By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-03-04 15:44:23
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队对阵俄克拉荷马城雷霆队时火力全开，但雷霆队最终以146-132的比分击败了“好人”。马刺队在结束“牛仔竞技表演之旅”后的第一场比赛中遭遇失利，战绩降至25胜34负。俄克拉荷马雷霆队则凭借这场胜利将战绩提升至49胜11负。
上半场，马刺队在主场球迷面前表现出色。他们在半场前三分球26投16中，以77-72领先。圣安东尼奥的球的运转非常流畅，几乎每个空位投篮都能命中。
不幸的是，火热的投篮状态在下半场没有延续。马刺队在下半场的前13次三分球尝试全部失手，而雷霆队的进攻则越来越火热。第四节，雷霆队成功拉开了差距。马刺队直到垃圾时间才再次命中三分球。
总而言之，圣安东尼奥在146-132的失利中表现出了顽强的斗志，但他们的防守不足以限制西部联盟头号强队。
数据：马刺队 vs. 雷霆队
马刺队 vs. 雷霆队 – 最终评分
德阿隆·福克斯(De’Aaron Fox)
福克斯表现尚可，但更多的是“空砍”。18次投篮出手得到20分，说得客气点，表现远非出色。他的组织进攻并不犀利，虽然只出现了一次失误值得肯定。福克斯在防守端付出了一定的努力，但很少对防守端产生影响。
评分：C
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
瓦塞尔继续拖累圣安东尼奥的比赛节奏。在防守端，他偶尔会爆发能量，但缺乏稳定性。在进攻端，瓦塞尔继续在投篮选择上挣扎，他的三分球不再值得信赖。他在33分钟内没有出现失误，但他未能让自己或队友的比赛变得轻松。
评分：C-
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
保罗的产量令人失望。他命中了所有两次投篮，但在28分钟内只有6分和6次助攻。马刺队需要保罗在进攻端做出更多贡献，才能弥补他在防守端的失分。这个版本的39岁保罗过于被动了。
评分：C
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯有充分的理由成为首发阵容中表现最好的一员。他的三分球投篮命中率很高，并且在禁区内打出了强硬的表现。他的突破很坚决，并且在移动中做出了正确的决定。巴恩斯的防守不太成功。29分钟内只抢到一个篮板是不够的，尤其是当他的其他防守表现最多只能算是平庸时。
评分：B-
比斯马克·比永博(Bismack Biyombo)
比永博表现不算糟糕，但他并没有在积极的方向上产生太大的影响。他在防守端根本无法减缓雷霆队的攻势。在进攻端，俄克拉荷马雷霆队忽视了他，比永博也很少能让雷霆队付出代价。
评分：C
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
毫无疑问，卡斯尔的表现是马刺队的一线希望。这位新秀上演了一场精彩的表演。他在32分钟内得到全队最高的32分。卡斯尔远投出色，突破到内线时很难被阻止，并且以老将的节奏打球。他的传球比平时略显松散，但他送出了不少不错的机会。在防守端，他付出了很大的努力，但他很难在防守端产生影响。话说回来，当对方得到146分时，这意味着每个人在防守端都遇到了问题。
评分：A-
杰里米·索汉(Jeremy Sochan)
索汉表现强劲。他高效地得到了17分，同时送出了许多明智的传球。但他本可以减少进攻端的失误。在防守端，索汉很努力，但他本可以在篮板方面做得更好，并且可以更好地阻止对手的突破。
评分：B+
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
考虑到他所处的环境，约翰逊对阵俄克拉荷马城雷霆队时表现相当不错。他很快陷入了犯规麻烦，但他能够留在场上。雷霆队非常关注他，但约翰逊通过增加传球来调整。他的防守没有什么特别之处，但他在篮板方面做得很好。约翰逊的表现不算出色，但他足以证明他的火热状态仍在延续。
评分：B+
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼的夜晚将因他在一次轻微的冲突后被驱逐出场而被人们记住。被罚出场很可惜，因为尚帕尼实际上打得非常好。他投篮命中率高，做出正确的判断，并且防守表现令人满意。当尚帕尼被“请”出场时，马刺队失去了他们当晚最好的球员之一。
评分：B+
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
嗯，首发五虎不行的情况越来越明显了。约翰逊很可能需要尽快做出改变。替补席现在打得非常好，但首发阵容几乎不可能赢得比赛。
评分：C-
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder – Game #59
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder – Game #59
The San Antonio Spurs put a lot of points on the board against the Oklahoma City Thunder but the Thunder ultimately outgunned the good guys by a final score of 146-132. The Spurs, who were playing their first game following the Rodeo Road Trip, dropped to 25-34 with the loss. OKC improved their record to 49-11 with the win.
In the first half, the Spurs were on fire in front of their home fans. They were 16-for-26 from three-point land before halftime and led 77-72 at the break. San Antonio’s ball-movement was great and they were knocking down practically every open shot.
Unfortunately, the hot shooting didn’t continue after intermission. The Spurs missed their first 13 three-pointers of the second half as OKC’s offense got hotter and hotter. In the fourth quarter, the Thunder were able to run away with it. The Spurs didn’t hit another three-pointer until garbage time commenced.
All in all, San Antonio put up a good fight in the 146-132 defeat but their defense just wasn’t up to the task of slowing the top team in the Western Conference.
Stats: Spurs at Thunder
Spurs at Thunder – Final Grades
De’Aaron Fox
Fox was decent but it was a lot of empty calorie play. Scoring 20 points on 18 field goal attempts is less than stellar, to put it kindly. His playmaking wasn’t sharp, although he deserves credit for only turning it over once. Fox gave decent effort on defense but rarely made an impact on that end.
Grade: C
Devin Vassell
Vassell continues to bog down San Antonio’s play. Defensively, there are sporadic bursts of energy but consistency on that side of the ball is missing. Offensively, Vassell continues to struggle with shot-selection and his three-point shot is no longer trustworthy. He didn’t turn the ball over in his 33 minutes but he’s failing to make the game easy for himself or his teammates.
Grade: C-
Chris Paul
Paul’s rate of production was lackluster. He hit both of his shots from the field but he had just six points and six assists in 28 minutes. The Spurs need more from Paul on offense to overcome the points he’s giving up on the defensive end. This version of the 39-year-old is much too passive.
Grade: C
Harrison Barnes
Barnes has a strong case that he was the best of the starters. He shot well from three-point range and played with toughness inside of the arc. His driving was hard-headed and he made the right decisions on the move. Defense wasn’t as successful for Barnes. One rebound in 29 minutes isn’t enough, especially when the rest of his defensive play was mediocre at best.
Grade: B-
Bismack Biyombo
Biyombo wasn’t bad but he didn’t move the needle much in the positive direction. He struggled to slow the Thunder at all on the defensive end. Offensively, OKC ignored him and Biyombo was rarely able to make the Thunder pay.
Grade: C
Stephon Castle
Unquestionably, the silver lining for the Spurs was Castle’s play. The rookie put on a show. He scored a team-high 32 points in 32 minutes. Castle shot it well from distance, was very difficult to stop when going to the paint and played at a veteran’s pace. His passing was a little bit looser than usual but he had a handful of solid looks. Defensively, he gave really good effort but he struggled to make much of a difference on that end. Then again, when the other team puts 146 points on the board, that means that everyone was having issues on that end.
Grade: A-
Jeremy Sochan
Sochan was stout. He put 17 efficient points on the scoreboard while also making a lot of heady passes. He could have limited his offensive mistakes, however. Defensively, Sochan was efforting but he could have done more rebounding-wise and he could have done a better job of staying in front of drivers.
Grade: B+
Keldon Johnson
Johnson did pretty good against Oklahoma City given the situations he found himself in. He got in quick foul trouble but was able to stay in the game. The Thunder were paying him a lot of attention but Johnson adjusted by passing more. His defense wasn’t anything too special but he did well on the boards. Johnson wasn’t great but he did enough to confirm that his hot streak continues.
Grade: B+
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie’s evening will be remembered for the fact that he got ejected following a mild dustup. Getting tossed was a shame because Champagnie was actually playing really well. He was knocking down shots, making the right reads and playing acceptable defense. The Spurs lost one of their best players on this night when Champagnie got the ol’ heave-ho.
Grade: B+
Mitch Johnson
Uh, it’s getting painfully obvious that the starting five isn’t working. Johnson most likely needs to switch things up sooner rather than later. The bench is playing pretty well right now but the starters are making it nearly impossible to win.
Grade: C-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk