# \[PtR\] 圣安东尼奥 vs. 犹他，最终比分：马刺轻敌爵士，以114-127告负付出代价
**URL:** https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/44139
**Category:** 环球刺讯
**Tags:** 米奇-约翰逊, 2025-26赛季, 杰里米-索汉, 朱利安-尚帕尼, 凯尔登-约翰逊, 维克托-文班亚马
**Created:** [2025 年12 月 28 日 04:00 UTC](https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/44139 "2025-12-28T04:00:10Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1
### 作者：  [@PtR](https://chinaspurs.com/u/PtR)
#### 发布日期： [2025 年12 月 28 日 04:00 UTC](https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/44139/1 "2025-12-28T04:00:10Z")
[马刺 vs 爵士 114 - 127 技术统计](https://china.nba.cn/game/0022500440/box-score) | [视频集锦](https://china.nba.cn/game/0022500440/collection)
By Jeje Gomez | Pounding The Rock (PtR), 2025-12-28 03:34:37
马刺队未能打出近期树立的水准，并为此上了惨痛的一课：在NBA，任何球队都不可掉以轻心。犹他爵士队周五击败了东部领头羊活塞队，周六又凭借出色的外线投射和更胜一筹的活力，击败了西部第二的球队。维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 回归首发阵容，最终得到32分，但他的贡献不足以弥补因伤缺阵的德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox) 留下的空缺。
在经历了近一个月的客场之旅并三次击败联盟最佳球队后回到主场，马刺队产生一些自满情绪也在预料之中。银黑军团比赛强度不高的迹象在首节就已显现，他们没有选择攻击联盟最差的防线，而是满足于外线跳投。米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson) 的一次暂停暂时扭转了局面。球队开始更多地冲击油漆区，或是在篮下得分，或是为外线射手创造空位机会。其结果是单节轰下40分，让圣安东尼奥取得了8分的领先优势。
尽管约翰逊将球员们从之前的浑噩状态中唤醒值得称赞，但他同样要为灾难性的第二节负责。他进行了大幅度的板凳轮换，给了近期跌出轮换阵容的卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)、林迪·沃特斯三世 (Lindy Waters III) 和杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan) 上场时间。这些球员已经尽力，但球队的任何凝聚力都已荡然无存。进攻火力不俗的爵士队找到了节奏，当马刺首发球员回到场上时，犹他队已经充满自信并掌控了比赛，而马刺的进攻则再次陷入停滞，满足于外线出手。客队单节打出38-20的攻击波，在半场结束时手握10分的领先优势。
如果圣安东尼奥指望爵士队会自动崩盘，那他们就大错特错了。爵士是一支战绩不佳但训练有素且拥有进攻武器的球队。当马刺队过多地陷入英雄球的打法时，客队则只是按部就班地执行战术，并不断扩大领先优势。在文班亚马打出一波出色表现后，银黑军团终于看起来准备吹响反击的号角，但当斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle) 在一次扣篮后疑似小腿受伤离场时，乐观情绪便难以维持。幸运的是，这位卫冕年度最佳新秀并无大碍，而哈珀、尚帕尼和文班亚马的出色发挥让马刺队在进入第四节时仍将分差保持在可追赶的范围内。
期待中的一波进攻高潮终于到来，圣安东尼奥扳平了比分。其中，文班亚马完成了一记即便以他的标准来看也堪称匪夷所思的扣篮，瞬间点燃了全场观众的热情。所有迹象都表明，马刺将重演他们此前的剧本：先戏耍对手一番，最后还是拿下胜利。但爵士队另有打算，他们继续命中三分并严防死守油漆区。银黑军团曾一度迫近比分，但这一次他们没能用天赋战胜对手。八连胜就此终结，球队将必须解决如何用同样的活力去对待每一场比赛的问题。
### 赛后观察
- 爵士队本赛季已经击败了一些强队。这份名单包括活塞、凯尔特人、火箭，以及现在的马刺。马刺此前并未输给过弱队，但他们确实对一些纸面实力不强的对手有所轻视。输给一支实力较弱的球队是迟早会发生的事。希望他们能从中吸取教训。
- 本场比赛前，朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie) 作为首发和替补出场时的数据惊人地相似。唯一显著的差异在于失误，他作为替补时更容易失误。而卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet) 作为替补时的进攻表现也奇怪地比首发时更好。这一趋势在尚帕尼身上得以延续，他作为得分手表现堪称灾难，但没有失误；而卢克则未能延续此趋势，他仅得到7分和1次助攻。
- 文班亚马在防守时，倾向于给那些投射能力不稳定的对位球员留出近乎过大的三分出手空间。这完全合乎逻辑，因为从统计学上看，这是一种低命中率的投篮，同时也能让文班留在油漆区附近。但当这种球投进时——就像第一节优素福·努尔基奇 (Jusuf Nurkic) 投进的那记三分——作为观众在当下会感到非常刺痛。幸运的是，文班坚持自己的防守策略，而没有因为一个回合就过度反应。
- 布莱恩特、索汉和沃特斯在场上看起来有些迷失。米奇·约翰逊让轮换之外的球员上场，同时为主力节省体力的做法可以理解，但或许将他们安排在角色定位更明确的阵容中会更合理。布莱恩特是唯一获得第二次上场机会的球员，他在与大部分首发球员并肩作战时表现得好多了。
- 劳里·马尔卡宁 (Lauri Markkanen) 穿上银黑战袍的样子一定会很棒。可惜的是，由于像今晚这样的表现，想要得到他的代价可能会过于高昂。“芬兰终结者”用16次出手砍下29分。
- 本场比赛前，爵士队的三分命中率排名联盟第19位。而在周六的比赛中，他们三分球37投17中。马刺糟糕的防守帮了他们一把，但爵士的射手们确实手感火热。与此同时，圣安东尼奥的外线命中率仅有23%。当三分球上的差距如此悬殊时，赢球几乎是不可能的。
- 凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson) 继续证明自己是联盟最高效的得分手之一，他用14次出手得到27分。在所有投三分的球员中，只有少数几人的有效命中率比他更高。KJ这个赛季的卓越表现令人叹为观止。
* * *
马刺队将于周一迎战令人捉摸不透的骑士队。比赛开始时间为美国中部时间晚7点。
_由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。_
> **点击查看原文：San Antonio vs. Utah, Final score: Spurs take Jazz lightly, pay the price in 127-114 loss**
>
> # San Antonio vs. Utah, Final score: Spurs take Jazz lightly, pay the price in 127-114 loss
>
> 
>
> The Spurs didn’t play up to the standard they had recently set and learned the hard way that no team should be taken lightly in the NBA. The Utah Jazz, who defeated the East-leading Pistons on Friday, took care of the second-best team in the West on Saturday, thanks to fantastic outside shooting and superior energy. Victor Wembanyama returned to the starting lineup and finished with 32 points, but his contributions weren’t enough to make up for the absence of De’Aaron Fox, who was out with an injury.
>
> Some complacency was expected from the Spurs after coming home after most of a month on the road and defeating the best team in the league three times. The signs that the Silver and Black were not playing with high intensity were there early in the first frame, as they settled for jumpers instead of attacking the worst defense in the league. A timeout from Mitch Johnson temporarily fixed things. The team started to touch the paint more, either getting buckets at the rim or finding open shooters. The result was a 40-point quarter that gave San Antonio an eight-point lead.
>
> While Johnson deserves praise for snapping his players out of their earlier stupor, he also deserves the blame for what turned out to be a disastrous second frame. He went deep into his bench, giving minutes to Carter Bryant, Lindy Waters III, and Jeremy Sochan, guys who had been out of the rotation recently. The players did their best but any sense of cohesion went out the window. The Jazz, who are a good offensive team, got going, and by the time the starters were back in, Utah was confident and in control of the game, while the Spurs went back to settling on offense. The visitors won the frame 38-20 and had a 10-point lead at the break.
>
> If San Antonio was expecting the Jazz to just fade, they were sorely mistaken. They are a team with a bad record but well-coached and with weapons on offense. While the Spurs went back to playing hero ball a little too much, the visitors just executed and grew their lead. Eventually the Silver and Black started to look poised for a comeback after a good stretch by Wembanyama, but when Castle had to check out with what seemed like a calf injury after a dunk, it was hard to remain optimistic. Fortunately, the reigning RoY was healthy, and Harper, Champagnie and Wembanyama did enough to keep the Spurs within striking distance heading into the fourth.
>
> The big run finally came and San Antonio tied the game. There was a dunk that was absurd even for Wembanyama’s standards that galvanized the crowd. All the ingredients were there for the Spurs to do what they have done before: play with their food but get the win in the end. The Jazz had other plans, as they continued to hit threes and clog the paint. The Silver and Black got close but simply couldn’t out-talent their opponent this time. The winning streak stops at eight, and the team will have to figure out how to play every game with the same energy.
>
> ### Observations
>
> - The Jazz have beaten some good teams this season. The list includes the Pistons, Celtics, Rockets and now Spurs. The Spurs hadn’t lost to bad teams, but they had taken opponents that were bad on paper lightly. A loss against an inferior team was bound to happen. Hopefully, they’ll learn from this.
> - Julian Champagnie had shockingly similar numbers as a starter vs. coming off the bench coming into this game. The only significant discrepancy was in turnovers, as he tends to cough the ball up more as a sub. Luke Kornet has curiously done better on offense as a sub than as a starter. The trend continued for Champagnie, who was a disaster as a scorer but didn’t turn it over, but not for Luke, who only scored seven points and had one assist.
> - Wembanyama has a tendency to give some of his assignments, who are questionable shooters, an almost excessive amount of room to shoot threes. It makes perfect sense, since it’s statistically a low percentage shot, and it allows Wemby to stay close to the paint. But when they go in, as one did for Jusuf Nurkic in the first quarter, they sting as a viewer in the moment. Fortunately, Wemby sticks to his process instead of overreacting to a single play.
> - Bryant, Sochan, and Waters looked a little lost out there. It’s understandable for Mitch Johnson to give players who are out of the rotation some run while saving the legs of his main contributors, but it would probably make more sense to do so in lineups in which their roles are more clearly defined. Bryant, the only one who got a second stint, looked a lot better while playing alongside mostly starters.
> - Lauri Markkanen would look great in Silver and Black. Alas, he’s probably going to be too expensive to acquire because of nights like this one. The Finnisher dropped 29 points on 16 shots.
> - The Jazz came into the game ranked 19th in three-point shooting percentage. On Saturday, they connected on 17 of 37 threes. The Spurs’ shoddy defense helped them, but their shooters were just on fire. San Antonio, meanwhile, only shot 23 percent from outside. It’s almost impossible to win when the three-point discrepancy is that big.
> - Keldon Johnson continues to be one of the most efficient scorers in the league, finishing with 27 on 14 shots. Only a handful of guys who shoot threes boast a better effective field goal percentage. KJ’s fantastic year has been amazing to watch.
>
> * * *
>
> The Spurs will face the confounding Cavaliers on Monday. Tip-off is scheduled for 7 p.m. CT.
By Jeje Gomez, via [Pounding The Rock](https://www.poundingtherock.com/game-recaps/92061/san-antonio-vs-utah-final-score-spurs-take-jazz-lightly-pay-the-price-in-127-114-loss)
---
### 作者：  [@PtR](https://chinaspurs.com/u/PtR)
#### 发布日期： [2025 年12 月 28 日 09:00 UTC](https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/44139/2 "2025-12-28T09:00:06Z")
# 热评：
> [@Tropicaldaze](#):
>
> 在各位因为这场丑陋的失利而心态崩溃之前，请记住，丹佛今晚输给了奥兰多，明尼苏达也输给了布鲁克林——要是你这三场冷门都下注买对了，你觉得你能赢多少钱？这类比赛固然难看又令人遗憾，但确实在所难免。
> [@2yrTimeline](#):
>
> 顺便说一句，KJ 这场比赛本该多打8分钟左右。他打得太好了，根本不该被换下。
> [@AussieSpur76](#):
>
> 我们都知道这是一场陷阱之战……结果还真是。
>
> 所以，是的，这是一场失利。输球在所难免……着眼下一场吧。
>
> 话虽如此……大家都在谈论马刺的阵容深度。但当一名关键球员缺阵（这次是福克斯），并且几位关键角色球员都发挥失常（巴恩斯、尚帕尼，没错，还有索汉）……或许，仅仅是或许，他们可能需要为阵容深度再添一道保险。尤其是在3号位和4号位上。
>
> 
> [@2yrTimeline](#):
>
> 凯尔登，在单赛季出场大于等于30场的赛季中：
>
> 本赛季有望在以下数据创下生涯新高：
>
> TRB%
> STL%
> TS%
> FG%
> eFG%
> PER
> BPM
> WS/48
> 3P% (爵士赛后)
>
> 每36分钟得分排名生涯第二。
> [@Tropicaldaze](#):
>
> 正如我之前在评论其他比赛时指出的，现代NBA的比赛是如此以三分为中心，以至于如果一支球队在三分线外手感火热，而对手远投冰冷，那么无论第二支球队在比赛中其他方面做得多好，他们几乎都不可能赢下比赛（前提是双方三分出手次数大致相当）。
>
> 我不是说马刺今晚在很多方面都做得很好，但说到底，我不确定其他任何因素是否能起到太大作用。很多时候，比赛胜负就取决于哪一方的远投运气更好。今晚，爵士队在三分线上的得分就比我们多了21分，这对于手感冰冷的马刺队来说是难以逾越的鸿沟。
>
> > [@2yrTimeline](#):
> >
> > 没错，但聪明、有竞争性且充满活力的团队防守，有助于压低对手的投篮命中率。很显然，我们的球员今晚在防守端不够专注和投入，没能对爵士队的投篮效率产生影响。是的，有时候对手就是手感火烫，但我并不认为这场比赛完全是这种情况。
> [@Pflyer062](#):
>
> 要是福克斯能多得个20多分，这场比赛就拿下了。比分会是134-127？
> [@Tropicaldaze](#):
>
> 哦，还有一件事……考虑到爵士刚刚在背靠背的比赛中，连续击败了联盟战绩第二和第三好的球队（其中背靠背第二场还是客场作战），我猜他们赛季初说“有意摆烂的日子已经结束了”这话，还真不是开玩笑的。
_由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。_
> **点击查看原文：**
>
> #
>
> > [@Tropicaldaze](#):
> >
> > Before any of you climb out on the proverbial ledge in despair over this ugly loss, just remember that Denver lost tonight to Orlando and Minnesota lost to Brooklyn – how much money do you think you’d have won if you’d have correctly bet on those three wagers? As unsightly and unfortunate as these types of games are, they do happen.
>
> > [@2yrTimeline](#):
> >
> > Btw, KJ should have played about 8 more minutes in this game. Simply playing too good to be taken out.
>
> > [@AussieSpur76](#):
> >
> > We all knew this was a trap game…and it was.
> >
> > So yeah, its a loss. They happen…next game.
> >
> > That said…everyone is talking about the Spurs depth. But when a key player is out (in this case Fox), and several of the key role players have off games (Barnes, Champs and yes still Sochan)…perhaps, just perhaps they might need a little more depth insurance. In particular in the 3/4 spots.
> >
> > 
>
> > [@2yrTimeline](#):
> >
> > Keldon, greater than or equal to 30 games played in a season:
> >
> > On pace for career highs this season in:
> >
> > TRB%
> > STL%
> > TS%
> > FG%
> > eFG%
> > PER
> > BPM
> > WS/48
> > 3P% (after Jazz game)
> >
> > 2nd to career high in points per 36.
>
> > [@Tropicaldaze](#):
> >
> > As I’ve pointed out about earlier games, the modern NBA game is so three-pointer-centric that if one team is just simply on fire from beyond the arc while its opponent is ice cold from distance it becomes almost an impossibility for that second team to win the game, no matter what else they do well during the contest (assuming a relatively equal number of three point shots).
> >
> > I’m not claiming the Spurs did a ton of things well tonight but in the end I’m not sure anything else would’ve mattered too much. A lot of times it all comes down to which side was luckier from long range. Tonight Utah was 21 points better from three-point-land and it was too much for an ice-cold Spurs squad to overcome.
> >
> > > [@2yrTimeline](#):
> > >
> > > True, but smart, competitive, energetic team defense can help prevent the opponent from shooting as well. Obviously, our guys were not focused or committed enough on that end tonight to make an impact on the shooting efficiency of the Jazz. Yes, sometimes the opponent is just hot, but I’m not conceding that’s the case in this game, at least not in full.
>
> > [@Pflyer062](#):
> >
> > Another 20+ points from Mr.Fox would have meant a win. 134-127?
>
> > [@Tropicaldaze](#):
> >
> > Oh, one more thing … considering they just beat the teams with the second and third best records in the league in back-to-back games (with the SEGABABA being on the road), I guess Utah really wasn’t kidding when they said at the beginning of the season that the days of intentionally tanking were over for them.
via [Pounding The Rock](https://www.poundingtherock.com/game-recaps/92061/san-antonio-vs-utah-final-score-spurs-take-jazz-lightly-pay-the-price-in-127-114-loss#comments)