By Marilyn Dubinski | Pounding The Rock (PtR), 2024-12-21 10:22:23
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
当然，这意味着马刺本应在比赛末段获得一次罚球并取得领先，但我们在此不做赘述。
NBA 官方宣布，撤销对文班亚马(Victor Wembanyama)在周五战胜老鹰的比赛第四节还剩 11 秒时判罚的技术犯规。这次判罚是双方技术犯规的一部分，当时德安德烈·亨特(DeAndre Hunter)一记精彩的扣篮追平比分后，他和文班亚马各吃了一次技术犯规。亨特随后盯着躺在地板上的文班，当文班站起来时，两人开始交谈。
德安德烈·詹姆斯·亨特 pic.twitter.com/xUG0lnj18i
— 亚特兰大老鹰 (@ ATLHawks) 2024 年 12 月 20 日
在不知道文班说了什么的情况下，裁判的双方技术犯规判罚似乎是一种逃避责任的做法，因为在亨特挑衅之后，文班只是做出回应而没有进一步升级事态，看起来并不应该受到惩罚。最有可能的是，裁判不希望一次技术犯规罚球决定比赛的胜负，所以他们选择了简单的处理方式，因为他们必须做出某种判罚。
然而，事实证明，根据 NBA 的说法，他们的判罚是错误的。通过撤销文班的技术犯规但保留亨特的技术犯规，联盟承认文班没有做错任何事，而亨特应该受到处罚。这意味着马刺本应获得一次罚球，然后在领先的情况下重新获得球权。结果很可能是老鹰犯规，马刺获得两次罚球，然后老鹰才有机会将比赛拖入加时。相反，在亨特的技术犯规罚球之后，比分仍然是平局，马刺出现失误，老鹰有机会在常规时间赢得比赛。幸运的是，他们错失了机会，马刺在加时赛中掌控了比赛，尤其是文班，在亨特激怒他之后，他展现出了更强的决心。
尽管马刺在昨晚的比赛中由于防守不佳以及自己的一次失误错失了绝杀机会而给自己带来了很大的压力，但裁判们最终还是松了一口气，因为马刺赢得了比赛，否则他们将会因为逃避责任的双方技术犯规判罚而不是仅仅对亨特判罚技术犯规而受到更多批评，而这反过来可能会改变比赛的结果。有时候，裁判也会走运。
点击查看原文：NBA rescinds Victor Wembanyama technical from Hawks game
NBA rescinds Victor Wembanyama technical from Hawks game
Of course, that means the Spurs should have had a late free throw to take the lead, but we digress.
The NBA has announced that it has rescinded the technical foul called on Victor Wembanyama with 11 seconds left in the fourth quarter of Friday’s win over the Hawks. The call was part of a double technical that was handed to him and DeAndre Hunter after Hunter posterized Wemby with a high flying dunk to tie the game up. Hunter then stared him down as he lay on the floor, and the two started talking as Wemby stood back up.
DE’ANDRE JAMES HUNTER pic.twitter.com/xUG0lnj18i
— Atlanta Hawks (@ ATLHawks) December 20, 2024
Without knowing what Wemby said, it seemed like a cop out on the refs part to call the double technical since he didn’t seem to deserve it for merely responding and not escalating things further after Hunter’s actions. Most likely, the refs did not want a technical free throw to be a game-decider, so they took the easy way out since they had to call something.
Well, as it turns out, they made the wrong call according to the NBA. By rescinding Wemby’s technical but not Hunter’s, the league is acknowledging Wemby did nothing wrong, but Hunter did deserve the tech. That means the Spurs should have had a free throw, then gotten the ball back with the lead. The result likely would have been a Hawks foul and two Spurs free throws before the Hawks would have a chance to force overtime. Instead, the game was still tied after Hunter’s tech, the Spurs turned the ball over, and the Hawks had a chance to win it in regulation. Fortunately, they missed, and the Spurs took over in overtime, particularly Wemby after Hunter had poked the bear and given him an extra dose of determination.
Although the Spurs brought plenty of stress on themselves last night by not playing amazing defense and blowing their own shot at a game-winner with a turnover, it’s still probably a relief to the refs that they ended up winning, otherwise they would be getting a lot more flack than they did for copping out the with double-technical call instead of what should have been just a technical on Hunter, which in turn could have changed the outcome. Sometimes, the refs get lucky, too.
By Marilyn Dubinski, via Pounding The Rock