# \[PtR\] 文班亚马闪耀全场，马刺险胜凯尔特人 ▶️

**URL:** <https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/44323>\
**Category:** 环球刺讯\
**Tags:** 视频, 德里克-怀特, 维克托-文班亚马, 2025-26赛季, 米奇-约翰逊, 达龙-福克斯, 凯尔登-约翰逊\
**Created:** [2026 年1 月 11 日 05:30 UTC](https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/44323 "2026-01-11T05:30:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

作者： ![PtR](https://chinaspurs.com/user_avatar/chinaspurs.com/ptr/32/98_2.png) [@PtR](https://chinaspurs.com/u/PtR)\
发布日期： [2026 年1 月 11 日 05:30 UTC](https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/44323/1 "2026-01-11T05:30:25Z")

</div>

[马刺 @ 凯尔特人 100 - 95 技术统计](https://china.nba.cn/game/0022500545/box-score) | [视频集锦](https://china.nba.cn/game/0022500545/collection)

By Jeje Gomez | Pounding The Rock (PtR), 2026-01-11 04:47:29

![](https://platform.poundingtherock.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/126/2026/01/gettyimages-2255093308.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0,0,100,100)

此番做客挑战出人意料的凯尔特人队，马刺队的表现并不出色，但最终还是设法带着一场侥幸的胜利逃离了波士顿。有时候，拥有场上最强的球员就足以决定一切，而维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 用他统治攻防两端的表现证明了这一点，带领圣安东尼奥马刺队在一场直到最后都如同棋局般博弈的比赛中，以100-95出人意料地取胜。

在卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet) 重回波士顿的比赛中，这位大个子凭借其高质量的掩护和顺下冲击篮筐的牵制力，可以说是比赛开局阶段进攻端表现最好的球员。尽管他值得称赞，但这恰恰凸显了马刺进攻引擎的挣扎。后卫们做出了一些糟糕的决策，导致失误，并被凯尔特人队抓住机会转化为得分；他们还落入了对手的陷阱，为那些被刻意放空的非射手们做球。而在防守端，马刺队对杰伦·布朗 (Jaylen Brown) 束手无策，当圣安东尼奥对他进行双人包夹或激进协防时，他总能得分或找到队友。由于内线拥挤，文班亚马的角色更像是一个空间点，但他在防守端确实发挥了作用，这也使得首节比赛得分较低，主队仅以五分优势结束该节。

第一节限制马刺进攻效率的一些问题在第二节继续困扰着他们。球队过多地依赖三分出手，而且出手的球员也不对。凯尔特人队的德里克·怀特 (Derrick White) 手感火热，他们在文班亚马休息时靠突破大杀四方。米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson) 尝试了让文班镇守中路的2-1-2联防，一度效果不错，但波士顿最终还是找到了破解之法。“外星人”有一些高光时刻，但圣安东尼奥整体的运转并不顺畅。令人惊讶的是，他们进入中场休息时仅落后五分。他们能做到这一点，完全是凭借场上的拼劲，尤其是在一次暂停文班下场之后。进攻篮板、一些罚球机会，以及后卫们提速反击带来的早期进攻机会，弥补了球队在执行力上的不足——面对一支防守聪明的球队，执行力差是很难蒙混过关的。

文班亚马的重要性在上半场已然清晰，但在比赛的最后24分钟，他作为圣安东尼奥取胜的关键变得更加不言而喻。球队其他成员在第三节开始时继续努力拼搏，但当这位大个子重新登场时，比赛的局势完全改变了。他在防守端无处不在，并为周六晚上始终没能找到节奏的进攻端提供了最后的保障。米奇·约翰逊也因做出必要调整而值得称道，比如弃用杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)，并简化防守体系，让文班亚马始终作为低位协防者，随时准备协防突破。这一策略的缺点是会放空射手，凯尔特人队也时常利用这一点，让客队为过度协防付出代价。即便如此，如果不是失误和糟糕的决策再次出现，马刺队本可能在该节以超过三分的优势胜出。

这场凯尔特人队在大部分时间里打得更好、本应轻松取胜的比赛，在进入最后一节时波士顿仅领先两分。凭借超级巨星的发挥以及像凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson) 和德阿龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox) 这样球员的顽强拼搏，马刺队为自己创造了偷走胜利的机会，并且他们充分把握住了。比赛过程并非总是赏心悦目，下一次录像分析会上会有大量的错误需要检讨，但他们顶住了对手的三分雨攻势，并设法为文班亚马争取到了足够的休息时间，让他为收官阶段做好准备。随后，约翰逊做出了最后一次出色的调整，在比赛末段派上了一套双中锋阵容，迫使乔·马祖拉 (Joe Mazzulla) 不得不通过换下一名射手来应对。凭借文班的几次漂亮的后仰跳投、角色球员们的拼抢表现以及几次及时的防守，圣安尼奥最终在一个一度看似败局已定的夜晚，赢得了赛季第27场胜利。

### 比赛要点

- 21分、6个篮板、3次盖帽的数据统计远不能完全反映文班亚马本场比赛的影响力。这绝非他完美的一夜，但他在关键时刻命中投篮，并让一支通常不轻易攻击内线的凯尔特人队在他面前变得不敢深入禁区，在他受到挑战的为数不多的几次对抗中都取得了胜利。
- 文班是马刺获胜的主要功臣，但凯尔登·约翰逊和德阿龙·福克斯也应得到大量赞誉，他们在大多数队友手感冰凉的夜晚，扛起了得分的重任。当外线投篮失准时，他们便努力冲击内线取分，并带来了十足的能量。两人合砍39分和19个篮板，他们挺身而出，为这场胜利扮演了至关重要的角色。
- 另一方面，对于新秀后卫和定点射手们来说，这是个艰难的夜晚。卡斯尔 (Castle) 和哈珀 (Harper) 合计23投仅5中，并且各有两次失误。不过他们都曾在某些时段防守杰伦·布朗，表现得很强硬，所以并非一无是处。至于朱利安·尚佩尼 (Julian Champagnie) 和哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)，两人三分球13投仅3中，这显然不够好。尚佩尼在篮板方面表现出色，两人也各自送出了3次助攻，但他们被派上场是为了投篮，而最近却常常陷入挣扎。球队想念德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)。
- 凯尔特人全场仅获得4次罚球，而马刺队有20次。圣安东尼奥是两队中更具侵略性的一方，但罚球次数上的差异值得注意。如果波士顿能得到更有利的吹罚，比赛结果可能会有所不同。
- 两位教练都做出了许多出色的战术决策和调整，并且至少在一段时间内是奏效的。那么双方各有一个完全失败的决定是什么？马祖拉让新秀雨果·冈萨雷斯 (Hugo Gonzalez) 首发，并试图让他的防守尖兵乔丹·沃尔什 (Jordan Walsh) 与文班亚马的出场时间相匹配来防守他。结果文班在身材更小的沃尔什头上得分，并且当沃尔什在另一端处于外线时，马刺队直接无视了他。至于约翰逊教练，在上半场索汉短暂的出场时间里，似乎没有任何让他参与进攻的计划。索汉只是站在底角，被完全忽略，导致球队的空间受到了影响。他在下半场没有再出场。

### 本场最佳进球

致命一击。

> WEMBY ICES IT!
> 
> 21 pts, 6 reb, 3 blk in the win over the Celtics 🫡
> 
> It’s San Antonio’s first win vs. Boston since Jan. 5, 2022! [pic.twitter.com/zgwAMXjXkH](https://t.co/zgwAMXjXkH)
> 
> — NBA (@ NBA) [January 11, 2026](https://twitter.com/NBA/status/2010191521945969032?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
> 
> https://hub.chinaspurs.com/v?url=https%3A%2F%2Fx.com%2FNBA%2Fstatus%2F2010191521945969032%3Fref_src%3Dtwsrc%255Etfw&key=fdf16f3a

### 下场比赛：周日客场挑战森林狼

马刺队将前往明尼苏达，在背靠背的第二场比赛中对阵森林狼队。文班会出战吗？这是最大的问题。

_由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。_

> **点击查看原文：Victor Wembanyama dazzles in Spurs’ close win over the Celtics**
>
> # Victor Wembanyama dazzles in Spurs’ close win over the Celtics
> 
> ![](https://platform.poundingtherock.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/126/2026/01/gettyimages-2255093308.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0,0,100,100)
> 
> The Spurs did not play well in their visit to the surprising Celtics, but managed to escape Boston with an unlikely win. Sometimes, having the best player on the floor is all it takes, and Victor Wembanyama proved it by dominating on both ends to lead San Antonio to an unexpected 100-95 victory in what was a chess match of a game until the end.
> 
> In Luke Kornet’s return to Boston, the big man was arguably the best offensive player to start the game, thanks to his screens and gravity rolling to the rim. While he should be commended for that, the fact that he stood out meant that the engines of the Spurs’ attack were struggling. The guards made some poor decisions that led to turnovers, which the Celtics converted into points, or fell for the trap of setting up non-shooters who were intentionally left open. On the other end, there was no answer for Jaylen Brown, who managed to both score and also find teammates as San Antonio doubled him or loaded up aggressively on him. With the paint packed, Victor Wembanyama faded into the role of a floor spacer, but he did make a difference on defense, leading to a low-scoring opening frame that ended with the home team up just five.
> 
> Some of the same issues that limited the Spurs’ effectiveness on offense in the first quarter continued to hurt them in the second. They settled for too many threes, and the wrong guys were taking them. Derrick White caught fire for the Celtics, who feasted on drives while Wembanyama rested. Mitch Johnson tried out a 2-1-2 zone with Wemby on the middle that looked good for a while, but Boston eventually figured it out. The Alien had some good moments, but not much was going right for San Antonio. It was surprising to see them head into the break down just five. The only reason they pulled that off was the effort level they played with, especially after a timeout in which Wemby checked out. Offensive rebounds, some trips to the line, and early offense as the guards pushed the pace helped make up for a lack of execution that was hard to get away with against a smart defensive team.
> 
> Wembanyama’s importance was clear in the first half, but it became even more obvious that he was the key to getting San Antonio the win in the last 24 minutes. The rest of the team continued to play hard to start the third, but the game completely changed when the big man checked back in. He was everywhere on defense and provided a failsafe for an offense that never clicked on Saturday. Mitch Johnson also deserves credit for making necessary adjustments, like going away from Jeremy Sochan and simplifying the defense to feature Wembanyama always as the low man, ready to help on drives. The strategy has the downside of leaving shooters open and the Celtics took advantage of it at times, making the visitors pay for overhelping. Even then, the Spurs would have probably won the frame for more than three points if not for the return of turnovers and poor decision-making.
> 
> A game in which the Celtics largely played better and arguably should have won handily, headed into the final quarter with Boston only up two. Through the play of their superstar and the grit of guys like Keldon Johnson and De’Aaron Fox, the Spurs gave themselves a chance to steal the win, and they made the most of it. It wasn’t always pleasing to watch, and there were plenty of mistakes for the next film section, but they survived onslaughts of three-pointers and found ways to give Wembanyama enough rest to have him ready to close the game out. Then Johnson made the last great adjustment by playing a two-center lineup late that forced Joe Mazzulla to match it by taking a shooter off the floor. A couple of pretty fadeaways from Wemby, some hustle plays from the role players and some timely stops led to San Antonio’s 27th win of the season, on a night in which a loss at times seemed inevitable.
> 
> ### Game notes
> 
> - The stat line (21 points, six rebounds, three blocks) doesn’t come close to reflecting Wembanyama’s impact in the game. It wasn’t a perfect night by him by any means, but he hit shots when he had to and made a Celtics team that normally doesn’t venture much to the paint terrified to go inside against him, winning the few times he was challenged.
> - Wemby is the main reason the Spurs won, but Keldon Johnson and De’Aaron Fox deserve plenty of praise for picking up the scoring slack on a night in which most of their teammates just couldn’t get shots to fall. When their outside shot failed them, they tried to get buckets inside and brought plenty of energy. A combined 39 points and 19 rebounds for two guys who stepped up and played an essential part in the win.
> - On the other side of that coin, it was a rough night for the rookie guards and the designated shooters. Castle and Harper combined for five buckets in 23 attempts and turned the ball over twice each. They both guarded Jaylen Brown for stretches and were physical, so it wasn’t all bad. As for Julian Champagnie and Harrison Barnes, three three-pointers in 13 attempts just isn’t good enough. Champagnie was great on the boards and they both dished out three assists each, but they are on the court to shoot and have struggled too often lately. Devin Vassell is missed.
> - The Celtics took just four free throws the entire game, to the Spurs’ 20. San Antonio was the more aggressive of the two teams, but the discrepancy in trips to the line is notable. Had Boston gotten a better whistle, the outcome could have been different.
> - There were a lot of great strategic decisions and adjustments by the two coaches that worked, at least for a stretch. One decision from each that didn’t pan out at all? Mazzulla started rookie Hugo Gonzalez and tried to have his defensive ace, Jordan Walsh, match Wembanyama’s minutes and defend him. Wemby scored over the smaller Walsh, and the Spurs ignored him when he was on the perimeter on the other end. As for Johnson, there seemed to be no plan to get Sochan involved on offense during his short first-half stint. He stood in the corner, was promptly ignored, and the spacing suffered. He didn’t play in the second half.
> 
> ### Play of the game
> 
> Dagger.
> 
> > WEMBY ICES IT!
> > 
> > 21 pts, 6 reb, 3 blk in the win over the Celtics 🫡
> > 
> > It’s San Antonio’s first win vs. Boston since Jan. 5, 2022! [pic.twitter.com/zgwAMXjXkH](https://t.co/zgwAMXjXkH)
> > 
> > — NBA (@ NBA) [January 11, 2026](https://twitter.com/NBA/status/2010191521945969032?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
> > 
> > https://hub.chinaspurs.com/v?url=https%3A%2F%2Fx.com%2FNBA%2Fstatus%2F2010191521945969032%3Fref_src%3Dtwsrc%255Etfw&key=fdf16f3a
> 
> ### Next game: at Timberwolves on Sunday
> 
> The Spurs will travel to Minnesota to take on the Wolves in the second game of a back-to-back. Will Wemby play? That’s the biggest question.

By Jeje Gomez, via [Pounding The Rock](https://www.poundingtherock.com/game-recaps/92830/victor-wembanyama-dazzles-in-spurs-close-win-over-the-celtics)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

作者： ![PtR](https://chinaspurs.com/user_avatar/chinaspurs.com/ptr/32/98_2.png) [@PtR](https://chinaspurs.com/u/PtR)\
发布日期： [2026 年1 月 11 日 12:00 UTC](https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/44323/2 "2026-01-11T12:00:11Z")

</div>

# 热评：

> [@Alvin](#):
>
> 这是一场丑陋的胜利。马刺打得很拼，但一球接一球地投丢，分差也缓慢而坚定地被拉开到2分、3分、5分、7分，最后马刺落后9分。
> 
> 奇怪的是，在经历了大量糟糕表现（失误、罚球不中和糟糕的三分投射）之后，马刺却将分差从6分、5分、3分、2分一路追到打平，然后反超2分、4分，并最终以5分优势获胜。作为一名马刺球迷，我为这场不可思议的胜利感到高兴，但同时也震惊不已。我完全可以肯定，凯尔特人的球迷看完这场比赛会气得破口大骂。这类比赛对于球迷来说真的很难理解。
> 
> 马刺过去11场比赛的三分命中率（呈下降趋势）：
> 
> vs 雷霆 44%  
> vs 雷霆 38%  
> vs 爵士 23% (输球)  
> vs 骑士 23% (输球)  
> vs 尼克斯 37%  
> vs 步行者 28%  
> vs 开拓者 32% (输球)  
> vs 灰熊 30% (输球)  
> vs 湖人 16%  
> vs 凯尔特人 23%
> 
> 以下是马刺输球比赛中的三分命中率：  
> vs 太阳 24%  
> vs 湖人 39%  
> vs 勇士 36%  
> vs 勇士 37%  
> vs 太阳 29%  
> vs 森林狼 24%  
> vs 骑士 35%  
> vs 尼克斯 36%  
> vs 爵士 23%  
> vs 骑士 23%  
> vs 开拓者 32%  
> vs 灰熊 30%
> 
> 马刺能在过去两场对阵湖人和凯尔特人的比赛中，分别以16%和23%的三分命中率取胜，这证明了球队在比赛的其他方面表现得有多么出色。
> 
> 如果马刺在比赛的其他所有方面都打得很好，并且能更好地限制森林狼的三分命中率（上一场比赛森林狼对马刺的三分命中率是46%对24%），那么即便自己的三分命中率只有24%，马刺也应该能在明天的再次交手中获胜。而且，文班上一场并没有出战。期待明天的对决！  
> 马刺加油！

> [@GWB60](#):
>
> 这是一场在客场对阵一支状态火热的强队时取得的漂亮胜利。说实话，今天早上我依旧兴奋不已。
> 
> 我们在投篮极其糟糕的情况下依然赢了球，这恰恰说明了这支马刺队在其他方面是多么全面和优秀。
> 
> 但是……我们不能指望在季后赛中还以这种投篮水平赢球。到了季后赛，你的弱点会被放大并被对手针对。
> 
> 那些主要任务就是投篮得分的球员（尚帕尼/巴恩斯）没有完成他们的工作。我们拥有顶级的突分好手，他们本该获得大量空位出手的机会。我昨天就在一个帖子里说过，如果马刺的三分能达到联盟平均水准（这个要求不过分吧？），那我们将对任何对手来说都是一块难啃的骨头。甚至对手的三分投得比我们好可能都不要紧，因为我们在其他方面足够优秀，可以弥补这一点。
> 
> 我只能希望是卡斯尔一直在养护的拇指伤势在困扰他。他的投篮简直惨不忍睹，对手都在放他大空位，就盼着他出手。你的进攻武器不能只靠强硬地冲击篮筐，如果他不能用一记像样的跳投让防守者不敢掉以轻心，那么他能突破的空间就会越来越小。或许可以开发一些中间距离的进攻手段，比如抛投、中距离？同样的问题也适用于哈珀，但他还是个19岁的新秀……
> 
> 我看着马刺的进攻，常常感觉它毫无章法，缺乏体系。有太多的单打和随意的三分出手。
> 
> 尽管伤病满营，有时还是客场作战，有时甚至没有文班，他们依然取得了很棒的战绩，并击败了数支强队，这有时几乎让人感到惊讶。但对我来说，这恰恰是极其鼓舞人心的，因为他们还有巨大的成长空间。
> 
> 现在是成为马刺球迷的大好时机。

> [@Habitus](#):
>
> - 我认为这是一场高质量的篮球比赛。双方的防守都做得很好。
> - 文班在防守端绝对是个怪物。他几乎从不失位。即便对手以为已经摆脱了他，领先他一个身位，他也能迅速补防到位。
> - 我同意球队很想念瓦塞尔。实际上，当他缺阵时，马刺的进攻会受到很大影响。他是队里唯一可靠的能在三个级别得分的球员，因为他除了拥有顶级的运动能力外，还是一个可靠且受人忌惮的射手，并且出手点非常高。他让其他队友打得更轻松。
> - 我觉得福克斯打得非常出色。他总能打到自己擅长的得分点，尤其是在没有和卡斯尔同时在场的时候。当他们两人一起上场时，会有些相互妨碍。福克斯需要找回他的三分手感来缓解这个问题。
> - 卡斯尔今天打得不好。当对手收缩内线，并且具备足够的运动能力来给他制造麻烦时，他就会陷入困境。而且，他在罚球区附近的失误是致命的。对手们会有意设计战术放他投三分。我希望他的三分能投得稍好一些。
> - 今天哈珀/福克斯的组合比卡斯尔/福克斯的组合效果更好。
> - 文班/科内特搭档的那几分钟打得非常出色。波士顿完全被打乱了阵脚。科内特在外线的防守也很好。

_由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。_

> **点击查看原文：**
>
> # 
> 
> > [@Alvin](#):
> >
> > It was an ugly win. Spurs played hard but missed shot after shot, slowly and surely, the score widen to 2, 3, 5, 7 and 9 against Spurs.
> > 
> > The strange thing was after a lot of bad plays (turnover, missed free throws and bad 3 pointers shootings), the Spurs cutting from 6, 5, 3, 2, tied, then leading by 2, 4 and won by 5 points. As a Spurs fan, I am glad but shocked for this improbable win. I am absolutely sure Celtics fans will be cursing and angry watching this game. This is kind of game very hard to comprehend by fan.
> > 
> > Spurs 3 points % over last 11 games (trending downwards):
> > 
> > vs OKC 44%vs OKC 38%  
> > vs Jazz 23% (Loss)  
> > vs Cavaliers 23% (Loss)vs Knicks 37%  
> > vs Pacers 28%vs Portland 32% (Loss)  
> > vs Memphis 30% (Loss)vs Lakers 16%  
> > vs Celtics 23%
> > 
> > Following were Spurs 3 points % in games lost:  
> > vs Sun 24%  
> > vs Lakers 39%vs Warriors 36%  
> > vs Warriors 37%  
> > vs Sun 29%  
> > vs Timberwolves 24%vs Cavaliers 35%  
> > vs Knicks 36%  
> > vs Jazz 23%  
> > vs Cavaliers 23%  
> > vs Portland 32%  
> > vs Memphis 30%
> > 
> > For Spurs to win last two games vs Lakers and Celtics with 16% and 23% 3 points shooting respectively is a testimonial of other fantastic aspects of Spurs games.
> > 
> > If Spurs playing well in all other aspects of games and defending Timberwolves 3 points % better (Timberwolves vs Spurs were 46% to 24% in last game 3 points %), Spurs should win tomorrow rematch even shooting 24% of 3 pointers. Also, Wemby did not play in previous game. Excited for tomorrow rematch!  
> > Go-Spurs-Go!
> 
> > [@GWB60](#):
> >
> > This was a fantastic win on the road, against a very good team, that has been red hot. Quite frankly, I’m still giddy this morning.
> > 
> > That we shot terribly and still won, speaks to how otherwise well rounded and good this Spurs team is.
> > 
> > But……we can’t continue to shoot at this level and expect to win in the playoffs. In the post season, your weaknesses are magnified and exploited.
> > 
> > Guys that are mostly paid to make shots (Champs/Barnes) aren’t doing it. With our elite penetration and kick guys, they should be feasting on open looks. I said it yesterday in a post. If the Spurs can shoot the league average on 3s (is that too much too ask) we’ll be a tough out for anyone. Not sure if it even matters if our opponents out shoot us there, as we’re otherwise good enough to overcome that.
> > 
> > I can only hope that the thumb that Castle had been nursing, is bothering him. His shooting has been atrocious, and opponents are giving him wide open shots, hoping he takes them. Your offensive game can’t only consist of drives hard drives to the basket, and he’ll find less and less space to do that if he can’t keep defenses honest, with a respectable jump shot. Maybe work on an in between game. Floaters, middies? Same applies to Harper, but he’s a 19 year old rookie….
> > 
> > I look at this Spurs offense and too often it looks like it lacks any semblance of an identity. A lot of iso ball and chucking up 3s.
> > 
> > That they have a great record and have beaten several quality teams, despite a multitude of injuries, some on the road and some without Wemby, almost seems surprising at times. But to me, that’s extremely encouraging, as they have so much room for growth.
> > 
> > Great time to be a Spurs fan.
> 
> > [@Habitus](#):
> >
> > - I thought this was a good basketball game. Both defenses played well.
> > - Wemby was absolutely a monster on defense. He is rarely out of the play. Even when the opponents think they shook him, gaining a step over him, he can close down.
> > - I agree that Vassell is missed. Actually, Spurs’ offense suffers a lot when he does not play. He is the only reliable three-level scorer in the team because he is a reliable/respected shooter with a very high release point in addition to his high level athleticism. He makes others’ job easier.
> > - I thought Fox played very well. He got to his spots, especially when he was playing without Castle. When they were together they got in each others’ way. Fox needs to regain his 3-point shot to alleviate this problem.
> > - Castle did not play well today. He gets into trouble when opponents pack the paint and have requisite athleticism to make his life difficult. Also, his turnovers around the key are costly. Teams actively scheme to make him take 3 pointers. I wish he shot slightly better from the three.
> > - Harper/Fox duo worked better than Castle/Fox today.
> > - A few minutes of Wemby/Kornet worked brilliantly. Boston was completely discombobulated. Kornet defended well on the perimeter.

via [Pounding The Rock](https://www.poundingtherock.com/game-recaps/92830/victor-wembanyama-dazzles-in-spurs-close-win-over-the-celtics#comments)