By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2024-10-08 17:02:44
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
在缺少了维克多·文班亚马（Victor Wembanyama）和许多队友的情况下，圣安东尼奥马刺队以107-112的比分输掉了季前赛的首场比赛。马刺队在第三节以40-29的比分赢了俄克拉荷马城雷霆队，但在其他三节比赛中却没有表现出足够的凝聚力。
和文班亚马一起坐在板凳席上的还有德文·瓦塞尔（Devin Vassell）、克里斯·保罗（Chris Paul）、扎克·科林斯（Zach Collins）、查尔斯·巴斯西（Charles Bassey）和小戴维·杜克（David Duke Jr.）。据报道，瓦塞尔将缺席常规赛，但其他人，包括文班亚马，应该很快就会复出。
马刺对阵雷霆数据统计
马刺对阵雷霆最终评分
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊看起来比上赛季瘦了大约20磅，但他的季前赛首秀却令人失望。在防守端，他犯了太多错误，其中一些肯定引起了教练的不满。在进攻端，他表现得更好，但约翰逊在那场比赛中更多地是依靠蛮力而不是头脑。
评分：D+
特雷·琼斯 (Tre Jones)
在保罗缺阵的情况下，琼斯并没有真正起到什么作用。他在防守端还算可以，但他的组织能力很差，决策也远不如平时果断。
评分：C
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯的统计数据看起来并不出色，但他显然是马刺队中最成熟的球员。他的移动很有目的性，并且始终保持克制。他的防守方式就像他知道这只是一场季前赛一样，但在进攻端，他展现出了惊人的控制力。
评分：B
杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)
索汉在21分钟的上场时间里表现有好有坏。他在场上无处不在，但这并不是一种赞扬。如果他在进攻端的决策能够更快一些就好了。他错失了空位队友，并且运球过多。在防守端，他的过度活跃弊大于利。话虽如此，索汉也有一些亮点。他的三分球看起来更好了，他不时地展现出组织进攻的能力。
评分：C
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
嗯，尚帕尼可不是一个害羞的人。他在21分钟的上场时间里出手了13次三分球。仅在上半场，他就在14分钟内出手了10次三分球。说实话，我很喜欢尚帕尼的表现。马刺队需要空间型球员，他今晚就扮演了这个角色。他的投篮看起来不错，他也是马刺队中为数几个认真防守的球员之一。他的篮板球也是一个加分项。
评分：A-
锡迪·西索科 (Sidy Cissoko)
优点：西索科的传球非常好。当他身边都是NBA级别的球员时，他传球的能力就显露出来了。在防守端，他的身体对抗能力值得注意。缺点：西索科在外线空位时甚至不看篮筐。这对他的发展来说是一个非常糟糕的迹象。他还犯规太多，控球能力也不强。
评分：C+
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔的处子秀表现非常稳固。当然，在正式比赛中出现6次失误是不可取的，但这些失误主要是因为他需要适应更高水平的对抗。这位新秀在冲击篮筐时的耐心和力量显而易见。在防守端，他不负众望。他的传球、组织进攻和积极决策能力都足以让人兴奋。
评分：B+
布雷克·韦斯利 (Blake Wesley)
韦斯利有时显得过于失控，但他在18分钟内送出7次助攻，只出现1次失误，所以这位三年级球员显然很好地控制了比赛。他利用自己的速度获得了优势，并在突破防守时做出了很多正确的选择。我也喜欢韦斯利在防守端的活力。要想更上一层楼，他需要更多地寻求得分。
评分：B+
马拉奇·布拉汉姆 (Malaki Branham)
18分钟内出手14次？没错，只要能看到篮筐，布拉汉姆就会出手投篮。除了在马刺队的一次进攻高潮中投进了几个三分球之外，我认为他今晚的表现并不出色。布拉汉姆的防守很差，如果能多传球就好了。高出手次数下的低效率表现毫无价值。
评分：D+
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利 (Sandro Mamukelashvili)
马穆克拉什维利一如既往地在得到机会时就能有所贡献。他高篮球智商的打球风格在今晚格外引人注目。尽管周围一片混乱，但他聪明的打法还是让人无法忽视。马穆三分球4投3中也为他的表现增色不少。
评分：A-
哈里森·英格拉姆 (Harrison Ingram)
英格拉姆打球时显得有些紧张，但他的表现还不错。他在防守端有很好的意识，在进攻端也知道该怎么做。让我们看看他是否有足够的运动能力和投篮能力在联盟中立足。
评分：B-
布兰登·波士顿 Jr. (Brandon Boston Jr.)
波士顿打得很努力，在运球方面也有一些漂亮的动作，但他对比赛的影响微乎其微。
评分：C+
莱利·米尼克斯 (Riley Minix)
米尼克斯可能是这份训练营名单上最令人惊喜的球员。在大学里，他的投篮非常出色，得分手段多样。在他的第一场NBA季前赛中，米尼克斯表明他的一些大学成功经验可以延续到下一个级别。他的投篮姿势很标准，而且很明显，他不只是一个定点投手。
评分：B+
马拉奇·弗林 (Malachi Flynn)
弗林在垃圾时间表现出色，这并不奇怪，因为他已经在联盟中打拼了一段时间。进入最终名单并不容易，但也不是不可能。弗林需要继续证明自己能够得分、拉开空间并在防守端做出贡献。
评分：B+
内森·门萨 (Nathan Mensah)
门萨除了投丢几个球之外，并没有什么其他表现。这位中锋最好的情况是用一份双向合同留在球队。
评分：C+
格雷格·波波维奇 (Gregg Popovich)
在季前赛中很难对教练进行评分，但我个人希望能在表演赛中看到健康的文班亚马和保罗。
评分：C+
雅各布·托比 (Jacob Tobey)
随着比尔·兰德在休赛期退役，27岁的雅各布·托比被选中接替他的位置。我喜欢我听到的内容。托比听起来知识渊博，但又不会说得太多，这很难做到。他和肖恩·埃利奥特之间的默契在一场比赛中就已显露无疑。干得好。
评分：A-
点击查看原文：Grades: Spurs vs. Thunder – Preseason Game #1
Grades: Spurs vs. Thunder – Preseason Game #1
Without Victor Wembanyama and many of his friends, the San Antonio Spurs dropped their preseason opener to the Oklahoma City Thunder by a final count of 112-107. The good guys outscored OKC 40-29 in the third quarter but didn’t show much cohesion in the other three periods.
Alongside Wembanyama on the bench could be found Devin Vassell, Chris Paul, Zach Collins, Charles Bassey and David Duke, Jr. Vassell will reportedly remain out into the regular season but the others, including Wembanyama, should return to action soon.
Stats: Spurs vs. Thunder
Spurs vs. Thunder — Final Grades
Keldon Johnson
Looking about 20 pounds slimmer than last season, Johnson had a preseason debut to forget. Defensively, there were too many mistakes — including a few that surely drew ire from the coaches. Offensively, he was better but Johnson was playing with more brawn than brain on that end too.
Grade: D+
Tre Jones
With Chris Paul on the sidelines, Jones didn’t really move the needle. He was okay-ish defensively but his playmaking was minimal and his decision-making wasn’t as crisp as usual.
Grade: C
Harrison Barnes
Barnes’ statistics don’t look especially good but he was clearly the adult in the room for the Spurs. He moved with purpose and always remained under control. He played defense like he realized it was only a preseason affair but he exhibited an intriguing amount of wherewithal on offense.
Grade: B
Jeremy Sochan
Sochan did a lot of good and a lot of bad during his 21 minutes on the court. He was everywhere — but that shouldn’t be taken as a compliment. Quicker decisions on offense would have been helpful. He missed open teammates and dribbled too much. Defensively, his hyperness was more hurtful than helpful. That said, Sochan had some bright spots. His three-point shot looked better and he flashed playmaking chops here and there.
Grade: C
Julian Champagnie
Well, Champagnie wasn’t exactly shy. He shot 13 three-pointers in only 21 minutes of action. In the first half alone, he had ten three-point attemps in 14 minutes. Truthfully, I liked what I saw from Champagnie. The Spurs need floor-spacers and he assumed that role tonight. His shot looked good and he was also one of the few players on the Spurs who tried to play defense. His rebounding was also a plus.
Grade: A-
Sidy Cissoko
The good: Cissoko’s passing was very good. When he’s surrounded by NBA level talent, his ability to dish the rock pops. Defensively, his physicality was notable. The bad: Cissoko doesn’t even look at the rim when he’s open from the perimeter. That’s a really bad sign for his development. He also fouls too much and isn’t much of a ball-handler.
Grade: C+
Stephon Castle
Castle looked rock solid in his debut. Sure, totaling six turnovers won’t cut it in a real game but those miscues were mostly a matter of him needing to adjust to a new caliber of athlete. The rookie’s patience and strength when attacking the rim were clear to see. Defensively, he lived up to the hype. There were enough flashes of passing, playmaking and positive decision-making to get excited about.
Grade: B+
Blake Wesley
Wesley was teetering on being too out of control at times but he finished with seven assists and only one turnover in 18 minutes — so the third year pro obviously held things together well enough. He used his speed to his advantage and made a lot of correct reads when breaking down the defense. I also liked Wesley’s energy on defense. To take the next step, he’s going to have to look to score the ball more.
Grade: B+
Malaki Branham
Fourteen field goal attempts in 18 minutes? Yeah, Branham was firing away whenever he could see the orange of the rim. Other than a couple threes he hit during a Spurs run, I wouldn’t say he did an especially good job tonight. Branham’s defense was poor and mixing in more passes wouldn’t have hurt matters. Sub par efficiency on high volume can’t be valued much at all.
Grade: D+
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Mamukelashvili continues to be a player who produces when given the opportunity. His high basketball IQ style of play really stood out this evening. With a lot of chaos around him, his smart plays were impossible to overlook. It also didn’t hurt matters than Mamu sank 3-of-4 three-pointers.
Grade: A-
Harrison Ingram
Ingram played with nervous energy but he was mostly fine. He has good instincts on defense and knows what to do on offense. We’ll see if he’s athletic enough and can shoot it well enough to make it in the association.
Grade: B-
Brandon Boston Jr.
Boston played hard and had a couple slick moves off the dribble — but his impact on the proceedings was minimal.
Grade: C+
Riley Minix
Minix is probably the sleeper of this training camp roster. In college, he shot really well and scored in a variety of ways. In his first NBA preseason game, Minix showed that some of his college success may translate to the next level. He has a pure shooting stroke and it’s already clear that he’s more than a catch-and-shoot specialist.
Grade: B+
Malachi Flynn
Flynn played well in garbage time, which isn’t surprising since he’s been around the league for a while. Making the final roster won’t be easy but it’s not impossible. Flynn will need to continue to show he can score the ball, space the floor and compete on defense.
Grade: B+
Nathan Mensah
Mensah didn’t do much other than miss a couple shots. The center’s best case scenario is to make the team on a two-way deal.
Grade: C+
Pop
It’s difficult to grade coaching in the preseason but personally I’m hoping we see a healthy amount of Victor Wembanyama and Chris Paul in exhibition play.
Grade: C+
Jacob Tobey
With Bill Land retiring in the offseason, 27-year-old Jacob Tobey has been selected to fill his shoes. I liked what I heard. Tobey sounded knowledgeable without talking too much, which is difficult to pull off. His chemistry with Sean Elliott was already palpable one game in. Good stuff.
Grade: A-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk