马刺 @ 森林狼 110 - 112 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2024-12-30 15:59:48
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
在一场精彩的你来我往的比赛中，圣安东尼奥马刺以112-110惜败明尼苏达森林狼。这场失利使马刺队的战绩回到了16胜16负，而森林狼队的战绩则为17胜14负。
马刺队在第一节表现出色，以33-25领先结束该节。不幸的是，第二节马刺队陷入了困境。森林狼队加强了防守，将马刺队的得分限制在12分。
在面对两位数的落后时，马刺队并没有放弃，而是在第三节奋起直追。比赛进入最后一节时，双方战成平局，并在接下来的比赛中一直保持胶着状态。马刺队在最后几分钟有多次机会扳平或反超比分，但他们都没能跨过这道坎。
数据：马刺对阵森林狼
马刺对阵森林狼 – 最终评分
文班亚马(Victor Wembanyama)
优点：我喜欢文班亚马的侵略性。他出手30次，我对此没有任何异议。文班亚马的激情和决心是马刺队反击的领军特质。他投进了很多关键球，而且他的活力十足。在这场身体对抗激烈、紧张的比赛中，只出现一次失误和零犯规堪称奇迹。表现不错，努力可嘉。缺点：文班亚马在第四节末段似乎体力不支，错失了最后四个三分球和一个本可以扳平比分的罚球。他的篮板球整场比赛都不够，而且他的篮筐保护也没有像往常那样出色。文班亚马在比赛的各个方面的决策都有待改进。总体而言：这位法国巨人效率很高，如果没有他，马刺队早就崩盘了。话虽如此，以他极高的标准来看，他本可以打得更好。
评分：B+
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
有所进步。瓦塞尔的投篮选择有时令人担忧，但总的来说，他在团队配合方面做得更好。他的远投和近投都很出色，贡献了四次助攻，并且没有失误。我认为他的防守也越来越好，瓦塞尔还抢下了七个篮板球。他还有提升的空间，需要继续学习如何在不脱离团队战术的情况下打球，但这是一个朝着正确方向迈出的一步。
评分：B+
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
森林狼队显然想限制保罗——而且他们在一定程度上成功了。他六投全失，其中包括四个三分球。然而，他罚球6罚6中，送出了14次助攻，而且没有失误。他对进攻的组织堪称完美，当保罗掌控进攻时，马刺队无疑处于最佳状态。在防守端，他同样令人印象深刻。保罗非常积极地沟通，并试图抢断他附近的一切球。
评分：B+
索汉(Jeremy Sochan)
首先，索汉的防守值得称赞。他是安东尼·爱德华兹的主要防守者，后者全场20投仅6中。他在外线的不懈努力值得掌声。不幸的是，索汉今晚的比赛也有一些弱点。他的篮板球表现不佳，控球过于随意，并且在得分方面也存在问题。8投2中是不及格的，尤其是在明尼苏达没有过多关注他的情况下。还必须指出的是，索汉错失了最后时刻本可以成为制胜一球的三分。
评分：B-
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
在经历了一系列平庸的比赛后，巴恩斯在明尼苏达打出了一场精彩的比赛。他9投8中，得到24分。他积极参与进攻，并且从未松懈。当他想要得分时，巴恩斯是一个宝贵的进攻武器。从快速出手的三分球到强硬的突破上篮，他在对阵森林狼的比赛中无所不能。然而，令人遗憾的是，巴恩斯的防守还有很多不足之处。当马刺队被突破时，通常是他的责任。尽管如此，今晚巴恩斯的进攻弥补了他在防守端的不足。
评分：A-
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
考虑到其他替补球员的表现都非常糟糕，约翰逊的表现值得称赞。他三分球5投0中，但两分球6投5中，并增加了三次罚球。他在篮下的终结能力很重要，而且他打得很干净。约翰逊的防守也比平常更好。如果他能提高三分命中率并增加组织进攻，那就更好了——但再次强调，他是今晚圣安东尼奥表现最好的替补球员。
评分：B
特雷·琼斯(Tre Jones)
琼斯出场13分钟，但没有取得太多成就。他在进攻端保护球——但也仅此而已。他完成了一次上篮和几次助攻，但他对球的保护才是真正引人注目的地方。在防守端，他很努力，但琼斯弊大于利。
评分：C
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
好吧，尚帕尼在11分钟的出场时间里一分未得。他四投全失，包括两个三分球。值得称赞的是，即使他没有得分，他的防守也相当不错。
评分：C
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
这肯定是卡斯尔新秀赛季最糟糕的一场比赛，他在场上度过了令人难忘的八分钟。在这段时间里，他出现了四次失误，这尤其令人震惊，因为整个球队只有九次失误。除了这些失误之外，他唯一一次出手还是一次不明智的三分球。希望卡斯尔能尽快从这场糟糕的表现中恢复过来。
评分：F
扎克·科林斯(Zach Collins)
这是科林斯三周以来的第一次出场——他的状态生疏显而易见。他的表现很糟糕。最突出的是他糟糕的篮板球表现。他的反应速度慢得像冰川，而且没有展现出任何韧性。在科林斯的七分钟出场时间里，他只犯规三次，失误一次，并投丢了一个三分球。他今晚的表现不应该再给他任何上场时间。
评分：D-
查尔斯·巴塞(Charles Bassey)
巴塞打球漫不经心，最终失去了轮换阵容的位置，被科林斯取代。他的数据看起来不错，但巴塞必须打得比今晚更有激情。
评分：D+
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
我其实很喜欢大部分的战术安排。约翰逊成功地让文班亚马早早地参与到比赛中来。为瓦塞尔、约翰逊和巴恩斯设计的战术通常都能收到成效。防守策略也还不错。然而，约翰逊的轮换阵容安排还有很多不足之处。使用科林斯是一个错误。事实上，他对整个替补阵容的使用都让人难以理解。然而，最要命的是教练组没能给文班亚马足够的休息时间。这位二年级巨星在第四节末段明显体力透支，这显然是失利的一个重要因素。
评分：C-
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Minnesota Timberwolves – Game #32
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Minnesota Timberwolves – Game #32
In an entertaining back and forth affair, the San Antonio Spurs lost a close one to the Minnesota Timberwolves by a final count of 112-110. The loss drops the Spurs back to .500 at 16-16, while the Timberwolves are now 17-14 on the season.
The good guys were rolling in the first quarter and led 33-25 at the end of the period. Unfortunately, the second quarter included a lot of the Spurs struggling. The Timberwolves locked in defensively and held San Antonio to 12 points in the second.
Instead of folding after facing a double-digit deficit, the Spurs rallied back in the third quarter. The game was tied heading into the final stanza and remained close the rest of the way. The Spurs had multiple opportunities to tie or go ahead in the closing minutes but they couldn’t quite get over the hump.
Stats: Spurs at Timberwolves
Spurs at Timberwolves – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
The good: I loved Wembanyama’s aggression. I don’t have a problem with him shooting 30 times. Wembanyama’s passion and determination were leading traits in San Antonio’s comeback. He hit many big shots and his motor was always on. Finishing with one turnover and zero fouls in this physical, intense game was miraculous. Good try, good effort. The bad: Wembanyama seemed to be running on fumes late in the fourth quarter and missed his final four three-pointers and a free throw that could have tied it. His rebounding was lacking throughout the game and his rim protection wasn’t nearly as special as usual. Wembanyama’s decision-making could have been better in all aspects of the game. Overall: The large Frenchman was very productive and the Spurs would have been toast without him. That said, he could have played better based on his very high standards.
Grade: B+
Devin Vassell
Better. Vassell’s shot-selection was scary at times but, all in all, he did a better job of playing as part of the team. He shot the ball well from all distances, he tallied four assists and didn’t turn the ball over. I also thought his defense got better and better and Vassell aided the cause with seven rebounds. He has room to keep improving and keep learning how to stay without the team concepts but this was a step in the right direction.
Grade: B+
Chris Paul
The Timberwolves clearly wanted to slow down Paul — and they had some success in doing just that. He missed all six shots from the field, including four from downtown. However, he was 6-for-6 from the free throw line and dished out 14 assists without turning the ball over. His running of the offense was pristine and the Spurs were unquestionably at their best when it was Paul orchestrating the attack. Defensively, he was impressive. Paul was very vocal and he was trying to swipe anything in his vicinity.
Grade: B+
Jeremy Sochan
First of all, Sochan deserves a lot of credit for his defense. He was the primary defender on Anthony Edwards, who was 6-for-20 from the field. His relentless effort out on the perimeter was applause-worthy. Unfortunately, there were some weaknesses to Sochan’s game tonight. His rebounding was poor, he was too sloppy with the ball and he had issues putting the ball in the basket. Going 2-for-8 won’t get it done, especially because Minnesota wasn’t paying much attention to him. It must also be noted that it was Sochan who missed what would have been a game-winning three-pointer in the closing seconds.
Grade: B-
Harrison Barnes
Barnes rebounded after a string of nondescript games with a fine outing in Minnesota. He scored 24 points on 8-for-9 shooting from the field. He got himself involved and never took his foot off the gas. When he’s looking to score, Barnes is a valuable offensive piece. From quick trigger three-pointers to hard-nosed drives to the cup, he was doing it all against the Timberwolves. Regrettably, though, Barnes’ defense left a lot to be desired. When the Spurs were getting burned off the dribble, it was usually his fault. That said, on this night, Barnes’ offense more than picked up the slack.
Grade: A-
Keldon Johnson
Considering that the rest of the bench was pretty damn bad, Johnson deserves credit for keeping his head above water. He was 0-for-5 from three-point range but was 5-for-6 from inside of the arc and added three free throws. His finishing at the rim was important and he played a clean brand of basketball. Johnson’s defense was also better than usual. Improved three-point shooting and more playmaking would be appreciated — but, again, he was by far the best reserve tonight for San Antonio.
Grade: B
Tre Jones
Jones played 13 minutes and didn’t get a lot done. He took care of the ball on offense — but that was about it. He had a layup and a couple assists but it was the safety of the ball in his hands that really stood out. Defensively, the effort was there but Jones did more harm than good on that end.
Grade: C
Julian Champagnie
Welp, Champagnie went scoreless in 11 minutes of play. He missed all four of his shots from the field, including a pair from three-point territory. To Champagnie’s credit, he did play pretty good defense even though he put up a goose egg in the scoring column.
Grade: C
Stephon Castle
In what has to be Castle’s worst game of his rookie campaign, he spent eight forgettable minutes on the court. In that time he turned the ball over four times, which was extra egregious because the entire team only had nine turnovers. Beyond those miscues, his one shot from the field was an ill-advised three-pointer. No, yeah, let’s hope Castle bounces back quickly from this poor showing.
Grade: F
Zach Collins
This was Collins’ first minutes in three weeks — and the rust was painfully obvious. He was bad. What stood out most of all was his poor rebounding. His reaction speed was glacial and he showed no toughness. In Collins’ seven minutes, all he did was foul three times, turn it over and miss a three-point shot. Nothing he did tonight should win him any further playing time.
Grade: D-
Charles Bassey
Bassey was playing nonchalant basketball and then eventually lost his spot in the rotation to Collins. His numbers look fine but Bassey has to play with more fire than what we witnessed this evening.
Grade: D+
Mitch Johnson
I actually liked the playcalling for the most part. Johnson successfully got Wembanyama involved early and often. Plays called for Vassell, KJ and Barnes usually paid dividends. The defensive gameplan was also fine. Johnson’s rotation left much to be desired, though. Going to Collins was a mistake. In fact, his entire usage of the bench unit didn’t make a whole lot of sense. Most damning, however, was the coaching staff failing to get Wembanyama enough rest in the second half. The superstar sophomore was obviously exhausted in the end stages of the fourth quarter, which clearly played a part in the loss.
Grade: C-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk