De’Aaron Fox)
很高兴看到福克斯真的投进了一些三分球。在他之前的七场比赛中，他的三分球命中率只有16.3%。对阵明尼苏达，他的三分球是6投4中，两分球也是6投4中。虽然福克斯在高效得分和限制失误方面做得很好，但他的组织能力却不见踪影。他在防守端也没有产生影响。
评分：B-
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
对于瓦塞尔来说，这是一场出奇安静的比赛。他在33分钟内只出手了8次，尽管他的三分球5投3中。更强的侵略性和更强的自信心会有所帮助。好消息是，瓦塞尔是少数在防守端表现出明显努力的马刺球员之一。
评分：B-
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
好的一面：保罗的投篮很稳，在25分钟内得到7分。他还贡献了7次助攻，没有出现失误。不好的一面：保罗在防守端很专注，但他的身高不足在很多回合中都成了问题。
评分：B
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯在进攻端做得非常好。他得到15分，并且在各个距离上的投篮都很出色——包括罚球线上5罚5中。不幸的是，他在防守端又把这些优势都还了回去。他在内线的对抗性不够，在外线的速度也不够快。
评分：B
俾斯麦·比永博(Bismack Biyombo)
这场失利不能怪比永博。他在18分钟的出场时间里表现出色。他的所有5次投篮都命中了。在防守端，他的积极性很高。比永博在篮板方面可以做得更好，但除此之外，他做了他应该做的事情。
评分：B
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
又一场比赛，卡斯尔又一次表现出色。这位新秀在28分钟内得到20分。他的两次三分球尝试都未能命中，但他通过获得9次罚球机会提高了效率。卡斯尔在冲击篮筐时的身体对抗、坚韧和顽强精神令人赞叹。他知道如何创造突破路线，并且在全力冲刺时不会被任何人阻止。卡斯尔的传球也很好，并且减少了自己的失误。虽然他值得为他在篮板方面的表现而鼓掌，但这位新秀的防守却很平庸。他比平时更容易出现位置错误。
评分：B+
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
好的一面：约翰逊的两分球7投6中。他很好地把握了进攻时机，并在需要的时候分享球。他在篮板方面也付出了努力。不好的一面：约翰逊的三分球3投0中。他有时控球不稳（尽管有几次真的不是他的错）。在防守端，约翰逊本可以做得更好。他今晚的脚步比平时还要慢。
评分：C
杰里米·索汉(Jeremy Sochan)
索汉今晚的表现并不理想。他在攻防两端都有一些不错的表现，但无法将这些积极的时刻串联起来。在进攻端，他状态不佳。在防守端，索汉展现出了一些亮点，但缺乏稳定性。
评分：C
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼7投1中，包括4次三分球失手。他在防守端弥补了一些失误，但总的来说，这是令人失望的17分钟。在这两场客场之旅中，尚帕尼在29分钟内9投1中。哎。
评分：C-
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利(Sandro Mamukelashvili)
我喜欢马穆克拉什维利的打球方式。从他踏上球场的那一刻起，他就非常活跃。他不断地运球、切入和跑动。再加上明显的无私精神，马穆就像一股清新的空气。他的防守没有那么出色，但他仍然在那一端也充满热情地打球。
评分：B+
布雷克·韦斯利(Blake Wesley)
韦斯利今晚获得了不少上场时间，看起来还不错。他有一些聪明的传球，并利用他的速度作为武器。不过，他的防守远不如本赛季早些时候那么有影响力。
评分：B
乔丹·麦克劳克林(Jordan McLaughlin)
麦克劳克林只在垃圾时间上场，但他的跳投看起来很流畅。
评分：Inc.
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
在进攻端，马刺队看起来像一支训练有素的球队。在防守端，嗯，就不是那么回事了。约翰逊本可以做更多的工作来找到能够在防守端站住脚的阵容。
评分：C-
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Minnesota Timberwolves – Game #62
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Minnesota Timberwolves – Game #62
The San Antonio Spurs got down early and eventually fell to the Minnesota Timberwolves by a final score of 141-124. The loss dropped San Antonio’s record to 26-36 — the first time all season the Spurs have been ten games below .500.
The Timberwolves scored the game’s first seven points and that set the tone for the evening. Minnesota led 37-29 at the end of the first quarter and the Spurs never really got back into it. They authored half-hearted runs here and there but the Timberwolves were able to cruise to victory.
The Spurs played decently well for long stretches but Minnesota’s hot shooting kept San Antonio at bay. The Timberwolves hit half of their three-pointers (21-for-42) and all but one of their free throws (14-for-15).
Stats: Spurs at Timberwolves
Spurs at Timberwolves – Final Grades
De’Aaron Fox
It was good to see Fox actually knock down some three-pointers. In his previous seven games, he was shooting 16.3% from three-point land. Against Minnesota, he was 4-for-6 from deep and 4-for-6 inside of the arc. While Fox did well scoring with efficiency and limiting his turnovers, his playmaking was missing in action. He also didn’t make a defensive impact.
Grade: B-
Devin Vassell
It was an oddly quiet outing for Vassell. He only shot eight field goal attempts in 33 minutes, even though he was 3-for-5 from three-point range. More aggression and more assertiveness would have helped matters. In better news, Vassell was one of the few Spurs players who played with a noteworthy amount of effort on the defensive end.
Grade: B-
Chris Paul
The good: Paul shot the ball straight on his way to seven points in 25 minutes. He also tallied seven assists without turning the ball over. The bad: Paul was attentive on the defensive end but his lack of height was an issue on a number of possessions.
Grade: B
Harrison Barnes
Barnes did really good work on the offensive end. He scored 15 points and shot well from all distances — including a 5-for-5 showing at the charity stripe. Unfortunately, he gave back a lot of that goodness on the defensive end. He wasn’t physical enough in the paint or quick enough on the perimeter.
Grade: B
Bismack Biyombo
This loss wasn’t on Biyombo. He performed during his 18 minutes of action. He hit all five of his shots from the field. Defensively, his activity level was high. Biyombo could have done a bit better on the boards but otherwise he did what he’s supposed to do.
Grade: B
Stephon Castle
Another game, another positive showing from Castle. The rookie scored 20 points in 28 minutes. He missed both of his three-point attempts but helped his efficiency by getting to the line for nine shots. Castle’s physicality, relentlessness and ruggedness when attacking the rim is awesome to watch. He knows how to create lanes and won’t be denied by anyone when he gets going downhill. Castle also passed the ball well and limited his mistakes. Although he deserves applause for what he did rebounding-wise, the rookie’s defense was lackluster. He got caught out of position much more often than usual.
Grade: B+
Keldon Johnson
The good: Johnson was 6-for-7 from two-point range. He timed his attacks well and shared the ball when needed. He gave effort on the boards. The bad: Johnson missed all three of his three-pointers. He was loose with the ball at times (although a couple times it wasn’t really his fault). Defensively, Johnson could have been a lot better. His feet were even slower than usual this evening.
Grade: C
Jeremy Sochan
Sochan didn’t have a very productive night at the office. He had some great possessions on both ends but couldn’t string together the positive moments. Offensively, he was out of sorts. Defensively, Sochan showed flashes but lacked consistency.
Grade: C
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie was 1-for-7 from the field, including four misses from three-point range. He made up for some of the misses on the defensive end but, all told, it was a disappointing 17 minutes. In this two-game road trip, Champagnie finished 1-for-9 from the field in 29 minutes. Ouch.
Grade: C-
Sandro Mamukelashvili
I liked how Mamukelashvili played. He was extremely active from the first moment his shoes hit the hardwood. He was driving, cutting and moving nonstop. Add in a palpable amount of unselfishness and Mamu was a breath of fresh air. His defense wasn’t as wondrous but he still played with enthusiasm on that end too.
Grade: B+
Blake Wesley
Wesley got some real minutes tonight and looked okay. He had some smart passes and used his speed as a weapon. His defense wasn’t nearly as impactful as it was earlier in the season, though.
Grade: B
Jordan McLaughlin
McLaughlin only played in garbage time but his jumper looked smooth.
Grade: Inc.
Mitch Johnson
Offensively, the Spurs looked like a well-coached team. Defensively, yeah, not so much. Johnson could have done more to find lineups that could hang on that end of the court.
Grade: C-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk