By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-03-09 18:38:43
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
在达龙·福克斯(De’Aaron Fox)重返萨克拉门托的比赛中，圣安东尼奥马刺队并没有取得太大的成功。国王队在下半场从未落后，最终以127-109获胜。马刺队的战绩因这场失利降至26胜35负。
马刺队在萨克拉门托开局不错。第一节结束时，马刺队以26-20领先。不幸的是，国王队在第二节打出了一波27-8的攻势，直接拉开了比分。半场结束后，马刺队未能组织起持续的反击。
总而言之，这场比赛没有什么值得肯定的地方。福克斯在他的回归之战中表现不佳，而马刺队也未能与之抗衡。
数据：马刺队对阵国王队
马刺队对阵国王队 – 最终评分
达龙·福克斯
是的，毫无疑问，这并不是福克斯希望在重返萨克拉门托的比赛中拥有的表现。他命中了第一个球，但之后表现挣扎。国王队的防守值得称赞，但福克斯也错失了一些空位投篮。在传球方面，他表现尚可，但有时反应较慢，未能及时找到空位的队友。他对球的控制尚可，但是福克斯在防守端本可以做得更好。总的来说，福克斯最近表现不佳，并没有为马刺队的胜利做出太大的贡献。
评分：D+
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
好的方面：在防守端，我很喜欢瓦塞尔的表现。这已经是连续第二场比赛，他看起来像是一个高于平均水平的外线防守者。他的投篮选择不错，并且没有失误。不好的方面：在上一场比赛中砍下职业生涯最高的37分之后，瓦塞尔又开始在外线投篮上挣扎。如果没有可靠的跳投，他很难成为一个有影响力的球员。
评分：C
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
在进攻端，保罗的表现基本合格。他命中了三个三分球，送出了六次助攻，并且只有一次失误。国王队给了他很大的空间，因此他本可以尝试更多的投篮。在防守端，保罗付出了努力，但马刺队很难将他隐藏起来——尤其是在轮换中。
评分：C+
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯在进攻端表现出色。他命中了四个三分球，并且在做决定时很果断。在防守端，巴恩斯看起来并没有完全投入。他在篮板方面做得不多，一对一防守缺乏强度，并且在协防上迟缓。巴恩斯活力十足，但他未能像他希望的那样发挥更大的作用。
评分：B-
比斯马克·比永博(Bismack Biyombo)
比永博的表现并不糟糕，但在这场比赛中，他更多的是一种负担而非资产。在进攻端，他经常挡路，国王队对他的关注也很少。在防守端，他付出了努力，但国王队能够在他之上或绕过他得分。比永博在防守篮板方面的工作也差强人意。
评分：C-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
现在听起来有点像老生常谈，但卡斯尔的表现是马刺队本场比赛的亮点。他投篮手感火热，在26分钟内得到25分。他没有做出更多贡献的唯一原因是受到了犯规困扰，最终犯满离场。在进攻端，卡斯尔简直就是一头野兽。他突破篮筐时气势汹汹，并且展现了比平时更好的手感。当他的外线投篮能够命中时，几乎无法阻挡他。他的组织能力也是一个加分项，并且他减少了失误。卡斯尔的防守并不特别引人注目，但并非因为缺乏努力。他在防守端努力拼抢——有时甚至过于努力。
评分：A-
杰里米·索汉(Jeremy Sochan)
当索汉在场上时，马刺队看起来更好。他是球队最好的篮板手，并且打出了应有的身体对抗。他的队友们有时会投机取巧地结束进攻，但索汉始终如一地挺身而出，努力制造机会。我很喜欢他在进攻端的大部分表现。如果说有什么不足的话，那就是他本可以更具侵略性。
评分：B+
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊继续在替补席上表现出色。他的三分球看起来比整个赛季都更加流畅。他的决策变得更加明智，并且他的失误也越来越少。我喜欢他在篮板和防守端的努力。约翰逊对阵国王队的不足之处在于他缺乏突破上篮。这本来是他最近的拿手好戏，但在萨克拉门托却不见踪影。
评分：B
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼在防守端表现不错，但他错失了两个三分球，并且在他出场的12分钟内没有投中任何球。
评分：C
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利(Sandro Mamukelashvili)
马穆克拉什维利重新进入轮换阵容，并且表现不错。由于国王队有时会使用大型阵容，他拉开空间并命中三分球的能力很有用。马穆在防守端有时显得身材矮小，但他全力以赴，并在防守端生存了下来。事后看来，如果他能得到更多的上场时间，可能会对球队有所帮助。
评分：B
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊尝试了不同的策略和阵容，但他未能找到有效的解决方案来对抗国王队。福克斯得到了一些不错的投篮机会，但战术安排本可以更好。轮换阵容并不糟糕，但有时缺乏逻辑。
评分：C-
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Sacramento Kings – Game #61
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Sacramento Kings – Game #61
In De’Aaron Fox’s return to Sacramento, the San Antonio Spurs didn’t find much success. The Kings never trailed in the second half on their way to a 127-109 victory. San Antonio’s record dropped to 26-35 with the loss.
The Spurs got off to a good start in Sacramento. At the end of the first quarter, the good guys had a 26-20 lead. Unfortunately, the Kings went on a 27-8 run in the second quarter to blow the game open. After halftime, San Antonio failed to put together a sustained run.
All in all, there weren’t many positives to take away from this affair. Fox didn’t play well in his homecoming and the Spurs weren’t able to compete.
Stats: Spurs at Kings
Spurs at Kings – Final Grades
De’Aaron Fox
Yeah, no, this wasn’t the type of outing Fox hoped to have in his return to Sacramento. He hit his first shot but then struggled mightily after that. The Kings deserve some credit for their defense but Fox was also missing open shots. Passing-wise, he was okay but was sometimes slow to hit open teammates. He took adequately good care of the ball, however Fox could have been better on the defensive end. Overall, Fox hasn’t played well lately and isn’t doing a whole lot to help San Antonio win games.
Grade: D+
Devin Vassell
The good: Defensively, I liked a lot of what I saw from Vassell. This is two straight games where he looks like an above average perimeter defender. His shot-selection was decent and he finished the game without a turnover. The bad: A game after scoring a career-high 37 points, Vassell was back to struggling with his outside shot. Without a trustworthy jumper, he doesn’t do enough else to really be an impactful player.
Grade: C
Chris Paul
Offensively, Paul was mostly fine. He hit a trio of three-pointers, handed out six assists and only turned it over once. The Kings left him quite a bit so a few more shot attempts would have been justified. Defensively, Paul gave effort but it was difficult for the Spurs to hide him — particularly in rotations.
Grade: C+
Harrison Barnes
Barnes did good work on the offensive end. He hit four three-pointers and was decisive with his decisions. Defensively, Barnes didn’t look to be fully locked in. He didn’t do much work on the glass, his one-on-one D was lacking and he was late to help. Barnes had extra pep in his step but he wasn’t able to move the needle as much as he would have liked.
Grade: B-
Bismack Biyombo
Biyombo wasn’t terrible but he was more of a liability than an asset on this night. Offensively, he got in the way too often and the Kings only paid minimal attention to him. Defensively, he was giving good effort but the Kings were able to score over and around him. Biyombo’s work on the defensive glass also left a lot to be desired.
Grade: C-
Stephon Castle
It’s starting to sound like a broken record at this point but Castle’s play was the silver lining for the Spurs. He shot well from all locations on his way to 25 points in 26 minutes. The only reason he didn’t do even more is he battled foul trouble and ended up fouling out. On offense, Castle was simply a beast. His drives to the basket were fierce and he showed off better than normal touch. When his perimeter shots are finding the net, he’s almost impossible to stop. His playmaking was a plus and he limited his mistakes. Castle’s defense wasn’t especially notable but it wasn’t for a lack of effort. He was scrapping on that end — sometimes too much, in fact.
Grade: A-
Jeremy Sochan
The Spurs looked better when Sochan was on the court. He was the team’s best rebounder and he played with the proper amount of physicality. He had teammates shortcutting possessions but Sochan was reliably putting his body on the line in an attempt to make plays. I liked a majority of what I saw from him on the offensive end. If anything he could have been more aggressive on that end.
Grade: B+
Keldon Johnson
Johnson continues to play well off the bench. His three-point stroke looks cleaner than it has all season. His decision-making has been smart and his miscues are coming less and less often. I liked his effort on the glass and on the defensive end. Johnson’s shortcoming against the Kings was his lack of driving the ball to the hoop. That has been his bread and butter lately but it was missing in action in Sacramento.
Grade: B
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie did pretty good on the defensive end but he missed both of his three-point attempts and didn’t make a shot from the field in his 12 minutes of play.
Grade: C
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Mamukelashvili re-entered the rotation and he did well. With the Kings using big lineups at times, his ability to stretch the floor and hit threes was useful. Mamu looked undersized on defense at times but he gave it his all and survived on that end. In retrospect, he probably would have helped the cause if he had been given more minutes.
Grade: B
Mitch Johnson
Johnson was trying different strategies and lineups but he couldn’t find a working solution to compete against the Kings. Fox got some good shots but the playcalling probably could have been better. The rotation wasn’t horrible but it sometimes lacked rhyme and reason.
Grade: C-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk