By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-02-23 16:18:16
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
在得知维克托·文班亚马(Victor Wembanyama)因肩部血栓将缺席本赛季剩余比赛后，圣安东尼奥马刺队迎来了第二场比赛，他们以125-110彻底输给了底特律活塞队。马刺队的战绩降至24胜30负，而活塞队的战绩则提升至30胜26负。
圣安东尼奥的开局异常缓慢。第一节结束时，活塞队以36-27领先。马刺队在第二节展现出复苏的迹象，甚至一度反超比分几分钟。
不幸的是，马刺队在第三节初段崩溃。活塞队在下半场开始不到四分钟的时间里打出了一波19-0的攻势，马刺队再也未能构成威胁。
数据：马刺队 vs. 活塞队
马刺队 vs. 活塞队 – 最终评分
达龙·福克斯(De’Aaron Fox)
很难找到福克斯对阵活塞队的比赛中有任何问题。在防守端，他非常积极，对抗性强，并且抢下了全队最高的4次抢断。在进攻端，福克斯高效地拿下了27分。他的投篮命中率很高，在快攻中显得格外迅速。福克斯可以做得更好的主要领域是传球。有几次他没能在正确的时间做出正确的传球，导致了全队的得分荒。
评分：A-
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
在文班亚马缺阵的情况下，瓦塞尔需要承担更大的进攻角色。周五晚上并没有发生这种情况——委婉地说。他的投篮很差，选择的投篮时机不明智，并且在23分钟内没有贡献一次助攻。瓦塞尔需要摆脱进攻低迷的状态，尤其因为他的防守也非常不稳定。对阵底特律，他的防守甚至比平时更糟糕。
评分：D+
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
这肯定是保罗本赛季效率最低的一场比赛。22分钟内得到3分和2次助攻？不，这远远不够。他在防守端也是一个漏洞。39岁的他能否以高水平结束本赛季，或者是否会在最后阶段状态下滑，这将很有趣。
评分：D-
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯和保罗一样，表现平平。这位老将在21分钟内没有得分，而充满活力的活塞队有时让他显得老态龙钟。巴恩斯做出了几次不错的传球，并限制了他在进攻端的失误，但他的防守平淡无奇，能量也降到了最低。
评分：D
俾斯麦·比永博(Bismack Biyombo)
比永博在首次代表马刺队首发时表现稳健。活塞队的比赛是比永博的第二次首发，情况并没有那么顺利。尽管他只被记录了两次失误，但他通常会被发现在进攻端笨手笨脚。在防守端，他可能更糟糕。比永博可能是一个有用的球员，但对阵底特律他并非如此。
评分：D
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊的表现是马刺队的一线希望。在进攻端，他非常出色。当他冲向篮筐时，几乎无法阻挡。他在内线的触球非常出色，他的决策也无可挑剔。当晚，当马刺队让约翰逊成为球队的进攻核心时，他们的表现最好。他可以成为一名才华横溢的进攻球员；让我们希望在接下来的比赛中看到这一点，尤其是在文班亚马缺阵的情况下。
评分：A
杰里米·索汉(Jeremy Sochan)
这对索汉来说是一次有点奇怪的出场。他的七次投篮尝试中有五次来自三分线外。他的篮板球表现迟缓，他的组织能力被削弱，他的防守强度也消失了。索汉时不时地会有一些不错的表现，但他需要表现出更多的热情和活力，才能成为一个有价值的齿轮。
评分：C-
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利(Sandro Mamukelashvili)
马穆克拉什维利获得了上场实战分钟的机会，并且做了很多好事。在进攻端，他无球跑动、传球技巧和积极性都成为了积极的特点。马穆本赛季的得分表现强劲，对阵活塞队也是如此。在防守端，他通过抢篮板和在球场上飞奔来提供帮助。
评分：B+
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼在他上场的14分钟内没有投进一球。在二月份，他的三分球命中率下降到31%，他的得分率也下降了。为了提供价值，尚帕尼必须弄清楚如何即使在替补席上也能成为一名喷火器。
评分：C-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔只打了13分钟。在那段时间里，他并不缺乏侵略性。他出手了9次，并尝试了5次罚球。虽然他可能有点太频繁地叫自己的名字了，但我不能抱怨那种程度的自信。这位新秀不会退缩——这就是为什么他的上限如此之高。卡斯尔在攻防两端都犯了一些错误，但这并不是因为缺乏努力或自信。
评分：B-
查尔斯·巴锡(Charles Bassey)
在因内侧副韧带扭伤缺席两周多后，巴锡回到了阵容中。他看起来很稳健。他投中了所有的三次投篮，在篮板上拼抢，并做出了正确的传球。巴锡在防守端看起来有点慢，这也导致他在11分钟内犯规三次。
评分：B
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
只让卡斯尔上场13分钟简直太疯狂了……我不会撒谎。这个数字必须增加。其余的轮换阵容还算不错。我喜欢KJ成为一个焦点，尤其是在他进入状态之后。福克斯也被安排在能够成功的阵地战中。
评分：C
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Detroit Pistons – Game #54
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Detroit Pistons – Game #54
Playing their second game since learning that Victor Wembanyama would miss the rest of the season due to a blood clot in his shoulder, the San Antonio Spurs were thoroughly defeated by the Detroit Pistons, 125-110. The Spurs dropped to a record of 24-30, while the Pistons improved to 30-26.
San Antonio came out of the gates painfully slow. At the end of the first quarter, the Pistons held a 36-27 advantage. The Spurs showed signs of life in the second quarter and were actually able to get out in front for a few minutes.
Unfortunately, things fell apart early in the third quarter for the Spurs. The Pistons completed a 19-0 run less than four minutes into the second half and the Spurs were never able to threaten again.
Stats: Spurs vs. Pistons
Spurs vs. Pistons – Final Grades
De’Aaron Fox
It’s difficult to find any issues with how Fox played against the Pistons. Defensively, he was very active, physical and swiped a team-high four steals. Offensively, Fox efficiently put 27 points on the board. He shot well from the field and looked extra quick in the open court. The main area where Fox could have done better was passing. There were a handful of times where he failed to make the right pass at the right time, which resulted in team-wide droughts.
Grade: A-
Devin Vassell
With Wembanyama out, Vassell needs to step into a bigger offensive role. That didn’t happen on Friday night — to put it gently. He shot poorly, he picked his spots unwisely and he failed to tally an assist in 23 minutes. Vassell needs to snap out of his offensive funk, especially because his defense is also really inconsistent. Versus Detroit, his D was even worse than usual.
Grade: D+
Chris Paul
This has to have been Paul’s most unproductive game of the season. Three points and two assists in 22 minutes? Yeah, no, that won’t get it done. He was also a liability on defense. It’ll be interesting to see if the 39-year-old can finish the season on a high note or if he’ll fade down the stretch.
Grade: D-
Harrison Barnes
Barnes, like Paul, did very little. The fellow veteran was scoreless in 21 minutes and the feisty Pistons made him look old at times. Barnes made a few good passes and limited his mistakes on offense but his defense was underwhelming and his energy was minimal.
Grade: D
Bismack Biyombo
Biyombo looked rock solid in his first start for the Spurs. The Pistons game was Biyombo’s second start and things didn’t go nearly as well. Although he was only credited with two turnovers, he could typically be found fumbling or bumbling on the offensive end. Defensively, he might have been even worse. Biyombo can be a useful player but he wasn’t that versus Detroit.
Grade: D
Keldon Johnson
Johnson’s play was the silver lining for the Silver and Black. Offensively, he was pretty darn good. When he got going toward the rim, he was nearly impossible to stop. His touch in the lane was outstanding and his decision-making was impeccable. The Spurs looked their best on this night when they had Johnson playing as the team’s go-to player. He can be a talented offensive player; let’s hope we see that down the stretch, especially with Wembanyama sidelined.
Grade: A
Jeremy Sochan
It was a bit of a strange outing for Sochan. Five of his seven field goal attempts were from beyond the three-point arc. His rebounding was lethargic, his playmaking was muted and his defensive intensity was missing in action. Sochan had moments here and there of solid play but he needs to play with more enthusiasm and electricity to be a valuable cog.
Grade: C-
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Mamukelashvili got a chance to play real minutes and did a lot of good. Offensively, his movement away from the ball, passing acumen and hustle all stood out as positive traits. Mamu has had a strong scoring season and that was again the case against the Pistons. Defensively, he helped out by rebounding and by flying around the court.
Grade: B+
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie didn’t hit a shot during his 14 minutes on the court. For the month of February, his three-point shooting is down to 31% and his scoring rate is also down. For Champagnie to provide value, he’s going to have to figure out how to be a flamethrower even when he’s coming off the bench.
Grade: C-
Stephon Castle
Castle only played 13 minutes. In that time, he didn’t lack aggression. He shot nine times from the field and attempted five free throws. While he might have called his own number a little too often, I can’t complain about that level of confidence. The rookie backs down from no one — and that’s why his ceiling is so high. Castle had a few mistakes on both ends but it wasn’t for a lack of effort or self-assuredness.
Grade: B-
Charles Bassey
Bassey was back in the lineup after missing more than two weeks with a sprained MCL. He looked solid. He hit all three of his shots from the field, battled on the boards and made the right passes. Bassey looked a little slower on defense, which played a part in him picking up three fouls in 11 minutes.
Grade: B
Mitch Johnson
Playing Castle for only 13 minutes is pretty insane … I’m not going to lie. That number has to go up. The rest of the rotation was decent enough. I liked KJ being a focal point, particularly after he got going. Fox was also put in positions to succeed.
Grade: C
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk