马刺 vs 国王 123 - 110 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-11-18 06:00:52
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
尽管维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 因小腿伤势缺阵，斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle) 也因臀部伤势在半场后退赛，圣安东尼奥马刺队最终仍以123-110轻松击败萨克拉门托国王队。本场比赛悬念不大，马刺队也借此将赛季战绩提升至9胜4负。
数据统计：马刺 vs. 国王
马刺 vs. 国王 – 最终评分
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
在对阵勇士队表现令人失望之后，福克斯在面对旧主时强势反弹。由于文班亚马和卡斯尔缺阵，他扛起了球队的进攻大旗——并且打得游刃有余。他全场贡献28分和11次助攻，且仅有2次失误。他的投篮命中率很高，持球决策明智，并让球队的进攻运转流畅。我甚至很欣赏福克斯在防守端的表现。当他打出这样的比赛时，马刺队在他身上的每一分投资都物有所值。当然，福克斯仍有可以提升的方面（如无球防守、传球精准度等），但这绝对是朝着正确方向迈出的坚实一步。
评分: A
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔
遗憾的是，卡斯尔仅出战16分钟就因臀部受伤被迫离场。在最终退场前，他送出了5次助攻，展现了非常出色的球场视野。然而，他投篮4投仅1中，并且已经出现了3次失误。希望卡斯尔能尽快回归，因为他一直是圣安东尼奥本赛季初取得成功的关键一员。
评分: C
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
瓦塞尔打出了足够的侵略性，使其运动能力得以充分展现。有时人们很容易忘记，他其实是一位运动天赋出众、弹跳能力相当出色的球员。对阵国王队时，瓦塞尔的突破目的性很强——这也为他打开了传球路线，让他最终送出7次助攻。我认为他当晚的防守也是一个加分项。美中不足的是他的三分球投射（4投0中）。
评分: B+
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯本赛季的投篮依旧精准。面对萨克拉门托，他高效地轰下了20分——尤其考虑到他在30分钟的出场时间里没有出现失误或犯规。不仅他目前的投篮手感非常柔和，巴恩斯在冲击篮筐时也显得活力十足。他今晚的防守同样值得称道。
评分: A-
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
顶替文班亚马首发出场的科内特，超额完成了自己的任务。他的篮板拼抢极其出色，尤其是在比赛初期。他在保护篮筐的同时，也很好地控制了犯规。进攻端，科内特的终结能力很强，并且似乎总能出现在最有利的位置。虽然他的签约当时并未引起太多关注，但他的表现已经完全达到甚至超出了马刺队的预期。
评分: A-
朱利安·尚佩尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚佩尼近来的出手欲望更强了，这对球员和球队来说都是好事。他现在能很好地为球队拉开场上空间，并命中关键投篮。他顽强的防守也给我留下了深刻印象。尚佩尼并非顶级运动健将，但他在防守端打得很有韧性，并屡有建树。
评分: B+
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
优点：约翰逊两分球7投7中。在短短23分钟内抢下了12个篮板。尽管他通常以凶猛的攻击性著称，但他本场没有失误。缺点：约翰逊错失了全部4次三分出手。在过去七场比赛中，他的三分球已经累计13投0中。坦白说，约翰逊本场对阵国王队的防守表现有所欠缺。
评分: B+
杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)
我喜欢索汉在对阵萨克拉门托时的表现。他的投篮姿势看起来改善了许多。他的控球技术和传球能力也更好了。索汉的篮下终结不错，并且在防守端付出了巨大的努力。甚至他的篮板表现，在对阵国王队的比赛中也显得更好了。索汉可以减少自己的失误，但看起来他可能正开始在这支球队中找到自己的定位。
评分: B+
凯利·奥利尼克 (Kelly Olynyk)
奥利尼克证明了他为何依然具有价值。首先，作为一名大个子球员，他的传球非常出色——18分钟内送出8次助攻就是最好的证明。他阅读比赛的能力很强，并且知道球该往哪里传。其次，他命中了一记三分球，展示了自己作为一名能够拉开空间的大个子的能力。第三，奥利尼克能很好地保护自己的篮板区域。他在防守端会比较吃力，也不是一个护筐者，但奥利尼克依然能够贡献高质量的上场时间。
评分: A-
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
我想说，我喜欢布莱恩特毫不犹豫地出手空位三分。虽然他三次尝试全部投失，但我很高兴他敢于出手。他的防守不错，但攻防两端的技术略显稚嫩，限制了他在今晚比赛中的价值。
评分: C
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
当约翰逊把比永博作为第一个替补派上场时，我着实捏了一把汗。我不理解他这么做的理由，但好在他只打了两分钟。除此之外，我认为约翰逊做得不错。他为福克斯创造了成功的条件。攻防两端的比赛计划都很明智。考虑到这些阵容组合在一起打球的时间并不多，球队展现出的整体化学反应水平令人印象深刻。
评分: B
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Sacramento Kings – Game #13
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Sacramento Kings – Game #13
Even though Victor Wembanyama didn’t play (calf) and Stephon Castle left the game at halftime (hip), the San Antonio Spurs still easily sauntered by the Sacramento Kings by a final score of 123-110. The game was never in much doubt as the Spurs improved to a record of 9-4 on the season.
Stats: Spurs vs. Kings
Spurs vs. Kings – Final Grades
De’Aaron Fox
After a disappointing outing against the Warriors, Fox bounced back in fine fashion against his former team. With Wembanyama and Castle out, he carried the load — and made it look easy. He finished with 28 points and 11 assists while only turning it over twice. He shot well from the field, made good decisions with the ball and kept the offense humming. I even liked what I saw from Fox on the defensive end. When he plays like this, he’s worth every penny the Spurs have invested in him. There are still areas where Fox can improve (off-ball defense, passing accuracy, etc.) but this was definitely a big step in the right direction.
Grade: A
Stephon Castle
Sadly, Castle was forced to leave the game with a hip injury after only 16 minutes of action. Before checking out for the final time, he had five assists while displaying very good court vision. However, he was only 1-for-4 from the field and had already turned it over three times. Let’s hope Castle can return ASAP because he’s been a huge part of San Antonio’s early season success.
Grade: C
Devin Vassell
Vassell played with enough aggression to let his athleticism shine through. Sometimes it’s easy to forget that he’s actually a really good athlete with a healthy amount of bounce. Against the Kings, Vassell was driving with purpose — and that also opened up passing lanes and allowed him to finish with seven assists. I also thought his defense was a plus on the night. What wasn’t good was his three-point shooting (0-for-4).
Grade: B+
Harrison Barnes
Barnes is shooting with precision again this season. Versus Sacramento, he put up a very efficient 20-point barrage — especially considering he had no turnovers or fouls in his 30 minutes of action. Not only does his stroke look very good right now, Barnes looks spry when taking it to the hole. His defense was also a plus on this night.
Grade: A-
Luke Kornet
Starting in place of Wembanyama, Kornet more than filled his role. He rebounded extremely well, especially early on. He protected the rim while staying out of foul trouble. Offensively, Kornet is finishing everything and he’s seemingly always in an advantageous spot. While his signing went under the radar, he’s been everything the Spurs could have hoped for and more.
Grade: A-
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie has had an itchier trigger finger lately and it’s working out for him and the team. He’s really spacing the court right now while hitting timely shots. I’m also really impressed with his defense. Champagnie isn’t a great athlete but he’s playing with grit on defense and he’s making plays on that end.
Grade: B+
Keldon Johnson
The good: Johnson was 7-for-7 from two-point range. He pulled down 12 rebounds in only 23 minutes. He didn’t turn the ball over, even though he could usually be found attacking with ferocity. The bad: Johnson missed all four of his three-pointers. He’s now 0-for-13 from deep in the last seven games. Johnson’s defense against the Kings was lacking, to put it kindly.
Grade: B+
Jeremy Sochan
I liked what I saw from Sochan versus Sacramento. His shooting stroke looks much improved. His ball-handling is better, as is his passing. Sochan is finishing well and giving very good effort on defense. Even his rebounding looked better against the Kings. Sochan can cut down on his mistakes but it appears as if he may be beginning to find his niche on this team.
Grade: B+
Kelly Olynyk
Olynyk showed why he still has value. First of all, he’s a very good passer for a big — as evidenced by his eight assists in 18 minutes. He reads the court well and knows where the ball needs to be. Secondly, he hit a three-pointer to show that he’s a big who can stretch the floor. Thirdly, Olynyk can rebound his area well. He’s going to struggle defensively and he’s not a rim protector but Olynyk can still give quality minutes.
Grade: A-
Carter Bryant
I mean, I like that Bryant didn’t hesitate to hoist open three-pointers. He missed all three of his attempts but I’m glad he shot them. His defense was good but his rawness on both ends limited his value on this night.
Grade: C
Mitch Johnson
Johnson scared me when he played Biyombo as his first player off the bench. I don’t understand the reasoning but thankfully he only played two minutes. Other than that, I thought Johnson did well. He put Fox in positions to succeed. The gameplan on both ends was smart. The level of overall chemistry was impressive considering these groupings haven’t played together much at all.
Grade: B
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk