# \[PtR\] 马刺大胜开拓者系列赛第四战：我们学到了什么 ▶️
**URL:** https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/46009
**Category:** 环球刺讯
**Tags:** 视频, 2025-26赛季, 米奇-约翰逊
**Created:** [2026 年4 月 27 日 18:01 UTC](https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/46009 "2026-04-27T18:01:18Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1
### 作者：  [@PtR](https://chinaspurs.com/u/PtR)
#### 发布日期： [2026 年4 月 27 日 18:01 UTC](https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/46009/1 "2026-04-27T18:01:19Z")
By Charlie Thaddeus | Pounding The Rock (PtR), 2026-04-27 17:14:38
我想我这辈子还没经历过这样一场比赛。
鉴于在 NBA 季后赛历史上，从未有球队在半场落后 17 分的情况下最终反超并大胜 21 分，我很确定其他人也没见过这种场面。我现在坐在这里，依然不太确定自己刚才到底看了什么。作为一名作家，我的看家本领就是把马刺的事儿和其他事儿做类比，你懂的。我喜欢建立联系。比如“文班亚马是一股引力场”，或者“重返季后赛就像是回家”，再或者“输掉第二场比赛的感觉就像是倒在冰锥上，血流不止，而凶器却在你眼前消失了”。就是这类稀松平常的类比。
但我现在有点词穷，因为马刺在第四场比赛的表现，在我脑海中找不到任何类比。这并不是什么神奇的英雄故事。他们既不是浴火重生的凤凰，也不是什么史诗级的弱者逆袭。马刺并不是在雪地里训练准备对抗苏联人的洛奇 (Rocky)。如果非要说的话，马刺才是那个苏联人！最终的结果本不该让任何人感到惊讶，然而达成结果的过程又是如此惊人，感觉就像你在看书时跳过了几页，不得不回过头去重读一遍。
这倒不像马刺开局慢热。那种戏码我们见多了，见鬼，在这个系列赛里我们就见过两次了。第一节表现还行！可能稍微有点迟钝，但还凑合。就是那种让你觉得“好吧，我们只是还没跑开”的开场。文班亚马表现出了适度且预料之中的生锈感。开拓者则展现出了适度且预料之中的韧性。看起来就像两支球队在互相试探，等着看谁先出招。
听着，第二节打得很烂。我不会坐在这儿假装没看见。但这是一种奇怪的体验，因为崩盘发生得太快了，我甚至都没来得及好好郁闷一下。前一分钟我们还打平，接着就落后 7 分，然后是 19 分。我还没消化完斯蒂芬回更衣室拍 X 光片的消息，迪兰 (Dylan) 就倒在地上捂着手，阿夫迪亚 (Avdija) 投进了一个底角三分，而米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson) 叫了暂停。我惊呆了，但还没感到害怕。
而不知何故，马刺队那边看起来也是这种感觉。这感觉与其说是在看篮球赛，不如说是在看一部自然纪录片。开拓者在稀树草原上奔跑，展示着惊人的灵活性和速度。你几乎都要为那只羚羊加油了，你懂吗？加油啊哥们！你能行的！但不，他们行不了。他们从来就没行过。
在第二场比赛中，当局势变得可怕时，你能_感觉到_球队也感受到了这种压力。他们不一定打得畏首畏尾，但打得像一只被逼入绝境的野兽。张牙舞爪，燃烧殆尽，愤怒且带着一丝绝望。面对文班亚马倒下这一创伤性事件，他们的反应展现出了适度的拼命感。这在某种程度上几乎是美丽的，但即使在发生时，这种状态显然也是不可持续的。最终的比分也反映了这一点。
开拓者建立巨大领先优势的过程，对我们这些坐在电视机前的观众来说可能并不好受，但在场上，这显然不是什么创伤性事件。马刺从未表现得像一支觉得自己陷入麻烦的球队。他们从未偏离比赛计划，只是调大了音量。上半场表现尚可的防守在下半场变得令人窒息。运转正常的进攻变得像手术刀般精准。感觉整整两节时间里，马刺的每一次进球要么是扣篮，要么是空位三分。他们有效地屏蔽了噪音，甚至从未显得被困扰。
每当人们谈论马刺在季后赛的前景时，总会重复一句话：“季后赛是完全不同的野兽。”周日的比赛并没有终结这场争论，但它提供了一个有趣的切入点。
这个版本的马刺——那个进化成顶级掠食者的版本——原本只存在于理论中。在未来的某个时刻，在经历了更多季后赛的洗礼和惨痛教训后，他们本该在——以后——向你展示这些。相反，我们在周日窥见了它的雏形。我们看到他们在一个充满敌意的球馆里，面对一支为生存而战、才华横溢、强硬且身体素质出众的球队，直面巨大的分差。我们看到了这支团队的能力，而且是在一个至关重要的场合看到的。
季后赛确实是完全不同的野兽。而马刺，可能也是。
* * *
**要点总结**
- 我永远、永远无法忘怀他们追回比分的速度有多快。我甚至不想去查具体的时间点，因为在我个人的记忆中，那有一种特殊的魔力和节奏，我永远不想失去它。半场结束时他们落后那么多，然后突然就不落后了。他们本在输球……然后突然就不输了。感觉一切都结束了，然后我们又回来了。就像眨眼之间。一声低语。一个响指。怎么做到的？我是说，到底怎么做到的？？不，不，别告诉我。魔术师从不透露他的秘密。
- 在第三节末段到第四节开局的一段特定时间里，感觉就像卡斯尔和文班亚马决定接管比赛。卡斯尔往上抛空接，文班就把球扣进去。一遍又一遍，没完没了。他们通过掩护配合，通过边线球配合，在转换进攻中也这么干。他们不断用这种方式重锤开拓者，你能感觉到波特兰人的气势每一次都在萎缩。那时候比赛还没结束，但某种程度上已经结束了，你懂吗？这感觉就像马刺在展示，如果需要的话，他们可以在每一个回合都随心所欲，如果开拓者能安静地认输，对大家都会容易得多。
- 任何季后赛征程都是由无数小事组成的。微小的瞬间，微小的决定。那些最终比你想象的更重要的微小转折。对于米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson) 在第三节斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle) 领到第 4 次犯规后决定让他留在场上的做法，我深有感触。哨声响起时我很烦躁，因为很明显那次犯规会记在斯蒂芬头上，逻辑上的做法是立即换下他，依靠马刺在后卫线上的深度——这可是我们的强项之一。但我希望他留下。我在心里想，“别换他，米奇”，果然他没换。他看着我们这位 20 岁的未来超级巨星，基本上是在说：“我信任你，继续做你正在做的事。”斯蒂芬的强度感觉是马刺反击的主引擎，我非常喜欢米奇选择不去中断这种势头。开拓者可能渴望斯蒂芬被换下，但他却留在了场上，紧贴着阿夫迪亚，争抢篮板，推快节奏，并在进攻端释放了文班。这是教练在季后赛中必须做出的艰难决定之一，我很高兴看到米奇和斯蒂芬都经受住了挑战。
- 这可能带点忧伤的基调，但这里不能总是一片欢声笑语，对吧？当比赛早期屏幕上打出卡斯尔和哈珀 (Harper) 成为继凯文·杜兰特 (Kevin Durant) 和拉塞尔·威斯布鲁克 (Russell Westbrook) 之后，仅有的两名在同一场季后赛中各自得分 25+ 且年龄在 21 岁或以下的二人组时，我感到一种奇怪的伤感。这显然是一个极好的信号，预示着这两位将成为伟大的球员，因为毫无疑问，杜兰特和威斯布鲁克都是职业生涯极其伟大的球员。但毫无疑问，他们的职业生涯也充满了坎坷。他们在雷霆队的魔幻征程最终未能获得总冠军。随后，这两位球员总共效力过_十支_不同的球队。十支！威斯布鲁克今年在萨克拉门托度过了一个默默无闻的赛季。杜兰特则在休斯顿做着……他现在正在做的那些事。我想这种对比让我感到震撼，因为你知道，如今 NBA 球员的职业生涯弧线可能非常漫长，而像蒂姆、托尼和马努那样守在圣安东尼奥不断夺冠、永远像家人一样的核心阵容，在现代 NBA 中感觉越来越像是一个遥远的概念。我说这些不一定是为了让大家沮丧，更多是为了强调我们现在正生活在一个非常酷的时代。永远不要停止享受它。德文 (Devon) 在他关于第三场比赛的文章中提到，[“有时在生活中，我们确实能准确地知道自己正处在一个特殊的时刻，”](https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/45961) 随着每一场比赛的进行，这句话依然显得那么真实。我们不知道这些年轻人的未来会怎样，这使得珍惜当下变得更加紧迫。
- 事实上，我们不能以那个结尾，让我们快来看看这个联盟最强内线完成的空接扣篮，怎么样？
> LUUUUKE 我的天呐 😱
>
> 📺 ESPN [pic.twitter.com/AitibJqyXy](https://t.co/AitibJqyXy)
>
> — 圣安东尼奥马刺 (@ spurs) [2026年4月26日](https://twitter.com/spurs/status/2048514084329451636?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
>
> https://v.chinaspurs.com/v?url=https%3A%2F%2Fx.com%2Fspurs%2Fstatus%2F2048514084329451636%3Fref_src%3Dtwsrc%255Etfw&key=c1178da5
* * *
**WWL 赛后新闻发布会**
_你刚才提到你喜欢“把马刺的事儿和其他事儿做类比”。这是你在学校里学到的专业术语吗？类比这儿类比那儿？_
听着伙计，你有机会也试试把这事儿和那事儿做类比。这可不容易！
_你说你觉得很难，然后接着又写了 1000 多字。这能有多难？_
把一辆汽车举过头顶很难，但当有人真的做到了，正常的反应通常应该是：“哇，太感人了！祝贺你取得了巨大的成功！”
_你是在把“将马刺比作《洛奇4》里的反派”等同于“把汽车举过头顶”吗？_
也许不是，但在做类比的同时，还能把马刺塑造成这个特定故事里的正面人物？这个行业里没多少人有这种才华能搞定这种事。
_是啊，你把方榫头塞进了圆孔里。恭喜。_
看看你，也学会类比了！
_由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。_
> **点击查看原文：What We Learned from the Spurs Game 4 win over the Blazers**
>
> # What We Learned from the Spurs Game 4 win over the Blazers
>
> 
>
> I don’t think I’ve ever lived through a game quite like that.
>
> Given that no team in NBA playoff history has ever been down 17 points at halftime only to go on and win by 21, I’m pretty sure no one else has either. I’m still sitting here not entirely sure what we just watched. My whole bread and butter as a writer is to come in here and compare Spurs stuff to other stuff, you know? I like making connections. “Wembanyama is a gravitational force” or “being back in the playoffs is a homecoming” or “losing Game 2 felt like falling on an icicle and bleeding out while the murder weapon disappears in front of your eyes.” Normal stuff like that.
>
> But I’m struggling here because the Spurs’ performance in Game 4 doesn’t really have an analog in my brain. It wasn’t some sort of magical hero story. They weren’t a phoenix rising from the ashes, nor were they some epic underdog comeback story. The Spurs weren’t Rocky training in the snow to fight the Russian. If anything, the Spurs were the Russians! The end result shouldn’t have surprised anyone, and yet how we got there was so astonishing that it felt like skipping a few pages of your book and needing to go back and reread.
>
> It wasn’t like the Spurs came out flat. We’ve seen that move, hell, we’ve seen it twice in this series. The first quarter was fine! A little sluggish maybe, but fine. The kind of opening where you think “okay, we’re just getting our legs under us.” Wembanyama showed an appropriate, expected amount of rust. The Blazers were showing an appropriate, expected amount of resilience. It just looked like two teams feeling each other out, waiting to see who would make the first move.
>
> Look, the second quarter was bad. I won’t sit here and pretend otherwise. It was a weird experience though, because it unraveled so fast that I almost didn’t have time to be properly miserable about it. One minute we were tied, then we were down seven, then nineteen. I wasn’t done processing Steph going back to the locker room to get X-rays before Dylan was on the ground holding his hand and Avdija was draining a corner three and Mitch was calling a timeout. I was stunned, but I wasn’t scared yet.
>
> And somehow, that’s exactly what it looked like from the Spurs’ side too. It almost felt more like watching a nature documentary than a basketball game. The Blazers were bounding across the savannah showing incredible feats of agility and speed. You’re almost rooting for the gazelle, you know? Come on bud! You got this! But no, they don’t got this. They never really did.
>
> In Game 2, when things got scary, you could _feel_ the team feel it too. They didn’t necessarily play scared, but they played like a cornered animal. Claws out, burning bright, furious and a little desperate. They reacted to the traumatic event of Wembanyama going down with what seemed like an appropriate amount of desperation. It was almost beautiful in its own way, but it was clearly unsustainable even as it was happening. The final score reflected as much.
>
> The Blazers mounting their big lead may not have been a fun watch for those of us at home, but it was clearly not a traumatic event on the court. The Spurs never once looked like a team that thought it was in trouble. They never deviated from the game plan, they just turned the volume up. The defense that was good in the first half became suffocating in the second. The offense that was functional became surgical. It felt like for two straight quarters every single Spurs basket came off a dunk or a wide open three. They effectively drowned out the noise without ever looking bothered.
>
> Whenever people talked about the Spurs’ chances in the postseason, the same refrain kept coming up: “The playoffs are a different animal.” Sunday didn’t settle that debate by any means, but it offered up an interesting wrinkle.
>
> This version of the Spurs, the one where they become an apex predator, it only existed in theory. Somewhere down the road, after more playoff miles and more hard lessons, they were supposed to show you this — later. Instead, we got a glimpse of it on Sunday. We saw them stare down a huge deficit, in a hostile building, against a talented, tough, physical team fighting for its life. We saw what this group is capable of, and we saw it in a place where it very much counted.
>
> The playoffs certainly are a different animal. The Spurs just might be one too.
>
> * * *
>
> Takeways
>
> - I will never, ever get over how fast they got this lead back. I don’t even want to look up the actual timestamps of anything because there was a certain magic, a certain rhythm to it in my own personal head canon that I never want to lose. They were so down at the half and then they weren’t. They were losing…and then they weren’t. It was so over, and then we were so back. It felt like a blink. A whisper. A snap of the fingers. How? I mean, really, how?? No, no, don’t tell me. A magician never reveals his secrets.
> - There was a specific stretch spanning the last few minutes of the third quarter and the opening of the fourth that felt like Castle and Wembanyama decided to just take matters into their own hands. Castle threw lobs up and Wemby threw them down. Over and over and over. They did it off screens and from out of bounds. They did it in transition. They just kept hammering the Blazers with it and you could feel Portland shrinking a little further every time. The game wasn’t even over at that point, but it sort of was, you know? It felt like the Spurs showing what they could do on every single possession if they needed to and it’d be a lot easier for everyone if they just went away quietly.
> - Any playoff run is going to be made up of lots of little things. Little moments. Little decisions. Little turns that end up mattering more than you think. I felt that way about Mitch Johnson’s decision to leave Castle in after he picked up his 4th foul in the 3rd quarter. I was annoyed when the whistle blew, because it was obvious that the foul would be on Steph and the logical thing would be to pull him immediately and lean on the fact that the Spurs’ depth at the guard position is one of our strong suits. I wanted him to stay. In my head I was like, “don’t do it Mitch” and sure enough he didn’t. He looked at our 20-year-old budding superstar and basically said, “I trust you to keep doing what you’re doing.” Steph’s intensity felt like the primary engine of the comeback the Spurs were mounting and I loved that Mitch chose not to interrupt that. The Blazers were probably dying for Steph to get pulled and instead he stayed right there, getting in Avdija’s grill, chasing down rebounds, pushing the pace, and unleashing Wemby offensively. It’s one of those hard decisions coaches have to make in the playoffs and I loved seeing that both Mitch and Steph seemed up to the challenge.
> - This is maybe a melancholy note, but it can’t be all fun and games around here all the time, can it? I felt a strange sort of sadness early in the game when they flashed the graphic about Castle and Harper joining Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook as the only duos age 21 or younger to each score 25+ points in the same playoff game. It’s obviously a wonderful indicator that those two are going to be great players because without a doubt, KD and Russ are great players who have had great careers. They’ve also, without a doubt, had really weird ones. Their magical run with the Thunder resulted in zero titles. Those two have then combined to play for _ten_ different teams. Ten! Russ played out an anonymous season in Sacramento this year. KD is doing…whatever it is he’s doing in Houston right now. I think the comparison just sort of felt striking to me because, you know, the arc of an NBA player’s career these days can be really long and the idea of building out a core like Tim, Tony and Manu who just hang out in San Antonio winning championships and being a family forever feels increasingly like a foreign concept in the modern NBA. I say all of this not necessarily to bring us down or whatever, but more just to highlight that we’re living in a very cool period of time right now. Never ever strop enjoying it. Devon made a point in his Game 3 piece to say that [“sometimes in life we do get to know exactly when we’re living in a special moment,”](https://www.poundingtherock.com/spurs-analysis/100684/what-we-learned-from-the-spurs-game-2-win-over-the-trail-blazers) and that continues to ring true with each passing game. We don’t know what the future holds for these guys, which makes it feel even more urgent to savor the present.
> - Actually, we can’t end on that, let’s watch the most dominant big man in the game throw down an alley oop real quick, how about that?
>
> > LUUUUKE OMG 😱
> >
> > 📺 ESPN [pic.twitter.com/AitibJqyXy](https://t.co/AitibJqyXy)
> >
> > — San Antonio Spurs (@ spurs) [April 26, 2026](https://twitter.com/spurs/status/2048514084329451636?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
> >
> > https://v.chinaspurs.com/v?url=https%3A%2F%2Fx.com%2Fspurs%2Fstatus%2F2048514084329451636%3Fref_src%3Dtwsrc%255Etfw&key=c1178da5
>
> * * *
>
> WWL Post Game Press Conference
>
> _You mentioned early on that you like “comparing Spurs stuff to other stuff.” Is that a technical term you learn in school? Comparing stuff to stuff?_
>
> Listen pal, you try comparing stuff to stuff sometime. It’s not easy!
>
> _You say you’re struggling with it and then proceed to do it for like 1000 more words. It can’t be that hard._
>
> It’s hard to lift a car over your head but when people proceed to do it, the proper response is usually to be like, “wow, that’s so impressive! Congrats on the enormity of your success!”
>
> _Are you equating comparing the Spurs to the villain from Rocky IV to lifting a car over your head?_
>
> Maybe not, but doing it while also framing the Spurs as the good guys of this particular narrative? Not a lot of people in this industry have the talent to pull something like that off.
>
> _Yeah, you shoved a square peg through the circle hole. Congrats._
>
> Look at you comparing stuff to other stuff!
By Charlie Thaddeus, via [Pounding The Rock](https://www.poundingtherock.com/spurs-analysis/100797/what-we-learned-from-the-spurs-game-4-win-over-the-blazers)
---
### 作者：  [@PtR](https://chinaspurs.com/u/PtR)
#### 发布日期： [2026 年4 月 27 日 20:50 UTC](https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/46009/2 "2026-04-27T20:50:45Z")
# 热评：
> [@LunchBucket](#):
>
> 开拓者球迷（又）来了！
>
> 伙计们，最后这两场比赛真是令人心碎。第2场之后，我本以为我们有机会把这轮系列赛拖到第6场甚至第7场。哈珀在第3场表现得像个猛兽（我相信他会继续保持下去），而我们的球员似乎心态崩了。他们看起来开局不错，但随后就稳不住了，战术开始走形，不再按体系打球，而你们则趁势起飞。希望我们的球员能在第5场证明我错了，但我预计这轮系列赛到时就会结束。你们拥有文班、哈珀、卡斯尔、瓦塞尔、尚帕尼、巴锡（CB）等等，天赋实在太溢出了。对我们来说不幸的是，我认为你们在未来很长一段时间都会是强队。
>
> 到目前为止，这是一轮精彩的系列赛。开始时我只要能赢下一场就满足了，但第2场之后我的期望值飙升，导致那场胜利现在感觉也没那么香了。
>
> 我确实认为这第一轮系列赛的磨练会给你们的球员带来一些韧性，或者不管你们怎么称呼它，这能让他们在进入下一轮时更有底气，就像他们已经经历过风浪，可以承受打击了。
>
> > [@Mario Alejandro](#):
> >
> > 人们低估了波特兰。健康的时候，他们是一支非常出色的球队。和我们一样，你们也缺乏三分投射，也许比我们还要差一点，但你们是一支伟大的防守球队。斯库特和德尼会继续成长。
> > 我很庆幸我们遇到的是波特兰而不是菲尼克斯。相比之下，你们能为我们接下来的系列赛提供更好的磨合。
> [@zhouprodigy](#):
>
> “不同的动物，同样的猛兽。”
>
> 我们看到了经典的福克斯式表现。关于他的合同随你怎么说，但这正是马刺给他这份合同的原因，即使阵中还有卡斯尔和哈珀。这就是为了保持武器库弹药充足，随时待命。卡斯尔和文班无疑是特别的，福克斯也意识到了这一点，但在那些他能表现得更特别一点的时刻，我们才会真正感受到他的价值。
>
> 昨晚有个时刻，如果我没记错的话，场上同时有福克斯、德文、文班、凯尔登和朱利安，我当时就跟朋友说这阵容简直太离谱了。防守讲究的是取舍，但在那个阵容里，你想放掉谁？场上到处都是武器，就算你能防住其中一个，甚至暴露了一个弱点，你还有卡斯尔、哈珀、科内特准备上场带来新的变数。这是一场八杯毒药的博弈，每一杯都足以致命。
>
> 文班确实提升了我们的上限，但正是其他所有人将我们的下限拉到了超越其他任何球队的高度。我们非文班球员的总和必须大于非约基奇（Jokic）、非华子（Ant）、非亚历山大（Shai）、非双探花（Jays）球员的总和。就目前而言，我认为没有多少球队愿意去算这道数学题。
>
> 马刺加油 (GSG)。让我们看看在第一年我们能走多远。
> [@Steve4192](#):
>
> > 他们在雷霆队的梦幻征程最终没能换来一座冠军。那两个人后来总共效力过_10_支不同的球队。
>
> 这是因为尽管他们两人都是伟大的个人球员，但他们都是糟糕的队友。
>
> 拉塞尔·威斯布鲁克 (Russell Westbrook) 无论从哪方面看都是个可靠的人，也深受队友喜爱，但他从未在场上或场下展现出真正的领导特质，而且他那种自私的“英雄球”风格并不利于赢得总冠军。
>
> 另一方面，凯文·杜兰特 (Kevin Durant) 是任何体系下完美的“即插即用”型球员，他的场上风格非常有利于赢得冠军，但他完全没有领导能力。当他在一支拥有强大更衣室文化的球队效力时，他能赢球，因为他只需打球，让别人去领导；但在需要他站出来领导的球队中，他失败得很惨。在这方面他很像凯里·欧文 (Kyrie Irving)，尽管没那么疯（但至少欧文还有个“脑子不正常”的借口）。
>
> 引文中没提到詹姆斯·哈登 (James Harden)，他是两者的劣质结合体。他有着威斯布鲁克的英雄球风格，在更衣室里又是负能量，在训练场外还有坏习惯，给年轻队友树立了坏榜样。
>
> 如果这些人中有谁能拥有文班、卡斯尔或哈珀一半的成熟度，他们或许能成就一番事业。但他们没有，所以他们没能成功（除了杜兰特，他抱了库里和格林的大腿）。
> [@Mark Barrington](#):
>
> 我一直是蒂亚戈·斯普利特 (Tiago Splitter) 的粉丝，也认可他担任波特兰主帅的表现，但他周日的表现并不好。当马刺在第三节初段掀起进攻狂潮时，他没有叫暂停，也没有做出调整。他就像被冻住了一样。主教练职责就是在球队遇到困难时提供帮助，通过叫暂停和重新凝聚球队来遏制对手的得分高潮。天知道我曾因为同样的事情批评过米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)，尤其是在赛季初期，但他后来进步了。斯普利特只是看着，直到球队落后15分才叫了第一个暂停，这比该叫的时候晚了大约25分。我仍然希望他能被开拓者聘为正式主帅，但他必须提高自己的临场指挥能力。他是个菜鸟教练，所以如果开拓者愿意给他机会，他还有时间进步。我希望他们会这么做。
>
> > [@Nicedoggie](#):
> >
> > 我也希望蒂亚戈能得到这份工作。不仅是为了他好，这也意味着少了一个可能挖走肖恩·斯威尼 (Sean Sweeney) 的竞争对手。
> >
> > > [@Mark Barrington](#):
> > >
> > > 斯威尼超出了波特兰的预算范围。老板正打算廉价聘请一位主教练，而斯威尼的身价会很高。
>
> > [@Mario Alejandro](#):
> >
> > 我喜欢米奇的应对，不让文班去单打，而是通过掩护和挡拆来发起进攻。
> [@Heng1985](#):
>
> 不再让文班去单打那些身材较小的防守者，这似乎是进攻端唯一需要做的调整。
> [@ElijahB](#):
>
> 我学到的是：卡斯尔仍然是我见过的最强硬的持球防守者之一，而我在过去的30年里见过很多优秀的篮球运动员。
>
> > [@HRutherfordHill](#):
> >
> > 他简直是坚持不懈。挤过掩护，承受身体撞击，拒绝传球，强壮如牛。简直是教科书级别的防守者。
> >
> > 他和朱·霍勒迪 (Jrue Holiday) 在防守端就像是彼此的镜像，除了……卡斯尔的运动能力更强，而且他更高，臂展更长。
> >
> > > [@ElijahB](#):
> > >
> > > 我和大家一样爱文班，但看卡斯尔防守持球人绝对是一种享受。我是卡斯尔的超级粉丝，去年很早的时候我就能看出他与众不同。
> [@Robapottamus](#):
>
> 上下半场最大的区别似乎在于是否开始打团队篮球。上半场，文班试图一个人搞定一切，我们制造了很多糟糕的投篮。下半场我们似乎想起来篮球是一项团队运动。一旦我们能从比赛一开始就那样打球，我们将变得非常危险。我们不可能每次都能填平那样的分差。
> [@Mario Alejandro](#):
>
> 看米奇·约翰逊的一个采访很有趣，他在采访中解释说他为球队设计了很多战术构思，但最终他们更倾向于让这支年轻的球队保持简单。
>
> 但我仍然认为我们需要更多的定点战术来让福克斯、瓦塞尔和文班获得中距离跳投的机会。还有为尚帕尼、瓦塞尔、文班和巴恩斯设计的绕掩护三分战术。
>
> 以及更多让维克托和科内特参与的挡拆战术。
> 上一场比赛，福克斯或瓦塞尔投进的大部分球都是高难度的强投。
> [@August Bembel](#):
>
> 到目前为止，这轮系列赛真是像过山车一样：获胜的一方连续第三次在下半场克服巨大分差逆转。这比3-1的领先优势和最终比分所显示的更让人心惊胆战。我们的马刺重返季后赛的表现太棒了！感觉好极了。
> [@RobertCrawley](#):
>
> 伟大的胜利，但下一场别再从落后追起了。开局就要拿出能量！
> [@Karula](#):
>
> 我很高兴地宣布，我成功利用了这轮系列赛的戏剧性和我疯狂的狂热，在纽约这里 ~~洗脑~~ 欢迎了一些全新的马刺球迷。向“外星人”和他的团队致敬！！
> [@BoneSpurs1987](#):
>
> 非常有意思的帖子，也反映了我们中一些人在第4场上半场落后时的感受。我妻子说我在追回比分时表现得异常从容（smug）。我告诉她：“马刺有能力逆转。”或者类似的话。干得漂亮。
> [@FredDB](#):
>
> 这些来自对手社区 Blazers Edge 的评论说明了一切：
>
> “波特兰开拓者队亲手送走了赢得对阵圣安东尼奥马刺队首轮系列赛的机会，连同他们大部分的尊严也一并丢掉了……”
>
> “就这样吧。波特兰在周二还有最后一次机会来扭转局面。但看着马刺打得像是在争冠，而开拓者打得像是在争夺最后一瓶米凯罗啤酒 (Michelob Ultra)，这看起来不太可能……”
>
> > [@RedFirebird](#):
> >
> > 我想说的很多，但为了避免在伤口上撒盐，我只想说开拓者并没有送走赢得系列赛的机会。他们能以3分优势赢下第2场纯属走运。我就说这么多，哈哈。
> [@SpinachBoy](#):
>
> 我们虽然没能横扫开拓者，但我对目前的上升势头感到满意，这只会让我们在个人和团队层面都得到成长。以下是一些亮点：
>
> - 多名球员打出爆发表现——福克斯 (28分) / 卡斯尔 (33分) / 哈珀 (27分) / 文班 (35分)
> - 文班在第1场和第4场统治了攻防两端
> - 在第3场（无文班）和第4场（有文班）完成了极限逆转
> - 彻底锁死了斯库特（第4场 - 0分）、德尼（第3场 - 14分）、朱 (Jru)（第1场 - 9分）和杰拉米 (Jeremi)（第1场+第2场 - 各得5分）
> - 角色球员各司其职——瓦塞尔 (DV) / 科内特 / 巴锡 (CB) / 尚帕尼 (JC) / 凯尔登 (KJ) / 巴恩斯 (HB)
> - 到目前为止，我们三分命中率最低的是瓦塞尔 (DV)，也有33%
>
> 而可怕的是，我们还没看到凯尔登 (KJ) 和瓦塞尔 (DV) 的爆发之战，他们两人在任何比赛中都有砍下20+的能力。
>
> 所以继续保持这股能量，我们只需要再在主场赢下一场！！！
> [@sdowns1470](#):
>
> [https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/san-antonio-spurs/news/victor-wembanyama-didnt-tell-whole-story-we-now-know-why-he-was-pissed-nba/bfbb623d11b60b7b1b0e6600](https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/san-antonio-spurs/news/victor-wembanyama-didnt-tell-whole-story-we-now-know-why-he-was-pissed-nba/bfbb623d11b60b7b1b0e6600) 夏姆斯 (Shams) 今天参加了帕特·麦卡菲 (Pat McAfee) 的节目，被问到维克托为什么对联盟感到不满。据夏姆斯透露：“他感到沮丧是因为他和马刺队都认为他已被获准参加第三场比赛。他对自己没能参加第三场比赛感到沮丧。”他和球队认为他通过了脑震荡保护协议，但联盟却说不行，这说明了很多问题。听起来在整个过程中某个环节出现了沟通误会。
_由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。_
> **点击查看原文：**
>
> #
>
> > [@LunchBucket](#):
> >
> > Blazers fan here (again!)
> >
> > Man the last two games have been devastating. After game 2 it seemed like we had a shot at putting this series to 6 or 7 games. Harper was a beast in game 3 (and I’m sure will continue to be one), and our guys seem like they just get in their heads. It seems like they start off good then can’t hold it together and plays start falling apart and they stop playing in the system and you guys just take off. Hopefully our guys can prove me wrong in game 5 but I’m expecting this series to be over then. You guys have way too much talent between Wemby, Harper, Castle, Vassel, Champagnie, CB, etc. Unfortunately for us, I think you guys will be around for a while too.
> >
> > Good series so far. At the beginning I was going to be happy to take one game but after game 2 my expectations jumped up and made the one win feel so much less satisfying.
> >
> > I do think the trials from this first series will give your guys some grit or whatever you call it going into the next series, like they’ve gotten through some stuff, so they can take some punches.
> >
> > > [@Mario Alejandro](#):
> > >
> > > People are understimating Porlant. They are a really good team when healthy. Like us you lack three point shooting, maybe you are a little worse than us, but are a great defensive team. Scoot and Deni will continue growing.
> > > Im grateful we got Porlant instead of Phoenix. You are a better preparation for the coming series than them.
>
> > [@zhouprodigy](#):
> >
> > “Different animal, same beast.”
> >
> > We got the Vintage Fox game. Say what you want about his contract, but this is why the Spurs gave it to him, even with Castle and Harper in the wings. It’s about keeping the weapon loaded with a full clip on standby. Castle and Wemby are undoubtedly special, and Fox realizes that, but it’s in the moments that he’s able to be just a little more special when we’re going to appreciate it.
> >
> > There was a moment last night where, IIRC, we had Fox, Devin, and Wemby in the game with Keldon and Julian, and I was telling my friend just how SILLY that was. Defense is all about give and take, but who in that lineup do you want to give anything to? The floor is full of weapons, and even if you can figure out one of them, even if you can expose a weakness, you have Castle, Harper, Kornet ready to come in and add a new wrinkle. It’s a 8 cup game of pick your poison, but every cup is lethal.
> >
> > Wemby raises our ceiling, for sure, but it’s everyone else that pushes our floor up past every other team. The sum of our non-Wemby parts needs to be greater than the sum of the Non-Jokic’s, the non-Ants, the non-Shai’s, the Non-Jays, and at this point, I don’t think there’s many teams who want to think about that math.
> >
> > GSG. Let’s see just how far we can get in Year 1.
>
> > [@Steve4192](#):
> >
> > > Their magical run with the Thunder resulted in zero titles. Those two have then combined to play for _ten_ different teams.
> >
> > Because even though both of them are great individual players, they are lousy teammates.
> >
> > Russ by all accounts in a solid guy and liked by his teammates, but he has never shown any real leadership qualities on or off the court, and he plays a selfish hero ball style that is not conducive to winning championships.
> >
> > Durant on the other hand is a perfect plug-and-play guy for any system and has an on-court style that is very conducive to winning championships, but he has no leadership qualities whatsoever. He was able to win when playing on a team with a strong locker room culture where he could just play ball and let others lead, but on teams that need him to lead, he has failed miserably. He’s similar to Kyrie Irving in that respect, though less crazy (but at least Kyrie has the excuse of being off his rocker).
> >
> > Not mentioned in the quote is James Harden, who was the worst of both worlds. He’s got Westbrook’s hero ball style, and is a net negative in the locker room with bad habits outside the training facility that sets a bad example for young teammates.
> >
> > If any one of those guys had half of Wemby’s or Castle’s or Harper’s maturity, they might have gone places. But they don’t, so they didn’t (except Durant, who rode Steph and Draymond’s coattails).
>
> > [@Mark Barrington](#):
> >
> > I’ve been a fan of Tiago Splitter and his tenancy as the Portland coach, but he didn’t have a good game on Sunday. When the Spurs went on their tear early in the third quarter, he didn’t call a time out and he didn’t make adjustments. It was like he was frozen. It’s the head coach’s job to help the team out when they run into problems and try to blunt runs from the opponent by calling a timeout and refocusing the team. God knows that I’ve criticized Mitch Johnson for the same thing, especially early in the season, but he got better at it. Splitter just watched and didn’t call his first timeout until the team was down by 15, which was about 25 points too late. I still hope he gets hired as the official coach by the Blazers, but he’s going to have to improve his game management. He’s a rookie, so there’s time to improve is the Blazers give him the chance. I hope they do.
> >
> > > [@Nicedoggie](#):
> > >
> > > I hope Tiago gets the job too. Not only for his sake, but it would mean one less team that might poach Sean Sweeney.
> > >
> > > > [@Mark Barrington](#):
> > > >
> > > > Sweeny is out of Portland’s price range. The owner is floating the idea of hiring a head coach cheaply, and Sweeny will command top dollar.
> >
> > > [@Mario Alejandro](#):
> > >
> > > I liked Mich counter not giving the ball to Wemby at isolations, but out of screens and at the pick and roll.
>
> > [@Heng1985](#):
> >
> > Moving away from Wemby iso’ing against smaller defenders felt like the only adjustment that needed to be made on offense.
>
> > [@ElijahB](#):
> >
> > I learned: Castle is still one of the most tenacious on ball defenders I’ve ever seen, and I’ve seen a lot of good basketball players the last 30 years.
> >
> > > [@HRutherfordHill](#):
> > >
> > > He is relentless. Fights over screens, absorbs body blows, denies passes, strong as bull. Just a textbook defender.
> > >
> > > He and Jrue Holiday are like mirrors of each other defensively, except… Castle is a better athlete and he’s taller with longer arms
> > >
> > > > [@ElijahB](#):
> > > >
> > > > I love Wemby like everyone else, but watching Castle play defense on whoever has the ball is an absolute treat. I’m just the biggest fan of Castle, I could tell real early last year that he was different.
>
> > [@Robapottamus](#):
> >
> > The biggest difference in the halves seemed to be just starting to play team basketball. In the first, Wemby was trying to do everything himself and we were creating terrible shots. We seemed to remember at half time that basketball is a team game. As soon as we start starting games off like that we will become dangerous. We won’t be able to close deficits like that all the time.
>
> > [@Mario Alejandro](#):
> >
> > It was intresting to watch an interview to Mitch Jhonson where he explains he has a lot of ideas of plays for the team, but at the end they prefered to keep it simple for this young team.
> >
> > Still I think we need more set plays to free Fox, Vassell and Wemby for midrange jumpers. Plays for Champaigne, Vassell, Wemby and Barnes threes coming out of screens.
> >
> > And a lot more pick and roll plays with Victor and Kornet.
> > Last game most of the shoots made by Fox or Vassell were hard contested shoots.
>
> > [@August Bembel](#):
> >
> > What a rollercoaster series this has been so far: For the third time in a row, the winning team overcomes a huge second-half deficit. Much more emotionally taxing than the 3-1 lead and the final scores suggest. What a return to the playoffs by our Spurs! Feels great.
>
> > [@RobertCrawley](#):
> >
> > Great win, but let’s not play from behind in the next one. Energy early!
>
> > [@Karula](#):
> >
> > I’m pleased to announce I’ve successfully used the drama of this series and my own wild fanaticism to ~~indoctrinate~~ welcome some brand new spurs fans out here in NYC. All Hail the Alien and his crew!!
>
> > [@BoneSpurs1987](#):
> >
> > Quite the entertaining post and a mirror of how a few of us felt after being down in the first half of Game 4. My wife said I was unusually smug about getting back in the ball game. I told her “The Spurs are capable of coming back.” Or something like that. Bravo.
>
> > [@FredDB](#):
> >
> > These quotes from the rival Blazers Edge community say it all:
> >
> > “The Portland Trail Blazers gave away their chances of winning the first-round series against the San Antonio Spurs, along with the greater part of their dignity,…”
> >
> > “And that’s that. Portland will have one more chance to turn the narrative on Tuesday. But with the Spurs looking like they’re playing for a title and the Blazers like they’re playing for the last Michelob Ultra,that seems unlikely…”
> >
> > > [@RedFirebird](#):
> > >
> > > I want to say plenty but to avoid adding salt to injury I would only say that the Blazers didn’t give away their chances of winning the series. They got lucky that they won Game 2 by 3 points. I will leave it at that LOL
>
> > [@SpinachBoy](#):
> >
> > We may not have swept the Blazers, but I’m happy with the trajectory so far, it will only grow us individually and collectively as a team, here are some highlights:
> >
> > - Breakout games from multiple players - Fox (28) / Castle (33) / Harper (27) / Wemby (35)
> > - Domination by Wemby on both ends of the floor in G1 and G4
> > - Ultimate comeback from deficit in G3 (non-Wemby) and G4 (with Wemby)
> > - Total shutdown on Scoot (G4 - 0pts), Deni (G3 - 14pts), Jru (G1 - 9pts) and Jeremi (G1+G2 - 5pts a piece)
> > - Role players doing their parts collectively - DV / Kornet / CB / JC / KJ / HB
> > - So far our worst 3P% is DV at 33%
> >
> > And the scary thing is, we have yet to see a breakout game by KJ and DV, who both are capable of scoring 20+ points in any game.
> >
> > So keep up the energy, we just need 1 more game at home!!!
>
> > [@sdowns1470](#):
> >
> > [https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/san-antonio-spurs/news/victor-wembanyama-didnt-tell-whole-story-we-now-know-why-he-was-pissed-nba/bfbb623d11b60b7b1b0e6600](https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/san-antonio-spurs/news/victor-wembanyama-didnt-tell-whole-story-we-now-know-why-he-was-pissed-nba/bfbb623d11b60b7b1b0e6600) Shams went on Pat McAfee’s show today and was asked why Victor was upset with the NBA. According to Shams: “He was frustrated because he and the Spurs believed he was cleared to play in game three. He was frustrated that he wasn’t able to play in game three.” It says a lot that he and the team believed he passed concussion protocol but the NBA said no. This sounds like there was miscommunication somewhere along the way.
via [Pounding The Rock](https://www.poundingtherock.com/spurs-analysis/100797/what-we-learned-from-the-spurs-game-4-win-over-the-blazers#comments)