By Boxscorehistory | Pounding The Rock (PtR), 2026-06-09 12:52:57
首先，我想向社区的读者们道歉，因为我错过了G2的分析文章。这倒不是因为最后10秒的比赛看得我想吐（虽然确实如此），而是因为我的两个年幼的孩子病了，整个周末都在往我身上吐。无论如何，我非常高兴能重新投入工作，而在本场比赛中，马刺纠正了困扰他们前两场比赛的最大问题：决胜时刻糟糕的执行力。除此之外，这场比赛的技术统计表还呈现出了一些非常有趣且罕见的细节。让我们一起来回顾一下：
注意： 随着季后赛的开始，用于评分的参考样本已从2012-2013赛季以来的常规赛，调整为2012-2013赛季以来的季后赛。除非下文另有说明，否则该样本确实包含附加赛。截至2026年6月8日结束，该样本共包含1204场比赛。
决定比赛胜负的因素
- 马刺和尼克斯在进攻机会相关的关键数据上互有胜负，但最终这种博弈对圣安东尼奥更为有利。首先，纽约多抢了3个防守篮板和6个进攻篮板，在其他条件相同的情况下，这本应为他们确保明显的进攻机会优势。然而，他们也多出现了5次失误，这大大削弱了这一优势。此外，尼克斯的失误付出了惨痛代价，马刺利用失误得分以21比7完爆对手。
- 从效率的角度来看，两队在任何单一领域都没有取得压倒性的优势。马刺在投篮表现上略微占优，投篮命中率（FG%）和三分命中率（3P%）的差值分别为+0.97和+0.16个百分点。然而，纽约在罚球命中率（FT%）上的优势达到了+3.69个百分点。
- 尽管效率较低，但尼克斯凭借更好的出手权（包括总出手次数多4次，三分出手多3次），在运动战得分上比圣安东尼奥多拿了3分。
- 鉴于尼克斯在运动战中的这一优势，这场比赛最终是在罚球线上决出胜负的。纽约仅比圣安东尼奥多犯规两次，但这些犯规的时机和类型要糟糕得多（这在很大程度上反映了圣安东尼奥极具侵略性的进攻）。结果，马刺获得了多出10次罚球的机会，并最终在罚球线上比尼克斯多得了7分。
罕见的数据统计
- 马刺成为自2012-2013赛季以来，仅有的第九支在季后赛中助攻比对手至少多出10次、但最终净胜不超过4分的赢球队伍。通常情况下，助攻优势达到这一幅度的获胜球队往往能净胜20分或更多。
- 与迈克·布朗 (Mike Brown) 想让你相信的相反，马刺本场比赛的罚球出手数（FTA）差值并非极其反常；事实上，自2012-2013赛季以来，近18%的季后赛获胜者（1204场中的213场）都拥有至少一样好的罚球差值。然而，马刺是在仅比纽约少犯规两次的情况下完成这一壮举的。在此期间，其他季后赛获胜者中，只有36场（1203场中略多于1/33）在犯规优势如此微弱的情况下，能比对手多获得10次以上的罚球。
- 圣安东尼奥成为自2012-2013赛季以来，第46支在投篮命中数和三分命中数均少于对手的情况下依然赢得比赛的季后赛获胜球队。
- 对于季后赛的赢球队伍来说，在拼抢进攻篮板极度挣扎的同时却在控制失误上完胜对手，这是相对罕见的。事实上，圣安东尼奥成为了自2012-2013赛季以来，仅有的第48支在进攻篮板差值不大于-6且失误差值达到-5或更好的季后赛获胜球队。
- 文班的精彩表现似乎几乎总是伴随着极其罕见的数据组合。在这场比赛中，他砍下了至少32分、8个篮板、6次助攻、2次抢断和3次盖帽，这是自1996-1997赛季季后赛以来，第10次有人在季后赛中打出如此全能的数据。
什么是球队数据评分？
简而言之，这些技术统计评分是对获胜方与落败方在基础数据上的差值进行评级，评分依据是获胜球队的差值与特定参考样本期内其他NBA获胜球队的差值对比。可以把它看作是一张成绩单，用来了解某支特定的获胜球队相对于其他获胜者的表现如何。所使用的参考样本期从2012-2013赛季开始一直到最近的比赛日，且仅包含相同赛事类别的比赛（即常规赛和季后赛不会进行相互对比）。
数据来源： 用于生成这些数据评分的基础数据收集自Basketball Reference。在所有情况下，数据均在比赛结束后的次日早晨收集。尽管罕见，但数据收集后确实可能会出现赛后数据修正，这可能会对最终结果产生事后影响。
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Box Grades: Silver and Black hold their ground in must-win Game 3
Box Grades: Silver and Black hold their ground in must-win Game 3
First and foremost, I want to apologize to the community for missing my Game 2 article; it wasn’t because the last 10 seconds made me want to throw up (though that certainly was the case); rather, it was because my two young kids have been sick and spent the weekend throwing up on me. In any case, I couldn’t be happier to return to action in a game where the Spurs corrected the main thing that plagued them in Games 1 and 2: poor execution down the stretch. On top of that, this game produced a box score laden with several interesting quirks. Let’s review:
Note: Now that we’ve moved into the postseason, the reference period used for grading changes from the set of regular season games since 2012-2013 to the set of postseason games since 2012-2013. Unless otherwise noted below, this set DOES include play-in games. As of the end of June 8 2026, this group include 1,204 games.
Factors that decided the game
- The Spurs and Knicks traded off some important box score wins with respect to offensive opportunity, though in the end this trade favored San Antonio. First, New York recorded 3 more defensive boards and six more offensive rebounds, which (all else equal) should have secured them a solid edge in offensive opportunity. However, They did have five more turnovers, which dampened that edge significantly. Furthermore, the Knick’s turnovers were costly, as the Spurs crushed them on points off turnovers (21 to 7).
- From an efficiency standpoint, no team racked up a massive advantage in any one area. The Spurs were slightly better from the field, with FG% and 3P% differentials of +0.97 and +0.16 percentage points, respectively. However, New York’s FT% margin was +3.69 percentage points.
- While less efficient, the Knicks outscored San Antonio by three from the field on the back of better volume, including four more total shot attempts and three more threes.
- Given this advantage from the field for the Knicks, this game was ultimately decided at the free throw line. New York only committed two more fouls than San Antonio, but the timing and type of those fouls was much worse (which largely reflected San Antonio’s aggressive offense). As a result, the Spurs got to shoot 10 more free throws, and ultimately outscored the Knicks by seven from the charity stripe.
Rare Box Score Stats
- The Spurs became just the ninth postseason winner since 2012-2013 to have at least 10 more assists than their opponent and win by no more than four points. Typically, a victor with an assist margin at least as good wins by 20 or more.
- Contrary to what Mike Brown would have you believe, the Spurs FTA margin in this game wasn’t wildly out of the ordinary; in fact, nearly 18% of postseason winners (213 of 1,204) have had a FTA differential at least as good since 2012-2013. However, the Spurs did accomplish this feat while only logging two fewer fouls than New York. Only 36 of 1,203 (a bit more than 1 in 33) other postseason winners during the period have enjoyed 10+ more free throws than there opponent with so narrow an edge in fouls.
- San Antonio became the 46th postseason winner since 2012-2013 to make fewer field goals and threes than their opponent.
- It’s relatively rare for a postseason winner to really struggle on the offensive glass while handily winning the turnover battle. In fact, San Antonio became just the 48th postseason winner since 2012-2013 to have an ORB differential no better than – 6 and a turnover differential of – 5 or better.
- Wemby’s great games seem to nearly always coincide with a box score combination that is extremely rare. In this case, he recorded just the 10th playoff performance since the 1996-1997 postseason that included 32+ points, 8+ rebounds, 6+ assists, 2+ steals, and 3+ blocks.
What are Team Graded Box Scores?
Very briefly, these box scores grade winner-loser differentials for basic box score statistics, with the grade being based on the winning team’s differential relative to other NBA winners during a defined reference period. Think of it like a report card for understanding how a given winner performed relative to other winners. The reference period used runs from the start of the 2012-2013 season to the latest date of play, including only games in the same season category (i.e., regular season and playoff games are not compared to each other).
***Data Source:*The underlying data used to create these box scores was collected fromBasketball Reference. In all cases, the data are collected the morning after the game is played. Although rare, postgame statistical revisions after data collection do occur and may affect the results after the fact.
By Boxscorehistory, via Pounding The Rock