[SpursTalk] 圣安东尼奥马刺 vs. 明尼苏达森林狼 – 第6场比赛评分

马刺 vs 森林狼 113 - 103 技术统计 | 视频集锦

By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2024-11-03 14:39:05

由生成式人工智能翻译,译文内容可能不准确或不完整,以原文为准。

在堪称本赛季迄今为止最佳的胜利中,圣安东尼奥马刺以 113-103 的最终比分击败了明尼苏达森林狼。虽然森林狼是在背靠背的第二晚出战,但马刺在赛前仍然不被看好。这场比赛的结果使两队在本赛季的战绩都达到了 3 胜 3 负。

上半场双方比分胶着。在第三节,马刺以 20-6 的比分领先森林狼——这一波进攻以凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)的两个三分球结束,使马刺领先了 19 分。此后,明尼苏达曾几次发起反击,但马刺展现出了足够的成熟度,保持了势头,最终轻松取胜。

数据:马刺 vs. 森林狼

马刺 森林狼 评分

马刺 vs. 森林狼 – 最终评分

维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)

文班亚马度过了一个稳定的夜晚。他的三分球 7 投仅 1 中,但在三分线内 8 投 6 中。我对他选择的投篮时机没有意见,而且他的传球也是一个加分项。在防守端,他在整个球场上都非常活跃。尽管如此,他在篮板球方面本可以做得更好,而且他在比赛的各个方面似乎时不时地会失去强度。

评分:B

克里斯·保罗 (Chris Paul)

保罗的表现简直太棒了。他的传球,尤其是在挡拆配合中,近乎完美。他以 13 次助攻和只有 1 次失误结束了比赛——这些数字准确地描绘了他传球的出色程度。除了组织进攻外,马刺还需要保罗将球送入篮筐以帮助拉开空间。在对阵森林狼的比赛中,他做到了这一点。他仅用 9 次出手就得到 15 分,并且在过去的四场比赛中场均得到 16.0 分。

评分:A

哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)

这是马刺在休赛期得到巴恩斯时所设想的那种表现。在 38 分钟的出场时间里,他似乎从未感到疲倦。事实上,他最重要的发挥出现在第四节。当明尼苏达威胁要发起最后的反击时,正是巴恩斯用关键的发挥阻止了他们的势头。他的外线投篮现在看起来非常流畅,他缓慢的突破上篮也很有效,而且他今晚的防守也高于平均水平。

评分:A-

杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)

我仍然喜欢索汉的比赛方式。他在攻防两端都非常强硬,篮板球比以往任何时候都更好,而且从不犹豫进攻。今晚,他的控球很有帮助,而且他的传球也超出了预期。索汉扮演着一个强力大前锋的角色,同时也能够在外线防守像安东尼·爱德华兹这样的超级巨星。这展示了一系列令人印象深刻的技能。

评分:A-

朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)

尚帕尼的小低迷仍在继续。在过去的四场比赛中,他的三分球 18 投仅 3 中。在对阵森林狼的比赛中,他值得称赞的是他保持了积极的心态。他通过空切和聪明的传球找到了帮助球队进攻的方法。在防守端,他很努力,并在篮板球方面做得很好。

评分:C+

凯尔登·约翰逊

不足之处:约翰逊在第四节 5 投 0 中,看起来体力不支。优点:在第四节之前,约翰逊的表现非常出色。他在前三节 12 投 10 中得到 25 分。他投中了三分球,用一种少见的勇气突破上篮,并在沉闷的时刻为队友们注入了明显的信心和能量。我甚至喜欢约翰逊的防守,这通常是他的弱点。

评分:A-

斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)

卡斯尔的数据看起来并不完美,但他的表现比数据显示的要好。除了保罗之外,马刺在面对明尼苏达的防守压迫时遇到了问题。然而,卡斯尔能够顶住压力。他还投中了新秀赛季的第二个三分球。在防守端,他在不同的回合中被孤立单防,最终的积极方面多于消极方面。

评分:B-

马拉基·布拉纳姆 (Malaki Branham)

布拉纳姆得到了替补控球后卫的出场时间——但效果不太好。他的控球很糟糕,传球不明智,当他掌管球权时,进攻陷入了停滞。他的防守也乏善可陈。

评分:D

扎克·科林斯 (Zach Collins)

对科林斯来说,这是一场某种程度上的反弹之战。他对阵明尼苏达的表现非常好。他的传球很出色,投中了一个三分球,在内线很有对抗性,并且在防守端也很有影响力。当文班亚马不在场时,马刺并没有失去太多的节奏,这显然要归功于科林斯的发挥。

评分:B+

米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)

波波维奇今晚因病没有出现在场边。米奇·约翰逊负责指挥,并且做得相当不错。最有趣的变化是约翰逊选择布拉纳姆作为第一个替补控球后卫。波波维奇一直使用布雷克·韦斯利作为他的第一个替补控球后卫,卡斯尔作为他的第二个选择……所以这是一个值得注意的变化。不幸的是,对于约翰逊和布拉纳姆来说,当布拉纳姆无法应对明尼苏达的压力时,这一举动变得相当糟糕。除此之外,约翰逊值得一轮掌声,因为他让他的球员们努力比赛,并且在他的指挥下进攻运转得如此流畅。

评分:B

点击查看原文:Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Minnesota Timberwolves – Game #6

Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Minnesota Timberwolves – Game #6

In what has to be considered their best win of the season to date, the San Antonio Spurs defeated the Minnesota Timberwolves by a final count of 113-103. While it’s true that the Timberwolves were playing on the second night of a back-to-back, the Spurs were still the underdogs going into the contest. The outcome of this game gives both teams a 3-3 record on the season.

The first half couldn’t have been much closer. In the third quarter, the Spurs outscored the Timberwolves 20-6 to open the half — a run that ended with a pair of Keldon Johnson three-pointers to put the good guys up by 19 points. Minnesota rallied a couple times after that but the Spurs exhibited enough maturity to keep the momentum and cruise to victory.

Stats: Spurs vs. Timberwolves

spurs timberwolves grades

Spurs vs. Timberwolves – Final Grades

Victor Wembanyama

Wembanyama had a solid night at the office. He hit only 1-of-7 three-pointers but was 6-for-8 inside of the arc. I didn’t have an issue with his shot-selection and his passing was a plus. Defensively, he was active all over the court. That said, he could have been better on the boards and he seemed to lose intensity from time to time in all areas of the game.

Grade: B

Chris Paul

Paul was simply fantastic. His passing, particularly in pick-and-roll sets, was nearly perfect. He finished the game with 13 assists and only one turnovers — and those numbers paint an accurate portrait of how well he dished the rock. In addition to orchestrating the offense, the Spurs also need Paul to put the basketball in the hoop to help the spacing. Against the Timberwolves, he did just that. He finished with 15 points on only nine shot attempts and is now averaging 16.0 points per game over the last four contests.

Grade: A

Harrison Barnes

This was the type of outing the Spurs imagined when they acquired Barnes in the offseason. In 38 minutes, he never seemed to get tired. In fact, his most important plays came in the fourth quarter. When Minnesota threatened to make a late run, it was Barnes who authored big plays to stem the tide. His outside shooting looks very fluid right now, his slow motion drives to the hoop are effective and his defense was better than average tonight.

Grade: A-

Jeremy Sochan

I continue to like how Sochan is playing. He’s being uber physical on both sides of the ball, rebounding better than ever and never hesitating to attack. Tonight, his ball-handling was helpful and his passing surpassed expectations. Sochan is playing as a powerful power forward who is also capable of defending superstars like Anthony Edwards out on the perimeter. That’s an impressive array skills on display.

Grade: A-

Julian Champagnie

Champagnie’s mini-slump lives on. He’s now just 3-for-18 from three-point range in his last four games. Versus the Timberwolves, he deserves credit for keeping his head up. He found ways to aid the cause on offense by cutting and making smart passes. Defensively, he hustled and did good work on the boards.

Grade: C+

Keldon Johnson

The bad: Johnson was 0-for-5 in the fourth quarter and appeared to be out of gas. The good: Prior to the fourth, Johnson was awesome. He had 25 points on 10-for-12 shooting in the first three quarters. He was knocking down threes, driving to the rim with an uncommon amount of chutzpah, and generating a palpable amount of confidence and energy that fed his teammates in times of dreariness. I even liked Johnson’s defense, which is typically a weakness of his.

Grade: A-

Stephon Castle

Castle’s numbers don’t look pristine but he played better than the stats suggest. Outside of Paul, the Spurs were having issues with Minnesota’s pressure on defense. Castle, though, was able to withstand the pressure. He also knocked down his second three-pointer of his rookie campaign. Defensively, he was put on an island during various possessions and came away with more positives than negatives.

Grade: B-

Malaki Branham

Branham got backup point guard minutes — and it didn’t go too well. His ball-handling was poor, he made unwise passes and the offense bogged down when he was at the helm. His defense was also nothing to write home about.

Grade: D

Zach Collins

This was a bounce back game of sorts for Collins. He was really good versus Minnesota. His passing was excellent, he drained a three-ball, he was physical in the lane and he was impactful on the defensive end. The Spurs didn’t skip too much of a beat when Wembanyama was off the court, which is obviously credit to Collins’ play.

Grade: B+

Mitch Johnson

Pop wasn’t on the sidelines tonight due to an illness. Mitch Johnson was in charge and did a pretty good job. The most interesting change was Johnson going with Branham as the first backup point guard. Pop has been using Blake Wesley as his first backup point guard and Castle as his second choice … so this was a notable change. Unfortunately for Johnson and Branham, the move turned out pretty ugly when Branham couldn’t handle Minnesota’s pressure. Other than that, though, Johnson deserves a round of applause for getting his guys to play hard and for the offense operating so smoothly under his watch.

Grade: B

By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk