5.1 Buck Harvey: Horry and small stuff: Nellie lesson

Buck Harvey: Horry and small stuff: Nellie lesson

http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/basketball/nba/spurs/stories/MYSA050107.01D.COL.BKNharvey.spurs.3e60a09.html

Web Posted: 05/01/2007 01:27 AM CDT
San Antonio Express-News

DENVER — Gregg Popovich went small to start the fourth quarter, and that meant one thing.

He’s been watching a lot of the Dallas-Golden State series.

But he took more from Don Nelson than that one trick. He took a lot from Nelson when Popovich worked for him, and he took even more when Nelson upset the Spurs in 1991.

What did Popovich take from that?

That the right personality means as much as talent.

Popovich needed talent, too, Monday night. That was on full display with about 30 seconds left. Then, Robert Horry stepped back and did what Robert Horry does.

“It wasn’t designed for me,” Horry said. “It was designed for Tony Parker, but we play team basketball.”

That brings up the personality angle and how this team is built on players who get along and understand the power of the locker room. Popovich understood this long ago; playing for Air Force likely taught him about teamwork. But this was reinforced on the pro level when Popovich was just starting.

The 1991 season is prehistoric for this franchise, but Sean Elliott says he’s been thinking about it. When he watches the Mavericks and Warriors, he remembers the only time he felt embarrassed after losing a series.

There had never been a bigger playoff upset at the time. The Spurs were the No. 2 seed, with speed and height and Larry Brown, and the year before, they had lost a classic seventh game to Portland.

Nelson coached the Warriors then, just as he does now. And he unleashed a small lineup on the Spurs just as he does on the Mavericks now. Tom Tolbert, better at TV now than he was as a player then, defended David Robinson, and Mario Elie got a surprise start against Terry Cummings.

Another similarity between these Mavericks and those Spurs: Nellie got away with going small because Robinson, like Dirk Nowitzki, was never best at posting deep. Cummings added to the Golden State strategy with an injury.

Someone else observing that series: George Karl was on hand as an unpaid assistant to Nelson.

But that’s where the parallels end. The Spurs weren’t a 67-win power as Dallas was this regular season, and they weren’t coming off a Finals appearance. Too many Spurs were going in different directions, and Elliott remembers that group as a “fake team.”

So Nelson didn’t take advantage of mismatches as much as he exposed the Spurs. They were fractured, without a sense of what was necessary, and Brown apparently understood as much. He wouldn’t last through the next season.

Working as Spurs assistants then — and not saying much — were Popovich and R.C. Buford. They would leave San Antonio, both going their own ways. And when they returned several years later, they built a different kind of roster.

They were lucky, of course. Building around Robinson and Tim Duncan would be a joy for any franchise.

But they’ve been careful to add the right people. From Jacque Vaughn, the consummate locker-room guy. To Brent Barry, who could sit on the bench through most of this series before getting a chance in Game 4. To Michael Finley, once a star and now happy to contribute. To Fab Oberto, who fits as seamlessly as Manu Ginobili has.

All five were together to start the fourth quarter, and that small combination was a playoff first. Then Vaughn threw in a jumper, Ginobili followed with a couple of free throws and a 3-pointer, and Karl called a timeout.

“I know they are small,” Karl told his guys. “I see that. Get out, and guard them.”

Popovich would play Nellie ball only for a few minutes. Going back to Duncan always makes sense, and then Duncan showed the personality that works through adversity. He’d been frustrated by the lack of calls, but none of it mattered without about a minute left. Then, he stepped through Nenê for a score.

“Guys got frustrated,” Horry said. “But tough times are going to happen, and tough people get going.”

Popovich saw the other side of that, and he learned from it.

开始翻译之前先八几句~~
火箭赢下了天王山,不过看他们打得也够吃力的,全靠了三分RP爆发呀。。。
热队钓鱼去了,下一个该谁了捏?呵呵,偶还是不说了,攒RP哦。。
忽然想起来,是哪个记者写过的,说总决赛是骑士对马刺呢,恩恩,现在看起来,不是没可能哦~~
:smiley:

丹佛—第四节一开始,Gregg Popovich换上了小个阵容,这说明了一个问题。

勇士和小牛的系列赛,他肯定一场都没拉下。

当然Popovich从Don Nelson 那儿学到的远不止这些,在担任Nelson助理教练的岁月中,在马刺1991年被Nelson的勇士淘汰的第一轮季后赛中,他学到的更多。

那么Popovich从那个系列赛中学到了什么呢?

就比赛而言,球员的性格和天赋一样重要。

周一晚的Popovich当然也需要球员的天赋来赢下比赛,这一点在比赛还剩30秒时展露无疑—Robert Horry 就象传说中的Robert Horry一样,拿球,后退一步,投篮,得分。

“那个战术本来不是由我,而是Tony Parker执行的,不过,我们打的是团队篮球嘛。”Horry赛后回忆。

这恰好提醒了我们球员的性格有多重要,以及这个团队是由怎样的球员组成的,他们相处融洽,明白和谐的更衣室会带来怎样的力量。Popovich 很久之前就对此坚信不移:在空军学院的日子让他了解了什么是团队精神,而进入职业篮球领域则让他明白这一精神的重要性。

即使1991年那个赛季早已是陈年旧事,但Sean Elliott 说他最近一直在回忆那个系列赛。就在观看小牛与勇士的系列赛时,他又想起了那唯一的一次,自己在输掉一轮系列赛后所感受到的尴尬和难堪。

那是当时最让人失望的系列赛,排名第二种子的马刺,由Larry Brown领导部门军,有的是速度和高度,还有着必胜的动力—前一个赛季,他们在一场典型的第七战中不敌波特兰。

和现在一样的,是当时的勇士由Nelson 带领。而他对付马刺的方法,与现在对付小牛的办法如出一辙—小个阵容。投身解说员事业远比当球员出色的Tom Tolbert,负责防守David Robinson,Mario Elie 则意外的在开球时发现自己的对手是Terry Cummings。

而另一个此时的小牛与彼时的马刺相似之处,是?又一次小球战术的得逞,因为Dirk Nowitzki,跟Robinson一样,从来都不是低位要位的好手。Cummings 则以一个受伤帮助了勇士战术的顺利实施。

还有人明察秋毫发现了十多年前的这一幕:George Karl 当时就坐在Nelson的旁边,以免费助教的身份。

可惜类比到此必须为止,毕竟当年的马刺不是今年的小牛—常规赛67胜的头号种子,去年功亏一篑的总决赛参与者。那时的马刺球员有太多个人打算,Elliott还记得,那是个“伪团队”。

所以让Nelson赢下那个系列赛的,除了错位攻防,还有压力下马刺球员被暴露的缺点。那个团队漏洞百出,球员们不知道要赢下比赛需要做什么,Brown 看来很清楚这一切,他甚至没能撑到下一个赛季结束。

当时作为马刺助理教练的,是当时沉默寡言的Popovich和R.C. Buford。那个赛季后没多久他们也离开了圣城。几年后当他们回来时,一支全新的球队成型了。

当然他们是幸运的,围绕Robinson和Tim Duncan 建立一套阵容对哪支球队来说都是求之不得的。

但他们也是小心的,对于该找些怎样的角色球员。从更衣室里的老好人Jacque Vaughn,到这个系列赛大部分时间坐在板凳上直到第四场的Brent Barry。从曾经是球队核心而现在乐于为队友贡献力量的Michael Finley,到毫不费力融合进球队的Manu Ginobili和Fab Oberto。

第四节先发上场的就是这五名球员—这样的小个阵容在季后赛还是第一次。于是Vaughn 跳投得手,Ginobili 罚球成功,三分命中,所以Karl叫了暂停。

Karl对他的球员说:“我知道对手现在都是些小个子。我看出来了。现在你们该做的是上场,好好防住他们。”

可惜Popovich只打了几分钟的Nellie战术。重新以Duncan为核心总是对的,而Duncan也展示了他应付不同比赛情形的性格。虽然裁判对他被侵犯的熟视无睹让他恼火,但在比赛还剩下不够一分钟时,这一切都变得无关紧要了。重要的是他越过了Nenê,投篮得分。

“球员都有郁闷的时候,可是到了重要时刻,只有坚强的球员能够挺过去。”Horry说。

Popovich看到的则是事情的另一面,这是他很就以前就学习到的。

丹佛 — 第四节一开始,Gregg Popovich换上了小个阵容,这说明了一个问题。

勇士和小牛的系列赛,他肯定一场都没拉下。

当然Popovich从Don Nelson那儿学到的远不止这些,在担任Nelson助理教练的岁月中,在马刺1991年被Nelson的勇士淘汰的第一轮季后赛中,他学到的更多。

那么Popovich从那个系列赛中学到了什么呢?

就比赛而言,球员的性格和天赋一样重要。

周一晚的Popovich当然也需要球员的天赋来赢下比赛,这一点在比赛还剩30秒时展露无疑——Robert Horry就像传说中的Robert Horry一样,拿球,后退一步,投篮,得分。

“那个战术本来不是由我,而是Tony Parker执行的,不过,我们打的是团队篮球嘛。”Horry赛后回忆。

这恰好提醒了我们球员的性格有多重要,以及这个团队是由怎样的球员组成的,他们相处融洽,明白和谐的更衣室会带来怎样的力量。Popovich很久之前就对此坚信不移:在空军学院的日子让他了解了什么是团队精神,而进入职业篮球领域则让他明白这一精神的重要性。

即使1991年那个赛季早已是陈年旧事,但Sean Elliott说他最近一直在回忆那个系列赛。就在观看小牛与勇士的系列赛时,他又想起了那唯一的一次,自己在输掉一轮系列赛后所感受到的尴尬和难堪。

那是当时最让人失望的系列赛,排名第二种子的马刺,由Larry Brown领导部门军,有的是速度和高度,还有着必胜的动力——前一个赛季,他们在一场典型的第七战中不敌波特兰。

和现在一样的,是当时的勇士由Nelson带领。而他对付马刺的方法,与现在对付小牛的办法如出一辙——小个阵容。投身解说员事业远比当球员出色的Tom Tolbert,负责防守David Robinson,Mario Elie则意外的在开球时发现自己的对手是Terry Cummings。

而另一个此时的小牛与彼时的马刺相似之处,是?又一次小球战术的得逞,因为Dirk Nowitzki,跟Robinson一样,从来都不是低位要位的好手。Cummings则以一个受伤帮助了勇士战术的顺利实施。

还有人明察秋毫发现了十多年前的这一幕:George Karl当时就坐在Nelson的旁边,以免费助教的身份。

可惜类比到此必须为止,毕竟当年的马刺不是今年的小牛——常规赛67胜的头号种子,去年功亏一篑的总决赛参与者。那时的马刺球员有太多个人打算,Elliott还记得,那是个“伪团队”。

所以让Nelson赢下那个系列赛的,除了错位攻防,还有压力下马刺球员被暴露的缺点。那个团队漏洞百出,球员们不知道要赢下比赛需要做什么,Brown看来很清楚这一切,他甚至没能撑到下一个赛季结束。

当时作为马刺助理教练的,是当时沉默寡言的Popovich和R.C. Buford。那个赛季后没多久他们也离开了圣城。几年后当他们回来时,一支全新的球队成型了。

当然他们是幸运的,围绕Robinson和Tim Duncan建立一套阵容对哪支球队来说都是求之不得的。

但他们也是小心的,对于该找些怎样的角色球员。从更衣室里的老好人Jacque Vaughn,到这个系列赛大部分时间坐在板凳上直到第四场的Brent Barry。从曾经是球队核心而现在乐于为队友贡献力量的Michael Finley,到毫不费力融合进球队的Manu Ginobili和Fab Oberto。

第四节先发上场的就是这五名球员——这样的小个阵容在季后赛还是第一次。于是Vaughn跳投得手,Ginobili罚球成功,三分命中,所以Karl叫了暂停。

Karl对他的球员说:“我知道对手现在都是些小个子。我看出来了。现在你们该做的是上场,好好防住他们。”

可惜Popovich只打了几分钟的Nellie战术。重新以Duncan为核心总是对的,而Duncan也展示了他应付不同比赛情形的性格。虽然裁判对他被侵犯的熟视无睹让他恼火,但在比赛还剩下不够一分钟时,这一切都变得无关紧要了。重要的是他越过了Nenê,投篮得分。

“球员都有郁闷的时候,可是到了重要时刻,只有坚强的球员能够挺过去。”Horry说。

Popovich看到的则是事情的另一面,这是他很就以前就学习到的。