By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2024-12-29 18:30:33
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队（16胜15负）以96-87的比分战胜了布鲁克林篮网队（12胜19负），胜率重回50%以上。篮网队虽然人员极其短缺，但他们战斗到了最后一刻。马刺队最终还是做了足够的努力，避免了一场令人失望的失利。
马刺队在第一节进攻陷入泥潭，仅得到11分。他们在第二节奋起反击，并在第三节拉开了比分。篮网队在第四节无力持续追分，马刺队轻松取胜。
数据统计：马刺对阵篮网
马刺对阵篮网 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马(Victor Wembanyama)
文班亚马这场比赛感觉相对低调，但他最终又一次填满了数据单。在进攻端，他不如以往那样频繁地出手。值得称赞的是，他让自己的得分更有价值。文班亚马在下半场早段得到的11分帮助马刺队获得了拉开比分的势头。他的传球稳健，失误很少，并且再次展现了惊人的护框能力。文班亚马本可以更加自信，更强硬地冲击篮筐以获得更多罚球机会——但是，尽管存在一些瑕疵，对于这位大个子来说，这又是一场高质量的比赛。
评分：B+
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
优点：瓦塞尔在传球方面做得更好；他积极地寻找并找到了队友。他在防守端的积极性也是一个加分项。瓦塞尔5投2中，三分球命中率不错，而且只出现了一次失误。缺点：虽然他的三分球投得不错，但两分球11投仅2中。正如这项数据所示，他的终结能力很差，并且选择了低命中率的投篮。不幸的是，瓦塞尔开始缺乏自信也变得越来越明显。
评分：C-
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
保罗比平时更多地分担了控球职责，三分球3投0中。虽然他的数据最终看起来并不太亮眼，但保罗在控制球和组织进攻方面做得很好。他的决策非常正确，并在最需要的时刻挺身而出。
评分：B
杰里米·索汉(Jeremy Sochan)
索汉继续着他的出色表现。对阵篮网的比赛中，他的篮板球是他最突出的优势。他在篮板球上的蛮力是一项重要资产。索汉从开场哨就一直给对手制造麻烦，他坚决的突破为他赢得了8次罚球机会。再加上防守端的拼搏、有限的失误、高质量的传球和一些强硬的终结，所有这些加起来，索汉又打出了一场好球。
评分：B+
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
考虑到巴恩斯最近进攻端的低迷，这场比赛实际上是朝着正确方向迈出的一步。他在进攻端更加积极，更多地参与其中。在防守端，巴恩斯表现得更好，但他在防守端的活力和篮板球的拼抢方面仍有很大的提升空间。巴恩斯没有失误和犯规也值得称赞。
评分：C+
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊最近在比赛中有些迷失，所以很高兴看到他在对阵布鲁克林的比赛中扮演了更积极的角色。他的队友都在寻找他，而约翰逊也没有让人失望。他像一头攻城锤一样冲击篮筐，命中了一记三分球，他的决策也很可靠。我甚至认为他的防守也更好了。约翰逊在防守端脚步移动积极，并且积极拼抢篮板。
评分：B
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
老实说，我担心尚帕尼对替补角色的转变不会有很好的适应。值得庆幸的是，这个转变基本上是无缝的。尚帕尼在20分钟内砍下18分，投篮命中率极高。只要他保持稳定的投篮，并在防守端全力以赴，他几乎肯定会继续在轮换阵容中扮演重要角色。
评分：A-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
优点：卡斯尔在进攻端的侵略性值得称道。他一点也不羞于让自己参与到进攻中。对于一个新秀来说，这是一个令人印象深刻的特质。我也喜欢卡斯尔的防守。他在防守端非常专注，并且很有破坏性。缺点：卡斯尔在进攻端的效率再次不高。他的投篮看起来不太好；他在罚球线上的手感尤其令人担忧。此外，卡斯尔的传球也不如往常。
评分：C
特雷·琼斯(Tre Jones)
琼斯最近经常打出这样的比赛。他上场后以惊人的速度送出助攻，而很少自己得分。这种策略一直很有效，替补阵容也因此更加 cohesive。琼斯的防守也很稳固，并且在攻防两端都积极奔跑。然而，最终他可能需要成为一个更可靠的得分手才能保持影响力。
评分：B
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊在球队开局低迷的情况下帮助球队渡过难关，值得称赞。看起来他的球队没有做好准备，但约翰逊做出了足够正确的调整，让球队回到了正轨。他的九人轮换阵容发挥了作用，我喜欢他为约翰逊设计战术让他找到状态。他也试图让瓦塞尔找到感觉，但结果并不那么积极。
评分：B+
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Brooklyn Nets – Game #31
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Brooklyn Nets – Game #31
The San Antonio Spurs (16-15) got back to over .500 by defeating the Brooklyn Nets (12-19) by a final score of 96-87. The Nets were extremely short-handed but they fought. The Spurs ultimately did just enough to avoid what would have been a disappointing loss.
San Antonio’s offense got stuck in the mud in the first quarter and the team only put 11 points on the board in the opening period. The Spurs rallied back in the second quarter before breaking the game open in the third. Brooklyn was unable to make a sustainable run in the fourth quarter as the Spurs strolled to victory.
Stats: Spurs at Nets
Spurs at Nets – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
It felt like a relatively subdued performance by Wembanyama but he ended up stuffing the statsheet once again. Offensively, he didn’t look at the basket as much as usual. To his credit, though, he made his points count. Wembanyama’s 11 points early in the second half gave the Spurs the momentum to blow the game open. His passing was solid, he minimized his mistakes and was once again an amazing rim protector. Wembanyama could have been more assertive and he could have gone up stronger to get to the line more — but, despite the flaws, it was another quality outing for the big man.
Grade: B+
Devin Vassell
The good: Vassell did a better job of passing the ball; he willingly looked for and found his teammates. His activity on defense was a plus. Vassell knocked down 2-of-5 three-pointers while only turning it over once. The bad: While he shot threes well, he was 2-for-11 on two-pointers. As that stat suggests, his finishing was poor and he settled for low percentage shots. Unfortunately, it has also become obvious that Vassell is beginning to lack confidence.
Grade: C-
Chris Paul
Paul was sharing ball-handling duties even more than usual and went 0-for-3 from three-point territory. While his numbers didn’t end up looking too impressive, Paul did well taking care of the ball and running the show. His decision-making was right on the money and he stepped up in moments in which he was most needed.
Grade: B
Jeremy Sochan
Sochan continues to string together strong performances. Against the Nets, his rebounding stood out as his best attribute. His brute strength on the boards is a major asset. Sochan was a pest from the opening tip and his determined drives got him to the free throw line for eight shots. Add in hustle on defense, limited mistakes, quality passes and a few burly finishes and it adds up to another good game by Sochan.
Grade: B+
Harrison Barnes
Considering how anemic Barnes’ offense has been lately, this was actually a step in the right direction. He was more active on offense and got himself more involved. Defensively, Barnes was better but he still has a lot of room to improve in terms of his energy level on that end and his effort level on the boards. Barnes also deserves credit for finishing without a turnover or foul.
Grade: C+
Keldon Johnson
Johnson had been lost in the shuffle lately so it was good to see him take a more active role in Brooklyn. His teammates were looking for him and Johnson didn’t disappoint. He was a battering ram going to the rim, he knocked down a three and his decisions were reliable. I even thought his defense was better. Johnson moved his feet on the perimeter and crashed the boards.
Grade: B
Julian Champagnie
Honestly, I worried that Champagnie wouldn’t respond well to moving to a bench gig. Thankfully, the move has basically been seamless. Champagnie poured in 18 points in 20 minutes and shot the ball extremely well. As long as he keeps shooting it straight while competing on defense, he’s almost guaranteed to have an important job in the rotation.
Grade: A-
Stephon Castle
The good: Castle’s aggression level was commendable on offense. He doesn’t get bashful at all about trying to get himself involved. For a rookie, that’s an impressive trait. I also liked Castle’s defense. He was attentive and disruptive on that end. The bad: Castle was inefficient on offense yet again. His shooting doesn’t look good; his lack of touch at the line was especially worrisome. Additionally, Castle wasn’t passing as good as usual.
Grade: C
Tre Jones
Jones has had a lot of these games recently. He comes in and racks up assists at a blistering rate while rarely looking to score. The strategy has been working and the bench unit is more cohesive as a result. Jones is also playing stout defense and running the court hard both ways. Eventually, though, he’s likely going to have to become a more reliable scorer to remain impactful.
Grade: B
Mitch Johnson
Johnson deserves credit for helping his team through a sluggish start. It looked like his team didn’t show up but Johnson pushed enough right buttons to get the team back on track. His nine-man rotation worked and I liked how he called plays for KJ to get going. He also tried to get Vassell going but the results there weren’t as positive.
Grade: B+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk