[ESPN] 2025 NBA 选秀:疯狂三月行情观察,前 100 名新秀

By Jonathan Givony | ESPN, 2025-03-25 19:00:00

由生成式人工智能翻译,译文内容可能不准确或不完整,以原文为准。

Image

随着男子 NCAA 锦标赛的首个周末结束,以及 NIT 进入四分之一决赛,现在正是更新 ESPN 前 100 名排行榜,并观察 2025 年 NBA 选秀前列新秀表现的绝佳时机。

虽然今年的锦标赛没有出现太多冷门,但分组情况对球探来说非常有利。许多高水平的对决,尤其是在第二轮,让 NBA 球队在 6 月 25-26 日的选秀大会前有足够多的评估素材。

尽管许多新秀仍在锦标赛中征战——预计的状元秀库珀·弗拉格(Cooper Flagg)和杜克大学是赢得 NCAA 冠军的热门——但也有几位新秀的赛季已经结束,包括贝勒大学的VJ·埃奇科姆(VJ Edgecombe),德克萨斯大学的特雷·约翰逊(Tre Johnson),俄克拉荷马大学的杰里迈亚·菲尔斯(Jeremiah Fears)等人。

锦标赛的故事远未结束,从 NBA 选秀的角度来看,还有很多值得期待的地方。ESPN 选秀内幕专家乔纳森·吉沃尼(Jonathan Givony)和杰里米·伍(Jeremy Woo)更新了前 100 名排行榜,并提供了关于顶级新秀表现、谁的表现有所提升以及哪些球员需要证明更多(无论是在锦标赛还是选秀前的过程中)的见解。

上次更新时间: 3 月 25 日

跳转至: 前 100 名 | 行情上涨 | 行情平稳/下跌

更多来自 ESPN+: NBA 高管谈弗拉格 | 模拟选秀

前 100 名潜力新秀排行榜

  1. 库珀·弗拉格(Cooper Flagg),SF/PF,杜克大学 | 年龄:18.2

  2. 迪伦·哈珀(Dylan Harper),PG/SG,罗格斯大学 | 年龄:19

  3. 西昂·詹姆斯(Sion James),SF,杜克大学 | 年龄:22.3

  4. 约翰·通杰(John Tonje),SF,威斯康星大学 | 年龄:23.9

  5. 科比·布雷亚(Koby Brea),SG/SF,肯塔基大学 | 年龄:22.3

  6. 塞德里克·考沃德(Cedric Coward),SF,华盛顿州立大学 | 年龄:21.5

  7. 博戈柳布·马尔科维奇(Bogoljub Markovic),PF/C,Mega MIS | 年龄:19.6

  8. 伊恩·杰克逊(Ian Jackson),SG,北卡罗来纳大学 | 年龄:20.1

  9. 丁克·佩特(Dink Pate),SG/SF,墨西哥城 | 年龄:19

  10. 约瑟夫·图格勒(Joseph Tugler),PF/C,休斯顿大学 | 年龄:19.8

  11. 罗科·齐卡尔斯基(Rocco Zikarsky),C,布里斯班 | 年龄:18.7

  12. 布拉登·史密斯(Braden Smith),PG,普渡大学 | 年龄:21.6

  13. 托米斯拉夫·伊维希奇(Tomislav Ivisic),C,伊利诺伊大学 | 年龄:21.6

  14. 塔哈德·佩蒂福德(Tahaad Pettiford),PG,奥本大学 | 年龄:19.6

  15. 小沃尔特·克莱顿(Walter Clayton Jr.),PG,佛罗里达大学 | 年龄:22

  16. 祖比·埃吉奥福尔(Zuby Ejiofor),C,圣约翰大学 | 年龄:20.9

  17. 戴林·斯温(Dailyn Swain),SG/SF,泽维尔大学 | 年龄:19.6

  18. 约翰·格伦洛(Johann Grunloh),C,维切塔 | 年龄:19.6

  19. 穆罕默德·法耶(Mouhamed Faye),C,雷焦艾米利亚 | 年龄:20.1

  20. 兹沃尼米尔·伊维希奇(Zvonimir Ivisic),PF/C,阿肯色大学 | 年龄:21.6

  21. 马利克·刘易斯(Malique Lewis),SF/PF,东南墨尔本 | 年龄:20.3

  22. 小贾文(Javon Small),PG,西弗吉尼亚大学 | 年龄:22.2

  23. 亨特·萨利斯(Hunter Sallis),SG,维克森林大学 | 年龄:21.9

  24. 小RJ·路易斯(RJ Luis Jr.),SF/PF,圣约翰大学 | 年龄:22.3

  25. 本·亨肖(Ben Henshall),PG/SG,珀斯 | 年龄:20.7

  26. 小伊戈尔·米利西奇(Igor Milicic Jr.),PF,田纳西大学 | 年龄:22.5

  27. PJ·哈格蒂(PJ Haggerty),PG,孟菲斯大学 | 年龄:20.9

  28. 贾米尔·沃特金斯(Jamir Watkins),SG/SF,佛罗里达州立大学 | 年龄:23.7

  29. 米卡·皮维(Micah Peavy),SG/SF,乔治城大学 | 年龄:23.6

  30. 阿马里·威廉姆斯(Amari Williams),C,肯塔基大学 | 年龄:23.1

  31. 格兰特·尼尔森(Grant Nelson),PF,阿拉巴马大学 | 年龄:23

  32. 杨瀚森(Hansen Yang),C,青岛 | 年龄:19.7

  33. 布鲁斯·桑顿(Bruce Thornton),PG,俄亥俄州立大学 | 年龄:21.5

  34. 安德烈·斯托贾科维奇(Andrej Stojakovic),SG/SF,加州大学 | 年龄:20.5

  35. 奥古斯塔斯·马丘利奥尼斯(Augustas Marciulionis),PG,圣玛丽学院 | 年龄:23

  36. 小韦斯利·耶茨(Wesley Yates III),SG,南加州大学 | 年龄:20.2

  37. 特雷·考夫曼-雷恩(Trey Kaufman-Renn),PF,普渡大学 | 年龄:22.5

  38. 奥特加·奥韦(Otega Oweh),SG,肯塔基大学 | 年龄:21.7

  39. 贾隆·摩尔(Jalon Moore),SF/PF,俄克拉荷马大学 | 年龄:21.9

  40. 伊桑·阿尔曼萨(Izan Almansa),PF/C,珀斯 | 年龄:19.7

  41. 马克斯·舒尔加(Max Shulga),PG/SG,弗吉尼亚联邦大学 | 年龄:22.7

  42. 佩顿·桑德福特(Payton Sandfort),SF,爱荷华大学 | 年龄:22.6

  43. 贾克森·罗宾逊(Jaxson Robinson),SG/SF,肯塔基大学 | 年龄:22.3

  44. 拉赫兰·奥尔布里奇(Lachlan Olbrich),PF/C,伊拉瓦拉 | 年龄:21.2

  45. 安德鲁·卡尔(Andrew Carr),PF/C,肯塔基大学 | 年龄:23.1

  46. 弗拉迪斯拉夫·戈尔丁(Vladislav Goldin),C,密歇根大学 | 年龄:23.8

  47. 马克·西尔斯(Mark Sears),PG,阿拉巴马大学 | 年龄:23

  48. 内特·比特尔(Nate Bittle),PF/C,俄勒冈大学 | 年龄:21.8

  49. 克利福德·奥莫鲁伊(Clifford Omoruyi),C,阿拉巴马大学 | 年龄:23.4

  50. 卡莱布·格里尔(Caleb Grill),SG,密苏里大学 | 年龄:24.7

  51. 瑞安·内姆哈德(Ryan Nembhard),PG,冈萨加大学 | 年龄:22

  52. 科比·约翰逊(Kobe Johnson),SG/SF,加州大学洛杉矶分校 | 年龄:22.1

注释:真实命中率 (TS%) 是一种将投篮命中率、罚球命中率和三分球命中率结合成一个综合比率的公式。 PR = 在 ESPN 前 100 名中的先前排名。

选秀观察:行情上涨

库珀·弗拉格(Cooper Flagg),SF/PF,杜克大学

前 100 名排名: 1 | PR: 1

身高: 6-9 | 年龄: 18.2 | TS%: 60.3%

弗拉格从可怕的左脚踝伤势中恢复后,没有表现出任何影响,在击败圣玛丽山学院后帮助杜克大学轻松战胜贝勒大学,两场比赛在 51 分钟内得到 32 分、16 个篮板、10 次助攻和 3 个盖帽。弗拉格展示了他高水平的攻防两端的多功能性,并展现了他作为一名投篮创造者的进步。他承担了大量的组织职责,包括挡拆、单打、低位进攻和快攻推进,在球场上四处传球,并到达篮筐,用双手完成进攻。

周四在纽约州纽瓦克将面临严峻的考验,头号种子蓝魔队将迎战 4 号种子亚利桑那大学,许多 NBA 高管将参加这场比赛,因为麦当劳全明星赛定于下周二在附近的纽约州布鲁克林举行。弗拉格将与预计的前 20 顺位新秀卡特·布莱恩特(Carter Bryant)对决,争夺与阿拉巴马大学或 BYU 对阵的精英八强席位。 – 吉沃尼


杰里迈亚·菲尔斯(Jeremiah Fears),PG,俄克拉荷马大学

前 100 名排名: 7 | PR: 9

身高: 6-4 | 年龄: 18.4 | TS%: 57.0%

菲尔斯的赛季以第一轮输给康涅狄格大学而告终,他在这场比赛中是当之无愧的最佳球员,以 20 分领先所有得分手。他出色的创造力以及通过他急躁的运球和不同的速度发挥来实现他想要的目标的能力是显而易见的。他改进了挡拆后的阅读,用遍布全场的传球剖析了康涅狄格大学的防守,并以多种方式得分。菲尔斯本可以获得十几次助攻(他有四次),这得益于他创造的良好机会,但他受到了俄克拉荷马大学 3 分球 17 投 3 中以及他的大个子们在篮筐周围无法得分的拖累。

虽然菲尔斯在防守和油漆区内终结方面值得商榷,但他的天赋是不可否认的。他经历了一个令人惊叹的新秀赛季,这使他成为前 10 名新秀,并且有很强的理由更接近彩票的第 5 到 7 位,具体取决于顺位的结果。 – 吉沃尼


卡曼·马卢阿奇(Khaman Maluach),C,杜克大学

前 100 名排名: 8 | PR: 7

身高: 7-2 | 年龄: 18.5 | TS%: 72.6%

马卢阿奇度过了一个积极的周末,在面对圣玛丽山学院和贝勒大学两个身材矮小的前场时,他在大胜中巩固了杜克大学的防守。比赛似乎正在为马卢阿奇放缓,他拥有大学篮球中最有影响力的油漆区存在之一,具有精英级别的移动性、时机、强度和臂展的结合。他经常阻止对手攻击篮筐,因为他知道他 9 英尺 8 英寸的站立摸高迫在眉睫。

马卢阿奇甚至在对阵圣玛丽山学院的比赛中投中了一个 3 分球,并且是可靠的空中接力目标,设置掩护并滚向篮筐。与亚利桑那大学的重赛周四即将到来。他在 11 月对阵野猫队的比赛中表现出色,但他们这次看起来会有所不同,因为 7 英尺 2 英寸的莫蒂耶斯·克里瓦斯(Motiejus Krivas)因脚伤缺席。 – 吉沃尼


德里克·奎因(Derik Queen),C,马里兰大学

前 100 名排名: 10 | PR: 11

身高: 6-10 | 年龄: 20.2 | TS%: 59.9%

奎因度过了一个出色的周末,展示了他多样化的技术和积极的心态。他击中了一个令人难以置信的压哨绝杀,帮助马里兰大学自 2016 年以来首次晋级甜蜜 16 强。他早早地投中了两个 3 分球(本赛季的第五个和第六个),是一个重要的终结目标,他在挡拆中完成了自己的投篮,并进行了一些华丽的动作,并在面对篮筐时熟练地完成了投篮。他在一阵阵爆发中表现出比平时更好的防守强度,表明他在关键时刻还有另一个档位。

周四在旧金山的比赛竞争将大大提高,因为马里兰大学将迎战佛罗里达大学,佛罗里达大学可以说是大学篮球中最好的前场。短吻鳄队将以他在职业生涯中从未见过的身高、体格和防守多功能性来挑战奎因。他与同为首轮秀的亚历克斯·康顿(Alex Condon)的对决对于两位新秀来说都是一个巨大的机会,可以展示他们在攻防两端的技能将如何投射到 NBA。 – 吉沃尼


埃戈尔·德明(Egor Demin),PG/SG,BYU

前 100 名排名: 12 | PR: 10

身高: 6-9 | 年龄: 19.0 | TS%: 51.3%

在 Big 12 锦标赛中表现不佳之后,德明在 NCAA 锦标赛周末表现出色,通过两场比赛获得 26 分、12 个篮板、10 次助攻,并且只有 5 次失误。他还完成了周末 3 分球 13 投 5 中,其中包括一个关键的后期投篮,帮助 BYU 击败了威斯康星大学。 19 岁的德明看起来充满信心和侵略性,并且在全场传球时表现出一些强大的时刻,展示了他出色的球场视野和组织能力。他远非完美,有时由于缺乏爆发力而难以为自己创造良好的机会,做出一些不稳定的决定,并且在投篮和让队友参与之间寻找正确的平衡,这对于这个级别比赛的青少年来说是很常见的。

BYU 和德明接下来将对阵阿拉巴马大学,这是美洲狮队本赛季遇到的最具进攻天赋的球队。 – 吉沃尼


威尔·莱利(Will Riley),SG/SF,伊利诺伊大学

前 100 名排名: 15 | PR: 22

身高: 6-8 | 年龄: 19.1 | TS%: 53.8%

莱利在伊利诺伊大学的赛季结束时有很多积极因素。他在对阵肯塔基大学的令人难忘的 84-75 的失利之前,连续串联了几次令人印象深刻的进攻表现。莱利在第一轮对阵泽维尔大学的比赛中展现了一切,得到 22 分,做出正确的决定,并作为得分手和组织者选择了自己的位置。

他已经收集了幕后的动力,成为值得在彩票后期考虑的球员。莱利在他的体型上有一些投篮的潜力,如果他继续在身体上有所改善,他有空间扩大他的比赛。他由于重心高和缺乏力量而在防守端挣扎,这会使他成为目标,但 NBA 评估员认为,他的潜力与这个选秀班中大多数更好的侧翼球员相比仍然很好。 – 伍


尼克·克利福德(Nique Clifford),SG,科罗拉多州立大学

前 100 名排名: 25 | PR: 39

身高: 6-6 | 年龄: 23.1 | TS%: 60.9%

克利福德的大学生涯以强大的 NCAA 锦标赛结束。在对阵他本赛季可能遇到的最好的竞争对手孟菲斯大学和马里兰大学的两场比赛中,他得到 35 分、15 个篮板和 12 次助攻。虽然他的跳投没有命中(3 分球 0 投 9 中),但克利福德展示了他在攻防两端影响胜利的多种方式,承担了重要的投篮创造职责,并用球做出了正确的决定。在防守端,他克服了掩护,拒绝了无球,创造了失误,并对身材较小的球员表现出极大的强度。

23 岁的克利福德看起来像是一个即插即用的侧翼球员,凭借他对比赛的感觉、成熟度和强大的强度,他已经准备好进入季后赛球队的轮换阵容。如果他本赛季 38% 的 3 分球命中率保持不变,他应该能够开创一个长期而富有成效的 NBA 职业生涯。 – 吉沃尼


亚克塞尔·伦德博格(Yaxel Lendeborg),PF/C,UAB

前 100 名排名: 28 | PR: 58

身高: 6-9 | 年龄: 22.4 | TS%: 60.5%

在整个赛季的大部分时间里都发布了令人印象深刻的数据之后,伦德博格在 AAC 锦标赛和 NIT 中充分利用了有利的平台,这些比赛在方便的球探地点(达拉斯、费城、圣何塞和加利福尼亚州欧文)举行,并吸引了许多 NBA 高管。凭借他处理、传球、投篮和篮板的能力,22 岁的伦德博格拥有 NBA 球队梦寐以求的攻防两端的多功能性、技术和本能。

他的决策和技术有时会留下一些不足之处,并且他对更好的竞争对手的效率不高(对阵前 100 名对手的真实命中率为 54%,失误率为 16%)。尽管如此,伦德博格是一个可以在整个球场上部署的大个子,并且具有潜力。他将在门户网站中权衡 NIL 报价(他还有一年 NCAA 资格),以及他将在 5 月 NBA 联合试训中收到的反馈,这将可能决定他的下一步行动。 – 吉沃尼


本内特·斯特茨(Bennett Stirtz),PG/SG,德雷克大学

前 100 名排名: 35 | PR: 未上榜

身高: 6-4 | 年龄: 21.4 | TS%: 61.1%

斯特茨在 NCAA 锦标赛中表现出色,在对阵密苏里大学和德克萨斯理工大学的两场比赛中获得 42 分和 12 次助攻,表明他可以与 SEC 和 Big 12 的竞争对手抗衡。凭借他低调的爆发力和狡猾的控球能力,他在球场上达到了他想要的位置,这对于他的 NBA 预测来说是一个好兆头,因为他在两场比赛中都通过下坡一致地创造优势。这很重要,因为斯特茨是大学篮球中最好的传球手和决策者之一。球探将对他做出瞬间决策和阅读挡拆的能力感兴趣,一旦他被更好的天赋包围。

他充满活力的投篮,在两场比赛中 3 分球 9 投 5 中——包括各种来自困难角度的运球后 3 分球——对他来说是个好兆头。尽管是对方防守的重点,但他在本赛季的 3 分球命中率为 40%,同时在篮筐周围展现出极好的触感和创造力。很难衡量斯特茨的防守;他打了所有 40 分钟,并且必须避免犯规麻烦,因为他的球队非常依赖他的组织能力。

斯特茨表现出防守的闪光点,追逐对手绕过掩护,在无球时处于正确的位置,创造失误,并在爆发中带来极大的努力。球探将质疑他作为一名防守者的瘦弱身材和缺乏身高,以及他适应更快 NBA 风格的能力。

斯特茨可能会宣布参加选秀并收集 NBA 的反馈。与本周被爱荷华大学聘用的德雷克大学教练本·麦科勒姆(Ben McCollum)重聚,并回到他的大四赛季可能是一个选择——如果没有保证合同的保证——因为在 Power-5 级别的全联盟表现可以巩固他进入首轮对话。在 NBA 联合试训中比赛可能会减轻一些球探的担忧,并且可以大大提高他在本次选秀中的地位。 – 吉沃尼


泰雷斯·普罗克托(Tyrese Proctor),PG,杜克大学

前 100 名排名: 46 | PR: 43

身高: 6-6 | 年龄: 20.9 | TS%: 59.5%

普罗克托在杜克大学轻松获得甜蜜 16 强的门票时,成为了明星。这位后卫从远距离开始了一波火热的连胜,在对阵圣玛丽山学院的比赛中得到 19 分,在对阵贝勒大学的比赛中得到 25 分。他在过去的三场比赛中 3 分球 30 投 19 中,包括 ACC 冠军赛,本赛季的 3 分球命中率高达 42%,这为杜克大学提供了一个关键的得分组成部分。

但他在这段时间内只尝试了 3 个 2 分球,这表明他有点一维的进攻存在。除了对于他的位置来说不错的身材之外,他在防守端也没有提供太多。后卫的比赛将是杜克大学夺冠希望的一个摇摆因素,如果普罗克托继续在外面做饭,这肯定不会损害他的选秀地位。 – 伍


约翰·通杰(John Tonje),SF,威斯康星大学

前 100 名排名: 52 | PR: 60

身高: 6-6 | 年龄: 23.9 | TS%: 65.7%

尽管威斯康星大学在第二轮被 BYU 爆冷击败,但通杰在那场比赛中令人惊叹的 37 分表现巩固了他令人惊讶的第六年突破,并成为选秀候选人的合法性。尽管 24 岁的选秀球员在 NBA 中取得突破的记录不佳,但考虑到对 3 分球角色球员的持续需求,通杰的力量、外线投篮以及进入油漆区和罚球线的能力使他具有角色球员的潜力。

他可能会断断续续,而且他的防守预测没有增加价值,但是具有他的框架和进攻技巧的球员值得一看。他将在选秀前过程中有更多需要证明的地方,并且大概会在联合试训中,但在密苏里大学因脚伤缺席了大部分时间后,他在威斯康星大学帮助了自己。 – 伍


祖比·埃吉奥福尔(Zuby Ejiofor),C,圣约翰大学

前 100 名排名: 64 | PR: 未上榜

身高: 6-9 | 年龄: 20.9 | TS%: 64.5%

尽管圣约翰大学在第二轮输给了阿肯色大学,但埃吉奥福尔在那场比赛中是一个亮点,在对阵剃刀队 NBA 大小的前场时,总共得到 23 分和 12 个篮板。

尽管按照 NBA 的标准来看身材矮小,但他在篮板上不懈的努力、令人印象深刻的体格、在地板上冲刺的能力以及高于平均水平的防守移动性都很突出。埃吉奥福尔在堪萨斯大学开始了他的大学生涯,在四月份满 21 岁,并且在本赛季获得了他作为约翰尼队首发球员的第一个机会。职业球队将需要从他那里看到更多。他稳固的大三赛季在某种程度上没有引起人们的注意,但他的表现在三月份的聚光灯下得到了帮助。凭借他吸引人的角色球员素质,他看起来像是 2026 年值得关注的选秀前景。 – 伍


戴林·斯温(Dailyn Swain),SF,泽维尔大学

前 100 名排名: 65 | PR: 57

身高: 6-8 | 年龄: 19.6 | TS%: 61.2%

斯温在泽维尔大学第一轮输给伊利诺伊大学的比赛中得到了职业生涯最高的 27 分,投中了本赛季的多个 3 分球,并且打得更有侵略性和自信心。他的身材、敏捷性和防守潜力应该对 NBA 球队具有吸引力。

他的得分限制和有问题的投篮(他在两个大学赛季的 54 次尝试中,3 分球命中率为 20%)使他成为一个项目。他将需要扩大他对那个端点的舒适度。无论他是否参加选秀,斯温的工具和潜力都使他成为一个有趣的球员,但他最好是在大学里再发展一个赛季。

一位消息人士告诉 ESPN 的杰夫·博泽洛(Jeff Borzello),周一,斯温进入了转会门户网站,根据 ESPN 的消息来源,泽维尔大学教练肖恩·米勒(Sean Miller)已达成协议,成为德克萨斯长角队的下一任主教练。 – 伍


选秀观察:行情平稳/下跌

VJ·埃奇科姆(VJ Edgecombe),SG,贝勒大学

前 100 名排名: 4 | PR: 4

身高: 6-5 | 年龄: 19.6 | TS%: 56.1%

埃奇科姆度过了一个基本上成功的周末,结束了一个强大的大一赛季,但在 32 强中输给了杜克大学。他充满电力的第一步在转换中和半场中都展现了出来,尤其是在熊队 NCAA 锦标赛揭幕战对阵密西西比州立大学的后期。他接管了对阵斗牛犬队的比赛,一次又一次地犯规,投中关键的罚球,并且提出了重要的阻止。

但是他本可以更多地寻找自己的投篮机会,而不是屈服于贝勒大学控球后卫的优势。年度 Big 12 最佳新生埃奇科姆似乎牢固地占据了前 3 到 5 名的位置,具体取决于 5 月 12 日的选秀抽签结果。 – 吉沃尼


特雷·约翰逊(Tre Johnson),SG,德克萨斯大学

前 100 名排名: 5 | PR: 5

身高: 6-6 | 年龄: 19.0 | TS%: 56.1%

约翰逊的赛季以输给泽维尔大学的附加赛而告终。对于约翰逊本赛季来说,这是一场典型的比赛。他有极高的表现,通过在掩护后跑出的高水平投篮,从运球中拉起,并投出不可能的后撤步跳投,不断地给对方的防守施加压力。并且令人沮丧的低谷,陷入掩护,满足于竞争激烈的长 2 分球,防守不佳,并且在事情不顺利时表现出沮丧。球探们质疑他驱动胜利的能力,此前德克萨斯大学的战绩为 19 胜 16 负,周围的阵容不太理想。

没有人怀疑约翰逊纯粹的得分能力,因为他多样化的投篮武器库是为 NBA 打造的。当他抬起头并希望做出正确的比赛时,他可以传球。约翰逊的 SEC 年度最佳新生竞选使他成为潜在的前 5 名球员,许多球队将希望更好地了解他在球场之外的情况,以确定他的潜力。 – 吉沃尼


卡斯帕拉斯·雅库西奥尼斯(Kasparas Jakucionis),PG,伊利诺伊大学

前 100 名排名: 6 | PR: 6

身高: 6-6 | 年龄: 18.8 | TS%: 59.8%

雅库西奥尼斯的赛季以不平衡的方式结束,他在第一轮战胜泽维尔大学的比赛中表现出色,他获得了接近三双(16 分、10 次助攻、9 个篮板),但在伊利诺伊大学输给肯塔基大学的比赛中表现挣扎。 NBA 高管们没有忘记他在赛季初期的表现有多出色,但他很难在最后阶段投中远距离的投篮(在他最后 10 场比赛中为 24.5%),并且在他的最后四场比赛中每次都记录了六次失误。

有时,他似乎正在努力产生影响,但对于一个 18 岁的人来说,他正在适应 Division I 篮球的体格和赛程——并且成为对方球探报告的焦点——雅库西奥尼斯总体上表现良好。他的位置尺寸和组织本能、投篮的闪光点和无形的东西应该从长远来看转化为 NBA 价值,并且将使他保持在前 10 名的对话中。 – 伍


贾斯·理查德森(Jase Richardson),PG/SG,密歇根州立大学

前 100 名排名: 13 | PR: 24

身高: 6-3 | 年龄: 19.4 | TS%: 63.3%

对于理查德森来说,这不是一个有特色的锦标赛,他在 32 强战胜新墨西哥大学的比赛中 10 投 1 中。随着他在密歇根州立大学的角色不断增长,他获得了一些关注,成为罕见的新生,赢得了斯巴达人教练汤姆·伊佐(Tom Izzo)的信任。部分吸引力在于他如何在得分之外影响胜利。他是一个聪明的球移动者,并且在很大程度上是一个避免失误的球员,他可以舒适地进行球上和球下比赛。

尽管他通常充分利用他的工具,但他并没有在身体上占据主导地位,这引起了 NBA 球探的疑问,他们担心他将如何转化为全职的球上角色。理查德森将有一个很大的机会来反弹,因为密歇根州立大学将在周五晋级与奥莱密斯大学的甜蜜 16 强比赛。 – 伍


利亚姆·麦克尼利(Liam McNeeley),SG/SF,康涅狄格大学

前 100 名排名: 14 | PR: 12

身高: 6-7 | 年龄: 19.4 | TS%: 53.6%

麦克尼利以在康涅狄格大学险些爆冷击败头号种子佛罗里达大学的比赛中得到 22 分结束了他的赛季,并且很可能结束了他的大学生涯。尽管有时被误导为哈士奇队的关键人物,但麦克尼利度过了一个积极的新生赛季,承担了比他可能承担的更多的责任。 NBA 球队仍然被他的位置尺寸、对比赛的感觉、韧性和多功能性所吸引。然而,最大的问题是麦克尼利的投篮,因为他本赛季的 3 分球命中率为 31.5%,2 分球命中率为 44%。

尽管他自高中以来的表现表明他是一名高效、充满活力的远距离投篮手,但麦克尼利将需要在选秀前训练中加强这一点,以提高他的地位。 – 伍


阿萨·纽厄尔(Asa Newell),PF/C,佐治亚大学

前 100 名排名: 21 | PR: 20

身高: 6-11 | 年龄: 19.4 | TS%: 62.0%

纽厄尔以在对阵冈萨加大学的比赛中得到 20 分和 8 个篮板结束了他的赛季,佐治亚大学在这场比赛中早早落后并且从未恢复。在之前一周 SEC 锦标赛输给俄克拉荷马大学的比赛中,他本赛季也交出了最好的数据线(21 分和 17 个篮板)。他的动力和在进攻篮板上的表现帮助了他的情况,但 NBA 球队会指出他不一致的防守贡献,因为他们在评估他最终选秀板上的位置。

他缺乏高水平的篮筐保护(在 33 场大学比赛中 32 次盖帽)以及有时值得怀疑的站位和感觉,这突显了他要如何在职业联赛中赢得大量上场时间还有很长的路要走。纽厄尔在本赛季帮助了自己,但他仍然是一个长期项目,对于任何一支选他的球队来说,都有很多取决于他的外线投篮发展。 – 伍


拉希尔·弗莱明(Rasheer Fleming),PF/C,圣约瑟夫大学

前 100 名排名: 29 | PR: 23

身高: 6-9 | 年龄: 20.7 | TS%: 64.4%

弗莱明的赛季以令人沮丧的方式结束,他在大西洋 10 锦标赛的备受瞩目的比赛中表现令人失望,并且在 NIT 中失利,他在这些比赛中作为决策者、

By Jonathan Givony | ESPN, via ESPN

点击查看原文:2025 NBA draft: March Madness stock watch, top 100 prospects

2025 NBA draft: March Madness stock watch, top 100 prospects

Image

With the first weekend of the men’s NCAA tournament in the books and the NIT entering its quarterfinals, it’s a great opportunity to update ESPN’s Top 100 rankings and see how many of the top 2025 NBA draft prospects performed.

Although this year’s tournament didn’t produce many upsets, the bracket shook out well for scouts. Plenty of high-level matchups, particularly in the second round, gave NBA teams much to evaluate ahead of the June 25-26 draft.

Though many prospects are still playing in the tournaments – projected No. 1 pick Cooper Flagg and Duke are among the favorites to win the NCAA title – several prospects’ seasons ended, including Baylor’s VJ Edgecombe, Texas’ Tre Johnson, Oklahoma’s Jeremiah Fears, and others.

The stories of the tournaments are far from done, and there’s plenty to anticipate from an NBA draft perspective. ESPN draft insiders Jonathan Givony and Jeremy Woo updated the top 100 rankings and players’ draft stock with insight on how top prospects fared, who moved the needle, and which players have more to prove – whether in the tournaments or the predraft process.

Last updated: March 25

Jump to: Top 100 | Stock up | Stock neutral/down\

More from ESPN+: NBA execs on Flagg | Mock draft

Top 100 big board rankings

  1. Cooper Flagg, SF/PF, Duke | Age: 18.2\

  2. Dylan Harper, PG/SG, Rutgers | Age: 19\

  3. Sion James, SF, Duke | Age: 22.3\

  4. John Tonje, SF, Wisconsin | Age: 23.9\

  5. Koby Brea, SG/SF, Kentucky | Age: 22.3\

  6. Cedric Coward, SF, Washington St | Age: 21.5\

  7. Bogoljub Markovic, PF/C, Mega MIS | Age: 19.6\

  8. Ian Jackson, SG, North Carolina | Age: 20.1\

  9. Dink Pate, SG/SF, Mexico City | Age: 19\

  10. Joseph Tugler, PF/C, Houston | Age: 19.8\

  11. Rocco Zikarsky, C, Brisbane | Age: 18.7\

  12. Braden Smith, PG, Purdue | Age: 21.6\

  13. Tomislav Ivisic, C, Illinois | Age: 21.6\

  14. Tahaad Pettiford, PG, Auburn | Age: 19.6\

  15. Walter Clayton Jr., PG, Florida | Age: 22\

  16. Zuby Ejiofor, C, St. John’s | Age: 20.9\

  17. Dailyn Swain, SG/SF, Xavier | Age: 19.6\

  18. Johann Grunloh, C, Vechta | Age: 19.6\

  19. Mouhamed Faye, C, Reggio Emilia | Age: 20.1\

  20. Zvonimir Ivisic, PF/C, Arkansas | Age: 21.6\

  21. Malique Lewis, SF/PF, South East Melbourne | Age: 20.3\

  22. Javon Small, PG, West Virginia | Age: 22.2\

  23. Hunter Sallis, SG, Wake Forest | Age: 21.9\

  24. RJ Luis Jr., SF/PF, St. John’s | Age: 22.3\

  25. Ben Henshall, PG/SG, Perth | Age: 20.7\

  26. Igor Milicic Jr., PF, Tennessee | Age: 22.5\

  27. PJ Haggerty, PG, Memphis | Age: 20.9\

  28. Jamir Watkins, SG/SF, Florida St | Age: 23.7\

  29. Micah Peavy, SG/SF, Georgetown | Age: 23.6\

  30. Amari Williams, C, Kentucky | Age: 23.1\

  31. Grant Nelson, PF, Alabama | Age: 23\

  32. Hansen Yang, C, Qingdao | Age: 19.7\

  33. Bruce Thornton, PG, Ohio St | Age: 21.5\

  34. Andrej Stojakovic, SG/SF, California | Age: 20.5\

  35. Augustas Marciulionis, PG, Saint Mary’s | Age: 23\

  36. Wesley Yates III, SG, USC | Age: 20.2\

  37. Trey Kaufman-Renn, PF, Purdue | Age: 22.5\

  38. Otega Oweh, SG, Kentucky | Age: 21.7\

  39. Jalon Moore, SF/PF, Oklahoma | Age: 21.9\

  40. Izan Almansa, PF/C, Perth | Age: 19.7\

  41. Max Shulga, PG/SG, VCU | Age: 22.7\

  42. Payton Sandfort, SF, Iowa | Age: 22.6\

  43. Jaxson Robinson, SG/SF, Kentucky | Age: 22.3\

  44. Lachlan Olbrich, PF/C, Illawarra | Age: 21.2\

  45. Andrew Carr, PF/C, Kentucky | Age: 23.1\

  46. Vladislav Goldin, C, Michigan | Age: 23.8\

  47. Mark Sears, PG, Alabama | Age: 23\

  48. Nate Bittle, PF/C, Oregon | Age: 21.8\

  49. Clifford Omoruyi, C, Alabama | Age: 23.4\

  50. Caleb Grill, SG, Missouri | Age: 24.7\

  51. Ryan Nembhard, PG, Gonzaga | Age: 22\

  52. Kobe Johnson, SG/SF, UCLA | Age: 22.1

Notes: True shooting percentage (TS%) is a formula that blends field goal percentage with free throw shooting and 3-point shooting into a catchall ratio. PR = previous ranking in ESPN’s Top 100.

Draft watch: Stock up

Cooper Flagg, SF/PF, Duke

Top 100 ranking: 1 | PR: 1\

Height: 6-9 | Age: 18.2 | TS%: 60.3%

Flagg showed no effects returning from a scary left ankle injury, helping Duke cruise past Baylor after beating Mount St. Mary’s while posting 32 points, 16 rebounds, 10 assists, and 3 blocks in 51 minutes over two games. Flagg showcased his high-level, two-way versatility and flashed his improvement as a shot creator. He shouldered significant playmaking duties out of pick-and-roll, isolations, post-ups and pushing in the open floor, making passes all over the court and getting to the rim and finishing with both hands.

A stern test awaits Thursday in Newark, New Jersey, with the No. 1 seed Blue Devils facing No. 4 seed Arizona, a game that many NBA executives will attend because the McDonald’s All-American game is set for next Tuesday in nearby Brooklyn, New York. Flagg will match up with Carter Bryant, a projected top-20 pick, for a trip to the Elite Eight against Alabama or BYU. – Givony


Jeremiah Fears, PG, Oklahoma

Top 100 ranking: 7 | PR: 9\

Height: 6-4 | Age: 18.4 | TS%: 57.0%

Fears’ season ended with a first-round loss to UConn, a game in which he was the clear-cut best player, leading all scorers with 20 points. His outstanding creativity and ability to get where he wanted with his jittery handle and play at different speeds were evident. He improved on reads out of pick-and-roll, dissected UConn’s defense with passes all over the floor and scored in many ways. Fears would have likely finished with a dozen assists (he had four) off the good looks he generated, but he was let down by Oklahoma’s 3-for-17 3-point shooting and his bigs’ inability to convert around the basket.

Though aspects of Fears’ defense and finishing in the paint deserve scrutiny, his talent is undeniable. He’s coming off a spectacular freshman season that has positioned him as a top-10 pick, with a strong claim to be made closer to the No. 5 to 7 range of the lottery, depending on how the order shakes out. – Givony


Khaman Maluach, C, Duke

Top 100 ranking: 8 | PR: 7\

Height: 7-2 | Age: 18.5 | TS%: 72.6%

Maluach had a positive weekend facing two undersized frontcourts in Mount St. Mary’s and Baylor, anchoring Duke’s defense in blowout victories. The game seems to be slowing down for Maluach, who is one of the most impactful paint presences in college basketball with an elite combination of mobility, timing, intensity and length. He often deters opponents from attacking the rim, knowing his 9-foot-8 standing reach is looming.

Maluach even made a 3-pointer against Mount St. Mary’s and was a reliable target for lobs, set screens and rolled to the rim. A rematch with Arizona awaits Thursday. He fared well against the Wildcats in November and they will look different this time without 7-foot-2 Motiejus Krivas, who is out because of a foot injury. – Givony


Derik Queen, C, Maryland

Top 100 ranking: 10 | PR: 11\

Height: 6-10 | Age: 20.2 | TS%: 59.9%

Queen had an excellent weekend, showing off his diverse skill set and aggressive mentality. He hit an incredible buzzer-beating game winner against Colorado State to help Maryland advance to its first Sweet 16 since 2016. He made a pair of early 3-pointers (his fifth and sixth makes of the season), was a significant target finishing in pick-and-roll, created his own shots after some gorgeous moves and finished skillfully facing the basket. He brought better defensive intensity than usual in spurts, showing he has another gear when the moment demands it.

The competition will rise significantly in San Francisco on Thursday as Maryland faces off against Florida, which has arguably the best frontcourt in college basketball. The Gators will challenge Queen with the length, physicality, and defensive versatility he has not seen in his career. His matchup with fellow first-rounder Alex Condon will be a huge opportunity for both prospects to show how their skills on both ends will project to the NBA. – Givony


Egor Demin, PG/SG, BYU

Top 100 ranking: 12 | PR: 10\

Height: 6-9 | Age: 19.0 | TS%: 51.3%

Coming off a shaky showing in the Big 12 tournament, Demin had a positive NCAA tournament weekend, posting 26 points, 12 rebounds, 10 assists and just 5 turnovers through two games. He also finished the weekend 5-of-13 from 3s, including a massive late-game shot to help BYU upset Wisconsin. Demin, 19, looked confident and aggressive and had some strong moments making passes all over the floor, showcasing his outstanding court vision and playmaking prowess. He was far from perfect, struggling at times to generate good looks for himself due to his lack of explosiveness, making some shaky decisions, and searching for the right balance between shooting and getting teammates involved, something common for a teenager at this level of competition.

BYU and Demin will match up next against Alabama, which is the most offensively talented team the Cougars have faced this season. – Givony


Will Riley, SG/SF, Illinois

Top 100 ranking: 15 | PR: 22\

Height: 6-8 | Age: 19.1 | TS%: 53.8%

There were plenty of positives from Riley’s finish to the Fighting Illini’s season. He strung together several impressive offensive showings before a forgettable 84-75 loss to Kentucky. Riley had it all on display against Xavier in the first round, scoring 22 points, making good decisions and picking his spots as a scorer and playmaker.

He has gathered steam behind the scenes as a player worth considering late in the lottery. Riley has some shooting upside at his size and room to expand his game if he keeps improving physically. He struggles defensively because of a high center of gravity and lack of strength that can make him a target, but NBA evaluators see that his upside holds up well to most of the better wings in this draft class. – Woo


Nique Clifford, SG, Colorado State

Top 100 ranking: 25 | PR: 39\

Height: 6-6 | Age: 23.1 | TS%: 60.9%

Clifford’s college career ended with a strong NCAA tournament. He dropped 35 points, 15 rebounds and 12 assists in two games against likely the best competition he has faced this season in Memphis and Maryland. Though his jumper wasn’t falling (0-for-9 on 3s), Clifford demonstrated the myriad ways he impacts winning on both ends, handling significant shot-creation duties and making good decisions with the ball. Defensively, he fought over screens, denied off the ball, generated turnovers, and brought terrific intensity against smaller players.

Clifford, 23, looks like a plug-and-play wing option ready to enter a playoff team’s rotation thanks to his feel for the game, maturity, and strong intensity. If his 38% 3-point shooting this season holds up, he should carve out a long and fruitful NBA career. – Givony


Yaxel Lendeborg, PF/C, UAB

Top 100 ranking: 28 | PR: 58\

Height: 6-9 | Age: 22.4 | TS%: 60.5%

After posting impressive numbers for much of the season, Lendeborg has his team in the NIT quarterfinals after back-to-back road wins at St. Joseph’s and Santa Clara.

Lendeborg is making the most of favorable platforms in the AAC tournament and NIT, which are played at convenient scouting locations (Dallas, Philadelphia, San Jose, and Irvine, California) and draw many NBA executives. With his ability to handle, pass, shoot, and rebound, Lendeborg, 22, has the two-way versatility, skill, and instincts NBA teams covet.

His decision-making and technique leave something to be desired at times, and he hasn’t been efficient against better competition (54% TS%, 16% TO% against top-100 opponents). Nonetheless, Lendeborg is a big man who can be deployed all over the floor and has upside. He’ll be weighing NIL offers in the portal (he has one more year of NCAA eligibility) with the feedback he’ll receive in May at the NBA combine, which will likely determine his next move. – Givony


Bennett Stirtz, PG/SG, Drake

Top 100 ranking: 35 | PR: Not ranked\

Height: 6-4 | Age: 21.4 | TS%: 61.1%

Stirtz had a positive NCAA tournament showing, posting 42 points and 12 assists in two games against Missouri and Texas Tech, showing he can hang with SEC and Big 12 competition. He got where he wanted on the floor with his understated burst and slippery ballhandling ability, which is a good sign for his NBA projection, as he created advantages consistently by getting downhill in both games. That’s important because Stirtz is one of the best passers and decision-makers in college basketball. Scouts will be interested in his ability to make split-second decisions and read out of pick-and-rolls once he’s surrounded by better talent.

His dynamic shot making, going 5-for-9 for 3 in two games – including a variety of off-the-dribble 3s from difficult angles – bodes well for him. He made 40% of his 3s this season despite being the focal point of opposing defenses while demonstrating tremendous touch and creativity finishing around the basket. It’s not easy to gauge Stirtz’s defense; he plays all 40 minutes and has to avoid foul trouble because of how heavily his team relies on his playmaking.

Stirtz has shown defensive flashes, chasing opponents around screens, being in the right spots off the ball, generating turnovers and bringing great effort in spurts. Scouts will question his thin frame and lack of length as a defender, as well as his ability to transition to a much faster NBA style.

Stirtz is likely to declare for the draft and gather NBA feedback. Reuniting with Drake coach Ben McCollum, hired by Iowa this week, and returning for his senior year could be an option – absent assurances of a guaranteed contract – as an all-conference showing at the Power-5 level could solidify him into the first-round conversation. Playing at the NBA combine might assuage some of the scouts’ concerns and could improve his standing significantly for this draft. – Givony


Tyrese Proctor, PG, Duke

Top 100 ranking: 46 | PR: 43\

Height: 6-6 | Age: 20.9 | TS%: 59.5%

Proctor took a star turn as Duke comfortably punched its ticket to the Sweet 16. The guard rode a hot streak from long range, scoring 19 against Mount St. Mary’s and 25 against Baylor. He has made 19 of 30 3-pointers in his past three games, including the ACC title game, and is up to 42% from range this season, giving Duke a critical scoring component.

But he has attempted just three 2-pointers in that span, pointing to a somewhat one-dimensional offensive presence. He also doesn’t offer a ton defensively, other than solid size for his position. Guard play will be a swing factor in Duke’s title hopes, and if Proctor continues cooking from outside, it certainly won’t hurt his draft standing. – Woo


John Tonje, SF, Wisconsin

Top 100 ranking: 52 | PR: 60\

Height: 6-6 | Age: 23.9 | TS%: 65.7%

Although Wisconsin fell to BYU in a second-round upset, Tonje’s spectacular 37-point showing in that game cemented his surprise sixth-year breakout and legitimacy as a draft candidate. Despite the poor track record of 24-year-old draftees breaking through in the NBA, Tonje’s strength, perimeter shooting and ability to get into the paint and to the line give him role player potential, considering the constant need for 3-point shooting role players.

He can be streaky, and his defensive projection doesn’t add value, but players with his frame and offensive skill set warrant looks. He will have more to prove in the predraft process, and presumably at the combine, but he helped himself at Wisconsin, after missing most of his lone season at Missouri because of a foot injury. – Woo


Zuby Ejiofor, C, St. John’s

Top 100 ranking: 64 | PR: Not ranked\

Height: 6-9 | Age: 20.9 | TS%: 64.5%

Despite St. John’s’ second-round loss to Arkansas, Ejiofor was a bright spot in that game, totaling 23 points and 12 rebounds against the Razorbacks’ NBA-sized frontline.

Although undersized by NBA standards, his relentless effort on the glass, impressive physicality, ability to sprint the floor and above-average defensive mobility stood out. Ejiofor began his college career at Kansas, turns 21 in April and got his first opportunity as a full-time starter this season for the Johnnies. Pro teams will need to see much more from him. His solid junior season went somewhat unnoticed, but was aided by his play in the March spotlight. He looks like a draft prospect of interest for 2026 with his appealing role player qualities. – Woo


Dailyn Swain, SF, Xavier

Top 100 ranking: 65 | PR: 57\

Height: 6-8 | Age: 19.6 | TS%: 61.2%

Swain scored a career-high 27 points in Xavier’s first-round loss to Illinois, knocking down multiple 3s for the first time this season and playing with more aggression and confidence. His size, agility, and defensive potential should be appealing to NBA teams.

His scoring limitations and questionable shooting (he’s a career 20% shooter from 3 on 54 attempts in two college seasons) make him a project. He will need to expand his comfort level on that end. Swain’s tools and upside make him an interesting player whether he tests the draft or not, but he’d likely be best served developing in college for another season.

On Monday, Swain entered the transfer portal, a source told ESPN’s Jeff Borzello, and Xavier coach Sean Miller reached an agreement to be the next head coach of the Texas Longhorns, according to ESPN sources. – Woo


Draft watch: Stock neutral/down

VJ Edgecombe, SG, Baylor

Top 100 ranking: 4 | PR: 4\

Height: 6-5 | Age: 19.6 | TS%: 56.1%

Edgecombe had a largely successful weekend, capping a strong freshman season, but bowed out to Duke in the round of 32. His electric first step was on display in transition and the half court in both outings, but especially late in the Bears’ NCAA tournament opener against Mississippi State. He took over against the Bulldogs, drawing foul after foul, making clutch free throws, and coming up with important stops.

But he could have looked for his own shot more instead of deferring to Baylor’s ball-dominant guards. Edgecombe, the Big 12 Freshman of the Year, appears entrenched in the top 3 to 5 picks, depending on how the lottery shakes out May 12. – Givony


Tre Johnson, SG, Texas

Top 100 ranking: 5 | PR: 5\

Height: 6-6 | Age: 19.0 | TS%: 56.1%

Johnson’s season ended with a play-in loss to Xavier. It was a typical outing for Johnson this season. He had extreme highs, putting nonstop pressure on the opposing defense with high-level shots running off screens, pulling up off the dribble and hitting impossible step-back jumpers. And discouraging lows, running into screens, settling for well-contested long 2-pointers, poor defense and showing frustration when things didn’t go his way. Scouts have questioned his ability to drive winning after Texas’ 19-16 season, with a less-than-ideal roster surrounding him.

No one doubts Johnson’s pure scoring prowess, as his diverse shotmaking arsenal is built for the NBA. He can pass when he is playing with his head up and looking to make the right play. Johnson’s SEC Freshman of the Year campaign has positioned him well as a potential top-5 pick, and many teams will be looking to get to know him better off the court to determine his potential. – Givony


Kasparas Jakucionis, PG, Illinois

Top 100 ranking: 6 | PR: 6\

Height: 6-6 | Age: 18.8 | TS%: 59.8%

Jakucionis’ season ended on an uneven note, playing well in a first-round win against Xavier in which he finished one rebound short of a triple-double (16 points, 10 assists, 9 rebounds), but struggling in Illinois’ loss to Kentucky. NBA executives haven’t forgotten how good he was early in the season, but he struggled to make shots from long range down the stretch (24.5% over his final 10 games) and recorded six turnovers in each of his last four performances.

At times, he appeared to be pressing to make an impact, but for an 18-year-old adjusting to the physicality and schedule of Division I basketball – and being the focus of opposing scouting reports – Jakucionis fared well overall. His positional size and playmaking instincts, flashes of shotmaking and intangibles should translate into NBA value in the long run, and will keep him in the top-10 conversation. – Woo


Jase Richardson, PG/SG, Michigan State

Top 100 ranking: 13 | PR: 24\

Height: 6-3 | Age: 19.4 | TS%: 63.3%

It hasn’t been a banner tournament for Richardson, going 1-of-10 from the field in a win against New Mexico in the round of 32. He has garnered some buzz as his role has grown at Michigan State, becoming the rare freshman to earn Spartans coach Tom Izzo’s trust. Part of the appeal is how he impacts winning beyond scoring. He’s a smart ball-mover and largely turnover-averse performer who is comfortable playing on and off the ball.

Though he generally makes the most of his tools, he’s not physically overwhelming and that raises questions with NBA scouts, who are concerned about how he would translate into a full-time, on-ball role. Richardson will have a big opportunity to bounce back as Michigan State advances to a Sweet 16 matchup with Ole Miss on Friday. – Woo


Liam McNeeley, SG/SF, UConn

Top 100 ranking: 14 | PR: 12\

Height: 6-7 | Age: 19.4 | TS%: 53.6%

McNeeley finished his season, and likely college career, with 22 points in UConn’s near-upset of No. 1 seed Florida. Though somewhat miscast as the Huskies’ go-to guy at times, McNeeley had a positive freshman season, handling more responsibility than he possibly could handle. NBA teams remain attracted to his positional size, feel for the game, toughness and versatility. However, the biggest question is McNeeley’s shooting, as he shot 31.5% from 3 this season and 44% on 2s.

Though his production since high school suggests he’s a highly efficient, dynamic shotmaker from long distance, McNeeley will need to reinforce that in predraft workouts to enhance his standing. – Woo


Asa Newell, PF/C, Georgia

Top 100 ranking: 21 | PR: 20\

Height: 6-11 | Age: 19.4 | TS%: 62.0%

Newell finished his season with 20 points and eight rebounds against Gonzaga in a game Georgia fell behind early and never recovered. He also turned in his best stat line of the season in an SEC tournament loss to Oklahoma the week before (21 points and 17 rebounds). His motor and production on the offensive glass have helped his case, but NBA teams will point to his inconsistent defensive contributions as they evaluate where he lands on their final draft boards.

His lack of high-level rim protection (32 blocks in 33 college games) coupled with sometimes questionable positioning and feel underscore how far he has to go to earn major minutes in the pros. Newell helped himself this season, but he still profiles as a long-term project for whichever team drafts him, with a lot riding on the development of his outside shot. – Woo


Rasheer Fleming, PF/C, Saint Joseph’s

Top 100 ranking: 29 | PR: 23\

Height: 6-9 | Age: 20.7 | TS%: 64.4%

Fleming’s season ended in discouraging fashion, with disappointing showings in high-profile games in the Atlantic 10 tournament and a loss in the NIT, where his warts as a decision-maker, defender and processor were on display. When Fleming, a 39% 3-point shooter, is making shots, he looks the part of an NBA big man with his 7-foot-5 wingspan, finishing prowess and the way he rebounds, blocks shots and picks up steals.

When he’s not making shots, he doesn’t impact the game in other ways, as he is a poor ball handler and passer, lacks the physicality to utilize his 240-pound frame in the paint and is a step behind defensively. George Mason, Dayton, and VCU targeted him relentlessly in pick-and-roll and one-on-one, and he yielded points on blow-bys, gambled wildly for steals, and was in the wrong spots off the ball, often watching while being late on plays.

Fleming’s excellent physical profile and terrific numbers, largely accumulated against lower-level college competition, will give NBA teams hope for developing him long term. He’s also a young junior (turning 21 in July). But how he ended his season will raise questions from teams seeking answers during the predraft process. – Givony


Drake Powell, SG/SF, North Carolina

Top 100 ranking: 31 | PR: 26\

Height: 6-6 | Age: 19.5 | TS%: 58.6%

Powell’s freshman season ended with North Carolina’s first-round loss to Ole Miss, leaving questions going into the predraft process that place him on the fringe of the first round. He’s a sturdy wing defender who guarded multiple positions effectively with his length and good instincts this season.

He struggled with confidence at times in a suboptimal team context, and never settled in away from the ball in an offense dominated by the Tar Heels’ guards. Powell shot 37% from 3 this season, offering hope for a long-term 3-and-D role at the next level. He flashed some passing ability that wasn’t often evident in the stat sheet. He might greatly benefit from a second season in college to showcase his skills. – Woo


Ryan Kalkbrenner, C, Creighton

Top 100 ranking: 32 | PR: 30\

Height: 7-2 | Age: 23.1 | TS%: 69.2%

Kalkbrenner’s five-year Creighton career ended with a second-round loss to Auburn, sending him into the draft as a reliable, if unspectacular, contributor. Some NBA team will likely value having a depth center who can run the floor, play drop coverage, hit the occasional open shot, and help in emergency minutes.

It’s unclear how his prolific shot blocking will translate against more physical and athletic NBA bigs. His age doesn’t have much-perceived upside, but there will be a place on a roster for Kalkbrenner, as legit 7-footers with his demonstrable consistency are difficult to find. – Woo


Alex Karaban, PF, UConn

Top 100 ranking: 33 | PR: 32\

Height: 6-8 | Age: 22.3 | TS%: 57.3%

Karaban struggled to make shots this past weekend (3-of-14 on 3s) but showed the other ways he impacts winning with his character, feel for the game and underrated defensive versatility, reminding NBA teams of his value as a role player who could thrive when surrounded with more talent.

Though not a fluid mover, Karaban was consistently in the right spots, generating deflections and steals and rotating to protect the rim with his 6-foot-11 wingspan and excellent timing. He keeps the offense moving fluidly by driving and dishing, making touch passes along the perimeter, and finding rollers in stride out of zoom actions. Though he hasn’t shot the ball as well as scouts might have hoped this season (35% from 3-point range), it was notable to see the often-reserved Karaban not shy away from any open shot, even running off screens or picking and popping with a hand in his face.

A 39% 3-point shooter during UConn’s two national championship-winning seasons, it wouldn’t be surprising if Karaban reverts closer to that number with less offensive responsibility than he had this season, which would bring real value with the other things he brings on both ends. – Givony


Miles Byrd, SG, San Diego State

Top 100 ranking: 50 | PR: 38\

Height: 6-7 | Age: 20.5 | TS%: 52.3%

Byrd had one of his worst games of the season, going 1-for-5 from the field with three turnovers in San Diego State’s loss to North Carolina in the NCAA tournament’s play-in game. Byrd has struggled offensively against high-level competition. He has posted a paltry 45% True Shooting percentage and averaged 10.4 points over 10 games against top-50 opponents, per KenPom. Byrd’s vaunted block and steal rates, the basis for his sparkling analytic profile, also dropped off dramatically in those games.

His rail-thin frame and lack of physicality raise questions about his ability to become a defensive stopper fighting over screens and containing stronger players one-on-one in the NBA. Byrd had a breakout season and put himself on NBA radars, and he will likely test the draft waters to see how teams view him. Returning for a fourth year of college and polishing his offensive skill set might prove to be in his best interest. – Givony


Ian Jackson, SG/SF, North Carolina

Top 100 ranking: 56 | PR: 33\

Height: 6-4 | Age: 20.1 | TS%: 57.7%

Jackson’s role evaporated over the final stretch of the season, and he totaled 10 points in 26 minutes in North Carolina’s two NCAA tournament losses.

His defensive shortcomings limited his ability to contribute for the Tar Heels (just 19 minutes per game in his last 15 games) and that outweighed a strong first couple of months. Returning to college and working on his all-around game looks like the most prudent move for his career, with his scoring ability offering a long-term pathway to the NBA. – Woo