# \[SpursTalk\] 赛后评分：圣安东尼奥马刺队客场对阵华盛顿奇才队——第28场

**URL:** https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/44076
**Category:** 环球刺讯
**Tags:** 2025-26赛季, 德文-瓦塞尔, 米奇-约翰逊, 卢克-科内特, 维克托-文班亚马, 斯蒂芬-卡斯尔, 凯尔登-约翰逊
**Created:** [2025 年12 月 23 日 08:30 UTC](https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/44076 "2025-12-23T08:30:18Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### 作者： ![SpursTalk](https://avatars.discourse.org/v4/letter/s/858c86/32.png) [@SpursTalk](https://chinaspurs.com/u/SpursTalk)
#### 发布日期： [2025 年12 月 23 日 08:30 UTC](https://chinaspurs.com/t/topic/44076/1 "2025-12-23T08:30:18Z")

</div>

[马刺 @ 奇才 124 - 113 技术统计](https://china.nba.cn/game/0022500399/box-score) | [视频集锦](https://china.nba.cn/game/0022500399/collection)

By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-12-23 07:53:01

在一场场面并不算精彩的比赛中，圣安东尼奥马刺队最终以124-113客场险胜华盛顿奇才队。马刺在第二节打出43-21的攻击波，一举掌控了比赛主动权。尽管圣安东尼奥在下半场的表现不算太好，但他们依然守住了足够舒适的领先优势，并最终锁定了他们的六连胜。

## 数据统计：马刺 vs 奇才

![spurs wizards grades](https://www.spurstalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/spurs-wizards-grades-28.jpg)

## 马刺 vs 奇才 – 最终评分

### 维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)

替补出场的文班亚马再次在有限的时间里贡献了全面的数据。这位法国球员仅用22分钟就拿下14分、12个篮板、2次助攻和2次盖帽。尽管文班亚马的三分球3投全失，但他在两分球区域10投6中。防守端，他在禁区内非常活跃，尤其是在篮板保护上展现了统治力。进攻端，文班亚马虽有亮点时刻，但总体而言并非一次特别值得称道的表现。

评分: B

### 德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)

在经历了两场得分个位数的比赛后，福克斯在华盛顿特区找回了此前的状态。他在33分钟内高效地砍下27分。他三分线外7投5中的表现，将自己本赛季的三分命中率提升到了39.5%。尽管福克斯本场比赛的能量水平起伏很大（尤其是在防守端），但我们很难对他的最终表现感到不满。除了得分，这位速度飞快的后卫还贡献了7个篮板、6次助攻，并且没有出现任何失误。

评分: B+

### 斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)

优点：充满身体对抗的持球突破为卡斯尔赢得了13次罚球机会。他的传球非常出色，送出11次助攻的同时仅有2次失误就是最好的证明。卡斯尔在篮板方面也做得很好。缺点：卡斯尔全场16投仅4中，三分球5投1中，还罚丢了4个球。防守端，有好几段时间他看起来只是在走过场。总评：卡斯尔在很多方面都做得不错，但时至今日，马刺队对他的期望已经不止于此了。

评分: C

### 德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)

瓦塞尔显然无法对自己的表现感到满意。他11投3中得到11分，其中三分球7投2中。此外，他的防守也乏善可陈。话虽如此，瓦塞尔的出手的时机值得称赞。他的两记三分球都来自第三节奇才队起势之时。如果没有这些及时的进球，圣安东尼奥很可能就此葬送全部领先优势。

评分: C-

### 哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)

值得庆幸的是，那段三分球18投0中的低迷正在成为过去式。面对奇才，巴恩斯命中了两记远投，并通过冲击篮筐得到了一些分数。他的篮板表现羸弱，防守也平平无奇，但好消息是，巴恩斯看起来越来越有他自己本来的样子了。

评分: C

### 卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)

在本场比赛大部分时间里，当马刺队陷入平庸表现时，科内特挺身而出，出色地填补了球队的空缺。再次以中锋身份首发的这位七尺长人，在28分钟内贡献了20分和12个篮板。他的掩护、顺下和终结都展现了高水平。他在篮板球方面的工作极其出色，并且总能在正确的时间出现在正确的地点。科内特打球充满身体对抗，同时还能做好攻防两端的各种细节，这让他成为了球队中一个非常宝贵的组成部分。

评分: A

### 凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)

当球队进攻陷入停滞时，马刺几乎总能信赖约翰逊带来的活力。对阵奇才的比赛再次印证了这一点。在圣安东尼奥射手群手感普遍冰凉的时期，约翰逊命中了两个三分球。他在24分钟内抢下9个篮板。总计，他得到12分，全程保持了高昂的斗志，并很好地控制了失误。干得不错。

评分: A-

### 迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)

哈珀的表现就像一个因客场奔波而疲惫不堪的年轻人。他全场8次出手全部投失，包括4次三分尝试。在18分钟里，他仅得到1分和3次助攻。在组织进攻方面，他偶有灵光一现，但却一反常态地错过了处于空位的队友。他的失误率也比平时更高。总而言之，对于这位19岁的年轻人来说，这是一个需要尽快忘记的夜晚。

评分: D-

### 凯利·奥利尼克 (Kelly Olynyk)

奥利尼克获得了9分钟的出场时间，其中有一段时间是出任大前锋。我认为他表现得不错。他得到4分和4个篮板，在防守端也表现稳健。进攻端，他持续保持侵略性，迫使华盛顿不得不对他进行重点布防。

评分: B+

### 米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)

优点：约翰逊很好地做到了临危不乱，并且避免了在非必要情况下让文班亚马出场时间过长。缺点：圣安东尼奥在下半场乏力的表现实在令人不忍直视。

评分: C+

_由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。_

> **点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Washington Wizards – Game #28**
>
> # Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Washington Wizards – Game #28
> 
> In a game that wasn’t exactly aesthetically-pleasing, the San Antonio Spurs escaped a road game against the Washington Wizards with a 124-113 victory. The Spurs outscored the Wizards 43-21 in the second quarter to grab control of the game. San Antonio didn’t play too well in the second half but they did enough to stay comfortably ahead and seal their sixth straight win.
> 
> ## Stats: Spurs at Wizards
> 
> ![spurs wizards grades](https://www.spurstalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/spurs-wizards-grades-28.jpg)
> 
> ## Spurs at Wizards – Final Grades
> 
> ### Victor Wembanyama
> 
> Coming off the bench, Wembanyama once again packed a whole lot of production in a short amount of minutes. The Frenchman finished with 14 points, 12 rebounds, two assists and two blocks in only 22 minutes. Although Wembanyama missed all three of his three-pointers, he was 6-for-10 from two-point range. Defensively, he was active in the middle and was especially dominant on the boards. Offensively, Wembanyama had his moments but it wasn’t an especially noteworthy performance on that end.
> 
> **Grade: B**
> 
> ### De’Aaron Fox
> 
> After a pair of games that saw Fox score in single-digits, he was back to his previous form in Washington DC. Fox poured in 27 points in 33 minutes and did so efficiently. His 5-for-7 shooting from three-point range raised his percentage on the season to 39.5%. While Fox’s energy level fluctuated a lot against the Wizards (particularly on the defensive end), it’s difficult to be upset about the results. In addition to the points, the speedster also had seven rebounds, six assists and zero turnovers.
> 
> **Grade: B+**
> 
> ### Stephon Castle
> 
> The good: Physical driving to the rim resulted in 13 free throw attempts for Castle. His passing was great, as evidenced by his 11 assists to go along with only two turnovers. Castle did well on the boards. The bad: Castle was 4-for-16 from the field, hit only 1-of-5 three-point tries and missed four free throws. Defensively, there were stretches where it appeared as if he was just going through the motion. Overall: Castle did well in a lot of areas but we’ve arrived at the point in time where the Spurs expect more from him.
> 
> **Grade: C**
> 
> ### Devin Vassell
> 
> Vassell can’t be too pleased with his play. He had 11 points on 3-of-11 shooting, including 2-for-7 from three-point range. Additionally, his defense was nothing to write home about. That said, Vassell does deserve some credit for the timeliness of his shots. Both of his three-pointers came in the third quarter when the Wizards were rolling. Without those timely buckets, San Antonio could have let the entirety of their lead slip away.
> 
> **Grade: C-**
> 
> ### Harrison Barnes
> 
> Thankfully, that 0-for-18 three-point stretch is becoming a thing of the past. Barnes hit a couple of longballs against the Wizards and added a few baskets going toward the rim. His rebounding was anemic and his defense was unremarkable but the silver lining is that Barnes is looking more like Barnes again.
> 
> **Grade: C**
> 
> ### Luke Kornet
> 
> With the Spurs floundering in mediocrity for a lot of this contest, Kornet did a great job of stepping up and filling the void. Starting at center once again, the seven-footer had 20 points and 12 rebounds in 28 minutes. His screening, rolling and finishing were all at high levels. He did outstanding work rebounding-wise and he was seemingly always in the right spot at the right time. Kornet playing physical basketball while also doing the little things on both ends has made him a very valuable cog.
> 
> **Grade: A**
> 
> ### Keldon Johnson
> 
> When things get sluggish, the Spurs can almost always rely on Johnson’s energy. That was once again the case versus the Wizards. Johnson hit a pair of three-pointers during an otherwise cold stretch for San Antonio’s shooters. He pulled down nine rebounds in 24 minutes. In total, he tallied 12 points, kept his enthusiasm high and limited his mistakes. Good work.
> 
> **Grade: A-**
> 
> ### Dylan Harper
> 
> Harper played like a road weary teenager. He missed all eight of his shots from the field, including four from downtown. He only had one point and three assists in 18 minutes. Playmaking-wise, there were flashes but Harper uncharacteristically missed open teammates. His mistake rate was also at a higher level than normal. All in all, this was a night for the 19-year-old to forget.
> 
> **Grade: D-**
> 
> ### Kelly Olynyk
> 
> Olynyk got nine minutes of playing time, including some time at power forward. I thought he did fine. He had four points and four rebounds and held up well on the defensive end. Offensively, he remained aggressive to force Washington to account for him.
> 
> **Grade: B+**
> 
> ### Mitch Johnson
> 
> The good: Johnson did a good job of not panicking and he avoided playing Wembanyama extra minutes unnecessarily. The bad: San Antonio’s lackluster play in the second half was unsightly.
> 
> **Grade: C+**

By LJ Ellis, via [SpursTalk](https://www.spurstalk.com/grades-spurs-wizards-2026-game-28/)