# \[The Athletic\] 尼克斯的13连胜终结了。现在是时候展现他们真正的面貌了
**URL:** https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/47390
**Category:** 环球刺讯
**Tags:** 迈克-布朗, 2025-26赛季
**Created:** [2026 年6 月 9 日 17:31 UTC](https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/47390 "2026-06-09T17:31:16Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1
### 作者：  [@TheAthletic](https://chinaspurs.com/u/TheAthletic)
#### 发布日期： [2026 年6 月 9 日 17:31 UTC](https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/47390/1 "2026-06-09T17:31:16Z")
By James L. Edwards III | The Athletic, 2026-06-09 10:00:37
_《The Athletic》正在实时报道2026年NBA总决赛第四场_[_马刺对阵尼克斯_](https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/live-blogs/spurs-vs-knicks-live-updates-nba-finals-game-4-score-result/Db9u9bivH79v/)_的比赛。_
纽约——连胜终结了。所有关于统治力的讨论现在都成了过眼云烟。近两个月来，[纽约尼克斯](https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/47374)第一次显得并非不可战胜。
然而，这往往也是他们最危险的时候。
尼克斯一路顺风顺水地杀入NBA总决赛第三场，在此之前，他们对任何挡在面前的对手都予以了沉重打击。这波13连胜期间，他们屡屡以惊人的分差狂胜对手，让许多人将他们奉为有史以来最伟大的季后赛球队之一。但在周一晚上，随着在麦迪逊广场花园以[111-115不敌](https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/47374)圣安东尼奥马刺，这波连胜戛然而止。
然而，尼克斯真正的特质并非由那段辉煌时期所定义。任何在过去两个赛季密切关注他们的人都知道，他们的DNA深植于韧性之中。我们一次又一次地看到这支球队在落后两位数的情况下逆转取胜。我们看到他们赢得了NBA杯，随后遭遇2胜9负的低谷，就在许多人急于唱衰他们时，他们却轰出一波八连胜。我们曾看到他们在季后赛系列赛中以1-2落后，随后却化身为最强版本的迈克尔·乔丹 (Michael Jordan) 芝加哥公牛和2010年代的金州勇士，接连轰下一场又一场30分的大胜。
纽约虽然目前仍以2-1的大比分领先，但现在必须找回让他们走到今天的立身之本，以避免重蹈覆辙。历史经验告诉我们，一切都会好起来的。
“（输球）并不是一种令人意外的感觉，”在第三场比赛中13投9中砍下28分的OG·阿努诺比 (OG Anunoby) 说道，“他们同样是一支伟大的球队，不可能轻易束手就擒。
“我们能做的就是向前看，并从中吸取教训。我们必须将其视为逆境，并做出回应。”
尼克斯周一晚上的表现，与赛前的现场氛围一样反常。这本该是一场狂欢，因为NBA总决赛在时隔27年后重返曼哈顿。然而，为了接待总统唐纳德·特朗普 (Donald Trump)，麦迪逊广场花园的球迷、媒体和工作人员被要求比平时提前数小时到达球馆。特朗普接受了好友兼尼克斯老板詹姆斯·多兰 (James Dolan) 的邀请，成为首位现场观看NBA总决赛的在任总统。每个人都必须接受机场安检级别的筛查，而手持重型武器的特勤局特工则在球馆内四处巡逻。
比赛开局后，纽约显得有些节奏大乱。球员们频频将球传出界外送上看台。在今年季后赛中冠绝联盟的防守，也失去了往日的身体对抗强度和整体协作性。进攻端几乎没有球权转移，只能依靠阿努诺比等人的超强个人强投能力来勉强咬住比分。
最终，尼克斯全场出现13次失误（其中杰伦·布伦森 (Jalen Brunson) 占了5次），让圣安东尼奥马刺借此斩获21分，这成了他们的致命伤。尽管马刺是一支优秀的球队，且在球迷入座后并未受到麦迪逊广场花园喧嚣氛围的影响，但纽约的这场失利在很大程度上可以说是自食其果。而在尼克斯主教练迈克·布朗 (Mike Brown) 看来，[裁判的判罚也毫无助益](https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/47389)。在比赛的最后24分钟里，尼克斯仅获得8次罚球机会，而马刺则多达24次。
“那并不是我们输掉比赛的原因，”卡尔-安东尼·唐斯 (Karl-Anthony Towns) 说道，“我们失误频频，执行力不足，没有做好那些让我们拿到13连胜的事情。这就是输球的原因。我们没有坚持前13场比赛一直在做的事，而是决定尝试一些不同的东西。不断把球送给对手，这清楚地表明了你会如何输掉比赛，尤其是在季后赛中。”
尽管如果能取得3-0的领先，历史规律将对纽约极为有利，尽管这座城市极度渴望看到自己的球队在第33街和第8大道的交汇处赢下一场总决赛，但尼克斯目前依然占据着主动权。他们只是保险杠上多了一道小凹痕。在过去的两个赛季里，他们几乎总是在遭受打击后迅速予以回击。这也是他们如此招人喜爱的原因。他们绝不轻言放弃，哪怕在某一瞬间，他们看起来似乎要松开手中的绳索。
外界常常在寻找放弃支持尼克斯的理由。然而，随着纽约在季后赛中豪取13连胜，且大多数场次都是毫无悬念的碾压，这些旁观者也不得不承认这支球队的统治力。在某种程度上，这是无可否认的。不过，这场失利可能会让人们再次产生动摇。尼克斯已经很久没有像周一那样栽跟头了，也很久没有球队能在关键时刻比他们坚持得更久了。2-1的领先优势确实不如3-0那样稳妥，但纽约曾面对过比这大得多的障碍。
在整个季后赛期间，尼克斯全队上下都保持着极其平稳的心态。没有球员会情绪过度亢奋或低落，也没有人在接受采访时不把“我们正把大比分当成0-0来打”挂在嘴边，哪怕他们刚刚在一场大胜后取得3-0的领先。作为一个整体，尼克斯专注于当下。他们似乎并没有被眼前的局势所压倒。基于这一点，以及他们屡屡能从困境中杀出重围的历史，很难想象一场失利就会让他们陷入崩溃。
至少，在第三场比赛之后，尼克斯依然值得我们保持信心。这趟摧枯拉朽的征程迟早会遇到一些颠簸。现在，是时候让纽约重新找回跨越难关的感觉了。
“现在是0-0，”兰德里·沙梅特 (Landry Shamet) 说道，“我知道我们可以解决一些问题，这让我感觉很好。今晚他们显然把我们揍扁了。这种感觉并不好受，很刺痛。但现在是0-0。过几天再见，各位。”
_由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。_
> **点击查看原文：The Knicks' 13-game win streak is done. Now it's time to show who they really are**
>
> # The Knicks’ 13-game win streak is done. Now it’s time to show who they really are
>
> 
>
> _The Athletic has live coverage of_ [_Spurs vs. Knicks_](https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/live-blogs/spurs-vs-knicks-live-updates-nba-finals-game-4-score-result/Db9u9bivH79v/) _in Game 4 of the 2026 NBA Finals._
>
> NEW YORK — The streak is over. All that talk about the dominance is now an afterthought. The [New York Knicks](https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7343693/2026/06/08/knicks-spurs-nba-finals-game-3-score-results-takeaways/), for the first time in nearly two months, looked mortal.
>
> And yet, that tends to be when they are at their most dangerous.
>
> The Knicks breezed into Game 3 of the NBA Finals, landing body blow after body blow on whoever stood in front of them. The 13-game run, which has featured victory after victory by astronomical margins, had many anointing them one of the best playoff teams of all time. But it was put to a halt Monday night in [a 115-111 loss](https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7343693/2026/06/08/knicks-spurs-nba-finals-game-3-score-results-takeaways/) to the San Antonio Spurs inside Madison Square Garden.
>
> However, the Knicks’ true identity wasn’t defined by that stretch of brilliance. Anyone who has paid close attention over the past two seasons knows that their DNA is rooted in resiliency. We’ve seen this team come back from double-digit deficits time and time again to win. We’ve seen them win the NBA Cup, go 2-9 shortly thereafter and then, with many eager to write them off, rattle off eight straight wins. We’ve seen them go down 1-2 in a playoff series, only to morph into the greatest version of the Michael Jordan-Chicago Bulls and 2010s Golden State Warriors and pile up 30-point victory after 30-point victory.
>
> New York, even with a 2-1 series lead, now has to get back to what got it here to avoid heartbreak. History says everything will be OK.
>
> “It’s not a surprising feeling (to have lost),” said OG Anunoby, who scored 28 points on 9-of-13 shooting in Game 3. “They’re a great team, as well. They weren’t just going to lay down.
>
> “All we can do is move and learn from this. We have to take it as adversity and just respond to it.”
>
> The Knicks’ play Monday night was as uncharacteristic as the atmosphere leading into the game. This was supposed to be a celebration. The NBA Finals were back in Manhattan for the first time in 27 years. Yet fans, media and workers at Madison Square Garden were asked to arrive at the arena hours earlier than usual to accommodate President Donald Trump, who took up an offer from buddy and Knicks owner James Dolan to be the first sitting president to attend an NBA Finals game. Everyone had to go through TSA-level screening as secret service agents with big guns walked around the arena.
>
> New York then opened the game looking like it had been thrown off its usual rhythm. Players were tossing the ball into the stands. The defense, which is the best in the NBA these playoffs, wasn’t as physical or together as it had been. The offense had very little ball movement and needed extraordinary shot-making from the likes of Anunoby to keep things close.
>
> In the end, the Knicks’ 13 turnovers, led by Jalen Brunson’s five, for 21 San Antonio points did them in. New York’s loss could be viewed as self-inflicted, even though the Spurs are a good team that didn’t appear rattled by the rowdiness inside Madison Square Garden once fans were able to take their seats. And if you ask Knicks coach Mike Brown, [the officiating didn’t help, either](https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7343661/2026/06/09/knicks-spurs-mike-brown-game-3-nba-finals). The Knicks shot only eight free throws in the game’s final 24 minutes to San Antonio’s 24.
>
> “That ain’t cost us the game,” Karl-Anthony Towns said. “We turned the ball over, didn’t execute and didn’t do what got us 13 straight wins. That’s how you lose a game. We didn’t do what we’ve been doing for 13. We decided to do something different. Throwing the ball away is a clear indication of how you’re going to lose the game, especially in the playoffs.”
>
> As much as history would have been in New York’s favor had it gone up 3-0, and as much as the city was starving to see its basketball team win a finals game on the corner of 33rd and 8th, the Knicks are still in the driver’s seat. They just have a little dent on their bumper. For the past two seasons, they’ve almost always punched back after absorbing a blow. It’s what has made them so endearing. There’s no quit, even when it feels for a second like they’re willing to let go of the rope.
>
> Outsiders are often waiting for a reason to give up on the Knicks. Yet, by New York winning 13 straight games in the playoffs, most in no-doubt fashion, those same observers have had to accept the team’s dominance. At a point, it was undeniable. This loss, though, could give people reason to hesitate again. It’s been a while since the Knicks have stubbed their toe like they did Monday, or since a team outlasted them in crunch time. A 2-1 series lead doesn’t feel as secure as a 3-0 series lead, but New York has faced bigger obstacles.
>
> Across the board, the Knicks have been even-keeled throughout these playoffs. No player has gotten too high or too low, or has participated in an interview without saying, “We’re treating it as if it’s 0-0,” even if they had just gone up 3-0 in a series after yet another blowout win. The Knicks as a collective are present in the moment. They don’t appear to be overwhelmed by what’s in front of them. Based on that, and their history of being able to swing their way out of a corner, it’s hard to envision a world where one loss forces them to spiral.
>
> At the very least, the Knicks deserve the benefit of the doubt after Game 3. This run of destruction was going to have a bump at some point. Now, it’s time for New York to remember what it feels like to get to the other side.
>
> “It’s 0-0,” Landry Shamet said. “I feel good knowing that we can clean some things up. They obviously kicked our a– tonight. That doesn’t feel good. That stings. But 0-0. We’ll see you guys in a couple of days.”
By James L. Edwards III, via [The Athletic](https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7343584/2026/06/09/knicks-win-streak-resiliency-spurs-nba-finals/)
---
### 作者：  [@TheAthletic](https://chinaspurs.com/u/TheAthletic)
#### 发布日期： [2026 年6 月 9 日 19:42 UTC](https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/47390/2 "2026-06-09T19:42:32Z")
# 热评
> [@Bud T.](#):
>
> 必须打得更聪明，首先要认识到布伦森整晚都会遭到纠缠和身体对抗，所以其他球员需要更多地承担运球过半场的任务，进攻需要更多地通过唐斯（KAT）来发起，寻找空位队友，在关键时刻为布伦森节省体力。他们还需要在身体对抗上与马刺硬碰硬。该犯规的时候，他们得像卡斯尔那样，对布伦森来一个NFL式的冲撞，让犯规罚得值。
>
> > [@John T.](#):
> >
> > @AD 3.
> > 还是那些老掉牙的烂借口。像个爷们一样。尼克斯就是被打爆了，就像马刺在第一场和第二场被打爆了一样。
>
> > [@ROBERT H.](#):
> >
> > @AD 3.
> > 犯规数是23比21（尼克斯23次，马刺21次）。尼克斯投了更多的中远投，随便看一下他们的投篮热图就能发现，马刺一直在冲击篮筐，而尼克斯则满足于在罚球线和油漆区附近出手。
> > 我是个中立球迷，我觉得如果真要说的话，马刺反而在几次非常轻微的犯规上被裁判坑了。底线是裁判吹得很紧，作为球员你必须意识到这一点并加以利用。不要满足于近距离的抛投或后撤步，去冲击篮筐，逼裁判吹哨。布朗应该感到羞耻，他居然在赛后发布会上拿裁判说事。
>
> > [@Jack B.](#):
> >
> > @ROBERT H. 我的意思是，当对方最好的球员对你这边最好的球员进行了一次极其恶劣的恶意犯规，而裁判却漏吹了，这确实是抱怨的理由。尤其是考虑到这会让他距离停赛只差一次恶意犯规，而且以他的打法，他极有可能再犯一次恶意犯规级别的动作。但裁判实际上是否会吹又是另一回事了。
>
> > [@Jeff P.](#):
> >
> > @AD 3. 第一场犯规比是23-23，第二场是23-20，第三场是23-21。
>
> > [@Jack B.](#):
> >
> > @Jeff P. 这对比赛结果至关重要。在一场输了4分的比赛中，2次罚球加球权难道不重要吗？而且马刺在场上有6名球员，居然没有被吹技术犯规。裁判把球递给发球人，球发出来，比赛处于活球状态，这都没吹技犯简直太卑劣了。而且他们还因此扣掉了1秒的进攻时间，并且没有补回来。所以下次马刺发球时，如果尼克斯想中断比赛并重新布置防守，是不是也直接冲上第6个球员就行了？还有，文班在哈特投三分时垫了他的脚踝，而之前尚帕尼刚刚因为同样的动作骗到了一个恶意犯规，但哈特没有假摔，所以甚至连犯规都没吹。光是这一场比赛，文班本可以轻而易举地吃到两次恶意犯规被驱逐出场。
> > 我对于尼克斯被吹无数次犯规没有异议，因为他们防守懒散、粗心，确实犯规了。但这完全是上述所有情况都偏向了马刺，尽管这些全都是极其恶劣的裁判失误。
>
> > [@John G.](#):
> >
> > @Jack B. 那只是一个回合，而且坦白说，布伦森夸大了身体接触，你以为文班为什么嘲笑他？因为文班知道布伦森在试图欺骗裁判。布伦森在卡斯尔身上骗到的那个犯规也夸大了。这么跟你说吧，如果裁判能把唐斯（KAT）在每个回合里熊抱文班，或者用双手死死拽住文班手臂的动作吹出来，那我对把文班那次犯规升级为一级恶意犯规完全没意见。
>
> > [@Jack B.](#):
> >
> > @John G. 啊对对对，后脑勺被推一把叫夸大接触，被一个比你高5英寸、重30磅的人全速撞上去也叫夸大接触。“布伦森骗到的那个犯规”，他当时站着一动不动，卡斯尔直勾勾地看着他，然后直接全速撞了上去。唐斯防守文班的方式，跟马刺在另一端防守唐斯的方式一模一样，而且我们可没看到唐斯往对手头上挥肘。
> [@Wes M.](#):
>
> 尽管他非常出色，而且带领尼克斯重返总决赛功不可没，但我仍会将第三场的失利归咎于杰伦·布伦森 (Jalen Brunson)。在比赛的大部分时间里，他的手感冰凉。他投丢了上篮，也投丢了那些平时闭着眼睛都能投进的球。当然，他拿到了32分，但他投篮只有25投11中。这些数据掩盖了一个事实：他在很长一段时间里手感极其冰凉，简直铁得离谱。最糟糕的是，他出现了5次失误，其中许多都是漫不经心的传球，就好像这是一场训练赛而不是总决赛。他完全没有传球和让队友参与进攻的意愿——而这正是带领他们取得季后赛13连胜的胜利方程式。昨晚有两次进攻完美地诠释了布伦森的表现。一次是他决定顶着马刺令人窒息的防守，在1打5的情况下耗尽进攻时间。解说员很犀利地指出，布伦森消耗了巨大的体力，却一无所获。另一次是在第四节最后几分钟的关键时刻，他顶着三人包夹强行突破上篮，而此时哈特在篮筐左侧处于绝对、绝对、绝对的空位。一个简单的击地传球给哈特，那就是稳拿的2分。但布伦森根本没有分享球的意愿，所以这一幕没有发生。主教练布朗坚持让他上场的时间远超合理范围，尤其是在上半场，当时有几次看起来布伦森的失误要比得分还多，而且球队在传导球上举步维艰。赛后，查尔斯·巴克利 (Charles Barkley) 说得最好：尼克斯又退回到了以布伦森为核心的单打进攻模式。这让他们输掉了比赛。这会让他们丢掉总冠军吗？
>
> > [@John T.](#):
> >
> > @Wes M.
> > 今天最深刻的观察之一。
> > 在弧顶通过唐斯（KAT）来运转进攻才是取胜之道。唐斯在寻找传球机会，而布伦森只想自己投篮。当尼克斯能把球传给空位投手时，他们真的很难被击败。
>
> > [@10721719](#):
> >
> > @Vincent B. 没必要听这个“环球威斯”在这瞎扯。他就是个典型的墙头草、顺风球迷。跟我一起念：我们信任杰伦！
>
> > [@Jack B.](#):
> >
> > @Wes M. 这在一定程度上也怪他的队友。在比赛的大部分时间里，当他持球时，根本没有人进行无球跑动；而当他把球传出去时，除了阿奴诺比（OG），其他队友看起来都害怕拿球做动作。布伦森确实有责任，但布朗甚至也说过，进攻端没有人进行无球移动，这让布伦森的处境更加艰难。不过，确实有一些低级的失误，在几乎没有防守压力的情况下直接把球传出了界。
>
> > [@Jim O.](#):
> >
> > @Wes M. & Jack B: 我觉得把你们两人的评论结合起来，就是对第三场比赛最准确的总结，也是赢下第四场的关键。把注意力放在裁判身上是一种失败者心态（不管文班那个漏吹或者其他判罚有多糟糕）。尼克斯打得足够好，半场还保持领先——他们是在第四节输掉比赛的，原因正是你们提到的那些问题。如果布朗在看录像回放时能发现我们所看到的这些，那这就是可以纠正的，并且能让他们带着3-1的领先优势回到圣安东尼奥。
>
> > [@Vincent B.](#):
> >
> > 我的观点是，杰伦·布伦森确实投进了一些关键球，但总体而言他打得并不好。如果布伦森状态在线，马刺（SAS）在第一节根本不可能建立起两位数的领先优势。
> [@Mike M.](#):
>
> 大家都知道，直到有主队赢球，系列赛才算真正开始。
> [@Matt T.](#):
>
> 听着，我们都知道该怪谁。
> 特朗普碰过的一切都会毁灭
>
> > [@Jim O.](#):
> >
> > @Matt T. 看着他在国歌仪式中敬礼，在一个平民、非军事活动中扮演三军统帅的角色，尤其是在他挑起针对伊朗的战争并参与了加沙平民的消灭行动之后，真是令人作呕。
>
> > [@HARVEY B.](#):
> >
> > @Brian R.
> > Jim O.的言论并不代表反犹太主义。在任何地方反对种族灭绝都不是反犹太主义。罪行是由犹太人犯下的这一事实并不能为该人脱罪。对就是对，错就是错。
> > 批评做错事的人跟反犹太主义毫无关系。当希特勒下令对犹太人进行种族灭绝时，我的祖先逃离了大屠杀。内塔尼亚胡在加沙所犯下的罪行是反人类罪。
> > 实际上，跟我交流过的每个人都同意，特朗普首先来观看这场比赛就极其令人反感。当他敬礼时，“这TM是什么鬼！！”的惊呼声在整个球馆里回荡。他是国家的耻辱。
>
> > [@6617836](#):
> >
> > @Luigi M. 我们当然嘘他了。ABC广播公司只是把声音给消音掉了。
> [@Diane B.](#):
>
> 杰伦·布伦森在本系列赛至今每场的表现：
> 31投12中
> 25投7中
> 25投11中
> 布伦森是尼克斯的超级巨星。
> 他们只输掉一场比赛算运气好了。
> [@Christopher T.](#):
>
> 现在这场闹剧终于结束了，他们可以收拾烂摊子，让尼克斯重新回到争夺总冠军的轨道上。
> 希望多兰能停止自我毁灭，不要再重蹈覆辙。
> 不管裁判有多烂，尼克斯都能重新找回行之有效的打法。
>
> > [@Al H.](#):
> >
> > @Christopher T. ..同意。多兰的这番操作太糟糕了，完全没有尊重自己的球迷。尼克斯依然会夺冠。
> [@AD 3.](#):
>
> 是的，我觉得作者对局势的把握非常精准。确实如此，他们的韧性正是他们能打出这波连胜的根本原因。然而，就我个人而言，我对他们的表现感到恶心，尤其是表现糟糕透顶的布伦森。我看到的是一支在场上争抢球权、不分享球、不寻找空位队友、不做无球移动的球队。全是单打独斗。如果继续这样自私下去，他们会输掉这个系列赛。
> [@1020081](#):
>
> 这是很长一段时间以来，我第一次觉得尼克斯在精神上有些开小差。也许布里奇斯在比赛的大部分时间里隐身并非巧合……当他运转顺畅时，尼克斯是不可阻挡的。真的需要减少布伦森的单打，多让布里奇斯和唐斯（KAT）参与进来。
>
> > [@John T.](#):
> >
> > 布里奇斯确实隐身了。如果阿奴诺比、布里奇斯和哈特都运转顺畅，尼克斯是无敌的。这就是为什么尼克斯必须把球从布伦森手里拿走，让进攻通过唐斯（KAT）来运转。
> [@David C.](#):
>
> 尼克斯昨晚的失败？全怪唐纳德·特朗普 (Donald Trump)。特朗普碰过的一切都会毁灭。
> [@Joe B.](#):
>
> 76人球迷不请自来……尼克斯加油！
>
> > [@Chris B.](#):
> >
> > @Joe B. 几周前刚把自己的76人门票卖给了尼克斯球迷，还以为我们会忘记呢
> [@Philip M.](#):
>
> 现在全看第四场了。谁赢下第四场，谁就能夺冠。
> [@Brandon L.](#):
>
> 布伦森确实可以多分享球，但他一直以来都极其大心脏，而且在第三场下半场，他是（和阿奴诺比一起）唯一能把球投进的人。其他人在无球时都只是站在原地，进攻完全停滞，所以在那种情况下，是的，我宁愿让杰伦顶着防守强投，也不愿看到其他人陷入糟糕的单打局面。他们试图通过唐斯（KAT）来运转进攻，但他作为轴心不断被顶防偏离位置，坦白说，他完全没有打出侵略性，被文班给统治了。
> 你不能因为唐斯没能打出侵略性而责怪杰伦，有很多次唐斯本可以出手三分或突破篮筐，但他只是虚晃一下然后把球传了出去。他和布里奇斯需要主动要球、接应球、进行无球移动，并去创造一些该死的进攻机会！！我们输掉这场比赛是因为布里奇斯和唐斯完全隐身了。这与前两场截然相反，前两场唐斯是核心并且打爆了文班。唐斯必须打得更有身体对抗性，并在弧顶确立自己的位置，布里奇斯必须更好地进行无球移动并更主动地要球，当然，布伦森也需要多传球……对布伦森的口诛笔伐让我感到莫名其妙……考虑到他面对的防守，他的效率已经相当不错了，他的问题在于失误，但在这种疯狂的身体对抗和狗屎般的哨子下，失误是在所难免的。尼克斯加油！
> [@10901272](#):
>
> 关键时刻到了，明天必须赢。
> [@Joshua F.](#):
>
> 第二场和第三场的裁判表演真是令人叹为观止；文班都快把布伦森的头给拧下来了，但不知怎么的，罚球对比居然是84比61，马刺占优（如果扣除“砍米切尔”战术的罚球，实际上是84比52）。
> 3场比赛多了32个罚球……真是活久见。
> [@Steve B.](#):
>
> 很多失误都来自于勉强传球给那些难以摆脱防守的队友。马刺在无球对抗上粗暴地压制了我们，这种情况绝不能再次发生，尤其是在我们的主场。
> [@Anonymous U.](#):
>
> 实际上，尼克斯本该1-2落后；他们第二场的胜利是文班送的大礼。圣安东尼奥马刺并不是你常见的那种年轻球队。他们打得既沉稳又聪明。在第二场输球后，他们一点也没有气馁；事实上，文班冷静而放松，甚至对此付之一笑，因为他意识到自己和球队把那场比赛拱手相让了。我希望尼克斯能夺冠，但我很担心。他们正在面对在对阵亚特兰大和克利夫兰时完全没有遇到过的东西：防守。布伦森和他的队友们需要更好地保护好球，并做好传导球。如果尼克斯赢不下第四场，他们就有大麻烦了。
> [@Daniel R.](#):
>
> 不要打英雄球……绝对不要……分享球……通过唐斯（KAT）运转进攻……多给阿奴诺比（OG）和唐斯（KAT）……卡位……左右转移球……让他们防起来……在防守落位前发动进攻……比分区决赛晚半小时开球……做好准备……全场94英尺紧逼……在进攻源头进行破坏……冲啊！
> 再赢两场就搞定了 LW 🏆
>
> > [@6904271](#):
> >
> > @Daniel R. 这样…打字…真恶心。
> [@10869932](#):
>
> 比赛一直相对焦灼，而这一次文班整场比赛都做出了贡献。这（刚好）足够支撑他们拼到比赛结束。比赛会充满身体对抗，而这正是如今NBA所推崇的。全身体接触的篮球。文班在这个系列赛中必须强硬起来，否则就只能拼死一搏，别无选择。
_由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。_
> **点击查看原文：**
>
> #
>
> > [@Bud T.](#):
> >
> > Gotta play smarter, starting with recognizing that Brunson will be harassed and battered all night, so others have to bring the ball up the floor more of the time, and the offense needs to go through KAT more, looking for the open man, saving energy for Brunson in crunch time. They also need to go body for body with the Spurs. When it’s time to foul, they need to do it like Castle with an NFL block on Brunson, and get their money’s worth.
> >
> > > [@John T.](#):
> > >
> > > @AD 3.
> > > Same ol lame excuses. Man up. The Knicks got outplayed, just like the Spurs got outplayed in games 1 and 2.
> >
> > > [@ROBERT H.](#):
> > >
> > > @AD 3.
> > > Fouls were 23 against and 21 for. Knicks shoot more jumpers, and a casual glance at their shot chart reflects the Spurs getting to the rim and the Knicks settling for the elbow/paint.
> > > I’m a neutral and I thought if anything the Spurs got jobbed on a couple of very soft fouls. The bottom line was the refs were calling it tight and as a player you have to recognize that and use it. Don’t settle for the floater/step back from close range and get to the bucket and make them call it. Brown should be ashamed he got up there and made it about the refs.
> >
> > > [@Jack B.](#):
> > >
> > > @ROBERT H. I mean when the other team’s best player commits an egregious flagrant on your own best player and it goes uncalled, yeah that’s cause for complaint. Especially considering it would put him one flagrant away from a suspension, and with the way he plays, it’s very likely he commits another flagrant level foul. But whether the refs actually would even call it is another thing.
> >
> > > [@Jeff P.](#):
> > >
> > > @AD 3. Fouls in game 1 23-23, game 2 23-20, game 3 23-21.
> >
> > > [@Jack B.](#):
> > >
> > > @Jeff P. It was extremely relevant to the outcome. 2 free throws plus the ball in a 4 point loss isn’t relevant? The spurs also didn’t get called for a tech despite having 6 players on the court. The official hands the ball to the inbounder and he inbounds, play is live, absolutely despicable that wasn’t a tech. And they took a second off the shot clock for it and didn’t put it back on. So the next time the spurs inbound the ball, if the knicks want to stop the play and reset their defense they should just rush a 6th player on. And wemby slides under Hart’s ankle on a 3, which Champagnie just worked for a flagrant, but Hart doesn’t flop so no foul is even called. Wemby could easily have picked up 2 flagrants and been ejected in this game alone.
> > > I have no qualms with the Knicks getting called for a million fouls, because they were playing lazy, sloppy defense and fouling. It’s just the cumulation of all of the above going the spurs way despite them all being egregious officiating blunders.
> >
> > > [@John G.](#):
> > >
> > > @Jack B. That’s one play and frankly, Brunson exaggerated the contact, why do you think Wemby was laughing at him? Because he knew that Brunson was trying to fool the refs. The foul that Brunson drew on Castle was exaggerated as well. Tell you what, I have no problem with calling the Wemby foul a flagrant 1, if the refs call KAT literally holding Wemby in a bear hug or grabbing his arms with 2 hands on every possession .
> >
> > > [@Jack B.](#):
> > >
> > > @John G. Ah yes, getting shoved in the back of the head is exaggerating contact, getting run into full speed by a guy 5 inches and 30 lbs heavier than you is exaggerating contact. “the foul that Brunson drew” he stood stationary as castle looked directly at him and just sprinted into him. KAT plays Wemby exactly the same way the spurs play KAT on the other end, and we don’t see KAT launching hooks into the opponent’s head.
>
> > [@Wes M.](#):
> >
> > As great as he is and as much as he deserves credit for bringing the Knicks to the Finals, I will forever blame Brunson for the Game 3 loss. Through much of the game, his shooting was ice cold. He missed layups and shots he usually can make with his eyes closed. Sure he had 32 points but he went 11 for 25. These numbers hide the fact that he had long stretches where he couldn’t hit the side of a barn if he were locked up in it. Worst of all, he had 5 turnovers, many of them careless passes, as if this were a scrimmage not the Finals. He showed absolutely no interest in passing the ball and getting his teammates involved in the offense—the winning formula that had led them to 13 straight playoff victories. There were two plays that exemplified Brunson’s game last night. One was when he decided to dribble the shot clock down going one on five against a smothering Spurs defense. The announcers correctly called out the enormous energy it took for Brunson to achieve absolutely nothing. The other was in the critical last several minutes of the fourth quarter when he drove to the basket against a triple team as Hart was wide, wide, wide open on the left side of the basket. A simple bounce pass to Hart and that’s an automatic 2 points. Brunson didn’t have it in him to share the rock so it never happened. Coach Brown insisted on playing him way longer than he should have, particularly in the first half when there were times it looked like Brunson was going to have more turnovers than points and the team was struggling with ball movement. After the game, Charles Barkley said it best: the Knicks were reverting back to a Brunson-centric offense. That cost them the game. Will it cost them the championship?
> >
> > > [@John T.](#):
> > >
> > > @Wes M.
> > > One of the best observations of the day.
> > > Running the offense through KAT at the top of the key is the way to victory. KAT is looking to pass; Brunson is looking to shoot. And when the Knicks are passing the ball to the open shooter, they are really tough to beat.
> >
> > > [@10721719](#):
> > >
> > > @Vincent B. no need to listen to World Wide Wes here. He’s fickle and fair weather. By definition. Repeat after me: IN JALEN I TRUST!
> >
> > > [@Jack B.](#):
> > >
> > > @Wes M. Some of this is also on his teammates. No one moved at all off ball for much of the game when he had the ball, and when he did get off it, outside of OG, teammates generally looked scared to do anything with it. Fault can definitely be found with Brunson, but Brown even said that no one was moving off the ball on offense, which makes JB’s life even harder. There were definitely some atrocious turnovers though, passes just thrown out of bounds with minimal pressure on the ball.
> >
> > > [@Jim O.](#):
> > >
> > > @Wes M. & Jack B: I think putting your 2 comments together provides the correct takeaway from game 3. And the key to winning game 4. It’s a losing mentality to focus on the refs (regardless of how bad the no call was on Wemby or any other call.) The Knicks played well enough to lead a halftime- they lost the game in the 4th quarter because of the observations you mentioned. If Brown sees what we saw when he reviews the video, it’s correctable and could lead to 3-1 advantage going back to SA.
> >
> > > [@Vincent B.](#):
> > >
> > > My point is that Jalen Brunson has hit some big shots, but overall he has not played well. If Brunson was on his game, the SAS would not run out to ten pouint leads in the first quarter.
>
> > [@Mike M.](#):
> >
> > Everyone knows the series doesn’t start until a home team wins a game.
>
> > [@Matt T.](#):
> >
> > Look, we all know who to blame.
> > Everything Trump Touches Dies
> >
> > > [@Jim O.](#):
> > >
> > > @Matt T. Watching him salute during the national anthem, playing the role of Commander in Chief in a civilian, non military event, especially after he started a war against Iran and participated in the extermination of civilians in Gaza, was nauseating.
> >
> > > [@HARVEY B.](#):
> > >
> > > @Brian R.
> > > Jim O.'s comments are NOT reflecive of antisemitism. Opposing genocide anywhere is not antisemitism. The fact that a crime is committed by someone who is Jewish doesn’t exonerate that person. Right is right & wrong is wrong.
> > > There us nothing antisemitic about criticizing someone when they do wrong. My ancestors fled the Holocaust when Hitler ordered genocide against the Jews. What Netanyahu has wrought in Gaza a crime against humanity.
> > > Practically everyone I’ve spoken with agrees that it was grossly offensive for Trump to attend this game in the first place. When he saluted, the cries of “WTF!!” resonated loudly throught the arena. He is a national disgrace.
> >
> > > [@6617836](#):
> > >
> > > @Luigi M. of course we did. abc just bleeped it out
>
> > [@Diane B.](#):
> >
> > Jalen Brunson so far this series in each game:
> > 12-31
> > 7-25
> > 11-25
> > Brunson is the Knick’s superstar.
> > They are lucky to have only lost one game.
>
> > [@Christopher T.](#):
> >
> > Now that the circus has left town, they can clean up the mess, and let the Knicks get back to winning a championship.
> > Hopefully Dolan will stop self-sabotaging . Falling back on bad habits.
> > Knicks can get back to what was working, lousy officiating or not.
> >
> > > [@Al H.](#):
> > >
> > > @Christopher T. ..Agreed. Terrible move by Dolan showing no respect to his own fans. Knicks are still going to be Champions.
>
> > [@AD 3.](#):
> >
> > Yea I think the writer has a great handle on things. Thats exactly true and their resilience is what created this run in the first place. Yet for myself I was sickened by their play and particularly Brunson who has been awful. I saw team that was fighting each other for touches and not sharing the ball, not finding the open man, not working offball. Just a bunch of one on one. They are going to lose this series with that type of selfishness
>
> > [@1020081](#):
> >
> > First game in a long time where I felt the Knicks were mentally half-there. And perhaps it is no coincidence that Bridges disappeared for large parts of the game…when he is clicking, the Knicks have been unstoppable. Really need less Brunson and more Bridges and KAT.
> >
> > > [@John T.](#):
> > >
> > > Bridges did disappear. If Anunoby, Bridges, and Hart are all clicking, the Knicks are unbeatable. This is why the Knicks have to get the ball away from Brunson and let the offense run through KAT.
>
> > [@David C.](#):
> >
> > The Knicks failure last night? It’s all Donald Trump’s fault. Everything Trump touches, dies.
>
> > [@Joe B.](#):
> >
> > Sixers fan here… Let’s Go Knicks!
> >
> > > [@Chris B.](#):
> > >
> > > @Joe B. sold his Sixers ticket to a Knicks fan a couple weeks ago and thought we’d forget
>
> > [@Philip M.](#):
> >
> > All about Game 4 now. Whoever wins that will win it all.
>
> > [@Brandon L.](#):
> >
> > Brunson can share the ball more but he has been incredibly clutch and was the only one in G3 (along with OG) who could buy a bucket in the second half. Everyone is just standing around without the ball completely stagnant so in that scenario yea I’d rather Jalen taking a contested shot than someone else in a bad iso situation. They tried to run the offense through KAT but he kept getting knocked off his spot as the hub and frankly he entirely failed to assert himself and got dominated by Wemby.
> > You can’t blame Jalen for KAT failing to assert himself, so many times KAT could have launched a three or driven to the bucket but he just pump faked and passed out. Him and Bridges need to CALL FOR THE BALL, COME TO THE BALL, MOVE WITHOUT THE BALL, and make some freaking plays!! We lost this game because Bridges and KAT completely disappeared. The opposite of the first two games where KAT was the focal point and outplayed Wemby. KAT has to be more physical and establish himself at the top of the key, Bridges has to move better without the ball and demand it more and yes Brunson needs to pass more…The Brunson hate is baffling me…his efficiency was quite good considering the defense he’s going up against, his problem was the turnovers but those are going to come with this insane physicality and dogshit whistle. LGK
>
> > [@10901272](#):
> >
> > Moment of truth, gotta win tomorrow.
>
> > [@Joshua F.](#):
> >
> > the ref show over games 2-3 has been quite something to watch; wemby tried to rip brunson’s head off and somehow the free throw disparity is 84-61 in favor of SAS (if you excise the hack-a-Mitch stuff it’s actually 84-52).
> > 32 more free throws over 3 games is… quite something
>
> > [@Steve B.](#):
> >
> > A lot of those turnovers came off forced passes to guys struggling to shake their defender. The Spurs manhandled us off the ball and that can’t happen again, especially not in our house
>
> > [@Anonymous U.](#):
> >
> > Actually, the Knicks should be down 2-1; their Game 2 victory was a gift from Wemby. San Antonio is not your usual young team. They play with poise and intelligence. After their Game 2 loss they didn’t look defeated at all; in fact, Wemby, calm and relaxed, grinned about it, realizing he and his team gave that game away. I want the Knicks to win the championship, but I’m worried. They’re facing what they didn’t remotely face against Atlanta and Cleveland: defense. Brunson and the crew need to take better care of the ball and do a better job of moving the ball around. If the Knicks don’t win Game 4, they’re in deep trouble.
>
> > [@Daniel R.](#):
> >
> > No hero ball … period … share the ball … play through KAT … more OG and KAT … box out … move the ball side to side … make them defend … offense before the defense sets up … half an hour later starting time than the conference finals … prepare for it … pick up 94ft. … disrupt at the point of attack … Let’s Go !
> > Two more wins and it’s done LW 🏆
> >
> > > [@6904271](#):
> > >
> > > @Daniel R. Doing… this…sucks.
>
> > [@10869932](#):
> >
> > The games have been relatively close, and this time Wemby contributed for the entire game. That was (just) enough to carry them through to the end of the game. It will be physical, and that is what the NBA is geared for these days. Full contact basketball. Wemby has to get tough through these series or die trying, there are no other options.
via [The Athletic](https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7343584/2026/06/09/knicks-win-streak-resiliency-spurs-nba-finals/#comments)